Re: text_funcs.C:80: no match for `_List_iterator & != _List_iterator'

2003-07-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:05:28AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote: > The latest CVS doesn't compile: Please try again. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)

Re: Some info about lyx-qt 1.3.2 segfaults

2003-07-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hmm. I have lots of functioning qt apps under 3.1.2 with submenu > navigation by keyboard shortcuts, but a broken LyX in this regard. Does > the LyX qt frontend do something unusual, triggering this bug? Not that I am aware of. Have your qt apps all been complied again

Re: Some info about lyx-qt 1.3.2 segfaults

2003-07-01 Thread larry
Hmm. I have lots of functioning qt apps under 3.1.2 with submenu navigation by keyboard shortcuts, but a broken LyX in this regard. Does the LyX qt frontend do something unusual, triggering this bug? On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:12:49AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Fernando Perez wrote: >

Re: Some info about lyx-qt 1.3.2 segfaults

2003-07-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Fernando Perez wrote: > Crash mode: start new document, press Alt-I-S (insert special character). > The 'Special' menu entry does NOT get highlighted, as it should. Now, > press right arrow. Lyx crashes. It's a qt bug. I can reproduce this kind of crash with any qt or kde app of my choice (kma

Re: [PATCH] missing lyx::support

2003-07-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | fixes building --with-pspell > > Ok. You have to apply it (I can't). Thanks, Juergen.

Re: text_funcs.C:80: no match for `_List_iterator & != _List_iterator'

2003-07-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Have I said it before? 2.95 is not exactly a good c++ compiler... | | Yes, you have...almost each time I have such complaints ;) I will probably continue to do so :-) | > And IMHO FreeBSD is doing its community a disservice not switching to | > a more

Re: text_funcs.C:80: no match for `_List_iterator & != _List_iterator'

2003-07-01 Thread Rob Lahaye
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Gcc 2.95 on FreeBSD 4.8 > > Have I said it before? 2.95 is not exactly a good c++ compiler... Yes, you have...almost each time I have such complaints ;) > And IMHO FreeBSD is doing its community a disservice not switchin

Re: text_funcs.C:80: no match for `_List_iterator & != _List_iterator'

2003-07-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gcc 2.95 on FreeBSD 4.8 Have I said it before? 2.95 is not exactly a good c++ compiler... And IMHO FreeBSD is doing its community a disservice not switching to a more modern compiler. That said... we are certainly able to work around this compilers defic

text_funcs.C:80: no match for `_List_iterator & != _List_iterator'

2003-07-01 Thread Rob Lahaye
The latest CVS doesn't compile: $ gmake [...] g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../boost -I/opt/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O -Wno-non-template-friend -ftemplate-depth-30 -W -Wall -c -o text_funcs.o `test -f text_funcs.C || echo './'`text_funcs.C text_funcs.C: In

Re: Really, nothing further on qt menu fails?

2003-07-01 Thread larry
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:09:38PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > Why aren't we seeing lots of reports then ? Hop on over to lyx-users. You'll see reports also by: Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Also, if you didn't notice, here on lyx-devel, it's a

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note, finally :-)

2003-07-01 Thread Michael Schmitt
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Here it is... working and all -- for me at least. A screenshot at > > www.hut.fi/~mvermeer/branch.jpeg Thanks for the screenshot. As far as I can see, the user has to type the name of the branch in each note inset which will cause consistency pro

Re: Really, nothing further on qt menu fails?

2003-07-01 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 03:04:58PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Be that as it may, it is endemic to redhat 9, as updated by redhat's > own update rpms. A rather widely used configuration, I'm afraid. Why aren't we seeing lots of reports then ? Did you compile lyx yourself ? john

Re: Paste Recent - wrong

2003-07-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | "Open Recent" means "Open Recent [Document] blah.lyx". "Paste Recent" | means "Paste Recent [selection that starts with] blah de blah..." To me this seems almost seem like a ad-hoc explanation tuned to agree with your opinions. Note that you add-on to "Pa

Re: Paste Recent - wrong

2003-07-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 01:42:50PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | | > There is nothing in common between "Open Recent" and "Paste Recent", | > OR has a list of recently opened documents. PR has a list of recently | > copied and cut selections, not a l

Re: Really, nothing further on qt menu fails?

2003-07-01 Thread larry
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 10:42:57PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > This is entirely within Qt, we have no control over it. Possible causes > are a compiler bug or some weird library mismatch. Be that as it may, it is endemic to redhat 9, as updated by redhat's own update rpms. A rather widely used

Re: Paste Recent - wrong

2003-07-01 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 01:42:50PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > There is nothing in common between "Open Recent" and "Paste Recent", > OR has a list of recently opened documents. PR has a list of recently > copied and cut selections, not a list of recently pasted selections. The linguistic

Re: Paste Recent - wrong

2003-07-01 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 01:58:46PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Lars> SO IMO "Paste Recent" is utterly misnamed. Unless I get strong > > Lars> objections and well founded objections I am going to change this > > Lars> to "Select and Paste". I've already covered why I think it's wrong, and Alfr

Re: requested changes for next LyX release

2003-07-01 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 03:54:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Ronald> This means, effectively, that users will need the X11 > Ronald> libraries and includes on their systems to compile lyx, even > Ronald> though they are not (supposedly) used to run LyX with the > Ronald> native Aqua lib

Re: Really, nothing further on qt menu fails?

2003-07-01 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:26:09PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > #0 0xe002 in ?? () > #1 0x42028b93 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > #2 0x082bb7a3 in lyx::abort() () > #3 0x080d5c11 in error_handler () > #4 > #5 0x4031eef6 in QPopupMenu::keyPressEvent(QKeyEvent*) () >from /

Re: shortcut clash in new menus

2003-07-01 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:14:15PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > '-dbg gui' says: > Menu warning: menu entries "Open recent|t" and "New from Template...|T" share the > same shortcut. I didn't know we did that. It should be a non-debug warning I think. > John, I'll let you find a better a

Re: [PATCH] missing lyx::support

2003-07-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 07:28:40PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly: | > | > fixes building --with-pspell | > | > Regards, | > Juergen | | I had the same problem in support/lstrings.C as reported above by | Jean-Marc and Kayvan. Removing the

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note, finally :-)

2003-07-01 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 08:11:19PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly: > > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Here it is... working and all -- for me at least. > > Can you send an updated patch, please? It does not apply cleanly anymore. > > Thanks, > Juergen Working on it... with luck, tomorrow.

Re: [PATCH] missing lyx::support

2003-07-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Spitzmueller) writes: | fixes building --with-pspell Ok. -- Lgb

Re: [PATCH] missing lyx::support

2003-07-01 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 07:28:40PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly: > > fixes building --with-pspell > > Regards, > Juergen I had the same problem in support/lstrings.C as reported above by Jean-Marc and Kayvan. Removing the lyx:: from the Assert's fixed at least the compilation error.

Re: New Cygwin compile problem

2003-07-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lyx/src/support -I../../src -I../../../lyx/sr | c/support/../ -I../../../lyx/boost -I/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -fno-exceptions -W - | Wall -Winline -mms-bitfields -MT os.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/os.Tpo -c ../../../lyx/ |

Re: Latest lyx CVS compile problem

2003-07-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | lstrings.C:705: `Assert' undeclared in namespace `lyx' | lstrings.C:706: `Assert' undeclared in namespace `lyx' | lstrings.C:707: `Assert' undeclared in namespace `lyx' | lstrings.C:708: `Assert' undeclared in namespace `lyx' | lstrings.C:709: `Asse

Re: Compilation failure with gcc 2.96

2003-07-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 04:06:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | > I believe you :) This is probably a problem related to gcc 2.95/2.96 | > with nested namespaces. | > | > Is using lyx::support:: really better than a plain lyx::? | | It's a ques

Re: Really, nothing further on qt menu fails?

2003-07-01 Thread larry
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 08:25:26PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > You may need to issue > ulimit -c unlimited > to enable core dumps. > > Then do > gdb core.PID lyx > and then please post the output of 'bt' to the list. Alfredo: Thanks for the brief tutorial. Here is the bt: (gdb) bt #0

Re: Really, nothing further on qt menu fails?

2003-07-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Me neither. Cannot reproduce with SuSE 8.2, qt 3.1.2 Actually, I can (both with 1.3.3cvs and 1.4cvs). I'll have a look. Juergen.

Re: Really, nothing further on qt menu fails?

2003-07-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > No one has any ideas??? > > Not me :( Me neither. Cannot reproduce with SuSE 8.2, qt 3.1.2 > I don't know if it would be useful, but could you get a complete backtrace? > You may need to issue It would perhaps also be useful if you could try to run a memory debugger

Re: Really, nothing further on qt menu fails?

2003-07-01 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No one has any ideas??? Not me :( I don't know if it would be useful, but could you get a complete backtrace? You may need to issue ulimit -c unlimited to enable core dumps. Then run and make lyx crash. you should have a 'core' or 'core.PID' file on the directory

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note, finally :-)

2003-07-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Here it is... working and all -- for me at least. Can you send an updated patch, please? It does not apply cleanly anymore. Thanks, Juergen

[PATCH] missing lyx::support

2003-07-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
fixes building --with-pspell Regards, Juergen Index: src/ChangeLog === RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.1402 diff -u -r1.1402 ChangeLog --- src/ChangeLog 2003/07/01 11:51:17 1.1402 +++ src/ChangeLog 2

New Cygwin compile problem

2003-07-01 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lyx/src/support -I../../src -I../../../lyx/sr c/support/../ -I../../../lyx/boost -I/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -fno-exceptions -W - Wall -Winline -mms-bitfields -MT os.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/os.Tpo -c ../../../lyx/ src/support/os.C In file included from ../../../lyx/src/

Latest lyx CVS compile problem

2003-07-01 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
Configuration Host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Special build flags:warnings assertions xforms-image-loader C Compiler: gcc C Compiler flags: -g -O2 C++ Compiler: g++ (2.95.1) C++ Compiler flags:

Really, nothing further on qt menu fails?

2003-07-01 Thread larry
No one has any ideas??? On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:50:55AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Interesting. Running under GDB, the error not only crashes LyX, it causes the > KDE window manager to lock up, and it doesn't seem recoverable. > > That means I can't run, cut and paste "bt" easily. > >

Re: Compilation failure with gcc 2.96

2003-07-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 04:06:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I believe you :) This is probably a problem related to gcc 2.95/2.96 > with nested namespaces. > > Is using lyx::support:: really better than a plain lyx::? It's a question of taste Personally I am already back from my "

Re: Compilation failure with gcc 2.96

2003-07-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Assert is in namespace lyx::support. Yes, and all seems reasonable in the code. Lars> I compiled all (xforms/qt/with-included-string) right before I Lars> committed the lyx::support, so I do not really understand this. I beli

Re: Compilation failure with gcc 2.96

2003-07-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I get: | | g++-2.96 -pg -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lyx-devel/src/support -I../../src -I../../../lyx-devel/src/support/../ -I../../../lyx-devel/boost -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O2 -fno-exceptions -ftemplate-depth-30 -Wno-non-template-friend -W

Compilation failure with gcc 2.96

2003-07-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
I get: g++-2.96 -pg -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lyx-devel/src/support -I../../src -I../../../lyx-devel/src/support/../ -I../../../lyx-devel/boost -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O2 -fno-exceptions -ftemplate-depth-30 -Wno-non-template-friend -W -Wall -c ../../../lyx-devel/src/support/lstrings.C -M