On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 04:06:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I believe you :) This is probably a problem related to gcc 2.95/2.96 > with nested namespaces. > > Is using lyx::support:: really better than a plain lyx::?
It's a question of taste.... Personally I am already back from my "let's have nested namespace" trip, but I think pro's and con's weigh about the same, and in any case it's not too important. > Or we could use lyxsupport::. In that case I'd even prefer a single flat 'lyx' namespace and trust ourselves not to create conflicting names.. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
