Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 04:06:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| > I believe you :) This is probably a problem related to gcc 2.95/2.96
| > with nested namespaces.
| >
| > Is using lyx::support:: really better than a plain lyx::?
|
| It's a question of taste....
|
| Personally I am already back from my "let's have nested namespace" trip,
| but I think pro's and con's weigh about the same, and in any case it's not
| too important.
|
| > Or we could use lyxsupport::.
|
| In that case I'd even prefer a single flat 'lyx' namespace and trust
| ourselves not to create conflicting names..
I'd prefere the nested one.
And 2.96 should have no problem... it is used all over boost.
--
Lgb
