Hi,
The Bibliography keys in the Xforms/Citation dialog should list all the
entries of the BibTeX file. However, all it does now is showing one
entry, that is the filename of the BibTeX file (without the .bib extension).
What has gone wrong?
Regards,
Rob.
Hi,
Just a tiny detail when updating cvs :
$ cvs update
[...]
? src/tex2lyx/libtexparser.la
? src/tex2lyx/texparser.lo
[..]
Apparently they are missing in the .cvsignore file of the corresponding directory.
Cheers,
Rob.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:18:43AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> When I add to ispell.C:
>
>#include
thanks, fixed.
john
Hi,
When I add to ispell.C:
#include
The following problem goes away:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../boost -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O -Wno-non-template-friend -ftemplate-depth-30 -W -Wall -c -o ispell.o `test -f ispell.C || echo './'`ispell.C
ispell.C: In method `bool ISpell::sele
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> $B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B:
(B
(B> Hello, sorry for my late response.
(B> CJK-LyX-1.3.0 is now in the state of 'final touch'.
(B> So please, wait at most a week or so.
(B
(BGreat! Thank you very much for your hard work, I hope I will
(Bstill be able to include CJK-LyX-1.3.0
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:02:28PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> GCC 3.3 allows LyX 1.2.3 to build on HP-UX 11.x with the addition of
> weak symbol support. When configuring 1.2.3, snprintf/vsnprintf are
> not detected properly because the test is done using the C++ compiler
> and AC_CHECK_FUNCS doe
Nirmal Govind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just downloaded preview-latex.. it seems to require xemacs or some
> sort of emacs with image support.. do I really need to install
> xemacs if I only intend to use it with LyX? Does preview-latex
> depend on emacs to do what it does?
preview-latex do
> I installed the preview-latex-common rpm from sourceforge. There was
> no dependency on xemacs or fsfemacs. After it was installed the
> previews just burst into life.
Hmm.. I tried that but it ended up crashing my lyx 1.3.0 with Qt.. so I
decided to download and compile from source and that s
Quoting Nirmal Govind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> David,
>
> I just downloaded preview-latex.. it seems to require xemacs or some
> sort of emacs with image support.. do I really need to install xemacs
> if
> I only intend to use it with LyX? Does preview-latex depend on emacs to
> do what it does?
>
David,
I just downloaded preview-latex.. it seems to require xemacs or some
sort of emacs with image support.. do I really need to install xemacs if
I only intend to use it with LyX? Does preview-latex depend on emacs to
do what it does?
Thanks,
nirmal
John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:54:15AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
>
>> > o use "Ignore All" not "Accept" - it's far clearer
>> Aspell does not really ignore the word, it puts it in a temp dict so it
>> may become a suggested word later. f.ex. Macphail, then it finds
>> MacPhail
GCC 3.3 allows LyX 1.2.3 to build on HP-UX 11.x with the addition of
weak symbol support. When configuring 1.2.3, snprintf/vsnprintf are
not detected properly because the test is done using the C++ compiler
and AC_CHECK_FUNCS doesn't provide a sensible prototype:
char snprintf ();
This results i
Conflicts resolved. Haven't tested the Qt bits, if somebody wants to ...
Anyway, if you want to consider this JMarc, here's the patch.
regards
john
Index: status.13x
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/Attic/status.13x,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> 1. Open the master doc and all child docs 2. Open the master
> Juergen> doc without child docs 3. Close the master and all childs 4.
> Juergen> Close the master only
>
> This seems a bit too many options to my taste...
OK, probably we won't need 2. I just wa
> You should set LD_LIBRARY_PATH appropriately if you want to override
> the default linking directories.
>
Thanks John.. it might be nice to mention this somewhere in the INSTALL
file...
nirmal
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:25:28AM -0700, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> was using the correct qt library when it started.. turns out it wasn't..
>
> I compiled qt 3.0.7 in /usr/local/qt and configure lyx using the
> --with-qt-dir=/usr/local/qt option but the program uses the libqt.so.3
> in /usr/lib whe
Hi.. I had reported a problem earlier where lyx didn't start up... I
emailed the debian-powerpc list and was asked to check using ldd if lyx
was using the correct qt library when it started.. turns out it wasn't..
I compiled qt 3.0.7 in /usr/local/qt and configure lyx using the
--with-qt-dir=/usr/
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> OK, good point and I see now that will also get opened when
Juergen> opening the master document (I thought it would not). Anyway,
Juergen> what I'm looking for is just a function to reverse what
Juergen> happens if I'm o
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 06:32:32PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> Yes. I do not know yet whether it should go in 1.3.1 or 1.3.2. I am
>> considering now a near release of 1.3.1. There is nothing
>> earth-shattering in it, bu
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 06:24:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So do you think I should apply it, or that it is not worth the
> trouble? You answer did not seem very positive :)
This bug is mega-old I think, and it can only happen at the very start
of a document. But then again, it can't
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 06:32:32PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes. I do not know yet whether it should go in 1.3.1 or 1.3.2. I am
> considering now a near release of 1.3.1. There is nothing
> earth-shattering in it, but at least it should work.
Either is fine by me. I'm glad we're havin
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:50:12PM +0100, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
> > Is there a file or page somewhere explaining what the different tags are
> > in the lyx cvs-tree? (not the ancient ones.. say after 1.0)
>
> Yes, on www.devel.lyx.org somewhere.
Angus Leeming wrote:
> If you _can_ draw the space like this and want the space then I
> suspect that we don't need the complicated code in input.c at all.
> Ie, we can treat the two XEvents separately after all and get rid of
> the stored_keybuf nastiness.
Sorry, that should be:
if (kbuf
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> JMarc, if this gets a good run for its money, would you consider
John> it ?
Yes. I do not know yet whether it should go in 1.3.1 or 1.3.2. I am
considering now a near release of 1.3.1. There is nothing
earth-shattering in it, but at lea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Would this be what you _really_ wanted in the xforms input widget
>> perhaps?
>>
>> // Or whatever test you now use to indicate that
>> // precomposition is finished
>> if (key == XKSpace and stor
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:24:14PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote: It goes back to 1.2 at least. Feel free to apply the
John> patch to 1.3 if you like - I could not find a problem with it
>> But I cannot reproduce the bug as de
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Would this be what you _really_ wanted in the xforms input widget
> perhaps?
>
> // Or whatever test you now use to indicate that
> // precomposition is finished
> if (key == XKSpace and stored_kbuflen > 1) {
> in
with lyx 1.3.1cvs, qt 3.1.1 I get the following (see screenshot). It is almost
impossible to chose a special bullet *intentional*.
Regards,
Jürgen.
<>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Montag, 17. Februar 2003 17:24, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Apart from that, everything is OK ?
>
> Let me test a little.
Neither "Ignore", nor "Add" are accepting words with "_" (which is _my_ Escape
character).
- --> Spellchecking stops with an alert-box, whic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In the xforms input widget, because of the space signal, the
> CJK-characters were sallowed. On the WorkArea, this never happens.
> So keeping 'space' is allowed.
Sigh...
Would this be what you _really_ wanted in the xforms input widget
perhaps?
// Or whatever
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:50:12PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> How come the extension is '.C' and not '.c'?
Because it is C++ Code. A .c suffix commonly indicates "plain C".
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, ei
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:50:12PM +0100, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> Is there a file or page somewhere explaining what the different tags are
> in the lyx cvs-tree? (not the ancient ones.. say after 1.0)
Yes, on www.devel.lyx.org somewhere. Needs updating though probably.
> How come the ext
Is there a file or page somewhere explaining what the different tags are
in the lyx cvs-tree? (not the ancient ones.. say after 1.0)
How come the extension is '.C' and not '.c'?
How do I cite lyx, e.g. This document was produced with LyX [1] ...
[1] - Lyx?
/Christian
--
Christian Ridders
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:41:46PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> A final question then: Is it correct that what I've just compiled
> is almost lyx 1.3.0, i.e. it's 1.3.0 plus this patch, which
> means that it's no more risky using this than 1.3.0?
Correct.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:07:26PM +0100, Christian Ridderström
> >> wrote:
> >> > > So test it and if you are happy tell Jean-Marc to incorporate
> >> > > the attach
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:38:02PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> ingore all with: students'
>
> doesn't work for me
A bug, but it's not new in my patch.
john
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> Ah, I understand. You want to 'turn on' the red square AND input your
> CJK char. I'm sure that Juergen could solve this in two minutes.
> Unfortuanately, he seems to have dissappeared.
>
> JJUUEERRGGEENN !
>
Means I have to wait indefinitely?si
> Apart from that, everything is OK ?
barging into the thread;
ingore all with: students'
doesn't work for me
Ed.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:24:14PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> It goes back to 1.2 at least. Feel free to apply the patch to
> John> 1.3 if you like - I could not find a problem with it
>
> But I cannot reproduce the bug as described by dekel... So what 1.3.0
> bug would that fix?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you for your re-interpretation of the CJK-input process. Here
> the problem is because of this process, inputting the first
> precomposed CJK-chars on the default cell of table fails. Let me
> explain the problem in step by step. First, I open the table and at
> thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Montag, 17. Februar 2003 17:12, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:00:15PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > child is writing to lyxerr[Debug::GUI]
> > (which now happens to be also the pipe)
>
> Well, that was stupid of me ! Thanks, I'll remove this
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:22:26AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote: Can't reproduce any problems with the below :
>> John, am I right that this bug does not happen with 1.3.1cvs?
John> It goes back to 1.2 at least. Feel free to
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:36:47AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> Should we do the same for 'Save'? What do the good UI rules say
>> about this?
John> I don't know about you but I compulsively save every now and
John> then.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> Guys, a brief préãis of how this CJK composition works:
>
> In 'normal' text input, X passes each XEvent through to LyX:
> one XEvent -> One char to place on the screen.
>
> When using these oriental precomposition methods:
>
> * Shift-space t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Montag, 17. Februar 2003 17:00, Kornel Benko wrote:
> child is writing to lyxerr[Debug::GUI] (which now happens to be also the
> pipe)
Ok, disabling the debug output, spellchecker works so far, but does not allow
me to use "_" inside words.
Kornel
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:00:15PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> child is writing to lyxerr[Debug::GUI]
> (which now happens to be also the pipe)
Well, that was stupid of me ! Thanks, I'll remove this code.
Apart from that, everything is OK ?
john
John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:15:29AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> There is a parameter 'emergency_exit' (see ControlDialog). If you
>> set it to true, then the dialog is not shown. Does it do the job
>> for you?
>
> No, emergency_exit_ is checked only *before* view().show()
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Montag, 17. Februar 2003 16:35, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:06:55PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > 28488 write(2, "s", 1) and so on with the string
> > 'spell invokation was aspell -a -d germa
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:07:26PM +0100, Christian Ridderström
>> wrote:
>> > > So test it and if you are happy tell Jean-Marc to incorporate
>> > > the attached patch into 1.3.1cvs.
>> >
>> > It works with 1.4.0cvs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My second problem is with regard to the tabular inset. When the
> table menu is clicked, table appears on the lyx main window. And at
> this moment, no "red square" appears on any of the tabular cells.
> However when I press, for example, "a" key, the signal from the
> ke
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:06:55PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> 28488 write(2, "s", 1)and so on with the string
> 'spell invokation was aspell -a -d german -C -w "_" -T
>latin1 '
Hmm, where's this string coming from ?
I'm having trouble figu
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:54:15AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > o use "Ignore All" not "Accept" - it's far clearer
> Aspell does not really ignore the word, it puts it in a temp dict so it
> may become a suggested word later. f.ex. Macphail, then it finds
> MacPhail and suggests Macphail.
Hmm
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:07:26PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > > So test it and if you are happy tell Jean-Marc to incorporate the attached
> > > patch into 1.3.1cvs.
> >
> > It works with 1.4.0cvs at least
>
> Should be the same.
>
> Jea
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:22:26AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> Can't reproduce any problems with the below :
>
> John, am I right that this bug does not happen with 1.3.1cvs?
It goes back to 1.2 at least. Feel free to apply the patch to 1.3 if you
like - I could not find a problem
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:15:29AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> There is a parameter 'emergency_exit' (see ControlDialog). If you set
> it to true, then the dialog is not shown. Does it do the job for you?
No, emergency_exit_ is checked only *before* view().show(). If it's only
used by the spe
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 04:18:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Why do you do this, especially since we have the same in
> stdstruct.inc?
Leftover from trying to get it working I suppose.
> + os << "\n\\layout Bibliography\n\\bibitem ";
> + if (! getOptions().empty())
> +
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:36:47AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Should we do the same for 'Save'? What do the good UI rules say about
> this?
I don't know about you but I compulsively save every now and then. I
vaguely remember reading someone's argument about how Save should always
be en
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Mike FABIAN wrote:
> Is CJK-LyX 1.3.0 already downloadable? I couldn't yet find it on
>
> ftp://stone.phys.pusan.ac.kr/pub/CJK-LyX/
>
> I was unfortunatly unable to make CJK-LyX 1.2.3 work on the
> beta version of SuSE Linux 8.2. xforms in SuSE Linux 8.2 has
> been upgra
Hello,
In my search of the position parameters of the cursor owned by the local
Input Method in tabular, footnote and note insets, I've got now some results
and a couple of questions.
First, the results: I can now put local Input method cursor at the right
position on those three insets. Fur
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
First I am not sure I see the real interest of the patch. You remove
Paragraph::bibkey, but replace it with Paragraph::bibkey(), which does
not make a big difference. What you remove, though, is the code to
draw the bibkey inset in the mar
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 03:15:36PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Well, since you want people to look at it...
>
> Shouldn't the reading of the inset now go in Buffer::readInset?
Maybe, but bibitems are no "real" insets in the .lyx file, they are
"inlined". Not sure whether that's a case fore read
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Well, since you want people to look at it...
Shouldn't the reading of the inset now go in Buffer::readInset?
buffer.C: readInset:
...
} else if (cmdName == "bibitem") {
lex.printError("Wrong place for bibitem");
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
bib.diff.gz
Description: application/gunzip
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:07:26PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > So test it and if you are happy tell Jean-Marc to incorporate the attached
> > patch into 1.3.1cvs.
>
> It works with 1.4.0cvs at least
Should be the same.
Jean-Marc? Your entrance!
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:31:19PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > I beg to differ... it's a "dangerous bug". First of all, it doesn't
> > compile the dvi, and secondly, saving it produces a different output.
> > This is what the difference look
Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> You aren't sure of any such thing.
> Use this to check that the widget has accepted your input.
>
> cout << "Widget contains " << getString(dialog_->input_style)
> << endl;
OK. so I have:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:31:19PM +0100, Christian Ridderström
>> wrote:
>> > I beg to differ... it's a "dangerous bug". First of all, it
>> > doesn't compile the dvi, and secondly, saving it produces a
>> > different
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:31:19PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > I beg to differ... it's a "dangerous bug". First of all, it doesn't
> > compile the dvi, and secondly, saving it produces a different output.
Hmm... it still doesn't compile.. a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Interpreting the trace
Lyx-pid = 28437
fork() --> child pid 28488
28488 dup2(9, 0)= 0
28488 dup2(12, 1) = 1
28488 dup2(14, 2) = 2
28488 close(9) = 0
28488 close(10)
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:31:19PM +0100, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
> BTW, do you really need {J^l}^T and not J^{l^T} or (J^l)^T ?
J^{l^T} doesn't look very nice... here J^l is a matrix, and then I want to
put a 'transpose' on it. But
\left(
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:31:19PM +0100, Christian Ridderström
>> wrote:
>> > I beg to differ... it's a "dangerous bug". First of all, it
>> > doesn't compile the dvi, and secondly, saving it produces a
>> > different
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:27:10PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > I like it because once you've installed a version of the software
> > properly, you can usually very easy go back and use that version
> > even if you've installed a later versi
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> } else if (ob == dialog_->browser_styles && ob_value == 2) {
> // double clicked in styles browser
> string const style = getString(dialog_->browser_styles);
> if (style.empty()) {
> return ButtonPolicy::SMI_NOOP;
> } else {
> fl_set_input(dialog_->input_style,
> ChangeExtensio
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:31:19PM +0100, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> I beg to differ... it's a "dangerous bug". First of all, it doesn't
> compile the dvi, and secondly, saving it produces a different output.
> This is what the difference looks like:
>
> ludde:bugs>diff math1.lyx math1_saved.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:31:19PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > I beg to differ... it's a "dangerous bug". First of all, it doesn't
> > compile the dvi, and secondly, saving it produces a different output.
> > This is what the difference look
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:31:19PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I beg to differ... it's a "dangerous bug". First of all, it doesn't
> compile the dvi, and secondly, saving it produces a different output.
> This is what the difference looks like:
So test it and if you are happy tell Jean-
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:27:10PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I like it because once you've installed a version of the software
> properly, you can usually very easy go back and use that version
> even if you've installed a later version. I've got these lyx modules:
> >module avail lyx
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:32:44AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Christian> Oops, should have said that this was with 1.3.0 qt and
> > Christian> 1.3.0 xforms. I'll try and compile the cvs-version and see
> > Christian> how that works.
> >
> >
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
>>Argh, the double click in this dialog does not work properly
>>anymore, for obscure reasons. My patch is still valid to allow
>>double-clicking, though.
>>
>
> In that case, does fl_redraw_object(your_ob) help. Or perhaps
> fl_redraw_form, if you have to
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:50:20AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Have you ever heard of something called 'modules'?
> >
> > http://modules.sourceforge.net/
>
> No.
>
Basically it's a systematic way of configuring your system for using
d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Montag, 17. Februar 2003 10:31, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Compiling now ...
NOT working. There is only an alert-box about failed invocation (comming immediately)
aspell -a -d german -C -w"_" -T latin1
This usage _works_ from if invoked manually.
Could n
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:32:44AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Christian> Oops, should have said that this was with 1.3.0 qt and
> Christian> 1.3.0 xforms. I'll try and compile the cvs-version and see
> Christian> how that works.
>
> Andre', does this means this bug exists in 1.3.0? Is it
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:50:20AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Have you ever heard of something called 'modules'?
>
> http://modules.sourceforge.net/
No.
How is that better than having two cvs snapshots?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:32:44AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Andre', does this means this bug exists in 1.3.0? Is it easily
> > fixable?
>
> I am currently compiling a 1.3.0 release.
> I'll check.
>
Have you ever heard of something called
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:27:08AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > \newcommand{\eexp}[1]{{\rm e}^{#1}}
>
> I would expect things like that are neater with math macros...
And furthermore, \rm is a Latex2.09 command. It should not be used with
latex2e.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:34:53AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> i.e. When I want to update cvs and compile it again, is it enough to do
> the following:
>
> cd /space/lyx-devel; # This is where I keep the source-code
> cvs up
> cd ../lyx-qt; # This is where I
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:32:44AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Christian> Oops, should have said that this was with 1.3.0 qt and
> Christian> 1.3.0 xforms. I'll try and compile the cvs-version and see
> Christian> how that works.
>
> Andre', does this means this bug exists in 1.3.0? Is it
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:25:38AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > PS. I caught this problem while working on my thesis... which ought to
> > explain why I'm not using the CVS version :-) DS
>
> Oh. I am using 1.4.0cvs for my thesis.
> Maybe th
> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Christian> On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:59:29AM +0100, Christian Ridderström
>> wrote: > this is a weird math bug I've found, it produces this
>> error message in > lyx: > Double super
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen, I'll let you be judge whether this would make sense to have
> in lyx.
It does make sense, since this is the most flexible letter class I know, it is
well documented and the old scrlettr class is not supported anymore.
Nonetheless I'd propose to keep the ol
John Levon wrote:
>
> Here is my "final" patch. Less code, more features ! Please test.
It works fine here with gnu aspell-0.50 and lyx-1.3.1CVS.
Adding words to the personal dictionary works.
--
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:25:38AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> PS. I caught this problem while working on my thesis... which ought to
> explain why I'm not using the CVS version :-) DS
Oh. I am using 1.4.0cvs for my thesis.
Maybe this explains something, too...
*sigh*
Andre'
--
Those
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:59:29AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > this is a weird math bug I've found, it produces this error message in
> > lyx:
> > Double superscript.
> >
> > J^{l}^
> >
> >{T}\end{array}\]
> >
> > I treat `x^1^2
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
>>
>> The patch uses double-mouse-click for selecting a style in the
>> Xforms BibTeX dialog (instead of the instant selecting as it is
>> now).
>
> Argh, the double click in this dialog does not work properly
> anymore, for obscure reasons. My patch is stil
John Levon wrote:
>
> Here is my "final" patch. Less code, more features ! Please test.
>
> There is one niggle left: we briefly show the dialog when there is
> no need (clean spell check). It's minorly visually distracting. I
> think it's worth it. Maybe Angus has a smart minimal fix for it.
T
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Things behave much more sensibly with thisd patch: it doesn't
John> make sense to revert an unsaved or unchanged document.
John> JMarc, do you want this for 1.3 ?
Yes.
Should we do the same for 'Save'? What do the good UI rules say ab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Montag, 17. Februar 2003 02:05, John Levon wrote:
> Here is my "final" patch. Less code, more features ! Please test.
>
> There is one niggle left: we briefly show the dialog when there is no
> need (clean spell check). It's minorly visually distracting. I thi
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:25:45AM -0200, Flavio de Melo Pereira
John> wrote:
>> Although LyX generates a DVI file that displays correctly using
>> KDVI, the references to figures in this file are generally
>> prepended by the path to th
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 06:34:48PM +, Mark van Rossum wrote:
> 1.3 looks great ! Thanks!
>
> I found a bug though. in
>
> The attached file was written in 1.2.3 and worked fine there,
> but gives latex errors in 1.3 (also after lyx2lyx)
The only error I get is a complaint about an a missing
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 06:00:04PM +, John Levon wrote:
>> I can't quite figure out what this check is supposed to be, but the
>> bug is obvious: 0 is a perfectly valid paragraph number.
>>
>> I'll test if "-1" makes things work bet
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
