On 03-May-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
> don't know.
> here it comes
Rob please head that when applying patches which change the fileformat of
a .lyx file you always risk that you can never read them again with a "real"
lyx. We may put the patch into cvs, but most probably not for 1.2.0 and
we can
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think I documented it un UPGRADING, but of course it should be in
> herbert's tips...
We should also document that things like
\AtBeginDocument{\renewcommand\contentsname{Contents}}
won't work anymore. I think this is used quite frequently (the fix is to place
\
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think that
>
>str.substr(0) == str
>str.substr(0, ) == str
>
> easy to check though.
21.3.6.7 basic_string::substr[lib.string::substr]
basic_string
substr(size_type pos = 0, si
R. Lahaye wrote:
> Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>with the attached patch you can insert into your
>>elseart.layout
>>
>
> My elsart.layout ? I don't have!!
>>From where or how am I supposed to get this file?
> This elsart.layout is nowhere to find in my LyX-CVS tree.
> Why is it not in CVS?
don't k
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> with the attached patch you can insert into your
> elseart.layout
My elsart.layout ? I don't have!!
>From where or how am I supposed to get this file?
This elsart.layout is nowhere to find in my LyX-CVS tree.
Why is it not in CVS?
Sorry, I'm quite keen on this, but I nee
> "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jules> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 02:03:04PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:40:02PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote: > A
>> big visual improvement, a small effort?
>>
>> I don't know, I thought we once had some technica
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I would like to point out that, in this particular case, it is very
>> easy to add usepackage{babel} just before the renewcommand. Just a
>> matter of telling people to add one line in their preamble.
Dekel> But how would a user know whe
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 05:05:02PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Several is a lot less than 100 a day. A lyx sig would work.
At a really really painful cost
regards
john
--
"The revolution won't be complete until users think as little of creating new
objects as they do of calling a subrouti
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 03:01:30PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Would it be unreasonable to require all mail to any lyx list to begin
> with the word lyx (case insensitive)
Yes.
> The latter would find most newbie posts. I don't recall ever getting
> spam with lyx in the body.
We've had seve
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 02 May 2002 6:03 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
>> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > On Thursday 02 May 2002 5:17 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
>> >>I don't who committed this:
>> >>
>> >>2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>
>> >> * fileto
R. Lahaye wrote:
> On Thursday 02 May 2002 2:24 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>Philippe Baucour wrote:
>>
>>>congratulations for Lyx 1.2pre4 I'm impressed, it works well on my
>>>mandrake 8.2 and it provides elsart.layout
>>>
>>elseart defines it's own bibstyle so you have to leave
>>
>
> Uh?
On Thursday 02 May 2002 6:03 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 May 2002 5:17 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >>I don't who committed this:
> >>
> >>2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> * filetools.C: getline -> std::getline.
> >>
> >>
> >>maybe
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 02 May 2002 5:17 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>I don't who committed this:
>>
>>2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * filetools.C: getline -> std::getline.
>>
>>
>>maybe that I'm getting old, but this is in my ChangeLog, but
>>not changed
On Thursday 02 May 2002 5:17 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> I don't who committed this:
>
> 2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * filetools.C: getline -> std::getline.
>
>
> maybe that I'm getting old, but this is in my ChangeLog, but
> not changed in my filetools.C and I never s
I don't who committed this:
2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* filetools.C: getline -> std::getline.
maybe that I'm getting old, but this is in my ChangeLog, but
not changed in my filetools.C and I never send such patch.
It's part of the attached patch, which is importan
On Thursday 02 May 2002 2:24 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Philippe Baucour wrote:
> >
> > congratulations for Lyx 1.2pre4 I'm impressed, it works well on my
> > mandrake 8.2 and it provides elsart.layout
>
> elseart defines it's own bibstyle so you have to leave
Uh? I have missed an import issue
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
| following the usual procedure now, I send to list the patch that is docbook
| related.
| I know that I have several issues merged under the same roof, but most of it
| are one liners.
Ok, apply this.
awfully late in th
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Alice had a crash in pre4 after some extensive use of the Delete key.
| When she restarted LyX she was surprised to not find the file she was
| working on in the list of last files. There was an emergency save file.
| Sorry I don't have additional in
Hi,
following the usual procedure now, I send to list the patch that is docbook
related.
I know that I have several issues merged under the same roof, but most of it
are one liners.
--
José Abílio
Index: src/ChangeLog
==
On Sunday 21 April 2002 12:05 pm, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in a hurry, so I make it short.
>
> Attached please find a new bug list. As usual, the latest and most
> important bugs are listed on top (Juergen V., please have a look at the
> uninitialized variable).
- I get english menus
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 08:12:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:11:24AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> | Probably a better solution than I proposed is sendin
On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>> ...and I belive I posted several versions of this fix on the list
>>> yesterday.
>>>
>>
>| First of all yesterday was a public Holiday, so you cannot prete
On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| The attached patch fixes the problem that in case of a cursor move and
>| following DEPM the maintext is also repainted.
>
> I guess that this cannot harm anyting.
The only thing that can happen is a red
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> ...and I belive I posted several versions of this fix on the list
>> yesterday.
>>
>
| First of all yesterday was a public Holiday, so you cannot pretend people
| looking at email. Second you tell us that
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The attached patch fixes the problem that in case of a cursor move and
| following DEPM the maintext is also repainted.
I guess that this cannot harm anyting.
--
Lgb
On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> ...and I belive I posted several versions of this fix on the list
> yesterday.
>
> ...except the last one of course.
First of all yesterday was a public Holiday, so you cannot pretend people
looking at email. Second you tell us that we are allowed to
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> export PATH=/usr/local/gcc-3.0.4/bin:$PATH
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/gcc-3.0.4/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
> after which I did ./configure in the lyx dir. But then I get this
>
> checking whether the C++ compiler (../../gcc-3.0
The attached patch fixes the problem that in case of a cursor move and
following DEPM the maintext is also repainted.
Jug
P.S.: What is with the patch for #348 is it ok to apply. I would like to know as
both of this patches are in BufferView_pimpl.C.
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Are you sure that you want % instead of >>, if not the below fixes this
| misguided change. I seem to have heard that patches should be sent to the
| list, but it seems this is requested only for a few persons. And then the
| one who did commit the belo
On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> bla bla...
#:O)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web:
Dear all,
Perhaps slightly off topic but...
I compiled and installed gcc-3.0.4 in /usr/local/gcc-3.0.4
then did
export PATH=/usr/local/gcc-3.0.4/bin:$PATH
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/gcc-3.0.4/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
after which I did ./configure in the lyx dir. But then I get this
checki
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Are you sure that you want % instead of >>, if not the below fixes
| this
Woooppsss... I was sure I changed that.
I used % when testing so that I wouldn't step on any other operators
toes.
| misguided change. I seem to have heard that patches should
Are you sure that you want % instead of >>, if not the below fixes this
misguided change. I seem to have heard that patches should be sent to the
list, but it seems this is requested only for a few persons. And then the
one who did commit the below did not mind to test it eighter. I think if
one i
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 01:14:45PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Has someone permission to access the mailinglist archive and
> actually delete arrived emails that should not be there?
The webarchive hosts 2929 lists and it has 4922544 messages in it.
Only one person has access to it, and it is an ex
Helge Hafting wrote:
> turning on subfigure to get an image title
> lets me type something, but latex seems to
> go into an infinite loop so this
> is unprintable. No dvi either of course.
subFIGURE, as the name says, is part of a figure-environment
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
Hello,
I have finished the updates to the French translation of interface and
manuals. All should be reasonably OK for 1.2.0
I send an archive with the po file on one hand and the docs on the other.
Could someone please apply ?
Adrien Rebollo
--
On 01-May-2002 Mike Alonzo wrote:
> im running LyX in a debian system. i use CUPS as my
> print manager. When I print, this error comes up:
>
> lp: unable to print file: client-error-not-found
>
> where do you think is the problem? CUPS daemon is listening
> but it just won't print..
Do
On Thursday 02 May 2002 10:44 am, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 30-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> > Sorry, no luck with the new patch
>
> Ok thanks for the file I can recreate the crash with it and your
> explanation. I fixed this now hopefully but there is IMO a greater problem
> to fix in GCItem.
Well to make it short I agree with John. For me it's VERY interesting and
helpfull to have the whole buglist there. On the other side I really seldom
let it list "ALL" bugs I just let it list "My Bugs" in which I also include
bugs I have a Cc: or any bug I did comment on.
And I think if a bug is
Subject: BOY, 15, EARNS $71,000 IN 5 WEEKS!
$$$"TRUE STORY" SEEN ON ABC 20-20
BOY, 15, MAKES 71 THOUSAND DOLLARS IN 5 WKS!! U CAN 2!!
AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TV: This is the one!
PARENTS OF 15 YEAR-OLD FINDS $71,000 CASH
HIDDEN IN HIS CLOSET
Does this headline look familiar? Of course it does. Y
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>| Lars I already commited my patch so my patch is already in and doesn't
>>| have to apply anymore. I didn't have a look at the patch from Dekel but
>>| if you tried it it's ok for me or should I try it out
רÃÅÉú²úÏúÊÛΪ¼¤¹â»úÊä³öÁòËáÖ½Ôö¼Ó
ºÚ¶ÈµÄÔöºÚ¼Á£¬ÏêÇéÁªÏµ£º
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
QQ:7705486
On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Lars I already commited my patch so my patch is already in and doesn't
>| have to apply anymore. I didn't have a look at the patch from Dekel but
>| if you tried it it's ok for me or should I try it out too?
>
> It did the same thing as yours + moved
I am trying to put a picture (a logo) in a table cell.
What I expect is that the cell will grow big enough to
contain the image, and not much more. (Unless other table
cells force it bigger of course.)
gif and eps images seems to work with only small
problems. The top of the image touch the tab
On 30-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> Sorry, no luck with the new patch
Ok thanks for the file I can recreate the crash with it and your explanation.
I fixed this now hopefully but there is IMO a greater problem to fix in GCItem.
(this is for Angus)
IMO that this function is wrong:
void GCac
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:38:22AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I really, really want to say that with gcc 3 you cannot use
>> lyxstring... (even if it is not hard to fix)
>>
>> For cxx I have no idea how to really fix it, but I guess we can eithe
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:38:22AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I really, really want to say that with gcc 3 you cannot use
> lyxstring... (even if it is not hard to fix)
>
> For cxx I have no idea how to really fix it, but I guess we can either
> use one of the functions Dekel provided an
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:48:38AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Oops. Haven't done this for a while. Apologies all.
No, why...
We need a reminder from time to time that coding in C++ is less painful
than plain C (or wrapping stupid libraries that count from 1 instead of 0
for that matter ;-))
On Thursday 02 May 2002 9:44 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> In anticipation of a meeting
Oops. Haven't done this for a while. Apologies all.
Angus
Spencer,
Rather than try and pull this off my machine from the aeronautics dept, I
thought I'd just send you the patch.
This is the full, unadulterated patch to the source as I have it here. It
includes all the trial and error changes to the global variables as well as
the genuine leak fixes.
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 01 May 2002 7:23 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 08:08:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> >> | lyxs
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 30-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> well... then Jürgens patch will not apply.
>
| Lars I already commited my patch so my patch is already in and doesn't
| have to apply anymore. I didn't have a look at the patch from Dekel but
| if you tried
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 7:23 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 08:08:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> >> | lyxstring.C:1764: parse error before `::'
> >> >> | l
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:40:59AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> What do yo mean by "native"? Inside the lyx binary?
Well, at least C++ and re-using parts of the current math parser for
tokenization and such.
> I think that would be a wrong move. IMHO an external program works just
> fine
On 30-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> well... then Jürgens patch will not apply.
Lars I already commited my patch so my patch is already in and doesn't
have to apply anymore. I didn't have a look at the patch from Dekel but
if you tried it it's ok for me or should I try it out too?
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 01-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Ok, this is a bug, but it also is a case of "do not do that then".
>> First of al it should not be allowed to change the layout of the par
>> where the index resides. Also no text should be allowed with the
On 01-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Ok, this is a bug, but it also is a case of "do not do that then".
> First of al it should not be allowed to change the layout of the par
> where the index resides. Also no text should be allowed with the
> indexlist inset at all...
I told this alread
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
>>
>> if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
>
| I think I'll have a look at a "native .tex parser" for LyX i
Herbert Voss writes:
>
> R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> > I have set about everything there's to set in the Graphics dialog (Draft,
> > Unzip, Extra LaTeX options etc. etc.) with, say, graph1.eps. I then clicked
> > on Browse for another graphics file, selected graph2.eps (No [Apply] nor
> > [OK] yet!), ju
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
>
> if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
I think I'll have a look at a "native .tex parser" for LyX in the 1.3.0
series. So WONTFIX would not be the wor
60 matches
Mail list logo
