Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:38:22AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I really, really want to say that with gcc 3 you cannot use
>> lyxstring... (even if it is not hard to fix)
>>
>> For cxx I have no idea how to really fix it, but I guess we can either
>> use one of the functions Dekel provided and do the stuff a bit higher
>> level, or we can snatch (can we?) the function cxx uses in its
>> operator>>.
>
| Or just use the code which was used up until recently:
| // very bad solution
| char * nome = new char[1024];
| is >> nome;
| lyxstring tmp(nome);
| delete [] nome;
| if (!tmp.empty()) s = tmp;
No, that has another problem.
It cannot handle long lines.
--
Lgb
