Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, I planned to write that at some point and forgot about it. We
> should have a 'reset to class defaults' (please suggest a better
> name!) button in the document dialog which does that. Then we could
> get rid of the annoying question, probably (what do you think?
Open a new document, choose letter,
Select Opening:
Nothing happens. So it is not just hollywood that has this problem.
Garst
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:11:22PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > A much more robust method of inserting source specials is to use \TeX\
> > (the program) instead of a macro solution. Some \TeX\ implementations,
> > such as Mik\TeX\footnote{from v.1.20 upwards; the command line option
> > is `\f
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:08:26AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > 2. Lyx already supports (partially) backward search:
> > 3. Lyx doesn't support forward search, but it shouldn't be hard to add this
> > feature.
>
> Do you mean by forward search and backward search the same thing I mean?
No.
>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:11:47AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:58:07AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > And what about actions that need e.g. FINISHED_RIGHT but are also UNDISPATCHED ?
>
> Which action do you have in mind?
Well, I don't know, are you are saying there ar
Angus, can you please apply this patch? It fixes a typo in
FormGraphics.C which is responsible for non-restoring the
height-choice AFAICS (copy & paste issue, I suppose).
Please delete the form_graphics.[fdC] stuff if you don't like it (the
framebox requested by Michael).
Thanks.
Jürgen
Index
On Friday 14 September 2001 17:36, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Am Freitag, 14. September 2001 17:13 schrieb Baruch Even:
> > I believe that the only place missing for jpg is the filename regex,
> > if my memory serves me right, there should be no problem beyond that.
>
> Nice. I didn't encounte
Am Freitag, 14. September 2001 17:13 schrieb Baruch Even:
> I believe that the only place missing for jpg is the filename regex,
> if my memory serves me right, there should be no problem beyond that.
Nice. I didn't encounter any problems either. Could then someone apply/
change this, please?
T
Am Freitag, 14. September 2001 16:01 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> Ok, Jürgen. Here it is back again with the preferences stuff working.
>
> Could you try it out please (and see if you can break it).
Many thanks! I'll have a look soon.
Jürgen
> Angus
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 05:22:38PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Do you see what I mean? DYSWIM
> >
> Not here. I get this
> Angus
> #LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
> \lyxformat 220
Ok. We are not crazy and the fine print is that I tested this using
1.1
On Friday 14 September 2001 17:15, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 05:35:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Is that only with docbook documents (I do not have the relevant tools,
> > so I do not have docbook claases installed)? I cannot reproduce it.
>
>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 05:35:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Is that only with docbook documents (I do not have the relevant tools,
> so I do not have docbook claases installed)? I cannot reproduce it.
There is nothing specific to docbook classes here.
> Maybe am I just stupid (s
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> So: do you feel that this patch should be applied?
>
> Herbert> from my point of view: yes. because 2. is solved
>
> But is it better that without both patches? I ask because I prefer to
> let the combox code alone if possible.
I'm a bit confused, because I can
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:21:38AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > >
> > > This explains why it reverts to Standard, by default the new paragraph
> > > goes to Standard.
>
> > Actually, it goes to the first type in th
I believe that the only place missing for jpg is the filename regex, if my
memory serves me right, there should be no problem beyond that.
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Michael Schmidt wrote:
> - The new graphics inset supports file extension ".jpeg" but not ".jpg".
> I thi
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:44:24PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Please use size_type. On an alpha, size_type is actually 'long int'
> (64bits). I tried to change sizes to size_type where I found the
> problems. We already had a session of 'cxx -w0' maybe one year ago.
But it's a pain to t
When I have a layout with a label, e.g., "FADE OUT" or "FADE IN: " I
have to use KeepEmpty 1, but the line is not empty, it has FADE OUT,
which does not take any input, or FADE IN; , which has optional input.
Search and Replace cannot find these words. Likewise, Spellchecker
cannot spellcheck them
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:50:04PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Since I am worried this you may run out of bugs, I compiled mathed
> with the anal-retentive option -w0, which spits a _lot_ of warnings
> (98)¹. While some of them are probably useless, I think this is worth
> investigating..
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:21:38AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> >
> > This explains why it reverts to Standard, by default the new paragraph
> > goes to Standard.
> Actually, it goes to the first type in the .layout file, which in
> hollywood is Dialogue.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:40:24PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Philipp" == Philipp Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Philipp> There is a latin9.def at
> Philipp> http://www.loria.fr/~gustedt/iso8859-15.html which allows one
> Philipp> to use iso8859-15 screen fonts and simply
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:10:00AM +0200, ben wrote:
> I've tried the Clark's sgml2xml. I'm a bit disappointed:
> * the XML output is really ugly, and in my opinion it cannot be seen as a decent
> XML export result.
Probably too old.
> * with a multi-parts document, it produces a single fil
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> This explains why it reverts to Standard, by default the new paragraph
> goes to Standard.
>
Actually, it goes to the first type in the .layout file, which in
hollywood is Dialogue. Somebody recently fixed this for the Note inset,
but not ERT.
Garst
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:44:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jose> Why does lyx forces the style to be standard when inserting an
> Jose> include inset?
>
> Every insets are in paragraphs, even 'displayed' on
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:50:04PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> [...]
What's the official policy for sizes?
STL uses unsigned types 'container::size_type', most of LyX just uses
'int'.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 13 September 2001 12:23, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > TODO: Moving the Display Options to Preferences (which folder?). I
> > > can do the Gui-Work, but I need help on the controller/ backend
> > > side. Does it help, if I drag'n'drop some stuff from the old
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Garst> If I have a layout with KeepEmpty 1, LableType Static,
> Garst> LabelSring "blah" and I invoke at the bottom of a file, and hit
> Garst> enter, nothing happens. I have insert a protected space f
On Friday 14 September 2001 13:30, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Yes, it has been there for a long time. I think I tried to trace it
> > and failed. Presumably getStatus gets called after the function has
> > been executed.
>
> You can see me clueless
On 14 Sep 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, it has been there for a long time. I think I tried to trace it
> and failed. Presumably getStatus gets called after the function has
> been executed.
You can see me clueless. Is there a way to reproduce this problem?
Michael
--
==
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:38:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> I've just updated the list of mathed bugs (src/mathed/BUGS).
>
> Andre> I'll delete the items marked with '//' soon unless somebody
> Andre> complains.
>
On Friday 14 September 2001 12:00, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > If I open a document (only 1) and then decide to close it, I can't.
> >
> > I get a little message to the minibuffer saying I'm not allowed to do this
> > and (worse) the File menu has reve
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> If I open a document (only 1) and then decide to close it, I can't.
>
> I get a little message to the minibuffer saying I'm not allowed to do this
> and (worse) the File menu has reverted to the No Buffer variant so I can do
> nothing useful with the do
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:32:30AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 1/ it is useless, since it is not will not be possible for an xdvi
> running on an exported latex file to do anything
There are people using LaTeX with regular editors...
> 2/ it is tasteless to have such useless code in ou
If I open a document (only 1) and then decide to close it, I can't.
I get a little message to the minibuffer saying I'm not allowed to do this
and (worse) the File menu has reverted to the No Buffer variant so I can do
nothing useful with the document that I'm not allowed to close.
This is cra
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:50:23AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Things like that always confuse me...
>
> Me too. 'The Goverment knows'
Ok... that would be the same as in German than... But that's unlikely ;-)
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PRO
On Friday 14 September 2001 10:41, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:34:52AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > > It is correct as is. "The LyX team" is one team so the verb is also
> > > > singular ("knows").
> > >
> > > But there is more than one person in it... I guess that's ag
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:34:52AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > It is correct as is. "The LyX team" is one team so the verb is also
> > > singular ("knows").
> >
> > But there is more than one person in it... I guess that's again American
> > vs British English.
>
> Naaa! It's the differen
Dear LyX developers!
This email carries two messages. First I want to inform You about a
successful LyX port to Sun Solaris 8, both Intel and Sparc architectures,
at Tartu University, Estonia. The porting procedure consisted basically
of ./configure and make, of course xforms library had to be in
On Friday 14 September 2001 10:14, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:17:03PM -0700, Micheas Herman wrote:
> > > (not sure) shouldn't it be "The LyX team know" not "The LyX team knows"
> > >
> >
> > It is correct as is. "The LyX team" is one team so the verb is also
> > singular (
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:12:10AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, as long as it is done only for "non-nice" files (i.e. when we
> actually plan to run latex).
What's the penalty otherwise? One more line in the nice .tex and bigger
.dvi produced from there?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz ...
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:17:03PM -0700, Micheas Herman wrote:
> > (not sure) shouldn't it be "The LyX team know" not "The LyX team knows"
> >
>
> It is correct as is. "The LyX team" is one team so the verb is also
> singular ("knows").
But there is more than one person in it... I guess that's
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:58:07AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> And what about actions that need e.g. FINISHED_RIGHT but are also UNDISPATCHED ?
Which action do you have in mind?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:56:41AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 06:21:36PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > - "File->Exit" does not work while editing a math formula;
> > > the same holds for opening/closing a file, changing paragraph layout...
> > > (This must defi
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 10:26:58PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> 1. LyX doesn't need to generate the src specials.
> The srcltx package (from CTAN) can be used for that
> We can make lyx always insert
> \IfFileExists{srcltx.sty}{\usepackge{srcltx}}{}
> to the preamble.
Cool. Could we do that then?
On Thursday 13 September 2001 19:08, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> > - What's the difference between OK and Apply? It seems to be
> >impossible to add a second, third,... graphic with the same
> >dialog (I assume that was the in
Michael Schmidt wrote:
- The new graphics inset supports file extension ".jpeg" but not ".jpg".
I think the latter is also commonly used. Can it be supported?
Is this really all that needs to be done (works for me) or are there real problems
with ".jpg"-files?
Excuse me if the answer is obvious
45 matches
Mail list logo
