Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

[John Levon]

On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:11:47AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:58:07AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > And what about actions that need e.g. FINISHED_RIGHT but are also UNDISPATCHED ?
> 
> Which action do you have in mind?

Well, I don't know, are you are saying there are /no/ unhandled lyxfuncs which should
also leave the math inset ?

I suggested splitting UpdatableInset::RESULT into two, or just removing the return 
string()
from the bits in lyxfunc.C

regards
john

-- 
"Who can afford to do professional work for nothing ? What hobbyist can put
3-man years into programming, finding all bugs, documenting his product and
distribute for free ?"
        - Bill Gates