Kalle Dalheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Also, a contentious point, but is it possible that we use :
| >
| > if (condition) {
| >
| > rather than
| >
| > if ( condition ) {
| >
| > consistently across the handwritten Qt2 files ? currently it's not even
| > consistent in some sourc
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Edwin said you had settled on :
|
| FormXXX
| FormXXXDialog <- machine generated
| FormXXXDialogImpl
|
| I would really prefer :
|
| FormXXX
| XXXDialog <- machine generated
| XXXDialogImpl
It would also be nice if the qt classes didn't clash too much
On 13 Jun 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
So you are changing your mind now... after all those years of removing
them from my code :P
Well only once or twice anyway.
> I disagree with this change... I really thing we should make it a rule
> to always use { ... } instead. Why?
> - cons
And with the ostream versions this would've been:
+
+string const LyXText::selectionAsStringWithLabels(Buffer const * buffer) const
+{
+ if (!selection.set()) return string();
+ string result;
+
+ // Special handling if the whole selection is within one paragraph
+
+
+string const LyXParagraph::StringWithLabels(Buffer const * buffer,
+ LyXParagraph::size_type beg,
+ LyXParagraph::size_type end)
+{
+ std::ostringstream ost;
+
+ if (beg == 0 && !params.labelString().empty())
+ ost
> Is there a current work-around? Do I need to walk my cvs back a couple
> of months to make a usable version?
January CVS should be ok. Labels/numbering broke pretty early iirc.
You might want to try mathed78.diff applied on current CVS, but I fear it
might still not do what you expect.
Andre
I disagree with this change... I really thing we should make it a rule
to always use { ... } instead. Why?
- consistency
- people will not be tempted to drop the {...} after comples
conditionals
- somewhat easier to follow program flow.
- else if
On Wednesday 13 June 2001 03:31, John Levon wrote:
> Edwin said you had settled on :
>
> FormXXX
> FormXXXDialog <- machine generated
> FormXXXDialogImpl
>
> I would really prefer :
>
> FormXXX
> XXXDialog <- machine generated
> XXXDialogImpl
>
> because it will be significantly easier to type for
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > You could be... and we have a prograssion bar in the dialog... this
> > should also be done with a signal (because then the frontend wont have
> > to implement the progression bar at all)
>
> Well the frontend doesn't have to implement the progression
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
[...]
> What do people think on these 3 points ?
Yes.
Allan. (ARRae) The shortest email I ever wrote.
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Peter Suetterlin wrote:
>
> Hi there,
Hi Peter!
> is there a specific reason that LyX inserts empty lines in some cases?
> The one that bites me most is the float figure environment, where the
[...]
> Is there a way to make LyX *not* insert those blank lines? Or why are
Transferred from lyx-users.
On 12 Jun 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > "Ramon" == Ramon Felciano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Ramon> Yes, that's what I ended up doing. It was just a bit painful to
> | Ramon> track or scan tha
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=429678&group_id=15212&atid=115212
this is because :
869 string const s1 = _("Saving document") + ' '
870 + MakeDisplayPath(owner->buffer()->fileName()
871
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:11:57AM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks to your efforts, I was able to remove two bugs from my list. But
> at the same time, I found two new ones. Therefore, please find an
> updated list enclosed.
>
> Michael
where's the list (I'm in bug-hunting and f
Hi,
thanks to your efforts, I was able to remove two bugs from my list. But
at the same time, I found two new ones. Therefore, please find an
updated list enclosed.
Michael
--
==
Michael Schmittphon
Edwin said you had settled on :
FormXXX
FormXXXDialog <- machine generated
FormXXXDialogImpl
I would really prefer :
FormXXX
XXXDialog <- machine generated
XXXDialogImpl
because it will be significantly easier to type for
things like TabCreate etc.
what do the qt2er's think ?
I would like t
I've just done the attached patch. For some reason though it only activates
in the inner folder, not the outer one. Can someone more familiar with xforms
explain why ?
thanks
john
p.s. of course the patch is not yet complete :)
--
"Please let's not resume the argument with the usual whining a
hopefully this one is ok
thanks
john
--
"Please let's not resume the argument with the usual whining about how
this feature will wipe out humanity or bring us to the promised land."
- Charles Campbell on magic words in Subject: headers
Index: src/ChangeLog
==
self-documenting
thanks
john
--
"Please let's not resume the argument with the usual whining about how
this feature will wipe out humanity or bring us to the promised land."
- Charles Campbell on magic words in Subject: headers
Index: ChangeLog
==
Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| when running "cvs update", I got a conflict in po/POTFILES.in. How is that
| possible? Does it make sense to put a file into the repository that is
| modified during compilation?
perhaps not...
I tend to think that this file should be under manual
Hi,
when running "cvs update", I got a conflict in po/POTFILES.in. How is that
possible? Does it make sense to put a file into the repository that is
modified during compilation?
cvs server: Updating po
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/po/POTFILES.in,v
retrieving revision 1.181
retrieving revision 1
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:47:57PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> New update!
>
> People who did already confirm:
>
> - Asger
> - Jean-Marc
> - Lars
> - André and Konni
>
> (all of them on Friday 22)
>
> People who did say they will come but didn't confirm till now:
Oh yes, I did. With a
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:05:15PM +0200 or thereabouts, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Koz" == Koz writes:
>
> Koz> at my (slightly out of date) mirror you can find a css based
> Koz> www.lyx.org http://www.koziarski.org/LyX/www-user/
>
> It looks good.
Thanks
> Koz> Possible issues
>
I haven't been able to insert references into equations
for a while. I think even doing it by ERT was broken last time aI
checked.
This morning, I printed a document from the fall, and all of the
cross-references to tables appeared as ?? . . .
Is there a current work-around? Do I need to w
Jong-Hwa Shin wrote:
>
> Now, I have a quite old laptop: Pentinum 75 Mhz, with 24MB Ram, 324MB
> Hard drive. Do you think that it is possible to use Lyx with any small X
> windows environment in the laptop? Only using Lyx with its functions!
> Pleased to listen from you and thank you in advance.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:59:35PM +0200, Jong-Hwa Shin wrote:
> I have loved Lyx since I enjoyed experimental installing SuSE 7.0 in a
> desktop with Pentinum III, Ram 64MB. Regrettably, I am very away from
> the desktop PC at the moment.
>
> Now, I have a quite old laptop: Pentinum 75 Mhz, wit
I have loved Lyx since I enjoyed experimental installing SuSE 7.0 in a
desktop with Pentinum III, Ram 64MB. Regrettably, I am very away from
the desktop PC at the moment.
Now, I have a quite old laptop: Pentinum 75 Mhz, with 24MB Ram, 324MB
Hard drive. Do you think that it is possible to use Lyx
john jabbered,
>1.Larry's being a curmudgeon again. :)
Gee, i grinned when I saw this from the only other person who wanted to
get "low grade moron" into the license :)
hey, wait a minute--what's wrong with curmudgeons???
hawk
--
Prof. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. /"\
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:36:36PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 28 May 2001 08:52, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > I can't add/modify converters using the Edit->Preferences screens,
> > I had to add them by hand into my .lyx/preferences.
>
> Fixed now!
> Angus
while we're on this, we nee
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:37:24PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> You started this thread to reach this point didn't you? :-)
ha ha :)
Yes Allan we all set up this fake flamewar to goad you into doing
the history stuff :))
john
--
"Please let's not resume the argument with the usual whining about
Hi there,
I'm working on the update of aapaper.layout (now aa.layout) which
brought me to a more general question regarding the layout files:
What should happen if the underlying textclass file changes? Especially
when the changes in the .cls file are not backward compatible?
In the current
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 16:58, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
> | Lars> 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønne
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I keep trying to use the support library in little bits of code I write.
| Either testing stuff for lyx or my own stuff. However, I always have to hack
| things because the library depends on code in the core. It wasn't meant to
| (at least that's wh
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> JMarc, the fix for --disable-nls is not complete. You also need
John> to move the include in gettext.C or #include gettext.h
Duh! Fixed.
JMarc
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> by some amount of time it seems... Then I guess the boost people
Lars> will not be overly eager to fix this.
Lars> Angus, what are your changes of getting a newer compiler?
And the latest is 6.3.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
| Lars> 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Angus Leeming
| Lars> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | >
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
Lars> 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Angus Leeming
Lars> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | I have FINALLY managed to
Lars> compile lyx again by reve
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> New update! People who did already confirm:
Juergen> - Asger - Jean-Marc - Lars - André and Konni
Juergen> (all of them on Friday 22)
My trains leave paris on friday night, but I'll arrive saturday in the
morning (something
I keep trying to use the support library in little bits of code I write.
Either testing stuff for lyx or my own stuff. However, I always have to hack
things because the library depends on code in the core. It wasn't meant to
(at least that's what the documentation says).
I'm very tempted to ch
Oscar Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi everybody
|
| I have updated today the lyx-devel from the cvs repository and I
| compiled
| to test it. The compilation was succesful, but when I started lyx I have
| found
| that I was unable to type anything in the lyx screen. Indeed everytime I
|
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Incidentally, I'd say that the "Start Spellchecking" is "Apply" by a
| > different name. That's just button labels.
|
| Do we need a "Start SpellC" button anyway? In kde, after running the
| spellchecker it jumps automatically to the firstmisspelled
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 15:50, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Incidentally, I'd say that the "Start Spellchecking" is "Apply" by a
> > different name. That's just button labels.
>
> Do we need a "Start SpellC" button anyway? In kde, after running the
> spellchecker it jumps automatically to the firstmi
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Well whatever IMO the easiest (and fastes) solution for now is just use
| #ifdef statements. If you want to use dl and load dynamic libaries
| and configure this all now so that Edwin can work with it, why not. When
| you are at it you could also dynami
Hi everybody
I have updated today the lyx-devel from the cvs repository and I
compiled
to test it. The compilation was succesful, but when I started lyx I have
found
that I was unable to type anything in the lyx screen. Indeed everytime I
stroke a key an "Unknown function" appeared in the minibu
On 12-Jun-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
I just tried the Apply stuff and now it works as expected (for me).
Could I have one more request? Would it be possible to have some sort
of "Reset" button which put's all the fields again into "No change"?
Would that be a good idea and/or fast to realize?
> Incidentally, I'd say that the "Start Spellchecking" is "Apply" by a
> different name. That's just button labels.
Do we need a "Start SpellC" button anyway? In kde, after running the
spellchecker it jumps automatically to the firstmisspelled word. This is what
we want right?
gr.ed.
New update!
People who did already confirm:
- Asger
- Jean-Marc
- Lars
- André and Konni
(all of them on Friday 22)
People who did say they will come but didn't confirm till now:
- José
Someone else?
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. J
On 12-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Well Edwin this probably won't work anyway. We have to use PREPROCESSOR
>| #ifdef/#else/#endif stuff to handle this. Why? Because if you don't want
>| pspell you shouldn't have it in the code otherwise it won't work. You
>| hopefully understand what I
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 12 June 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to
| version
| > | 1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 14:48, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 12-Jun-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Edwin, you're talking about a controller/view split of the Spellchecker.
> [snip Class definition]
>
> Well more or less. Only that we don't have an Apply/Ok behaviour.
> We have more Buttons which h
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to
version
> | 1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I know to exist in the
> | frontend.
> |
> | So...
>
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 12:55, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 12-Jun-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Jürgen, can you remember what the bug was in the Character dialog and why
you
> > didn't like the patch I sent to you weeks past. I know that it didn't do
all
> > that it should but have lost the r
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello all!
|
| As the meeting is not that far away and I have to organize some things
| I just would like to know who is comming for sure and who MAY come:
|
| People who did already confirm:
|
| - Asger
| - Jean-Marc
Sure I am comming.
Will arrive
On 12-Jun-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> Edwin, you're talking about a controller/view split of the Spellchecker.
[snip Class definition]
Well more or less. Only that we don't have an Apply/Ok behaviour.
We have more Buttons which have to raise an action. While we are
checking the only allowed sig
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 12-Jun-2001 Edwin Leuven wrote:
|
| > While we are at it. I am having some scarce free moments again in which I am
| > looking at the spellcheck code.
|
| Good!
|
| > What I was thinking was to have something like the following (watch out, a
| >
Hello all!
As the meeting is not that far away and I have to organize some things
I just would like to know who is comming for sure and who MAY come:
People who did already confirm:
- Asger
- Jean-Marc
People who did say they will come but didn't confirm till now:
- Lars
- Jose'
- Andre
Did
> 4. Update dialog
> 5. Stop: listen to dialog
> Your help is greatly appreciated.
>
> Greets, Edwin.
>
> ps. is it Friday yet? ;-)
;-)
Edwin, you're talking about a controller/view split of the Spellchecker.
class ControlSpellChecker {
private:
ViewBase * view_;
SpellChecker
On 12-Jun-2001 Edwin Leuven wrote:
> While we are at it. I am having some scarce free moments again in which I am
> looking at the spellcheck code.
Good!
> What I was thinking was to have something like the following (watch out, a
> flow of consciousness of a c++ beginner follows!):
[snip cl
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| While we are at it. I am having some scarce free moments again in which I am
| looking at the spellcheck code.
|
| What I was thinking was to have something like the following (watch out, a
| flow of consciousness of a c++ beginner follows!):
|
| A b
> "larry" == larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
larry> [...]
Why are you all having fun discussions when I am away? Now, you have
taken all the valid points I might have made, I'm frustrated :)
Larry, just one point (which has already been made, I know): LyX 1.0.x
codebase is _ugly_. Most o
On Friday 25 May 2001 13:30, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could anybody please check whether the following bug is still present in
> the latest cvs version?
>
> In the "Include file" dialog, the "OK" is not activated if you change
> the file name by hand instead of opening the file browser.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Angus> I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting
| Angus> lyxsum.C to version 1.18 and so can now address some of the
| Angus> bugs that I know to exist in the fronten
> We want GUII _even_ if xforms is the only toolkit. Why? Cleaner code! And
> something that is maintainable.
This smells like cognitive dissonance to me.
Personally I would like cleaner, maintainable code + modern toolkit. Which of
course does not imply GUII *in the sense that lyx implements
Hi there,
is there a specific reason that LyX inserts empty lines in some cases?
The one that bites me most is the float figure environment, where the
LaTeX output looks like this:
>\begin{figure*}
>\resizebox*{1\columnwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{fig2.eps}}
>
>
>\caption{\label{histogram}Histo
> "Koz" == Koz writes:
Koz> at my (slightly out of date) mirror you can find a css based
Koz> www.lyx.org http://www.koziarski.org/LyX/www-user/
It looks good.
Koz> Possible issues
Koz> 1) wrong font colours (stuff is black)
Yes, this is really a problem for me.
JMarc
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting
Angus> lyxsum.C to version 1.18 and so can now address some of the
Angus> bugs that I know to exist in the frontend.
Note that it should work now with the real head code. At
On 12-Jun-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jürgen, can you remember what the bug was in the Character dialog and why you
> didn't like the patch I sent to you weeks past. I know that it didn't do all
> that it should but have lost the relevant mails. Pointers to the thread in
> the list would be w
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to version
| 1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I know to exist in the
| frontend.
|
| So...
So... what specific problems did you have with the new lyxsum, on what
code
I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to version
1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I know to exist in the
frontend.
So...
Jürgen, can you remember what the bug was in the Character dialog and why you
didn't like the patch I sent to you weeks past. I
On Monday 28 May 2001 08:52, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> I can't add/modify converters using the Edit->Preferences screens,
> I had to add them by hand into my .lyx/preferences.
Fixed now!
Angus
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Cyrille Artho wrote:
> in lyx 1.6fix2, I cannot make text bold in the "Lyx code" style. This
> used to work in previous versions, IIRC. The LaTeX code generated by Lyx
> looks OK, but the output does not contain bold text. Is this a Lyx or
> LaTeX problem?
the default fixed
> "Cyrille" == Cyrille Artho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Cyrille> Hi, in lyx 1.6fix2, I cannot make text bold in the "Lyx code"
Cyrille> style. This used to work in previous versions, IIRC. The
Cyrille> LaTeX code generated by Lyx looks OK, but the output does not
Cyrille> contain bold text.
Hi,
in lyx 1.6fix2, I cannot make text bold in the "Lyx code" style. This
used to work in previous versions, IIRC. The LaTeX code generated by Lyx
looks OK, but the output does not contain bold text. Is this a Lyx or
LaTeX problem?
\begin{lyxcode}
non-bold:~\textbf{bold}~non-bold
\end{lyxcode}
--
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Lior Silberman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Casually looking at the new XHTML-compiant website [good work!] I found
> that the logo for the 5th LDM sponsors is not displayed except at
> top-level pages, because the image URL in end.php3 is relative and not
> absolute.
>
> Since anoncvs is
74 matches
Mail list logo
