On Tuesday 12 June 2001 16:58, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
> | Lars> 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Angus Leeming
> | Lars> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | I have FINALLY managed to
> | Lars> compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to | version | > | 1.18
> | Lars> and so can now address some of the bugs that I know to exist in
> | Lars> the | > | frontend. | > | | > | So... | > | > So... what
> | Lars> specific problems did you have with the new lyxsum, on what | >
> | Lars> code contruct did the compiler crash? | | See attached for the
> | Lars> errors. I'm using | DIGITAL C++ V6.1-029 on DIGITAL UNIX V4.0
> | Lars> (Rev. 1091)
> |
> | Lars> What is the difference between the version you are using and the
> | Lars> one Jean-Marc is using?
> |
> | Mine is newer:
> | Compaq C++ V6.2-024 for Digital UNIX V4.0F (Rev. 1229)
>
> by some amount of time it seems...
> Then I guess the boost people will not be overly eager to fix this.
>
> Angus, what are your changes of getting a newer compiler?
In the immediate future --- zero. I'm pretty busy!
Later, we'll see.
But I upgraded to this compiler 8 months ago. Admittedly, it wasn't bleeding
edge even then but DEC have introduced so much bloat into their distro that I
took my sys admin's advice and upgraded to 4.0e rather than 4.0f.
For the time being I'm happy using v1.18 of lyxsum.C. This code isn't likely
to change again is it, and nothing else uses crc.h
Incidentally, what is it that the compiler is complaining about?
Angus
