Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:50:20PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > On Fri, 4 May 2001, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > > > Here's the patch. > > Somebody correct me if I'm wrong but can't the static bool be placed > at a minimal scope (just before the inner conditional). That would keep > the variable next

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > Here's the patch. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong but can't the static bool be placed at a minimal scope (just before the inner conditional). That would keep the variable next to where it's used and it minimize its scope. Since it's static it'll s

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > Here's the patch. Though it is obscured by the presence of an unrelated bug > that exists in the current CVS: When you type space at the beginning of a > paragraph or after another space, the message flashes across but is > immediately replaced by the

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 05:56:36AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > I don't have this problem on my machine. > > Do you have gcc 2.96 ? > > No. I have gcc-2.95.2. > > The problem was/is one of not regenerating the output file when one of the > included png or pdf figures has changed. This was using

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:10:14AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > Hopefully we'll get a few more people interested in testing the beta > > releases this time around. Which reminds me that the "buffer-update pdf2" > > doesn't in 1.2.0cvs. I didn't try other u

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:10:14AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > Hopefully we'll get a few more people interested in testing the beta > releases this time around. Which reminds me that the "buffer-update pdf2" > doesn't in 1.2.0cvs. I didn't try other update types because all I could > generate with

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:01:54PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > On 4 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote: > > > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > | > Why not output the message only once per session? > > | > > | I already suggested that! You can either say "I agree." or sug

Re: cvs make.log

2001-05-04 Thread Baruch Even
It also happens on my machine (gcc 2.91.66). The immediate and simple solution is to add an: #include "MenuBackend.h" to the top of src/frontends/Menubar_pimpl.h The reason for this is line 77 in the Menubar_pimpl.h file that says: : pimpl_(p), obj_(o) { item_.reset(i); } specifically the probl

compile error: latest CVS

2001-05-04 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../images -I../../../src/ -I. ./../../src/frontends/ -I../../../src/frontends/controllers -I../../.. -I../../. . -I../../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce -c Menubar_pimpl.C -o Menubar_pimpl.o In file included fr

cvs make.log

2001-05-04 Thread Garst R. Reese
gcc-2.95.2 today's make.log attached Garst Making all in xforms make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/local/garst/lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms' /bin/sh ../../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../images -I../../../src/-I../../../src/frontends/ -

Bug in Lyx 1.1.6fix1 ?

2001-05-04 Thread Charles de Miramon
Hello, I'm using the Lyx 1.1.6fix1 rpm package found on Kavyan A. Sylvan ftp site. When I hit the return key on the numerical keyboard, LyX doesn't create a new paragraph but inserts a space. When you hit the numerical keyboard return key several times, LyX inserts several spaces on the screen

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread John Levon
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > On Fri, 4 May 2001, John Levon wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 May 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > > > > > It's also a good chance for John to fix his implementation. > > > > implementation of what ? Or do you mean John Weiss ? > > Maybe it's my fading memory but I though

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 4 May 2001, John Levon wrote: > On Fri, 4 May 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > > > It's also a good chance for John to fix his implementation. > > implementation of what ? Or do you mean John Weiss ? Maybe it's my fading memory but I thought it was you that provided the "two-spaces" message in t

Re: !NEW_INSETS removed

2001-05-04 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Baruch Even wrote: > For my defence I only have the fact the only LFUN_HELP_OPEN says in > LyXAction.C that it takes arguments, the others have no mention of it in > their definition. > > Why is this inconsistency? If Argument is unneeded, remove it. If it's > needed why are

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > It's also a good chance for John to fix his implementation. implementation of what ? Or do you mean John Weiss ? john -- "Brodie, he's a reasonable man, but he's *insane* !" - Kramer

Re: !NEW_INSETS removed

2001-05-04 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > On 04-May-2001 John Levon wrote: > > > Also spellcheck needs doing, but I'm not sure about stepping on Juergen's > > toes if he finds time to have a go at tabular spellcheck + find/replace. > > Please keep on reminding me. I'm quite busy at the mome

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > If we just keep saying: > "Such-and-such is annoying. Let's add a preference to disable it." > > then maybe such-and-such shouldn't exist at all or is at least not well > thought out. Otherwise we get preference bloat and you'll either end up > with

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On 4 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Allan> Okay, just do 1.1.6fix2 with what we have now. Michael was the > Allan> only one complaining anyway. I'll still look at backporting his > Allan> fixes so he can check out the fix series

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> Okay, just do 1.1.6fix2 with what we have now. Michael was the Allan> only one complaining anyway. I'll still look at backporting his Allan> fixes so he can check out the fix series as well in case Allan> there's something there not in

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
Okay, just do 1.1.6fix2 with what we have now. Michael was the only one complaining anyway. I'll still look at backporting his fixes so he can check out the fix series as well in case there's something there not in the main tree. May as well make that branch as solid as possible since we'll be

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> If you wait I'll work on getting the other sigc++ related fixes Allan> of Michael's ported to 1_1_6 so that that release should be Allan> more portable. If you are positively sure you can get it to work and it will not break other com

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On 4 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I will be away until wednesday. If you want, I can tag 1.1.6fix2 and > send you an announcement. Then I could prepare a patch when I am back. > > The alternative is to wait until next wednesday. If you wait I'll work on getting the other sigc++ related

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> Hello, | | Appended as usual is a list of what has been fixed Lars> since 1.1.6fix1. | My plan is to release 1.1.6fix2 soon Lars> (tomorrow?). Lars, will you be | able to

Re: [s.bernaud@free.fr] Feedback from www.lyx.org

2001-05-04 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 04-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Are you a subscriber to the lyx-feedback mailing list? This is what > gets sent from the web page. I just forwarded it from there. No I'm not subscibed there, I'm also not anymore subscribed in lyx-users (I tried some time ago but the server doesn't

Re: StateMachineEngine

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: > Allan, I don't have a Unix system handy, so maybe you could generate > the docs and post them somewhere for me to have a look? Okay. I finally had time. I managed to leave in the unfinished and now out of date GenericController stuff. Thi

Re: !NEW_INSETS removed

2001-05-04 Thread Baruch Even
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 15:18]: > Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | * Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 14:28]: > | > Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > | > | > The intention is that in the minibuffer you will not be allowed to > |

Get LyX listed on LWN campaign

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
Ever wondered why LyX is not listed in the application links at LWN? It's because you haven't emailed them and asked them very nicely if they might add a link to your favourite document processor. There are two suitable lists on their site: On the Desktop -> Office Apps Develop

Re: !NEW_INSETS removed

2001-05-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | * Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 14:28]: | > Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | > The intention is that in the minibuffer you will not be allowed to | > | > enter "free text" strings. i.e. lfuns with arguments, but will _o

Re: !NEW_INSETS removed

2001-05-04 Thread Andre Poenitz
> This is fine, the current lfun's do not require arguments so this > transitional flaw is of no concern. math-macro-arg required an argument last time I looked... Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: !NEW_INSETS removed

2001-05-04 Thread Baruch Even
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 14:28]: > Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > The intention is that in the minibuffer you will not be allowed to > | > enter "free text" strings. i.e. lfuns with arguments, but will _only_ > | > be allowed to enter the lfun. If the lfu

Re: !NEW_INSETS removed

2001-05-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > The intention is that in the minibuffer you will not be allowed to | > enter "free text" strings. i.e. lfuns with arguments, but will _only_ | > be allowed to enter the lfun. If the lfun requires an argument it will | > be asked for (or more than one).

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On 4 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote: > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > Why not output the message only once per session? > | > | I already suggested that! You can either say "I agree." or suggest > | something different. Rewording an existing suggestion isn't a v

Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous)

2001-05-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:07:37AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: ... > From: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous) > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from Martin Vermeer at "May 4, 2001 > 11:02:41 am" > To: Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 4 May

Re: !NEW_INSETS removed

2001-05-04 Thread Baruch Even
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 13:47]: > Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > | We should try to have the next version stabilized soon so that our users > | > | who want something better than 1.1.5fixN will be able to upgrade. The > | > | tables code in 1.1.6fix2 wil

Re: !NEW_INSETS removed

2001-05-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | We should try to have the next version stabilized soon so that our users | > | who want something better than 1.1.5fixN will be able to upgrade. The | > | tables code in 1.1.6fix2 will not have all fixes and we need to | > | stabilize that before we g

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Why not output the message only once per session? | | I already suggested that! You can either say "I agree." or suggest | something different. Rewording an existing suggestion isn't a valid | option! so where's the patch then? prttbbttr! --

Re: !NEW_INSETS removed

2001-05-04 Thread Baruch Even
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 12:58]: > Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | * Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010503 18:49]: > | > My immediate todo list: > | > - lists of floats > | > - try out dymmy LyXView/BufferView > | > - try ou

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On 4 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote: > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > | I think we should sit back a moment and ask ourselves if there really is > | any point in showing this message at all. I find it a distraction and > | while it'd be easy to add YAP (Yet Anoth

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, 4 May 2001, Michael Koziarski wrote: | | > On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 05:15:27PM +0200 or thereabouts, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes |wrote: | > > This message was added because somebody felt it was irritant to be | > > unable to add double space without reas

Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous)

2001-05-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:50:37PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: | > On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 09:21:53AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: | > > > trickier. You'd basically have to convert from utf-8 to full Unicode | > > > on-the-fly, as you displayed. | > > | > >

Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous)

2001-05-04 Thread Andre Poenitz
> A compromise solution would be to internally, and transparently, > convert a "block" of text from UTF-8 to 32 bits representation and back. I would not even look at this as a compromise. This should be the most efficient approach in most circumstances. > The size of the block? Uhhh... what ab

Re: [s.bernaud@free.fr] Feedback from www.lyx.org

2001-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> On 03-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Juergen, is this fixed now? Juergen> I never saw this messages is it a new one? I'll answer to it Juergen> below! Are you a subscriber to the lyx-feedback mailing list? This is w

Re: Latest CVS: Layout->Latex preamble crashes LyX

2001-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Unable to reproduce. Kayvan> I am unable to reproduce as well now. Kayvan> I recompiled everything from scratch on my Solaris box (where Kayvan> the problem was happening). However, after writing this message, I tried to quit LyX

Re: !NEW_INSETS removed

2001-05-04 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 04-May-2001 John Levon wrote: > Also spellcheck needs doing, but I'm not sure about stepping on Juergen's > toes if he finds time to have a go at tabular spellcheck + find/replace. Please keep on reminding me. I'm quite busy at the moment with various projects (most of them I get money for ;

RE: [s.bernaud@free.fr] Feedback from www.lyx.org

2001-05-04 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 03-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Juergen, is this fixed now? I never saw this messages is it a new one? I'll answer to it below! > This is a bug report. > It occurs with the rpm version 1.1.6 fix 1 of Lyx. > When I try to use a table with the "p" colomn attribute, the width I en

Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous)

2001-05-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 08:34:40AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm > Precedence: bulk > X-No-Archive: yes > List-Post: > List-Help: > List-Unsubscribe: > Delivered-T

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread Helge Hafting
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "George" == George De Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > George> What does form at least a minor irritant is the message about > George> not being about to insert two spaces. I just wish there was a > George> way to turn this one message off. It really do

Re: double spaces at the end of a sentence: readability

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Michael Koziarski wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 05:15:27PM +0200 or thereabouts, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > This message was added because somebody felt it was irritant to be > > unable to add double space without reason :) I do not know whether we > > are supposed to