> A compromise solution would be to internally, and transparently, > convert a "block" of text from UTF-8 to 32 bits representation and back. I would not even look at this as a compromise. This should be the most efficient approach in most circumstances. > The size of the block? Uhhh... what about the whole loaded document? :-) No problem with that. Actual "text" makes only a fraction of all data structures used.. Andre' PS: I somehow seem to remember that kind of discussion a few weeks ago... -- André Pönitz ............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- enormous Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Unicode (was Re: enormous) John Weiss
- Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous) Martin Vermeer
- Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous) Dekel Tsur
- Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous) John Weiss
- Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous) Andre Poenitz
- Re: Unicode (was Re: enormo... Martin Vermeer
- Re: Unicode (was Re: en... Andre Poenitz
- Re: Unicode (was Re: en... Martin Vermeer
- Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous) Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Fwd: enormous Stephen Reindl
- Re: Fwd: enormous Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Fwd: enormous Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fwd: enormous Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Fwd: enormous Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fwd: enormous Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Fwd: enormous Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fwd: enormous Andre Poenitz