Re: !NEW_INSETS removed

[Lars Gullik Bjønnes]

Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| > The intention is that in the minibuffer you will not be allowed to
| > enter "free text" strings. i.e. lfuns with arguments, but will _only_
| > be allowed to enter the lfun. If the lfun requires an argument it will
| > be asked for (or more than one). To do this the information we keep
| > about each lfun must also hold the number or arguments and their type.
| > Not hard to do, but I need some time...
| 
| This is fine, the current lfun's do not require arguments so this
| transitional flaw is of no concern.

Several of the lfuns require arguments.

-- 
        Lgb