I'd nail 'em if I had the hardware and intellectual capacity but I don't :^(
Lance
PS:
--- On Thu, 4/4/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>From: Phill Whiteside
>Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Zsync latest build
>To: "Jose Lopez"
>Cc: "lubuntu-qa@lists.launchp
This also effects i386 :^)
Lance
From: "ke...@refaceplace.net"
To: Lubuntu QA
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] PPC: LiveCD displays two network icons in tray
I couldn't find a bug for this listed for the
I see that nio/sudodus reported that bug again with the 20131014 i386 image bug
I think a new should be filed based on the status of that old bug.
Does that make sense?
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https
The bug is filed and confirmed:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1205643
It's worked since Gutsy but no more, and I maintain 23 boxes with that graphics
chip :^(
It still worked in Saucy Alpha 1 but not since then.
Lance
From:
Thanks Phill.
Off-topic, but I am now running an i386 standard upgrade test just to be sure
we're not borked in that regard :^)
BTW did you decide to mention in the release notes that some VIA graphics chips
are borked? I wish I could get a reply from someone at Xorg on that bug :^(
grade (image) test before continuing with the rest of
the installation tests.
It only adds about 20 minutes to the entire test cycle for each live image.
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lu
As we head into Beta 2 testing I decided to test the heck out of all apps and
encountered this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcmanfm/+bug/1229181
I personally think it's a sensitivity issue with apport rather than a PCManFM
bug but wanted to share that.
Lance
--
Mailing
lead,
but I respect your decision.
Lance
From: Phill Whiteside
To: Nio Wiklund
Cc: Erick Brunzell ; "lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net"
; lubuntu user list
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] please help testin
Not much to add to that:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1205643
I hope the Xorg devs aren't dropping support for those because I maintain over
20 of them.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://l
icky (could use the word "problematic") with some hardware. We're continuing
to look into this issue, but if you can't boot the live image to a working DE
we recommend not installing this alpha 2 image".
That's a rough draft.
What do you all think?
Lance
__
The server image worked OK so it's likely an Xorg bug.
But Nio is having trouble too:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1203852
I sort of think that we're having two different problems but I'm not sure.
Lance
PS: sorry for the top posting but I
m trying this server image now:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/pending/
It shows last updated 07/25 so I'll see what happens.
Lance
From: Jonathan Marsden
To: Lance ; Phill Whiteside
Cc: lubuntu-qa
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 7:11 PM
with that VIA hardware later, I'm now thinking it may
actually be an X issue :^/
So, I need to figure out if it's the kernel or X ... that could
take a while.
From: Phill Whiteside
To: Lance
Cc: lubuntu-qa
Sent: Wednesday, J
I'm setting up for the i386 upgrade (image) test but I'm turning into a bobble
head so expect this to take quite a while :^)
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https://help.l
Yee-haa! My grandson dropped off his laptop on the way to work so I should be
able communicate :^)
From: Lance
To: lubuntu-qa
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:04 AM
Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Hitting the live amd 64 tests now!
Both the i386 and amd64
Both the i386 and amd64 standard upgrade tests passed with flying colors :^)
Now I'm going to hit the amd64 iso tests including the upgrade (image) test.
With part of my test suite down I'll not be able to communicate or check for
image upgrades during part of that process!
BTW we'll worry abou
o promises :^)
Someone else will likely have to jump on the alternate image tests.
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
thanks,
Lance
From: Nio Wiklund
To: Erick Brunzell
Cc: Julien Lavergne ; lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing
On 2013-07-23 08:16, Erick Brunzell wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 04:18 PM, Jul
Hi Lars. I'm not sure.
I'm including the boss (Phill) directly in the conversation so he can tell us
what's still needed.
I think on i386 and amd64 we're good enough for an Alpha 1, but Phill may have
different ideas.
Lance
- Original Message -
From: Lars No
pgrade tests should still be valid:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/270/builds/47105/testcases/1310/results
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/270/builds/47106/testcases/1310/results
Technically valid until tommorrow ;^)
I can't help with PPC, armhf, or amd64+mac :^(
I'm running an upgrade test via release-upgrader now which should complete the
i386 tests.
I think we'll be OK with a few release notes for Alpha 1.
Tomorrow I'll hit both upgrade tests for amd64 but I'd much appreciate it if
someone ran the other amd64 installo tests,
/sites/default/files/docimages/install-precise/035-edubuntu-options-oneiric.png
As I said we'd only need one additional screen rather than two, just so we
could choose between a minimal (core) or full (desktop) install.
Easy to imagine but I'm sure much more complex to implement.
Lance
Why do we need a poll?
The bug report shows 93 effected + 13 duplicates:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/930447
Lance
--- On Thu, 5/9/13, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
From: Ali Linx (amjjawad)
Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] [Pentium M] Poll
To: "lubuntu user list" ,
&
I think your mention in the release notes regarding that upgrade bug is good.
Many, many thanks.
Lance
--- On Thu, 4/25/13, Lance wrote:
From: Lance
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Upgrade tests
To: "Phill Whiteside"
Cc: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net, "Julien Lavergne"
Date
Xubuntu has some uncompleted testcases also, and there are a lot of uncompleted
upgrade tests which are incredibly time consuming. I'm waiting for a last
minute bug fix to hit Ubuntu GNOME.
They're the new kid on the block this time, we all remember what that was like
;^)
Lance
---
Many, many thanks!
I must say, "I love this team"!
I'm serious about that, we be good!
Lance
--- On Thu, 4/25/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Upgrade tests
To: "Lance"
Cc: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net, "Julien Laver
Hi Phill,
I'm Lance (lbsolost), not Lars, but I don't mind as long as Lars doesn't :^)
Where can we view the proposed release notes?
I apologize for being a major pain, but that's kind of who I am.
Lance
--- On Thu, 4/25/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Wh
I added a couple of comments to that bug report.
Not sure how we'd mention that in the Release Notes?
Lance
--- On Thu, 4/25/13, Lance wrote:
> From: Lance
> Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Upgrade tests
> To: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
> Date: Thursday, April 25, 2013, 12:17 AM
&
I had three done and I'm running the last one now. Do you have any thoughts
about this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lxadmin/+bug/966451
On this last test I increased the time to 300 minutes for Blank after and Cycle
after so I'll see what happens.
Lance
PS; I'm just wo
Not yet, I see nio is working on i386.
I hope I can help later today but right now I'm working on testing a respin of
Ubuntu GNOME :^(
Sometimes I test until my brain stops working, and sadly beyond :^/
Lance
--- On Wed, 4/24/13, Lars Noodén wrote:
> From: Lars Noodén
> Subjec
I see there's a new build this AM so give me several hours to rinse-n-repeat.
Lance
--- On Tue, 4/23/13, Lance wrote:
> From: Lance
> Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Two upgrade questions
> To: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net, "Julien Lavergne"
> Date: Tuesday, April 23, 201
Thanks Nicholas. Sometimes I can be a little thick :^(
Lance
--- On Thu, 4/18/13, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
> From: Nicholas Skaggs
> Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] New upgrade test - via live image
> To: "Lance"
> Cc: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
> Date: Thursday, April
uot;.
So I'm totally confused.
Lance
--- On Wed, 4/17/13, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
> From: Nicholas Skaggs
> Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] New upgrade test - via live image
> To: "Lance"
> Cc: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
> Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2013, 5:42 PM
er upgrades for 12.10 installations and older.
At the moment this is the desired design and expectation."
So I assume that all of the "Upgrade (image)" tests should be removed from the
tracker.
Lance
--- On Wed, 4/17/13, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
> From: Nicholas Skaggs
>
12.10 installations and older.
At the moment this is the desired design and expectation."
So maybe that upgrade test should be removed altogether???
Lance
--- On Tue, 4/16/13, Lance wrote:
> From: Lance
> Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] New upgrade test - via live image
> To:
duced
rather than a "weekly" cycle :^)
Lance
--- On Tue, 4/16/13, Lance wrote:
> From: Lance
> Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] New upgrade test - via live image
> To: "Nicholas Skaggs" ,
> lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
> Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2013, 9:41 PM
>
filing a bug against the tracker, I felt it best to have an
open discussion before doing so. Particularly since this is something rather
new to most testers.
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
behavior in our flavor against
Ubuntu itself to see if it still exists "upstream".
In this case the behavior is the same in Ubuntu as it it here, so I reported a
bug :^)
Lance
--- On Mon, 4/8/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Check disc for d
ge problem since mid-November!
Thank goodness we kept the alternate alive!
Lance
--- On Mon, 4/8/13, Lance wrote:
From: Lance
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Check disc for defects bug needs confirmation
To: "Ali Linx (amjjawad)"
Cc: "lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net"
Date: Monday
Many thanks ;^)
Lance
--- On Mon, 4/8/13, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
From: Ali Linx (amjjawad)
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Check disc for defects bug needs confirmation
To: "Lance"
Cc: "lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net"
Date: Monday, April 8, 2013, 2:07 PM
Done!
On Mon,
I remembered this being mentioned so I cross-tested todays Ubuntu image:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1166379
It would be beneficial to have a confirmation.
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
There is a test written for "Check disc for defects" here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/243/builds/41187/testcases/1447/results
But a lot of it is wrong I think ... I'm pretty sure that's a 'casper'
bug ;^)
Lance
--- On Sat, 4/6/13, Ali
t=2128648&p=12579118#post12579118
It's been a real thorn in my side and it's dramatically slowed my ability to
properly test the iso images.
Lance
PS: You may have to copy-n-paste the links!
--- On Sat, 4/6/13, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
From: Ali Linx (amjjawad)
Subject: [Lubuntu-
e impressed
with Lubuntu itself aside from the upstream and side-stream warts :^)
Lance
--- On Wed, 4/3/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alt images and encryption
To: "Lance"
Cc: "lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net"
Date: Wednesday,
be
a totally different test.
I'm doing my best and I know you are doing likewise, so let's not form a
circular firing squad ;^)
Lance
--- On Wed, 4/3/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alt images and encryption
To: "Lance"
Cc: "
Cool :^) I'm downloading the live amd64 image right now so I can complete those
tests.
And that i386 upgrade test is running on another box.
Lance
--- On Wed, 4/3/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alt images and encryption
To: "Lance"
Change of plans. I need to haul a dog to the vet so I'm just going to start an
i386 upgrade test ;^)
Lance
--- On Wed, 4/3/13, Lance wrote:
> From: Lance
> Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Alt images and encryption
> To: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net, phi...@ubuntu.com
> Date: Wednesd
r of testing the new i386 netboot
image and possibly the amd64 live image.
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
nded up being kernel related so I just skipped from Jaunty to Lucid.
Sorry to be clueless,
Lance
--- On Mon, 4/1/13, Jose Lopez wrote:
From: Jose Lopez
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Lubuntu 12.10, 13.04 reboot
To: "Lance"
Cc: "lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net"
Date: Monday, April 1
Thanks Phill. I just don't like leaving questions totally unanswered, even if I
don't know the answer :^)
Lance
--- On Mon, 4/1/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Lubuntu 12.10, 13.04 reboot
To: "Lance"
Cc: "
am/Cadence/Raring
I can see that the QA Tracker has frozen some images:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/243/builds
That leads me to believe that we'll have an actual test cycle but I'm not sure
what to expect.
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post
Well I'm clueless :^(
Do we have any laptop or netbook users on the team that have experienced this?
Would Jonathan or Phill care to weigh in on this?
Lance
--- On Sun, 3/31/13, Jose Lopez wrote:
From: Jose Lopez
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Lubuntu 12.10, 13.04 reboot
To: "
Would it be possible for you to cross-test with Ubuntu itself on the same
hardware?
I've not seen that behavior on any of my hardware but I use only i386 which
I've found to be quite stable.
Lance
--- On Sun, 3/31/13, Jose Lopez wrote:
From: Jose Lopez
Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Lub
Thanks Phil.
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Netboot i386 mini.iso failure
To: "Lance"
Cc: "lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net"
Date: Friday, March 29, 2013, 6:57 PM
Hi Lance,
I went and asked...
(23:39:37) phillw1:
I didn't save Julien's response but he said it was being considered. I think 30
to 36 months is probably the maximum length of time we'd want to go,
particularly since we're the only ones using Chromium as our default browser.
Let's just go with what the boss says ;^)
Wow, you're all "wikified" ;^) I like the way that looks. I'm too busy ATM to
really get involved but it would be super-cool for you to bring that up again
just after we release Raring.
Maybe we could share some tweaks:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2099506
Lan
rdless I'm in for the long run and I'll go along with whatever Julien
decides. IMHO Julien is our SABDFL and his word on things is final :^)
Lance
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Fwd: S Release Schedule
To: "lubuntu-qa@l
ing that we kept the alternate
images alive. A lot of people may need to do a CLI install using our alternates
;^)
RE:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1161898
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
omeone at least make that master bug public?
With that and bug #1080701 testing is quite difficult to complete.
Neither bug is exclusive to Lubuntu however, they both effect other flavors
including Ubuntu ;^)
Lance
PS: I'm glad we kept the alternate images alive ;^)
--
Mailing list: https://
I think this is the message that is attempting to display:
http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/ubuntu-initrd-bug.html
Lance
--- On Wed, 3/20/13, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
From: Ali Linx (amjjawad)
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Lubuntu 13.04 failed twice to work after fresh new
installation
To
, but Ubuntu 10.04 server is good for another 2 years :^)
Other than making that decision I think the minimal install page looks good.
Lance
--- On Tue, 3/19/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] 13.04 pages
To: lubuntu-wiki-d...@lists.launchpad.net, lubun
icholas
because I've largely found it to be a somewhat safer, and certainly faster way
to upgrade than using the update manager.
Just thinking out loud,
Lance
--- On Tue, 3/19/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Fwd: Changes in Ubuntu re
;Aere Greenway" , "Lance" Cc: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.netDate: Friday, March 15, 2013, 8:43 PMHi Aere,the sex, sexuality, religion. physical handicaps, age, race / creed etc. of people is of little interest to me. It took me nearly two years to be finally
'prodded' by oth
tests. While that's cool I'm sure he's a busy man :^)
We shouldn't fall into a hole like this when one of us in unable to test. I do
try to promote Lubuntu while it's in development:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2099506
Any thoughts about recruiting iso-tester
Sorry I missed Beta 1 testing, I was certainly ready to take on the i386 live
and alternate images but my internet went down Monday afternoon and AT&T
couldn't get someone out here to fix things until late yesterday :^(
I was forced to change from AT&T DSL to U-verse on Feb 19th and things were
Is there a reason we're not yet seeing Beta 1 pre-release testing images
available on the QA Tracker?
If I'm just being impatient please accept my apologies in advance.
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscri
arthritis that typing is both painful and clumsy so I tend to keep things as
simple as possible.
The terminal is by default already "looking in" Home so look at these two
examples:
Example #1:
lance@lance-desktop:~$ ls /home/lance/Downloads
Debian
point that out because sometimes a lower case "L" is
confused as upper case "i") is used to see what is in the current directory.
Now, as far as naming any folder or directory that's simply a personal choice.
But, just as an example, since I test both Ubuntu and Lubunt
- changes the directory
As an example if I open my terminal and type ls I see:
lance@lance-desktop:~$ ls
Backups Documents examples.desktop Music Public Templates
Desktop Downloads I'm_lost.png Pictures Reorganize_me Videos
If I cd to Downloads and the
fact
that we'll adapt to whatever changes are actually adopted!
The sky is NOT falling!
Lance
--- On Thu, 3/7/13, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
From: Ali Linx (amjjawad)
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] changes to release cycle.
To: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Date: Thursday, March 7, 2013, 6
I'm subscribed now ;^)
Lance
--- On Thu, 3/7/13, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
From: Nicholas Skaggs
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Broken installer theme in lubuntu.
To: "Lance"
Cc: "Jackson Doak" , lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net,
"ubuntu-qual...@lists.ubuntu.com"
onstraints
and illness, so if that bug effects only architectures other than i386 I can't
help :^(
Since we had no Alphas I truly hope we can get all testers on board for the
Betas!
Lance
--- On Thu, 3/7/13, Jackson Doak wrote:
From: Jackson Doak
Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Broken installer t
Thanks Julien. I see this AM that Mark has also weighed in on the subject in
his typical calm and reassuring manner:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1228
Lance
--- On Thu, 3/7/13, Julien Lavergne wrote:
From: Julien Lavergne
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] changes to release cycle.
To
Oops, I said "Alpha 1" when I intended to say "Beta 1". Please don't send me to
the corner with my well deserved dunce cap.
Lance
--- On Wed, 3/6/13, Lance wrote:
> From: Lance
> Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Proposed dev cycle changes and testing
> To: lubuntu
me new images from Monday thru Thursday
next week. And if I turn out to be wrong I still believe no testing is wasted
;^)
Lance
PS: I also think we should be more cautious about our public mailing list
rants. I've been as frustrated as anyone with certain changes but Ubuntu and
C
attention.
Now it's just a crap shoot.
Lance
--- On Fri, 2/22/13, Jackson Doak wrote:
From: Jackson Doak
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Desktop, Alternate and flavours
To: "Nicholas Skaggs"
Cc: "Lance" , "lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net"
, "P
eir testing has no impact.
Don't be surprised when testers drop out after seeing weeks, months or even
years of critical (and fixable) bugs going unattended.
Lance
--- On Fri, 2/22/13, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
From: Nicholas Skaggs
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] D
lls :^(
I hate to be the turd in the punch-bowl, but why bother testing if nothing ever
gets fixed?
Lance
PS: this is an indication that "cadence" should be renamed, maybe to "we'll
look at it later"!
--- On Thu, 2/21/13, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill White
In deed. As far back as I can remember you must still use "sudo
update-alternatives --config x-www-browser" to actually change the default
browser.
I've just become so used to it that I don't even think twice anymore.
Lance
--- On Wed, 2/20/13, Lars Noodén wrote:
I'm also going to be doing quite a lot of Ubuntu and Xubuntu 12.04.2 testing so
forgive me if I don't get much done ;^)
I would suggest though that we try to nail down this bug because if you can't
install you can't test:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1080701
On anoth
hat
Julien jumped in with that addition to one of his PPA's ;^)
But, beyond the complications explained above, my general use of Abiword is
fairly mundane so I wondered if an actual test-case exists?
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.l
ee space exists.
It's all good clean fun :^)
Lance
--- On Tue, 10/30/12, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Dropping Alphas for raring cycle
To: "Lance"
Cc: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2012, 7:41 PM
Hi,
y
another for encryption of only the desired partitions(s) via manual
partitioning
Best case scenario is 20 to 30 minutes per test if no major bugs are
encountered. This will be a bit more than just a heavy lift IMHO :^)
Lance
--- On Tue, 10/30/12, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
want to do is discourage testers from participating.
Lance
--- On Tue, 10/30/12, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Dropping Alphas for raring cycle
To: "Lance"
Cc: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net, "Julien Lavergne"
Date: Tuesday, October 3
e?
If so it's a major overload and I think that type of test cycle will only serve
to discourage volunteer testing :^(
Lance
--- On Tue, 10/30/12, Lance wrote:
From: Lance
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Dropping Alphas for raring cycle
To: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net, "Phill Whites
CD/DVD/USB options which I've actually found to be a
truly great option since Maverick ;^)
I just hope they keep Nicholas where he is! He seems to listen and he's open to
change when and where change is needed.
Lance
PS: I've been doing some Precise 'abiword' testin
I see Julien has knocked out most of what I was going to do ;^)
I love this team, Lubuntu rocks!
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https://help.launchpad.net
ot; so I end up with a blank screen.
And It took three installs for me to figure out what was biting me in the butt
;^)
I'm loath to file a bug against that behavior because it truly is a corner
issue, I mean how many of of use a KVM switch?
As Greg said, I'll test until my eyes close,
o pull that off,
Lance
--- On Wed, 10/17/12, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] PPC
To: "Greg Faith"
Cc: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2012, 4:54 PM
Hi Greg,
with all the respins, the table looks a bit barren. ppc-alter
Just thought to add:
I may not have time to do the amd64 PP -> QQ upgrade test though. It'll be a
back burner issue for me ;^(
Lance
PS, it's purely a time availability issue.
--- On Wed, 10/17/12, Lance wrote:
From: Lance
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] PPC
To: "UH" , &q
I'm just finishing up with i386 and unless something horrible happens I can
jump on the amd64 images soon.
Lance
--- On Wed, 10/17/12, Greg Faith wrote:
From: Greg Faith
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] PPC
To: "UH"
Cc: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Date: Wednesday, October 17
g should display the appropriate upgrade message?
That other initial boot error is nothing to really worry about but should it be
mentioned in the release notes?
Sorry to be a pain,
Lance
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : h
OTOH I notice the subscriptions now show up properly on the tracker ;^)
Lance
--- On Mon, 9/24/12, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] QA Beta 2
To: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: "Ubuntu Mailing list"
Date: Monday, September 24, 2012, 9:13 PM
H
quest.
Phill would know much more about that than I do. So I wonder if we've included
Julien in this conversation yet?
IMHO any bug that has a potential of resulting in data loss is critical so we
need to give it the absolute highest priority.
Lance
--- On Sat, 9/8/12, Karl Anliot wrote:
I doubt it's plymouth. It almost surely has to do with the mechanism put in
place when Ubuntu itself dropped unity-2d and metacity in favor of using compiz
+ llvmpipe.
I can understand Ubuntu dropping support for 5 to 7 year old graphics chips,
but not Lubuntu or Xubuntu ;^)
Lance
--- O
ne
knowledgeable enough to try and nail down the problem.
I can't help but feel that posts like this are trying to scapegoat the testing
community while the real problem lies with design and development :^(
Lance
--- On Thu, 8/30/12, Phill Whiteside wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside
Subj
rver-xorg-video-openchrome/+bug/1041625
If this is just the end of support for most hardware that's more than five
years old then it needs to be said loudly and clearly.
Lance
--- On Mon, 8/27/12, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
From: a.gra...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [U+1] Fwd: Pro
ouble buffering in order to prevent
crash on 'Paste Unformatted'.
-- Dmitry Smirnov Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:08:23 +1000
So I'd appreciate everyone that is familiar with abiword to test the puddin'
out of it over the next week or so ;^)
It looks good to me but my use of a wo
litch????
Lance
--- On Thu, 8/23/12, Greg Faith wrote:
From: Greg Faith
Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] qa Tracker ahead of Spins?
To: "Nicholas Skaggs" , "Ubuntu Mailing list"
, lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Date: Thursday, August 23, 2012, 9:59 PM
So I decided to do a few live session
Too, too funny ;^)
Laughed so hard I scared the dogs.
Lance
--- On Fri, 8/17/12, Karl Anliot wrote:
From: Karl Anliot
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Survey Results
To: "Phill Whiteside"
Cc: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Date: Friday, August 17, 2012, 4:04 AM
I was just watching this
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
