Thanks Phill. Off-topic, but I am now running an i386 standard upgrade test just to be sure we're not borked in that regard :^)
BTW did you decide to mention in the release notes that some VIA graphics chips are borked? I wish I could get a reply from someone at Xorg on that bug :^( Lance ________________________________ From: Phill Whiteside <phi...@ubuntu.com> To: Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com> Cc: lubuntu-qa <lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:50 PM Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Apport malfunction or PCManFM bug? I've also see it with chromium, now that beta-2 is completed, next time I get a false alarm, I'll add it and link it to your bug report. If others can also add such false alarms, we can bring it to the attention of the team who look after the crash reports. regards, Phill. On 23 September 2013 17:43, Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com> wrote: As we head into Beta 2 testing I decided to test the heck out of all apps and encountered this: > > >https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcmanfm/+bug/1229181 > > >I personally think it's a sensitivity issue with apport rather than a PCManFM >bug but wanted to share that. > >Lance >-- >Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa >Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net >Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa >More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
