SuibianP wrote:
I don't have commit access and please kindly help commit on my behalf when you
see fit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140908
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ppc64le-flang-rhel-clang`
running on `ppc64le-flang-rhel-test` while building
`clang-tools-extra,clang,lldb` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/157/builds/2
https://github.com/jasonmolenda approved this pull request.
This looks good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138416
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang-tools-extra,clang,lldb` at
step 6 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/32614
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: John Harrison (ashgti)
Changes
In lldb-dap, we have existing tests that are known to be unstable when lldb and
lldb-dap are built in the Debug configuration.
This decorator lets us skip those tests in CI jobs that are to slow with those
c
https://github.com/ashgti created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141159
In lldb-dap, we have existing tests that are known to be unstable when lldb and
lldb-dap are built in the Debug configuration.
This decorator lets us skip those tests in CI jobs that are to slow with those
conf
ashgti wrote:
This patch has grown a bit due to discovering a number of issues in some of the
tests.
I think I'll try splitting it up into smaller patches instead.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140777
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-co
@@ -1102,3 +1103,28 @@ def is_feature_enabled():
return "%s is not supported on this system." % feature
return skipTestIfFn(is_feature_enabled)
+
+
+def skipIfBinaryToLarge(path: Optional[str], maxSize: int):
+"""Skip the test if a binary is to large.
+
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""
+Usage: LLDB_MAJOR_VERSION
LLDB_MINOR_VERSION LLDB_PATCH_VERSION
+
+This script uncomments and populates the versioning information in
lldb-defines.h
+"""
+
+import argparse
+import os
+import re
+
+LLDB_VERSION_REGEX = re.compile(
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+//===-- lldb-defines.h --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// Run the convert script on it, then run the framework include fix on it. The
framework version fix script
+// expects that all lldb references have been renamed to lldb-rpc in order for
it to modify the includes
+// to go into the framework.
https://github.com/ashgti updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140777
>From e50ea7d279adcb181f68a7156b5fc12d1047f402 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Harrison
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 11:09:35 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb-dap] Test gardening, enabling tests and improving
doc
ashgti wrote:
I have a change to remove the size check on the binary and yea, these tests are
broken on macOS for sure.
If this is submitted, then I'll rebase my changes on this, otherwise I also
have a patch that could fix this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140908
__
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`amdgpu-offload-ubuntu-22-cmake-build-only` running on `rocm-docker-ubu-22`
while building `clang-tools-extra,clang,lldb` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/203/builds
chelcassanova wrote:
> There is functionality in lldb/scripts/framework-header-fix.sh that does the
> same thing. Can you remove this functionality from that script too?
Yeah, I can remove that. The ultimate goal I want here is:
1. Fixing up the versioning takes place in its own script (the one
https://github.com/chelcassanova updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138028
>From 0b83514cde0b6fa2adc8c31a082a03770248ae4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chelsea Cassanova
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 13:37:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb][RPC] Upstream Python scripts
As part of upstre
https://github.com/chelcassanova updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138028
>From 31161db1c9b0bd040513eb8ff4504c29d1e6c04f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chelsea Cassanova
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 13:37:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb][RPC] Upstream Python scripts
As part of upstre
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// Copy lldb-defines.h from source.
+# RUN: mkdir -p %t/input
+# RUN: mkdir -p %t/output
+# RUN: cp %p/../../../../../include/lldb/lldb-defines.h %t/input
chelcassanova wrote:
Nice, I didn't know that about llvm-lit. I'll change everything to us
https://github.com/da-viper approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140908
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Jlalond wrote:
@labath So I moved the behavior to platform, I agree it's cleaner this way. One
area that I couldn't decide is if the ValueObj should be constructed in
Platform or not. Because Thread calls out to platform I just decided to call
the existing method, but I wanted your feedback on
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`amdgpu-offload-rhel-9-cmake-build-only` running on `rocm-docker-rhel-9` while
building `clang-tools-extra,clang,lldb` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/205/builds/10
https://github.com/Jlalond updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140150
>From 94d78d5ea7866fe896381319c875d6b9c3d34c90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Lalonde
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:57:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] Update ThreadElfCore
---
lldb/include/lldb/Target/UnixSi
https://github.com/eronnen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140975
>From 419aa75b4f0d3fe54a3e08c8223906224bad2822 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ely Ronnen
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 02:44:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb-dap] attempt to fix test_disassemble
---
lldb/test/API/
https://github.com/eronnen edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140975
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp --
lldb/tools/lldb-dap/Handler/DisassembleRequestHandler
eronnen wrote:
@medismailben I tested locally and now the test should be fixed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140975
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`amdgpu-offload-rhel-8-cmake-build-only` running on `rocm-docker-rhel-8` while
building `clang-tools-extra,clang,lldb` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/204/builds/10
jansvoboda11 wrote:
Thanks, I'll fix those ASAP.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139584
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord commented:
There is functionality in `lldb/scripts/framework-header-fix.sh` that does the
same thing. Can you remove this functionality from that script too?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141116
___
lldb-commit
kazutakahirata wrote:
> Thanks, I'll fix those ASAP.
@jansvoboda11 Please feel free to add me as a reviewer. I am happy to build
things with your fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139584
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists
kazutakahirata wrote:
@jansvoboda11 I also see:
```
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/plugin/ClangTidyPlugin.cpp:45:51: error: too few
arguments to function call, expected 2, have 1
45 | Context->setDiagnosticsEngine(DiagEngine.get());
| ~
@@ -88,6 +89,42 @@ class IdentifierNode : public ASTNode {
std::string m_name;
};
+class MemberOfNode : public ASTNode {
+public:
+ MemberOfNode(uint32_t location, ASTNodeUP base, bool is_arrow,
+ std::string name, lldb::DynamicValueType use_dynamic,
+
https://github.com/cmtice updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138093
>From fe9ac0fa05bb43ea718214746f0ea9b7eefc929a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caroline Tice
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 00:05:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [LLDB] Add field member operators to DIL
Add the arrow and pe
https://github.com/JDevlieghere closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140958
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2025-05-22T13:04:13-07:00
New Revision: 48ace3f872e4d844471cd1e821502dece3fe2bc0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/48ace3f872e4d844471cd1e821502dece3fe2bc0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/48ace3f872e4d844471cd1e821502dece3fe2bc0.d
https://github.com/da-viper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141122
>From a839dde6f9be0d3cbec73b9c001144b6cdbdc732 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ebuka Ezike
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 23:26:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [lldb][lldb-dap] support DataBreakpointBytes capability
---
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`cross-project-tests-sie-ubuntu` running on `doug-worker-1a` while building
`clang-tools-extra,clang,lldb` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/181/builds/2022
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building
`clang-tools-extra,clang,lldb` at step 4 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/17038
H
https://github.com/da-viper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141122
>From a839dde6f9be0d3cbec73b9c001144b6cdbdc732 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ebuka Ezike
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 23:26:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [lldb][lldb-dap] support DataBreakpointBytes capability
---
jansvoboda11 wrote:
Are those in the upstream repo? If so, where are they coming from? I have a
sparse checkout, so it's possible I missed some non-Clang and non-LLDB usages
of `DiagnosticOptions`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139584
___
https://github.com/chelcassanova updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141116
>From 70c3d439f67c331823a218b76feef7fddd34c4d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chelsea Cassanova
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 11:00:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb][headers] Create script to fix up versioning
Th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-win-fast` running on `as-builder-3` while building
`clang-tools-extra,clang,lldb` at step 6 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/2/builds/24607
Here
kazutakahirata wrote:
> > @jansvoboda11 I've revered your PR due buildbot failures above (and my
> > local build failures with the same error messages). I'm happy to try your
> > revised patch to see if it build cleanly. Thanks!
>
> I already forward-fixed both failures:
> [d25f95f](https://g
jansvoboda11 wrote:
Reverted the revert, since the build now fails due to the forward-fixes not
being reverted...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139584
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `arc-builder` running on
`arc-worker` while building `clang-tools-extra,clang,lldb` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/3/builds/16354
Here is the relevant
jansvoboda11 wrote:
> @jansvoboda11 I've revered your PR due buildbot failures above (and my local
> build failures with the same error messages). I'm happy to try your revised
> patch to see if it build cleanly. Thanks!
I already forward-fixed both failures: d25f95fdbc5314f30618912e18f00ad4dd
https://github.com/da-viper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135778
>From 8070e1a391d876ccbab25dac6d2a6d2d77f16069 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ebuka Ezike
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:25:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [lldb] Add test for jumping by offset
Signed-off-by: Ebuka E
kazutakahirata wrote:
@jansvoboda11 I've revered your PR due buildbot failures above (and my local
build failures with the same error messages). I'm happy to try your revised
patch to see if it build cleanly. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139584
_
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r HEAD~1...HEAD
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-dap/dap_server.py
lldb/packa
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Ebuka Ezike (da-viper)
Changes
This adds the support for `supportsBreakpointInfoBytes` to set watchpoint on a
address range.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141122.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/packa
https://github.com/da-viper created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141122
This adds the support for `supportsBreakpointInfoBytes` to set watchpoint on a
address range.
>From a839dde6f9be0d3cbec73b9c001144b6cdbdc732 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ebuka Ezike
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r HEAD~1...HEAD lldb/scripts/version-header-fix.py
``
View the diff from darker
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
Beautiful
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141066
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/chelcassanova updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141116
>From 6b43888f8eaf5d28c4fa58e716cc2c534f325c3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chelsea Cassanova
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 11:00:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb][headers] Create script to fix up versioning
Th
https://github.com/Bigcheese approved this pull request.
lgtm. I agree this makes the lifetime clearer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139584
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Chelsea Cassanova (chelcassanova)
Changes
This commit creates a Python script that fixes up the versioning information in
lldb-defines.h. It also moves the build logic for fixing up the lldb headers
from being in the framework only to bein
https://github.com/chelcassanova created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141116
This commit creates a Python script that fixes up the versioning information in
lldb-defines.h. It also moves the build logic for fixing up the lldb headers
from being in the framework only to being in th
https://github.com/kuilpd edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141102
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ image show-unwind -n func0
# CHECK-NEXT: This UnwindPlan is sourced from the compiler: yes.
# CHECK-NEXT: This UnwindPlan is valid at all instruction locations: no.
# CHECK-NEXT: This UnwindPlan is for a trap handler function: no.
-# CHECK-NEXT: Address range
kuilpd wrote:
@labath
This code
```
llvm::Expected num_children = synthetic->GetNumChildren(child_idx
+ 1);
```
didn't work for `std::vector` on Windows on AArch64, got a buildbot error
there: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/141/builds/8906
```
AssertionError: ':1:7: array index
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Ilia Kuklin (kuilpd)
Changes
---
Patch is 21.53 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141102.diff
13 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/docs/dil-expr-lang.ebnf (+7-2)
- (modified) l
https://github.com/kuilpd created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141102
None
>From ad2c40ea689c71074237287989fa7ae01bd428e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ilia Kuklin
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 16:15:11 +0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [LLDB] Add array subscription and integer parsing to DIL
@@ -1102,3 +1103,28 @@ def is_feature_enabled():
return "%s is not supported on this system." % feature
return skipTestIfFn(is_feature_enabled)
+
+
+def skipIfBinaryToLarge(path: Optional[str], maxSize: int):
+"""Skip the test if a binary is to large.
+
@@ -10,8 +10,16 @@ add_lldb_unittest(DAPTests
VariablesTest.cpp
LINK_LIBS
+liblldb
lldbDAP
+lldbUtilityHelpers
LLVMTestingSupport
LINK_COMPONENTS
Support
)
+
+set(test_inputs
+ linux-x86_64.out
+ linux-x86_64.core
JDevliegher
https://github.com/ashgti closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140738
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -100,29 +100,25 @@ function(add_lldb_library name)
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -fPIC")
labath wrote:
Yes, kinda, although it's moot while it's unused. However, the idea was that if
someone explicitly asks for an OBJECT library, he should get
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64-aix` running
on `aix-ppc64` while building `bolt,clang,flang,lld,lldb,mlir,polly` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/64/builds/37
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// clang-format off
+
+// REQUIRES: target-windows
+// RUN: %build --compiler=clang-cl -o %t.exe --std c++20 -- %s
+// RUN: env LLDB_USE_NATIVE_PDB_READER=1 %lldb -f %t.exe -o "b main" -o "run"
-o "fr v" -o c | FileCheck %s
+
+#include
DavidSpi
SuibianP wrote:
The FIFO file served two purposes,
- Send real target PID back to debugger
- Synchronisation: Prevent premature execution of target
And the original implementation 0f0462c states the reason against socket and
signal,
> I'm using this instead of using a signal or a similar mecha
@@ -100,29 +100,25 @@ function(add_lldb_library name)
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -fPIC")
DavidSpickett wrote:
> And even if they did, llvm_add_library should know how to handle that.
Oh is this why you left those bits in?
https://github.com/ll
@@ -100,29 +100,25 @@ function(add_lldb_library name)
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -fPIC")
DavidSpickett wrote:
Also the bit:
```
elseif (PARAM_OBJECT)
set(libkind OBJECT)
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141066
@@ -100,29 +100,25 @@ function(add_lldb_library name)
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -fPIC")
DavidSpickett wrote:
Should you remove OBJECT from:
```
cmake_parse_arguments(PARAM
"MODULE;SHARED;STATIC;OBJECT;PLUGIN;FRAMEWORK;NO_INTERNAL_DEPENDE
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141063
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -93,13 +93,6 @@ function(add_lldb_library name)
set(libkind STATIC)
endif()
- #PIC not needed on Win
- # FIXME: Setting CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS here is a no-op, use target_compile_options
DavidSpickett wrote:
Sounds reasonable, I've been bitten by distro c
@@ -93,13 +93,6 @@ function(add_lldb_library name)
set(libkind STATIC)
endif()
- #PIC not needed on Win
- # FIXME: Setting CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS here is a no-op, use target_compile_options
labath wrote:
I believe we don't -- and I think that's the right thi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
Nothing in lldb sets this. And even if they did, llvm_add_library should know
how to handle that.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141066.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/cma
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141066
Nothing in lldb sets this. And even if they did, llvm_add_library should know
how to handle that.
>From b2d4e92fcc647d36671c5de682e3af2d1978de0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Labath
Date: Thu, 22 May 202
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141063
Like the comment says, this really is a no-op and has no offect on the
generated build commants.
>From 5eac5e7976005c74d5e1d669a64596688b3d8d25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Labath
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025
@@ -93,13 +93,6 @@ function(add_lldb_library name)
set(libkind STATIC)
endif()
- #PIC not needed on Win
- # FIXME: Setting CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS here is a no-op, use target_compile_options
DavidSpickett wrote:
Do we in fact use target_compile_options? Or do
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141063
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141063
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
Like the comment says, this really is a no-op and has no offect on the
generated build commants.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141063.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/cmak
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141062.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/source/Core/AddressRange.cpp (+7-4)
- (modified) lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/Breakpad/stack-cfi-parsi
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141062
None
>From 298dcd8cc367050e7dcb6dd8644073305c72c6e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Labath
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 14:53:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Make AddressRange dump easier on the eye
---
lldb/s
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// clang-format off
+
+// REQUIRES: target-windows
+// RUN: %build --compiler=clang-cl -o %t.exe --std c++20 -- %s
+// RUN: env LLDB_USE_NATIVE_PDB_READER=1 %lldb -f %t.exe -o "b main" -o "run"
-o "fr v" -o c | FileCheck %s
+
+#include
Michael1
https://github.com/kuilpd closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141059
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Ilia Kuklin
Date: 2025-05-22T17:33:01+05:00
New Revision: 5df819ffb32530dff9342a970ffd1527ea1c31bb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5df819ffb32530dff9342a970ffd1527ea1c31bb
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5df819ffb32530dff9342a970ffd1527ea1c31bb.diff
L
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Ilia Kuklin (kuilpd)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#138551
---
Patch is 21.24 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141059.diff
13 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/docs/dil-expr-
https://github.com/kuilpd created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141059
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#138551
>From b2e110036df39bb33163b5cd6c8dacf9253b6b33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ilia Kuklin
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 17:29:24 +0500
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[LLDB] Add array subscrip
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140761
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Pavel Labath
Date: 2025-05-22T14:18:35+02:00
New Revision: b63c1c47b78a3c7af3014c4c77d1aad87ec78729
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b63c1c47b78a3c7af3014c4c77d1aad87ec78729
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b63c1c47b78a3c7af3014c4c77d1aad87ec78729.diff
https://github.com/labath closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140927
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// clang-format off
+
+// REQUIRES: target-windows
+// RUN: %build --compiler=clang-cl -o %t.exe --std c++20 -- %s
+// RUN: env LLDB_USE_NATIVE_PDB_READER=1 %lldb -f %t.exe -o "b main" -o "run"
-o "fr v" -o c | FileCheck %s
+
+#include
Michael1
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// clang-format off
+
+// REQUIRES: target-windows
+// RUN: %build --compiler=clang-cl -o %t.exe --std c++20 -- %s
+// RUN: env LLDB_USE_NATIVE_PDB_READER=1 %lldb -f %t.exe -o "b main" -o "run"
-o "fr v" -o c | FileCheck %s
+
+#include
Nerixyz
https://github.com/HemangGadhavi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138687
>From a47e4642e6ebcbe6b5466ff118968bac83ccf1e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: HemangGadhavi
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 07:59:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb][AIX] get host info for AIX (cont..)
---
lldb/s
https://github.com/HemangGadhavi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138687
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140761
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140761
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140761
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
HemangGadhavi wrote:
> The failure is in lldb_private::HostInfoBase::GetArchitecture. To fix this,
> you need to `Initialize()` the HostInfo class.
Thank you @labath. Thanks for the guidance, it worked.
Could you please review and give your comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
