Re: [PATCH v2] 8xx: Add support for the MPC852 based board from keymile.

2008-03-18 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Stephen, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:24:30 +0100 Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >> +struct cpm_pin { >> +int port, pin, flags; >> +}; > > I wish someone would consolidate all these definitions of cpm_pin. Hmm... do you mean something like,

Re: [PATCH v2] 8xx: Add support for the MPC852 based board from keymile.

2008-03-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Heiko, On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:13:06 +0100 Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:24:30 +0100 Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > >> +struct cpm_pin { > >> + int port, pin, flags; > >> +}; > > > > I wish someone

Re: [PATCH v2] 8xx: Add support for the MPC852 based board from keymile.

2008-03-18 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Stephen, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:13:06 +0100 Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:24:30 +0100 Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [...] +struct cpm_pin { + int port, pin, flags; >>

[PATCH v3] 8xx: Add support for the MPC852 based board from keymile.

2008-03-18 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello, Add support for the MPC852 based mgsuvd board from keymile to arch/powerpc. Supported SMC1 (serial console), SCC3 Ethernet (10Mbps hdx) Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mgsuvd.dts | 158 +++ arch/powerpc/configs/mgsuvd_defconfig | 827

Re: Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git

2008-03-18 Thread Bartlomiej Sieka
Grant Likely wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] we were hoping that the changes would go upstream (in 2.6.25). I can see that the .dts files for those boards are in the mainline already, but I see no trace of for example _defconfig files

Re: Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git

2008-03-18 Thread Bartlomiej Sieka
Grant Likely wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] It may be argued that this code should be moved somewhere else, but I don't remeber to have seen any such review comments. The LED code just hasn't been picked up. IIRC, it was reworked to m

Re: simple MPC5200B system

2008-03-18 Thread Andre Schwarz
Grant, I've pulled the latest git and built a mpc5200_simple system with a minimal dts. There's not a single char put on the console Grant Likely schrieb: On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:15 PM, André Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All, I'm quite stuck in getting our MPC5200B based

Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] 83xx: MPC837xRDB's VSC7385 ethernet switch isn't on the MDIO bus

2008-03-18 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 18:08 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > eth0 is also up, was it commit 4942bd80e83d13bf394df4a8109bee39d861820f > > that fixed that bug? > > Yep. Unfortunately, I don't really know enough about the ucc_geth driver to > know what could be wrong. I ju

Re: Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git

2008-03-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 09:29 +0100, Bartlomiej Sieka wrote: > Grant Likely wrote: > > The LED code just hasn't been picked up. IIRC, it was reworked to > > make it a proper driver in drivers/leds. > > Yes, the Motion-PRO LED driver has been reworked and posted: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxp

Re: simple MPC5200B system

2008-03-18 Thread Andre Schwarz
Grant, sorry for having troubled you. Looks like the build system has been in an invalid state... After doing a git-pull and "make distclean" + "make mpc5200_defconfig" the system is finally up and running. Using mpc5200-simple-platform machine description Linux version 2.6.25-rc6-00978-

Re: Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git

2008-03-18 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:42:14 -0600 "Grant Likely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear Grant, > > > > > > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > > > However, I have declined (for now) to pick up the defconfigs

[PATCH 1/2] [POWERPC] Add PPC4xx L2-cache support (440GX & 460EX/GT)

2008-03-18 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch adds support for the 256k L2 cache found on some IBM/AMCC 4xx PPC's. It introduces a common 4xx SoC file (sysdev/ppc4xx_soc.c) which currently "only" adds the L2 cache init code. Other common 4xx stuff can be added later here. The L2 cache handling code is just a copy of Eugene's code i

[PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] Add L2 cache node to AMCC Taishan dts file

2008-03-18 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch adds the L2 cache node to the Taishan 440GX dts file. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/taishan.dts | 10 ++ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/taishan.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/

Re: [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Support for Pause packets in EMAC driver

2008-03-18 Thread Valentine Barshak
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=120449748701492&w=2 I sent it to Ben with netdev on CC because you asked the various people sending NEWEMAC patches to you to find a single person. So from now on, what are we going to do? It seems we're playing net maintainer ru

Re: simple MPC5200B system

2008-03-18 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Grant, > > sorry for having troubled you. Looks like the build system has been in an > invalid state... > > After doing a git-pull and "make distclean" + "make mpc5200_defconfig" the > system is finally up and running.

Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] 83xx: MPC837xRDB's VSC7385 ethernet switch isn't on the MDIO bus

2008-03-18 Thread Timur Tabi
Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > Found it, the eth1 i/f on this board isn't working and does not generate > any clocks which makes ugeth_graceful_stop_tx() hang forever. Well, that doesn't make it very graceful, does it? :-) Can you fix this yourself, or do you want me to file an internal bug report?

Re: [PATCH v2] Force 4K pages for IO addresses.

2008-03-18 Thread Nathan Lynch
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 19:34 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:54:19PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > > > Currently HEA requires 4K pages for IO resources. Just set the pages > > > size to > > > IO to 4K. > > > > Well, that's too bad. Why

Re: Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git

2008-03-18 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Grant, > > Yes, the Motion-PRO LED driver has been reworked and posted: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?q=Motion-pro&id=16617 > > > > > I need to look at it again, > > but it is a lot of code for a ver

Re: [PATCH v2] 8xx: Add support for the MPC852 based board from keymile.

2008-03-18 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 09:04:14AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: > OK. Another thought about this. Shouldnt this table go in the dts? > A device node like > > cpm_pin { > pins = ; > }; > > would be nice, or? Well, the device tree is a mechanism for communicating from the firmware to the ker

Re: simple MPC5200B system

2008-03-18 Thread Andre Schwarz
Grant Likely schrieb: On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Grant, sorry for having troubled you. Looks like the build system has been in an invalid state... After doing a git-pull and "make distclean" + "make mpc5200_defconfig" the system is finally u

Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] 83xx: MPC837xRDB's VSC7385 ethernet switch isn't on the MDIO bus

2008-03-18 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 09:32 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > Found it, the eth1 i/f on this board isn't working and does not generate > > any clocks which makes ugeth_graceful_stop_tx() hang forever. > > Well, that doesn't make it very graceful, does it? :-) Nope, :) >

Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] 83xx: MPC837xRDB's VSC7385 ethernet switch isn't on the MDIO bus

2008-03-18 Thread Timur Tabi
Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > I fixed it by adding a counter which aborts after 100 loops. If you > could move along the 2 patches I sent today, "Add Fixed PHY support for > ucc_geth" and "ucc_geth: Add 8 bytes to max TX frame for VLANs" into > 2.6.25 that would be great :) I have no control over tha

[PATCH] fsl_elbc_nand: fix mtd name

2008-03-18 Thread Anton Vorontsov
Currently fsl_elbc_nand doesn't initialize mtd->name, and this causes nand_get_flash_type() to assign name that is equal to chip type, like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/mtd dev:size erasesize name mtd0: 0080 0001 "fe00.flash" mtd1: 0200 4000 "NAND 32M

[PATCH] [POWERPC] 83xx: mpc837x_rdb: add simple-bus compatible matching

2008-03-18 Thread Anton Vorontsov
This is needed to probe nor and nand flashes on the localbus. Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc837x_rdb.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc837x_rdb.c b/arch/powerpc/platfor

Re: [PATCH] fsl_elbc_nand: fix mtd name

2008-03-18 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 06:43:44PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > With this patch applied fsl_elbc_nand chip will have proper name: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/mtd >dev:size erasesize name >mtd0: 0080 0001 "fe00.flash" >mtd1: 0200 4000 "e060.fl

[PATCH v2] fsl_elbc_nand: fix mtd name

2008-03-18 Thread Anton Vorontsov
Currently fsl_elbc_nand doesn't initialize mtd->name, and this causes nand_get_flash_type() to assign name that is equal to chip type, like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/mtd dev:size erasesize name mtd0: 0080 0001 "fe00.flash" mtd1: 0200 4000 "NAND 32M

Re: [BUG]2.6.25-rc6:Unable to handle kernel paging request

2008-03-18 Thread Michael Neuling
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Hi, > I found the following bug at kernel boot up on my power machine > with 2.6.25-rc6 kernel. > > USB Mass Storage support registered. > mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice > Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address > 0xd8

Re: [PATCH v2] fsl_elbc_nand: fix mtd name

2008-03-18 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 06:58:14PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > Oops, forgot the NULL checking. [snip] > + if (priv->mtd.name) > + kfree(priv->mtd.name); > + Not needed; kfree(NULL) is a no-op. -Scott ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Li

Re: [PATCH v2] 8xx: Add support for the MPC852 based board from keymile.

2008-03-18 Thread Vitaly Bordug
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:04:14 +0100 Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Stephen, > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:13:06 +0100 Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:24:30 +0100 Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>

Re: [PATCH v2] 8xx: Add support for the MPC852 based board from keymile.

2008-03-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Well, the device tree is a mechanism for communicating from the firmware > to the kernel, and if we could control the firmware better we'd just make > it set the pins properly to begin with. :-) Is this just a comment, or do you oppose Hei

Re: simple MPC5200B system

2008-03-18 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've read some discussions about the "interrupt-map" attribute of the pci > node. I tried to follow Ben and David in their explanations - obviously I > didn't really get it. > Looks like there are a lot of people outside

Re: [PATCH] Add Fixed PHY support for ucc_geth

2008-03-18 Thread Vitaly Bordug
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:46:55 +0100 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > The new Fixed PHY method, fixed-link property, isn't > impl. for ucc_geth which makes fixed PHYs non functional. > Add support for the new method to restore the Fixed PHY > functionality. > Makes sense to me, but let's cc linuxppc-devel

[PATCH v3] fsl_elbc_nand: fix mtd name

2008-03-18 Thread Anton Vorontsov
Currently fsl_elbc_nand doesn't initialize mtd->name, and this causes nand_get_flash_type() to assign name that is equal to chip type, like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/mtd dev:size erasesize name mtd0: 0080 0001 "fe00.flash" mtd1: 0200 4000 "NAND 32M

Re: Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git

2008-03-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 08:47 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Grant, > > > > Yes, the Motion-PRO LED driver has been reworked and posted: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?q=Motion-pro&id=16617 > > Okay, I'

Re: simple MPC5200B system

2008-03-18 Thread Andre Schwarz
Grant Likely schrieb: On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've read some discussions about the "interrupt-map" attribute of the pci node. I tried to follow Ben and David in their explanations - obviously I didn't really get it. Looks like there are a lo

Re: Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git

2008-03-18 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 08:47 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > I don't mind having a specific driver but I don't know anything about > the hardware its creating the interface for so I need the community's > help with that

Re: [PATCH v2] 8xx: Add support for the MPC852 based board from keymile.

2008-03-18 Thread Scott Wood
Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Scott, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: Well, the device tree is a mechanism for communicating from the firmware to the kernel, and if we could control the firmware better we'd just make it set the pins properly to begin with. :-) Is this just a comment, or

Re: [PATCH v2] Make 83xx perfmon support selectable

2008-03-18 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 05:59:03PM -0600, Andy Fleming wrote: > Not all e300 cores support the performance monitors, and the ones > that don't will be confused by the mf/mtpmr instructions. This > allows the support to be optional, so the 8349 can turn it off > while the 8379 can turn it on. Sadl

[PATCH][POWERPC] bootwrapper: Add a firmware-independent simpleboot target.

2008-03-18 Thread Grant Likely
From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This target produces a flat binary rather than an ELF file, fixes the entry point at the beginning of the image, and takes a complete device tree with no fixups needed. Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This has been tested on a Xilinx Vir

Re: [PATCH 6/8] [POWERPC] sysdev,qe_lib: implement FSL GTM support

2008-03-18 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 08:24:29PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > +Required properties: > + - compatible : should be "fsl,gtm" ("fsl,qe-gtm" in addition for QE > + GTMs). > + - reg : should contain gtm registers location and length (0x40). > + - interrupts :

Re: [PATCH 3/8] [POWERPC] qe_lib: implement qe_muram_offset

2008-03-18 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 08:24:13PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > qe_muram_offset is the reverse of the qe_muram_addr, will be > used for the Freescale QE USB Host Controller driver. > > This patch also moves qe_muram_addr into the qe.h header, plus > adds __iomem hints to use with sparse. We sh

Re: [PATCH 6/8] [POWERPC] sysdev,qe_lib: implement FSL GTM support

2008-03-18 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:43:29PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 08:24:29PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > +Required properties: > > + - compatible : should be "fsl,gtm" ("fsl,qe-gtm" in addition for QE > > + GTMs). > > + - reg : should cont

Re: [PATCH 6/8] [POWERPC] sysdev,qe_lib: implement FSL GTM support

2008-03-18 Thread Scott Wood
Anton Vorontsov wrote: +arch_initcall(qe_init_gtm); If this happens before the gtm_init_gtm(), "If" isn't possible, order is guaranteed. You use arch_initcall for both, so you're relying on link order. I think this at least merits a comment. then np->data will not be set. It's a bug i

Re: [PATCH 6/8] [POWERPC] sysdev,qe_lib: implement FSL GTM support

2008-03-18 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 02:55:14PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >>>+arch_initcall(qe_init_gtm); > >>If this happens before the gtm_init_gtm(), > > > >"If" isn't possible, order is guaranteed. > > You use arch_initcall for both, so you're relying on link order. I > think th

Re: [PATCH v2] Force 4K pages for IO addresses.

2008-03-18 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 09:45 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 19:34 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:54:19PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > > > > Currently HEA requires 4K pages for IO resources. Just set the pages

Re: [PATCH 6/8] [POWERPC] sysdev,qe_lib: implement FSL GTM support

2008-03-18 Thread Scott Wood
Anton Vorontsov wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 02:55:14PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: Anton Vorontsov wrote: +arch_initcall(qe_init_gtm); If this happens before the gtm_init_gtm(), "If" isn't possible, order is guaranteed. You use arch_initcall for both, so you're relying on link order. I thin

Re: [PATCH v2] Force 4K pages for IO addresses.

2008-03-18 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 07:31:25AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 09:45 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote: > > The ibm,drc-names property of the root node should have "HEA" strings > > in it on systems where EHEA can potentially be present. > > Ah good, I didn't know. That wi

Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] Add L2 cache node to AMCC Taishan dts file

2008-03-18 Thread Segher Boessenkool
+ L2C0: [EMAIL PROTECTED] { + compatible = "ibm,l2-cache-440gx", "ibm,l2-cache"; + dcr-reg = <20 8 /* Internal SRAM DCR's */ + 30 8>;/* L2 cache DCR's */ The unit address is based on the _first_ entry in

Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] Add L2 cache node to AMCC Taishan dts file

2008-03-18 Thread David Gibson
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 02:37:46PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > This patch adds the L2 cache node to the Taishan 440GX dts file. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/taishan.dts | 10 ++ > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Xilinx: Add generic configuration option to enable all xilinx drivers.

2008-03-18 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the future, this will be used to provide similar configuration for > PowerPC and Microblaze. It may also be convenient for those using > Xilinx cores as peripherals for external processors, rather than > expli

RE: [PATCH] [RFC] Xilinx: Add generic configuration option to enable all xilinx drivers.

2008-03-18 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
Hmm... interesting points. I guess my feeling was that XILINX_DRIVERS could be a more broadly configurable option, with some of these ideas in mind. Currently, it's hidden by default, but we could easily change this to be visible by default, or selected by a broader number of architectures.

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Xilinx: Add generic configuration option to enable all xilinx drivers.

2008-03-18 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hmm... interesting points. I guess my feeling was that XILINX_DRIVERS could > be a more broadly configurable option, with some of these ideas in mind. > Currently, it's hidden by default, but we could easil

Re: [BUG]2.6.25-rc6:Unable to handle kernel paging request

2008-03-18 Thread Paul Mackerras
Sudhir Kumar writes: > Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address > 0xd82e Looks like some driver tried to access I/O port 0x2e without checking whether there was possibly anything there first. > Faulting instruction address: 0xc074ded8 > cpu 0x0: Vector: 300

[Fwd: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] Fix cell IOMMU code to cope with empty dma-ranges, and non-PCI devices]

2008-03-18 Thread Michael Ellerman
Forwarded Message From: Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] Fix cell IOMMU code to cope with empty dma-ranges, and non-PCI devices Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:47:39 +1100 (EST) The cell IOM

[PATCH] Hide resources on Axon PCIE root complex nodes

2008-03-18 Thread Michael Ellerman
The PCI bridge representing the PCIE root complex on Axon, contains device BARs for a memory range and ROM that define inbound accesses. This confuses the kernel resource management code, the resources need to be hidden when Axon is a host bridge. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH] Hide resources on Axon PCIE root complex nodes

2008-03-18 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 17:10 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > The PCI bridge representing the PCIE root complex on Axon, contains device > BARs for a memory range and ROM that define inbound accesses. This confuses > the kernel resource management code, the resources need to be hidden when > Axon i

Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] Add L2 cache node to AMCC Taishan dts file

2008-03-18 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 19 March 2008, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 02:37:46PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > > This patch adds the L2 cache node to the Taishan 440GX dts file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/taishan.dts | 10

Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] Add L2 cache node to AMCC Taishan dts file

2008-03-18 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > + L2C0: [EMAIL PROTECTED] { > > + compatible = "ibm,l2-cache-440gx", "ibm,l2-cache"; > > + dcr-reg = <20 8 /* Internal SRAM DCR's */ > > + 30 8>; /* L2 cache DCR's */ > >

Re: [PATCH v2] 8xx: Add support for the MPC852 based board from keymile.

2008-03-18 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Vitaly, Vitaly Bordug wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:04:14 +0100 > Heiko Schocher wrote: [...] >> OK. Another thought about this. Shouldnt this table go in the dts? >> A device node like >> >> cpm_pin { >> pins = ; >> }; >> >> would be nice, or? >> > This has been a disputable question