Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=120449748701492&w=2
I sent it to Ben with netdev on CC because you asked the various people
sending NEWEMAC patches to you to find a single person.
So from now on, what are we going to do? It seems we're playing net
maintainer russian roulette for NEWEMAC and it's getting old.
I'm happy to collect the patches. I said I would do it, I was just taken
aback a bit by Jeff suddenly merging two of Stefan patches directly :-)
I was actually planning this week to post a serie of all the pending
EMAC patches for final review.
Cheers,
Ben.
FYI, These are the NEWEMAC patches I've sent:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052114.html
(This is a TAH csum fix, that I don't see on the patchwork for some reason)
and a couple of PHY clock workarounds
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=17211
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=17212
The latter two patches depend on the "dcri_clrset" one:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=17199
Ben, could you please also take a look at the PCIe dcri_clrset stuff here
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=17214
(not EMAC related)
Thanks,
Valentine.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
