On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hmm... interesting points. I guess my feeling was that XILINX_DRIVERS could > be a more broadly configurable option, with some of these ideas in mind. > Currently, it's hidden by default, but we could easily change this to be > visible by default, or selected by a broader number of architectures. I > tend to think about them as a group: What if x86 *did* support the > primitives needed by these drivers, then if the individual drivers depend on > XILINX_DRIVERS, then the modification could be made in one spot. By your > suggestion, we would have to modify each one independantly.
Heh; it's not *that* many drivers and it's just Kconfig stuff which is real easy to change. My preference would be to eliminate XILINX_DRIVERS entirely, but I'm not going to fight about it. :-) Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
