>
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Guest section DW wrote:
>
> > I see that an entire discussion has taken place. Let me just remark this,
> > quoting the Austin draft:
> >
> > If the path argument refers to a path whose final component is either
> > dot or dot-dot, rmdir( ) shall fail.
> >
> > EINVAL
Sorry for being kind of OT but did anyone gpg --verify pre11?
It says BAD signature to me with key 517D0F0E which I think is the good
one.Just say yes if so and I'll try to see what I did wrong, don't wanna
waste your time :-)
Jani.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Sorry for being kind of OT but did anyone gpg --verify pre11?
> It says BAD signature to me with key 517D0F0E which I think is the good
> one.Just say yes if so and I'll try to see what I did wrong, don't wanna
> waste your time :-)
>
Sorry do
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 12:19:43AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> And a quick read of the code I pasted instead of just pasting
> suggests instead we should be using the patch below. Question
> however is who stole port 0x279 which is the normal port to use. It
> shouldnt be lp since lp is supposed to
I just got this on a dual Pentium III-700 system, running
2.4.0-test11-pre4; no special patches applied except for commenting out
the printk line generating the tons of "APIC error on CPU0" messages
generated on Gigabyte P2D boards:
Unexpected IRQ trap at vector 6c
kernel BUG at smp.c:281
ksymoo
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 09:32:39AM +0100, Eric Paire wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Guest section DW wrote:
> >
> > > I see that an entire discussion has taken place. Let me just remark this,
> > > quoting the Austin draft:
> > >
> > > If the path argument refers to a path whose final comp
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> ISDN_MODEM_ANZREG undefined on 2.4.0-10(11) and 2.2.18-22, rpm.spec is
> attached.
This has been fixed 2000/03/03, see below. Just use the latest version,
ftp.isdn4linux.de/pub/isdn4linux/utils/isdn4k-utils.v3.1pre1.tar.gz
--Kai
Index: iprofd.c
=
On 19 Nov 2000, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> Some generic way to make module args available as kernel args too
> would be nice. Or at least some simple one-liner I could put next to
> the MODULE_PARM() macro...
Well, I did a patch that does automagically convert MODULE_PARAM
stuff to __setup() functions
Andries,
Don't you mean
(drive->id->cfs_enable_1 & 0x0400) word85
and not
(drive->id->command_set_1 & 0x0400) word82
Because when bit 10 of word 85 is not set then clip or HPArea is not enabled.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research Group
EVP Linux Developmen
Le Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 01:11:33AM +, Alan Cox a écrit:
> Bugs to go: PS/2 mouse detection
> Anything which isnt a strict bug fix or previously agreed is now 2.2.19
> material.
Once again, I needed this patch by Dave Miller to compile the
kernel:
--- kernel/sysctl.c.~1~ Thu Nov 9 19:41:52
> Both disks claim support for the Host Protected Area feature set.
> No doubt early disks had firmware flaws.
So it's yet another "borken hardware"... Is there anything like
SCSI "blacklist" for IDE driver? Then it could be handled easily
by registering the drive there and check that out before
Fixed now and working on it..
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, T. Yamada wrote:
>
> > Both disks claim support for the Host Protected Area feature set.
> > No doubt early disks had firmware flaws.
>
> So it's yet another "borken hardware"... Is there anything like
> SCSI "blacklist" for IDE driver? Then
Hi Linus,
this patch contains the long overdue revision of Documentation/initrd.txt.
The changes are mainly updates (e.g. mention devfs), and I've changed the
focus from change_root to pivot_root.
The changes in detail:
- updated e-mail addresses of authors
- reduced description of change_root
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'd disagree. UHCI has tons of advantages, not the least of which is
> [Cthat it was there first and is widely available. If OHCI hadn't been
> done we'd have _one_ nice good USB controller implementation instead of
UHCI has a couple of disadvantages, though (and some o
> It seems to me that it would be better to initialize all the (non-PnP)
> ISA cards first, and have them claim their preferred ranges. Now you
> can pick the PnP isolate port out of what is left, and also have a
> much better idea of what is available.
Post 2.4 only. It means re-architecting al
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 05:10:24PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:
> it is. The new scsi error stuff does mention that drivers must
> spinunlock/spinlock if it enables interrupts.
Okay, I guess it is safe then.
Tim.
*/
PGP signature
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, M.Kiran Babu wrote:
> sir,
> i am getting some problem with graphics mode. my system is opening in text
> mode only. upto yesterday it is ok. but now it is failing to open in
> graphics mode. i am using startx, xinit and Xconfigurator all options. but
> even it is showing err
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Ville Herva wrote:
> My questions is: I saw Andrea's VM-global patch being
> recommended as a solution for this problem, and I already
> compiled it in (although I haven't booted into it yet). Should I
> use Rik's or Andrea's patch?
This patch is incremental with VM-global,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> ...
>
> I'll think about this some more. One thing I noticed is that the
> "wake_up(&sem->wait);" at the end of __down() is kind of bogus: we don't
> actually want to wake anybody up at that point at all, it's just that if
> we don't wake anybody up we'll end up having
I tried to help a friend this weekend convert to Linux.
He lives in Upstate New York, so it was a long trip from
Cambridge, Massachusetts.
He has a Dual Pentium III, 600 MHz TYAN "Thunderbolt".
It has a built-in Adaptec SCSI controller and Intel
100-base-T Ethernet controller. It also has 1/2 Gb
You're complaining on the wrong list.
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
>
> I tried to help a friend this weekend convert to Linux.
> He lives in Upstate New York, so it was a long trip from
> Cambridge, Massachusetts.
>
> He has a Dual Pentium III, 600 MHz TYAN "Thunderbolt".
>
With 2.2.18pre22 I get a lot of scsidisk I/O errors on my parallel port
zip.
All pervious versions of 2.2.18pre worked fine. The problem is 100%
reproducible and occurs
after a long period of inactivity (10 or more minutes)
compiled with #define PPA_DEBUG 1 I get:
ppa_fail(3) from ppa_wait at l
> Charles Turner, Ph D writes:
> I tried to help a friend this weekend convert to Linux.
> He lives in Upstate New York, so it was a long trip from
> Cambridge, Massachusetts.
> I was terribly wrong. This Red Hat version is irrevocably defective.
This list is about problems with the Lin
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
> I certainly don't know what to purchase for my
> next attempt at a "shrink-wrap" installation.
Try Red Hat 7.0 -- it is certainly better. True, no distribution is
perfect but over the years I've developed my own CD image upgrade.iso
Tony Spinillo wrote:
>
> Same problem as Vincent - OOPs when "ls" a mounted cdrom. It did work
> once with a CD-R. My report symptoms are nearly identical to previous
> post with same subject heading with a few differences:
there is a buglet in fs/isofs/namei.c, corrected in test11-final.
--ale
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 08:53:19AM -0500, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
[snip]
> I was terribly wrong. This Red Hat version is irrevocably defective.
[snip]
> (3) It "sort of" worked. However, network daemons kept
> dropping core. X would eventually crash, leaving the
> terminal in an
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 20 12:29:59 2000
Andries,
Don't you mean
(drive->id->cfs_enable_1 & 0x0400)word85
and not
(drive->id->command_set_1 & 0x0400)word82
Because when bit 10 of word 85 is not set then clip or HPArea is not enabled.
I saw no
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 05:01:32PM +0300, Oleg Makarenko wrote:
> the following partial reversal patch seems to help (but I am not sure it
> is correct):
Hmm. That patch went in because without it it doesn't work at all for
some people. :-((
Tim.
*/
PGP signature
Okay, okay, I didn't really make my point persuasively enough.
The file linux/drivers/char/mem.c contains this:
===
static ssize_t write_null(struct file * file, const char * buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
retur
I noticed 2 things. One is quite annoying.
1) sunlance:
Nov 19 19:09:49 sparq kernel: eth0: Carrier Lost, trying AUI
Nov 19 19:09:52 sparq kernel: eth0: Carrier Lost, trying TPE
This has been going on for some time since it has been up. But I think
something oopsed to cause this
2) the oops.
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, David Ford wrote:
> I've been trying [unsuccessfully :S] to get the kernel's pcmcia
> working. I woke up this morning and found the following oops:
This has nothing to do with the pcmcia support, but with the tulip driver.
The easiest thing to try is to comment away the fo
Hi
With some years of practice with Novell NetWare, I've been wandering why
the (unused?) file system compression mechanism in ext2 is based on
doing realtime compression. To make compression efficient, it can't be
made this simple. Let's look at the type of volume (file system)
compression intro
> "Charles" == Charles Turner, Ph D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> It had been running Windows 2000 "Professional". Several
Charles> months ago, he purchased Red Hat "DELUXE" version 6.2. He was
Charles> unable to install it. I convinced him that installation was
Charles> easy.
Charles
Hello.
I subscribed to this list expressly to tell you guys about a bug in the kernel that
is being carried forward. I am not a kernel master, all I do is install stuff.
First, before I begin, PLEASE reference linux-kernel posting entitled:
Subject "kswapd related oopses in 2.2.13"
From: Arthu
In his message of Sat 18 November, Andrew Morton writes :
> Try booting with the `noapic' option. Looks like your APIC
> is getting itself unprogrammed. Check that you're not
> overclocked and not over temperature.
Booting with noapic did not improve anything.
The processor is not supposed to
Wrong list, but this needs to be set straight. Please send any further
problem reports about Red Hat Linux to http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla
> I was terribly wrong. This Red Hat version is irrevocably defective.
With the exception that it works for everyone else.
> (1) It will not create
Hello.
I've been experiencing SCSI-related oopsen since 2.4.0-test6.
Couple of minutes ago I tried with test11 final, no luck still.
When I attempt to play an audio CD using cdplay from the cdtool
package, I'm rewarded with the following oops and cdplay
segfaults.
ksymoops 2.3.5 on i686 2.4.0-te
Second try (probably since I didn't correctly follow all the rules
before, thanks for the timely discussion).
The Maestro 2E on my laptop, which worked on 2.2 kernels, stopped
working on 2.4.0. Where stopped working means no sound and "pauses"
when interacting with the driver.
The symptom was
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Try Red Hat 7.0 -- it is certainly better. True, no distribution is
> perfect but over the years I've developed my own CD image upgrade.iso
> which goes directly after installing latest Red Hat distribution. It is
> full of things like BRS, dict(1), '
I tried using the kernel thread as demonstrated in your example and again it
failed (panic - scheduling in interrupt).
The difference is that your code executes the thread from within dev->open,
while my code tries to do that from dev->do_ioctl that has spinlocks around
the entire operation (which
I have a newly installed RH-7.0 distribution on a Celeron Pentium 400.
When I tried to compile the kernel I got the following:
1. I ran make xconfig (or make menuconfig) and saved without changing any
options - completed OK
2. make dep: OK.
3. make zImage: produced the following output:
k
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 11:10:21AM +0100, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
> > ISDN_MODEM_ANZREG undefined on 2.4.0-10(11) and 2.2.18-22, rpm.spec is
> > attached.
>
> This has been fixed 2000/03/03, see below. Just use the latest version,
> ftp.isdn4li
> I have a newly installed RH-7.0 distribution on a Celeron Pentium 400.
> When I tried to compile the kernel I got the following:
>
> 1. I ran make xconfig (or make menuconfig) and saved without changing any
>options - completed OK
Step 0: make mrproper
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 08:53:19AM -0500, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
Charles,
6.2 is one of te better distributions. You should also go talk to RedHat
directly.
Jeff
>
> I tried to help a friend this weekend convert to Linux.
> He lives in Upstate New York, so it was a long trip from
>
The de4x5 driver crashed on me twice today (on a 2 CPU x86 box); The
network went down for no visible reason (nothing in syslog or on the console).
The network card is a
00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43 (rev 41)
Subsystem: Compu-Shack: Unknown de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrei Smirnov wrote:
>
> I have a newly installed RH-7.0 distribution on a Celeron Pentium 400.
> When I tried to compile the kernel I got the following:
>
> 1. I ran make xconfig (or make menuconfig) and saved without changing any
>options - co
Hi!
I want to share memory between two differents processes in kernel mode. The
goal is to copy the read buffer of a user process into the read buffer of
another user process. I know it's possible to do it by creating an
intermediate buffer in kernel mode and to use the 'copy_from
Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
> I can even see obvious bugs in the trace, i.e., :
> stat("/usrusr/lib/ldscripts", 0xba7c) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
Probably only a cosmetic problem. A regular run (RedHat binutils-2.9.5.0.22-6)
yields:
stat("/usrusr/lib/ldscripts", 0xb5c4) =
> The patch against test11-pre7 (1043 lines) is at
>
> http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/tq_scheduler.patch
>
> It affects the following files:
Andrew, can you put your patches on a properly configured site. The site
admins have all ICMP packets blocked on www.uow.edu.au so you ar
Hi,
I too run linux on a Compaq Deskpro EN PII 350. It never crashed. It runned 2.2.9 ->
2.2.15, without any oops. But I must say, I only run official kernels from kernel.org
that I compiled myself. I'm not interested in the pre-compiled redhat thingies.
Did you compile your kernel yoursel
Hello.
In reading about the cool new features of Linux v2.4, most of the
improvements/changes seem to relate to high-end systems. Would users of low-end
systems (386/486, low memory, etc.) be advised to stay with kernel v2.2.x or is
v2.4.x the way to go for these systems as well?
Thank you.
"Benjamin Monate
> In his message of Sat 18 November, Andrew Morton writes :
> > Try booting with the `noapic' option. Looks like your APIC
> > is getting itself unprogrammed. Check that you're not
> > overclocked and not over temperature.
>
> Booting with noapic did not improve anything.
> The
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In reading about the cool new features of Linux v2.4, most of
> the improvements/changes seem to relate to high-end systems.
> Would users of low-end systems (386/486, low memory, etc.) be
> advised to stay with kernel v2.2.x or is v2.4.x the way t
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> > Try Red Hat 7.0 -- it is certainly better. True, no distribution is
> > perfect but over the years I've developed my own CD image upgrade.iso
> > which goes directly after installing latest Red
We were using the attached spec file for 3.1pre1 and the other file for
3.1beta7 (sorry I posted the wrong file, it was about 2 a.m. in the
morning). When built against 2.2.18-21 with 3.1pre1, I get a whole new
slew of errors. Neither seems to work. I have attached the 3.1pre1
spec file which
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 07:00:41PM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > Writeprotect the flashbios with the motherboard jumper, and remove the
> > > cmos battery.
> > > Checkmate. :-)
> > Only if you run your kernel
Hi
I just noticed this problem -
I'm missing some large files created in the filesystem.
This is 'ls' output from 2.4.0-test11/test10
total 33
drwxr-xr-x6 root root 4096 Nov 20 18:06 .
drwxr-xr-x 42 root root 1024 Nov 20 14:02 ..
drwxr-xr-x2 root root
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 05:07:14PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The patch against test11-pre7 (1043 lines) is at
> >
> > http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/tq_scheduler.patch
> >
> > It affects the following files:
>
> Andrew, can you put your patches on a properly configured site. The
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
> > I certainly don't know what to purchase for my
> > next attempt at a "shrink-wrap" installation.
>
> Try Red Hat 7.0 -- it is certainly better. True, no distribution is
[SNIPPED...]
I jus
On 20 Nov 00 at 17:56, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> I just noticed this problem -
> I'm missing some large files created in the filesystem.
>
> This is 'ls' output from 2.4.0-test11/test10
> total 33
> drwxr-xr-x6 root root 4096 Nov 20 18:06 .
> drwxr-xr-x 42 root root 1
Dans son message du Mon 20 November, Fort David ecrit :
> > Further investigations showed that the problem will occur only when
> > Xfree 4.0.1 is running with an smp kenel . Xfree 3.3.6 is ok. Could this
> > be a bug in X ? I thought that the kernel should prevent such a bug
> > from locking th
> a lock of the PCI bus (as SCSI and NIC are still working). Only the
> timer interrupts and NMI seem to be stuck : can a driver cause
> something so "lowlevel" ?
Something stopping the timers on the APIC I guess. But quite what or how I
don't know
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
At the risk of being flamed for a distribution type discussion...
Security nuts are probably rolling on the floor laughing at you for
these two. I can think of some situations where these would be usefull
though.
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> 3) edit /etc/ftpusers to allow root
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
> (4) For those who think the hardware is broken; The hardware worked
> for six months using Windows/2000. It has a NT core.
On this note, I recall a time that I 'appropriated' a workstation for
linux.
It was pulled out of the student la
Andreas:
My changes for process accounting were not accepted along with the rest of
the 32-bit UID patches. The current state of things as I understand it is
that SGI is working on some "enhanced" accounting support for Linux, which
may end up replacing the current process accounting. (stuff like
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 07:06:07PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 20 Nov 00 at 17:56, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> > I just noticed this problem -
> > I'm missing some large files created in the filesystem.
> >
> > This is 'ls' output from 2.4.0-test11/test10
> > total 33
> > drwxr-xr-x6 root
Does Linux 2.4pre support the raid controller on the abit vp6? The kernel
says it supports the 370, but it doesn't mention raid. I was confused as
to if there was a difference or not.
Also, OT, does anyone know if the controller is managed through hardware
or through software?
Thanks.
,.;::
:
On 20 Nov 00 at 13:19, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Does kernel 2.4.x compile and run well for all of our supported archs?
AFAIK yes. At least on all Debian archs.
> Do programs compiled against a glibc with LFS (2.4.x kernel) support, and
> using that LFS support, work on kernel 2.2.x machines?
Yes
My NT box fritzed on sending this via outlook express, so I lost Kai's
email (MUTT works better on Linux). Here's the other info he inquired
about on the 3.1pre1 compile problems.
Jeff
We were using the attached spec file for 3.1pre1 and the other file for
3.1beta7 (sorry I posted the wrong
HELLO WORLD!
Michael, do not take this as a flame, please. You just happen to jump on
that nerve at the wrong point. ;-)
http://www.linux-ide.org/chipsets.html
Linux ATA Development Project, Supported Chipsets (p1 of 3)
Supported Chipsets and Ve
> "Trond" == Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> " " == Ivan Kanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ivan> space. I am running this on ext2fs. Fsck-ing the filesystem
Ivan> does not help. The only way to recover the space is to
Ivan> reformat the partition.
Ivan>
I
Same experince here
Boxes ran perfectly fine with Windows (95/98/NT) but barfed with linux.
RAM replacement fixed it. Now whenever I see a signal 11 with gcc memory
is the first thing I go after.
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, John Jasen wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
> On
When I user the ieee1394 subsystem to transmit data from a camcorder to an
IDE disk and the IDE driver is not using DMA, then there will be some data
lost in the ieee1394 driver. If I turn on DMA in the IDE driver (hdparm -d1
/dev/hda), I do not have any data loss in the ieee1394 driver. Also,
Hi,
I've a Wacom Graphire USB. I tested the test11-pre6 kernel with my
Graphire USB. The scroll whell of the Graphire mouse does not work with the last
test kernels. The last kernel supporting the wheel was test11-pre2, I think...
I used the IMPS/2 compatible mouse emulation of
Well, this is a little update to the proc.txt file, it's based in 2.2 kernel, and I
have updated it a little to the 2.4 series, I have updated all the thing I have been
told in lk, so I submit this in order to include this in the main tree in order to
have a better updated info.
diff -urN lin
I've got an older HP E40 that I'm having problems getting to work with
DMA turned on.
Specifically, I get the following errors when I do a
"hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda" and the same for hdc. If I boot into single
user mode I can't seem to generate the problem, but after booting into
multi user mode I c
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
These are hardware problems, not software. Programs like gcc and ld
segfaulting like this is NOT a software problem.
Please don't turn up with some 'hey, it worked with my disk', that's no
clue that the distrib is bad. The same arguments as 'i
Hi,
I also get this kernel panic with the latest kernel (test11-pre5/6)
but I didn't get it with any earlier kernels. I don't think this has anything to do
with Linux-IrDA but maybe I'm wrong.
-- Dag
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:57:30 +0400 (GMT-4), you wrote:
> Guys,
>
> can someone confirm the f
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 07:32:39PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 20 Nov 00 at 13:19, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Does kernel 2.4.x compile and run well for all of our supported archs?
>
> AFAIK yes. At least on all Debian archs.
So, sparc, ultrasparc, i386 (with pcmcia support), alpha, arm,
November 20, 2000.
Thanks to Wolfgang Scherr, who was the first maintainer of this driver,
we now have support for Iomega Buz cards again. There are no changes for
current DC10plus and LML33 cards users (besides that dc10.[ch] files
have been renamed to zoran.[ch]), however I would like to ask th
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 12:53:04AM +1030, Alan Kennington wrote:
>
> I still think that write_null() should be rewritten as:
>
> ===
> static ssize_t write_null(struct file * file, const char * buf,
> size_t count, loff_t
Hello,
I´ve set up a Debian-2.2-System and built a Kernel-2.4.0-test11 on it.
Hardwareconfiguration : athlon-850MHz, Asus-A7V (promise ultra-100 on
board), additional promise ultra-100-card. 3 IBM DTLA 307045 Disks only
one at each IDE-channel. The three ata-100 disks should become a raid-5.
Add
To Charles:
I see your intentions but you really want to take this up with Redhat
and some linux advocacy groups. linux-kernel really doesnt need to deal
with things like gcc being broken and such (which I don't think is your
case; check your hardware -- my reason? I've deployed RH 6.2 on 20 or
so
Hi,
I've a Wacom Graphire USB. I tested the test11-pre6 kernel with my
Graphire USB. The scroll whell of the Graphire mouse does not work with
the last test kernels. The last kernel supporting the wheel was
test11-pre2, I
think...
I used the IMPS/2 compatible mouse emulation of
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Michael J. Dikkema wrote:
> Does Linux 2.4pre support the raid controller on the abit vp6? The kernel
> says it supports the 370, but it doesn't mention raid. I was confused as
> to if there was a difference or not.
I have a standalone card with the HPT370 chipset doing RAID
Hello
I am using a Gigabyte 6VXDC7 Dual Pentium III MB.
This motherboard uses a Via 694 chipset. cf
http://www.giga-byte.com/products/6vxdc7.htm
With the 2.4.0-test11-pre1 kernel the system freezes during boot. I
suspect APIC pbs.
Can anybody help me ?
Thanks. Vincent
Below is the content of t
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 02:16:41PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Do programs compiled against a glibc with LFS (2.4.x kernel) support, and
> > > using that LFS support, work on kernel 2.2.x machines?
> >
> > Yes. Even glibc (2.2) compiled against kernel without LFS support has LFS
> > interface
Can everyone lay off this guy, he made a mistake and the heat is not cool.
This is no way for the general masses to get a taste of Linux, cool?
Please jsut let it die or offline the chap.
Regards,
Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research Group
EVP Linux Development, TRG
Linux ATA Development
-
To
>
> Just for comparison, RedHat delivers glibc compiled with
> 2.3.nn/2.4.0 headers -> newer interfaces are supported.
>
Let's not even get started on what RH did or did not do. If everyone did
what RH did, then everyone else can just roll over and die, since there
will be no differ
> it's heck of alot better if we don't have a user that later
> thinks 'Damn, linux developers are meanies'...
>
> Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/
When in fact according to this linux-kernel post:
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9912.1/0653.html
Hello,
I just got a severe ext2 filesystem corruption again (something from
ext2_free_blocks about freeing blocks not in datazone and then in system
zones and also allocating block in system zone). Previously (last week) it
happened on a 4cpu machine. Today on 2cpu. All UP machines running latest
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 08:53:19AM -0500, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
> [root@merrimac linux-2.2.17]# make dep
> gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/mkdep
>scripts/mkdep.c
> collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault], core dumped
> make: *** [script
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000, Oleg Drokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hub.c in 2.4.0-test10 and above contains hardcoded HZ value,
> which is wrong. Here is the patch:
>
>
> --- drivers/usb/hub.c.origFri Nov 17 12:51:34 2000
> +++ drivers/usb/hub.c Fri Nov 17 12:51:59 2000
> @@ -813,7 +813,
> Frederic LESPEZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think the problem is due to a bad PCI detection but i let you judge.
> > Here is a description of the problem :
> > I'm under X (Xfree 4.0.1).
> > I switch to a VT (virtual terminal).
> > I load my sound module (modprobe emu10k1).
>
> could y
John Jasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> On this note, I recall a time that I 'appropriated' a workstation for
> linux.
>
> It was pulled out of the student labs, where it had worked for 3 months
> running NT 4.0, but the RH install kept on crashing out.
So what? My former machine ran fine
AS> When I user the ieee1394 subsystem to transmit data from a camcorder to an
AS> IDE disk and the IDE driver is not using DMA, then there will be some data
AS> lost in the ieee1394 driver. If I turn on DMA in the IDE driver (hdparm -d1
AS> /dev/hda), I do not have any data loss in the ieee139
I just installed a Promise Ultra66 in my computer. It is running kernel
2.2.17 with the unified ide patch (20001118) from Andre Hedrick. When I
boot the machine with drives plugged into this device the machine will hang
during the partition check of the first drive connected to this controll
Hi all. 2.4.0-test11 is crashing during bootup while
detecting my raid5 array. According to the EIP printed (assuming
I did it right), that's in the function xor_block().
2.4.0-test10 works fine with the same .config. One of the
things in the change file for test11 is "make raid
Hello again,
I Tried again to built my soft-raid by the same way, with the same
result. But this time i sent you that nice message the kernel has shown
me:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0010 printing eip:
c01c8e66
*pde =
Oops:
CPU:0
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jorge Nerin wrote:
> Well, this is a little update to the proc.txt file, it's based in 2.2 kernel, and I
>have updated it a little to the 2.4 series, I have updated all the thing I have been
>told in lk, so I submit this in order to include this in the main tree in order to
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
