Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-07 Thread Ely Levy
In the meanwhile there is less than a job offer/request a week, and the only thing making noise on this list is the people which are again (after it was decided like 3 times already) whine about it. so how about making a linux-il-flame@ and then everyone would be much happier. (beside marc I guess

Re: [OT] Re: How times have changed (Was: job wanted also - NOT -YES!)

2002-10-07 Thread Evgeny Stambulchik
> Now, ObListHistory: does anyone know if archives of the late 20th > century postings are available? It would be an interesting historical > document for us, wouldn't it? Evgeny? Compressed html'zed archives are available here: ftp://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/pub/docs/LinuxIL/ Regards, Evgen

Re: Why jobs are wanted (was Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!)

2002-10-07 Thread guy keren
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > In addition, I would also like to know what is going on because it > > seems that many people are loosing their job lately. I consider this > > information on topic as well. > > Ah, well, there are several reasons:

[OT] Re: How times have changed (Was: job wanted also - NOT - YES!)

2002-10-06 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Aviram Jenik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just to be historically correct, it was decided about 2 years ago that > job _offers_ that are related to Linux are acceptable. My recollection is different, but I may be mistaken and the archives don't go back even two years. In any case, links to resu

How times have changed (Was: job wanted also - NOT - YES!)

2002-10-06 Thread Aviram Jenik
> > IIRC, it has been decided long ago (longer than the archives are kept, > I guess, though I have not checked) that postings regarding (linux) > jobs - both ways - were acceptable on the list. Just to be historically correct, it was decided about 2 years ago that job _offers_ that are related

Why jobs are wanted (was Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!)

2002-10-06 Thread herouth
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > In addition, I would also like to know what is going on because it > seems that many people are loosing their job lately. I consider this > information on topic as well. Ah, well, there are several reasons: The quarter has just ended, and with it, dire financial res

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Amir Tal
are we living in the same country as the reporter who wrote this ?? http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-2160334,00.html and i thought things were bad... ;) (i know they are for me) tal. To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PR

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Eli Marmor
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > > Yaacov Fenster - System Engineering Troubleshooting and other miracles ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > c) A certain company just decided to get rid of this person. > > This piece of information was not in the OP. But thanks for the It was. As an indirect-indirect

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote: > > own personal job-searching agenda PLEASE at least give a URL with their > > resume? > > Since nobody posted here their "job-searching agenda" without a CV URL, > why do you even bother complaining about this non-issue? Actually,

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Guy Cohen
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 04:33:15PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote: > > > > own personal job-searching agenda PLEASE at least give a URL with their > > > resume? > > > > Since nobody posted here their "job-searching agenda" without a

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Yaacov Fenster - System Engineering Troubleshooting and other miracles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > c) A certain company just decided to get rid of this person. This piece of information was not in the OP. But thanks for the "respected" part - I was hoping someone would think so... ;-) Peopl

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Yaacov Fenster - System Engineering Troubleshooting and other miracles
Guy Cohen wrote: > > Well since every one dont give a f*ck about the list and > thinks it's their mothers, i want too. The original posting was short, to the point and on topic. It told me (and anyone who bothered to read it) that a) A respected member of this list is looking for a job. b) A po

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > In addition, I would also like to know what is going on because it > seems that many people are loosing their job lately. Or quit. The latest several job-seeking leeches have not discussed the reasons. -- Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Nadav Har'El wrote: >On Sun, Oct 06, 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!": > > >>Will the people on this list who want to shamelessly leach it for their >> >> > >Again, I don't think the phrase "sh

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Guy Cohen wrote: > an alternative would be to open linux-il-jobs. > consider doing this because self propaganda is not in place for > this list. There is il.jobs.resumes , IIRC. It contains mostly spam, though. -- Tzafrir Cohen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.technion.a

RE: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Martin Polley
Guy Cohen wrote: I don't see how. consider having 200 people fired from "whateverbigcompany" in a day, now since most of them are linux/unix professionals they are surly subscribe to linux-il. what if 30% of them decide to post a short message to the list saying they want a job? you'll have 50-70

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Omer Zak
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Guy Cohen wrote: > I don't see how. consider having 200 people fired from "whateverbigcompany" > in a day, now since most of them are linux/unix professionals they are surly > subscribe to linux-il. what if 30% of them decide to post a short message > to the list saying they

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!": > Will the people on this list who want to shamelessly leach it for their Again, I don't think the phrase "shamelessly leach" is appropriate here. It was decided that such postin

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread shaulka
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:19:37PM +0300, Guy Cohen wrote: > Well since every one dont give a f*ck about the list and > thinks it's their mothers, i want too. > > HEY... IM LOOKING FOR A JOB CAN YOU HALP ME > I DONT CARE IF THATS OFFTOPIC/INAPPROPRIATE/RUDE/WTF I DONT CARE!! > > I WANT A JO

RE: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread e-tie
row mindless to me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Guy Cohen Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 1:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: job wanted also - NOT - YES! Well since every one dont give a f*ck about the list and thinks it's their

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Guy Cohen
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 11:58:52AM -, Moshe Zadka wrote: > On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Guy Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And the worst thing is that im the only one who flame them. > > Maybe there's a good reason for you being the only one who flames > them. yes. im shameless. ===

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Guy Cohen
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:47:26PM +0300, Orna Agmon wrote: > > I think job offers and job-wanted offers are very much on topic in > linux-il, if they are linux related. I don't see how. consider having 200 people fired from "whateverbigcompany" in a day, now since most of them are linux/unix p

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Guy Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And the worst thing is that im the only one who flame them. Maybe there's a good reason for you being the only one who flames them. = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PR

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Guy Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well since every one dont give a f*ck about the list and > thinks it's their mothers, i want too. > > HEY... IM LOOKING FOR A JOB CAN YOU HALP ME > I DONT CARE IF THATS OFFTOPIC/INAPPROPRIATE/RUDE/WTF I DONT CARE!! > > I WANT A JOB! > > will you hir

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Will the people on this list who want to shamelessly leach it for their own personal job-searching agenda PLEASE at least give a URL with their resume? I don't think that, given the times, I want to flame the job seekers, but there is really nothing to show my HR department unless you also giv

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002, Guy Cohen wrote about "job wanted also - NOT - YES!": [vulgar language removed] > And the worst thing is that im the only one who flame them. Hmm, maybe it's because there was a discussion about that in the past, and it was decided that both job-offers and

Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Orna Agmon
I think job offers and job-wanted offers are very much on topic in linux-il, if they are linux related. As a person who is constantly looking for good profesional to recommend for hiring, I find it most useful to have job offers and job-wanted offers published here. I am not into flaming us

job wanted also - NOT - YES!

2002-10-06 Thread Guy Cohen
Well since every one dont give a f*ck about the list and thinks it's their mothers, i want too. HEY... IM LOOKING FOR A JOB CAN YOU HALP ME I DONT CARE IF THATS OFFTOPIC/INAPPROPRIATE/RUDE/WTF I DONT CARE!! I WANT A JOB! will you hire me? And the worst thing is that im the only one who fl