Hi all,
The Wednesday, 8/7/2024 GoLUG meeting commences at 7pm
Eastern Daylight Time online at meet.jit.si/golug [1].
Who: David Billsbrough, presenter.
What: Constructing Your Own Linux and FreeBSD Packages.
Where: Online GoLUG meeting at
Hi all,
Wednesday Evening, May 4, 2022, at 7pm Eastern Daylight time David
Billsbrough gives his "FreeBSD In The Cloud" presentation at the
monthly GoLUG online meeting.
When: 7pm New York time on Wednesday, May 4, 2022. Starts right at 7pm
Eastern Daylight Time.
Where: https://m
Hi,
I know this list is for Linux, but this seems relevant enough. I'm sorry if
that's off topic here.
A friend from an integration company is looking for a FreeBSD kernel
developer to help with creating a network related module.
Please let me know if you have or know anyone who ha
Hello there,
Could somebody recommend a program/some free management project by which
I could rate limit 200-500 directly connected by Ethernet clients.
Thanks, Serge.
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailm
Next Monday (28/3/2005), 18:30, the Haifa Linux Club will once
again meet to hear Ido Barnea talk about:
FreeBSD kernel networking
Abstract
This lecture will be a very basic introduction to the FreeBSD
networking stack. We will see the mbuf, which is the main data
structure used
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 08:17:38PM +0200, Herouth Maoz wrote:
> Point being - since I'm sure my lecture is not easy on the ears of
> the free-software junkies, MacOS being a proprietary piece of
> software (with all the drawbacks) - you can be both professional in
> maintaining your user base an
At 13:16 +0200 on 14/12/2002, Max K. wrote:
i hope you know that Apple's Mac OS 10 (or OS X) - is FreeBSD kernel with
some additions...
Actually, it is said to be something between FreeBSD and NetBSD...
Anyway, this connects to the thread about professional maintenance of
back
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Max K. wrote:
> FreeBSD has a.f.a.i.k. no marketing departaments, and linux, in each
> distro has... don't you think that if (although all the marketing effort
> of linux) FreeBSD still is alive, advances and kicking...it is a warning
> sign for linux ?
e the BSD
> people are carefully checking for dog shit with every move they take they see
> Linus runnig like crazy and he has long left them behind...:)
so your point is: ok, bsd guys, you are better, but we are wild, and have
more followers.
right ?
FreeBSD has a.f.a.i.k. no marketing depar
On Saturday 14 December 2002 01:00 pm, you wrote:
> Not expressing any constructive opinion, your paragraph here is just saying
> that BSD guys are more professional.
That depends on your definition of "professional". If professional is careful
up to the point of stagnation then professional is a
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 12:49:01PM +0200, Mark Veltzer wrote:
>
> The BSD people are in a real dilemma as I can see it: They do have a more
> secure and reviewed system but they fail to understand that the Wild Wild
> West nature of Linux, while maybe lowering the OS security some, is causing
>
On Saturday 14 December 2002 11:56 am, you wrote:
> thought you might find this interesting :
> http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/bsd_flier.html
Too much in favour of BSD as compared to Linux...:). Almost all the points are
history today and it only goes to show the fast rate of Linux progress...
At 11:56 +0200 on 14/12/2002, Amir Tal wrote:
thought you might find this interesting :
http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/bsd_flier.html
A bit out of date, isn't it? It talks about Linux 2.4 in future
tense, also on journalling FS.
Herouth
--
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HOME PAGE: http://hero
thought you might find this interesting :
http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/bsd_flier.html
--
==
Amir Tal
Founder, Owner
Whatsup, Hebrew Linux Portal
Voice:+972-8-9363164
Fax: +972-8-9363164
Cell: +972
Hi,
Although this is Linux mailing list, there are quite few people who use
FreeBSD..
So, to those people who use FreeBSD in their workstation and for those who have
NVidia card - NVidia just released a beta driver with all the features that the
Linux binary driver have..
Read more at: http
natch!"
[L.Carrol "Jabberwacky"]
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Nimrod Mesika wrote:
> Did anyone have any success making FreeBSD work with Bezeq's ADSL
> service?
>
> --
> Nimrod.
>
>
>
> =
> To
ECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: Bezeq's ADSL and FreeBSD
> Thanks!
>
> Just wanted to make sure before I order the service.
>
> By the way, pptp seems to be running pppd and I'm kind of used to
> user-ppp (never did get the kernel ppp to
day, November 16, 2001 4:29 PM
Subject: Bezeq's ADSL and FreeBSD
> Did anyone have any success making FreeBSD work with Bezeq's ADSL
> service?
>
> --
> Nimrod.
>
>
>
> =
> To unsubscrib
Did anyone have any success making FreeBSD work with Bezeq's ADSL
service?
--
Nimrod.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
e
Hi Uri,
1. No problems. I will be glad to help anytime.
2. You can use System ccommand to boot FreeBSD without any problem so you
dont have to worrry about that.
3. I have used the latest System commander (I think it was 2000) But Im not
using this right now.
4. I will send you the file. I just
ad NT,Solaris and FreeBSD , but I never succeeded to
load Solaris 5.7
with LILO :(
Thanks,
Uri
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo uns
c: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: HD copying in FreeBSD
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Ishay Sommer wrote:
> (Please don't flame me about this)
> What about Norton Ghost?
Whats norton ghost?
Its probably a windows program.. why use it when you can do it easily on
linux.
(Please don't flame me about this)
What about Norton Ghost?
-Original Message-
From: Sagi Bashari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 6:01 AM
To: Omer Zak
Cc: Linux-IL mailing list
Subject: Re: HD copying in FreeBSD
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Omer Zak wrote:
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Omer Zak wrote:
> The 'dd' command?
>
I think that you can you 'dd' only if the HDD's are exactly the same size,
etc. otherwise it wont work..
_
___ __ _ __ _(_) Sagi Bashari
(_-
ructure and
> links. I need to do it ASAP, so I'm terrible sorry, but I have no time to
> look for documentation (only man on machine itself will be available), and I
> don't have any experience with FreeBSD. I need just a command line which
> does it and if there are po
Hi,
There's a nice manual about that at
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Hard-Disk-Upgrade/index.html. it's a
linux manual, but it should work on freebsd as well. (except the mount
devices, etc).
anyway - you'll have to setup the freebsd bootloader as well. I'm not
so I'm terrible sorry, but I have no time to
> look for documentation (only man on machine itself will be available), and I
> don't have any experience with FreeBSD. I need just a command line which
> does it and if there are possible problems.
> Any help will be greately ap
look for documentation (only man on machine itself will be available), and I
don't have any experience with FreeBSD. I need just a command line which
does it and if there are possible problems.
Any help will be greately appreciated.
> It's always the worst time to release a new distro.
It makes sense, but it's not right in practice.
Sometimes, so many packgaes of Linux have major upgrades almost
together, and then may pas a year or two without so many changes.
It happened before RH6.0 was released, and RH6 actually include
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 19:28:12 +0200, Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Udi Finkelstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> As for RedHat, as far as I remember, the X.2 were always the last version
>> before the (X+1).0 product...
>
>Do you remember far enough? I don't think there was anyth
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 19:48:45 +0200, Alex Shnitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, Udi!
>
>On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 06:31:06PM +0200, you wrote the following:
>
>> As for RedHat, as far as I remember, the X.2 were always the last version
>> before the (X+1).0 product... and were always the most sta
Alex Shnitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FWIW (probably not much), Red Hat 4.0 shipped with Linux 2.0, and
> maybe even 3.0.3 did (but I wouldn't know since I used Slackware
> then).
That was 1.2.13, IIRC. [History is on topic, isn't it? ;-)]
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | BLOOMBERG L.P. (BFM) | [EMA
Hi, Udi!
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 06:31:06PM +0200, you wrote the following:
> As for RedHat, as far as I remember, the X.2 were always the last version
> before the (X+1).0 product... and were always the most stable.
> IIRC, it was RedHat 5.0 which shipped with Kernel 2.0, and 6.0 shipped with
>
Udi Finkelstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As for RedHat, as far as I remember, the X.2 were always the last version
> before the (X+1).0 product...
Do you remember far enough? I don't think there was anything between
3.0.3 and 4.0... ;-) Oh, weel, ancient history...
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | B
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 06:31:06PM +0200, Udi Finkelstein wrote:
> As for RedHat, as far as I remember, the X.2 were always the last version
> before the (X+1).0 product... and were always the most stable.
> IIRC, it was RedHat 5.0 which shipped with Kernel 2.0, and 6.0 shipped with
> kernel 2.2 .
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 10:51:09 +0200, Eli Marmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>(*) Regarding RH6.2 - as always, maybe except for timing of 6.0,
>this is probably the worst time to release a new distro, and RH
It's always the worst time to release a new distro.
When you whip mature components, you g
k.a Netscape 6.0),
BIND 9.0, and - as you mentioned - kernel-2.4.0.
All of this story (including the XFree86-4.0 and FreeBSD-4.0) was
what I wanted to tell you in the last meeting (at Compaq), and Ira
"budgeted" 5 minutes for it (the time I asked), but I had to leave
before, and now this ne
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
http://appwatch.com/Linux/
XFree4, FreeBSD4, (almost) Linux 2.4 - this is one busy month!
Thanks,
Chen.
--
Chen ShapiraWeb Developer and Linux Activist
Hackers do for love what other people wouldn't do for money
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Nimrod Mesika wrote:
> I'm interesting in comparing FreeBSD's SMP performance to Linux.
> Anyone has a FreeBSD 3.3 CD that I can duplicate (or willing to do that
> for me)?
The basic OS requires a single CD which can be downloaded (see
http://www.freebs
I'm interesting in comparing FreeBSD's SMP performance to Linux.
Anyone has a FreeBSD 3.3 CD that I can duplicate (or willing to do that
for me)?
-- Nimrod.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Itamar Shtull-Trauring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I heard a talk by Ted T'so in New York, where he talked a bit about XFS. He
> said that XFS is extremely integrated with Irix's VM system, so that adding
> it to Linux using the existing codebase may require major chang
Actually, most developers in BSD systems are not part of the ``core''
group. They are people who have proven to be willing, trustworthy and
talented and were therefore granted access to the projects'
development machines and CVS repositories. The ``core'' group is more
l
Thats why I make shure to keep the old kernel around untill I check that
the new one works.
It's a basic rule for everything in computers.
Don't upgrade a program (and especially a system) and I don't care what it
is, before you know it works on your hardware.
On Sat, 4 Sep 1999, Nir Soffer wrot
On Sat, 4 Sep 1999, Micha Feigin wrote:
> The fact that people upgrade because they can is their problem.If you
> wan't stable you can always stick with the stable releases when they come
> and not use the development ones (which from my experience are very stable
> - and I have a bad tendency to
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Yaron Zabary wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
>
> > YZ>> I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
> > YZ>> points (compared to Linux) are:
> >
> > I'm a bit sur
ontinue and you are informed that another one
> :> is missing.
> :>
> :> Does anybody know if such thing exists in Linux?
> :>
> :> Regards,
> :> Shlomo.
> :>
> :> Dune wrote:
> :>
> :> >hey listdoes any one uses Freebsdand can tell
Quoth Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo on Fri, Sep 03, 1999:
> VV>> Yup. Think different. Apple.
>
> I would, but the darn thing has no command line, so I can't figure how it
> can be useful...
I heard you can install Linux or NetBSD (maybe even OpenBSD) on
it, although I can't imagine how nice
VV>> Yup. Think different. Apple.
I would, but the darn thing has no command line, so I can't figure how it
can be useful...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425/\ JRRT LotR.
Quoth Meir Litmanovich on Fri, Sep 03, 1999:
> Hei !
> Let's stop the holy war ! Both of them are better ! :-)
Than none of them.
Vadik.
--
Strange Fruit. A brilliant way to describe
somebody hanging from a tree...
-- Marcus Miller
Quoth Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo on Thu, Sep 02, 1999:
> YZ>> I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
> YZ>> points (compared to Linux) are:
>
> I'm a bit surprised how many myphologized is a mind of an average
> advocate. W
Quoth Shlomo Reches on Wed, Sep 01, 1999:
> I know one thing that is good in Free BSD.
> They have something much better than RPM.
RPM is not a Linux thing. It's a DeadRat thing.
> When you want to upgrade a certain program
> it automatically detects the depandencies and
> get from the web any
On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Meir Litmanovich wrote:
> XFS is logged filesystem - which means you can power-off
> the system at the middle of activity and no file-system
> damage will be caused, so - no fsck and file-system
> corruption sheet. (BTW - it still do not prevents you from damage
> to user fil
Meir Litmanovich wrote:
> XFS is logged filesystem - which means you can power-off
> the system at the middle of activity and no file-system
> damage will be caused, so - no fsck and file-system
> corruption sheet. (BTW - it still do not prevents you from damage
> to user files)
> XFS can promise
Hei !
Let's stop the holy war ! Both of them are better ! :-)
> It means that to SGI's mind, XFS is better than ext2fs. SGI is
> marketing XFS as fast, reliable, and scalable. Therefore SGI believes
> that ext2fs is missing one or more of these features.
Maybe. But there are few other things a
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Adam Morrison wrote:
> Yaron Zabary wrote:
>
> > I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
> > points (compared to Linux) are:
> >
> >. Its networking code is better.
>
> This seems to be an argument flogged
"Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo" wrote:
> YZ>> I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
> YZ>> points (compared to Linux) are:
>
> I'm a bit surprised how many myphologized is a mind of an average
> advocate. What you s
Yaron Zabary wrote:
> I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
> points (compared to Linux) are:
>
> . Its networking code is better.
This seems to be an argument flogged about greatly, but it REALLY depends
on what you mean by ``better'&
ce we start talking serious things,
like 24x7-available computational or database servers. And please, no
references to mySQL etc...
Funnily enough, I am a Linux user and I've never used FreeBSD (mostly
because of the multi-platform issues), and yet I am extremely pissed
off with the Linux k
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
> YZ>> I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
> YZ>> points (compared to Linux) are:
>
> I'm a bit surprised how many myphologized is a mind of an average
> advocate. W
YZ>> I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
YZ>> points (compared to Linux) are:
I'm a bit surprised how many myphologized is a mind of an average
advocate. What you say is "standard 'Linux sucks' advocate kit". As most
&qu
e and you are informed that another one
:> is missing.
:>
:> Does anybody know if such thing exists in Linux?
:>
:> Regards,
:> Shlomo.
:>
:> Dune wrote:
:>
:> >hey listdoes any one uses Freebsdand can tell me The Differnce
:> > Between FreeBsd And linuxBesid
ed as well.
:Regards,
:Shlomo.
:
:Dune wrote:
:
:>hey listdoes any one uses Freebsdand can tell me The Differnce
:> Between FreeBsd And linuxBesides The obvius ? and by the way this is
:> the posix user group not the linux user group since all thetalks are
:> around a posix based unix syste
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Dune wrote:
> hey list
> does any one uses Freebsd
> and can tell me The Differnce Between FreeBsd And linux
> Besides The obvius ?
I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
points (compared to Linux) are:
. It is based on sour
> Shlomo.
>
> Dune wrote:
>
> > hey listdoes any one uses Freebsdand can tell me The Differnce
> > Between FreeBsd And linuxBesides The obvius ? and by the way this is
> > the posix user group not the linux user group sin
anybody know if such thing exists in Linux?
>
> Regards,
> Shlomo.
>
> Dune wrote:
>
> > hey listdoes any one uses Freebsdand can tell me The Differnce
> > Between FreeBsd And linuxBesides The obvius ? and by the way this is
> > the posix user group not the linux user
download it then
continue and you are informed that another one
is missing.
Does anybody know if such thing exists in Linux?
Regards,
Shlomo.
Dune wrote:
hey
listdoes any one
uses Freebsdand can tell
me The Differnce Between FreeBsd And linuxBesides
The obvius ? and by
the way this is the posix user
SR>> needed. In RPM you will get a message that
SR>> a package is missing. You go download it then
SR>> continue and you are informed that another one
SR>> is missing.
Unless you use rpmfind (which, unfortunately, isn't workign with rpm 3
yet) or something like grpm and you have all RPMs in place
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 10:22:15PM +0300, Shlomo Reches wrote:
>I know one thing that is good in Free BSD.
>They have something much better than RPM.
>When you want to upgrade a certain program
>it automatically detects the depandencies and
>get from the web any other package
download it then
continue and you are informed that another one
is missing.
Does anybody know if such thing exists in Linux?
Regards,
Shlomo.
Dune wrote:
hey
listdoes any one
uses Freebsdand can tell
me The Differnce Between FreeBsd And linuxBesides
The obvius ? and by
the way this is the posix user
D>> does any one uses Freebsd
D>> and can tell me The Differnce Between FreeBsd And linux
D>> Besides The obvius ?
Well, besides the obvious there's no much differencies. And this is like
karate and aikido - every one has own phylosopy, own school and own
masters, and if
hey list
does any one uses Freebsd
and can tell me The Differnce Between FreeBsd And
linux
Besides The obvius ?
and by the way this is the posix user group not the
linux user group since all the
talks are around a posix based unix
systems
thnx and cya
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 01:13:36AM +0300, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
I will not flame anyone, just point out one correction:
> Alright. It's only my opinion, so feel free to flame away.
>
> > 1. Hardware resources
> > 1.1 What is supported, what is not
>
> Linux supports more hardware than BSD sys
; 1.2 Minimal system requirements
Basically the same in BSD and Linux systems. I don't know about
any major differences.
> 2. Installation
> 2.1 Ease of installation - "gotchas"
BSD systems are basically as easy to install as Linux systems.
Of all the BSD systems, FreeBSD
e no "religious" predilections about Linuces vs Unices.
Incidentally, I have taken on notice the problem of the length of the
"signature garbage"
attached to my (?) email.
Dan Feiglin
Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Quoth Daniel Feiglin on Tue, Jun 08, 1999:
> >
BNM>> Alexander this FreeBSD Q is about cool as temperature and not
BNM>> cool as "good system"
Oh, really? *Now* I see.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425/\
Quoth Daniel Feiglin on Tue, Jun 08, 1999:
> Has anyone done a detailed comparison of Linux and FreeBSD?
Benchmarks are all lies. Linux people will tell you that Linux
is great, FreeBSD people will tell you that FreeBSD is great.
You need to look at both sources, and refuse to believe either
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Ben Nes Michael wrote:
Walla ?? I bet he didn't notice .. ;)
--Ariel
> Alexander this FreeBSD Q is about cool as temperature and not cool as "good
> system"
>
> Alexander Indenbaum wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Daniel Fei
Alexander this FreeBSD Q is about cool as temperature and not cool as "good
system"
Alexander Indenbaum wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Daniel Feiglin wrote:
>
> > At the risk of starting a religious war:
> >
> > Has anyone done a detailed comparison of Linux and
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Daniel Feiglin wrote:
> At the risk of starting a religious war:
>
> Has anyone done a detailed comparison of Linux and FreeBSD?
>
>From FreeBSD FAQ ( http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ )
12.8. How cool is FreeBSD?
Q. Has anyone done any temperature testing while
At the risk of starting a religious war:
Has anyone done a detailed comparison of Linux and FreeBSD?
begin: vcard
fn: Daniel Feiglin
n: Feiglin;Daniel
org:Dilog Computers Ltd.
adr:POB 36;;;Shavei Shomron, Mobile Post;;44858;ISRAEL
email
Who said that apples is more tasty then oranges ??
Oranges are much better though its harder to install them ;-)
"Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo" wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, 12:52 Ben Nes Michael wrote:
> BNM>> Why and or in what points is Linux better or more preferabl
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, 12:52 Ben Nes Michael wrote:
> BNM>> Why and or in what points is Linux better or more preferable then
> BNM>> FreeBSD ?
>
> Why and/or in what points are apples better or more tast
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, 12:52 Ben Nes Michael wrote:
BNM>> Why and or in what points is Linux better or more preferable then
BNM>> FreeBSD ?
Why and/or in what points are apples better or more tasty than oranges?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanis
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> Ben Nes Michael wrote:
>
> > Why and or in what points is Linux better or more preferable then
> > FreeBSD ?
>
> The name. Plus it has a cool logo. That's it ;-)
>
> No seriously, and hopefully trying to avoid
Ben Nes Michael wrote:
> Why and or in what points is Linux better or more preferable then
> FreeBSD ?
The name. Plus it has a cool logo. That's it ;-)
No seriously, and hopefully trying to avoid the religous war that is
about to break here, the best answer is really:
FreeBSD is U
Hi All
Why and or in what points is Linux better or more preferable then
FreeBSD ?
--
Canaan Surfing Ltd.
Internet Service Providers
Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
Tel: 972-6-6925757
Fax: 972-6-6925858
http://www.canaan.co.il
--
86 matches
Mail list logo
