Hei !
Let's stop the holy war ! Both of them are better ! :-)
> It means that to SGI's mind, XFS is better than ext2fs. SGI is
> marketing XFS as fast, reliable, and scalable. Therefore SGI believes
> that ext2fs is missing one or more of these features.
Maybe. But there are few other things about XFS that
MUCH more important that marketing slogans:
XFS is logged filesystem - which means you can power-off
the system at the middle of activity and no file-system
damage will be caused, so - no fsck and file-system
corruption sheet. (BTW - it still do not prevents you from damage
to user files)
XFS can promise file-access and file-read speed - it means
that no matter what's going on - you'll receive your X Mbp/s
from the filesystem - that is extremely important in
"near realtime" enviroments, as well as enterprise
ones.
Meir,
just awiting to XFS release :-)
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
