> -Original Message-
> From: Shaul Karl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 5:43 AM
[snip]
Hello all
You are talking about the SPAM problem but ignoring a bigger problem: The misuse of
SMTP.
This announcement is automatic; yet instead of replying to the envelope
On Saturday 02 August 2003 17:59, Vasiliev Michael wrote:
> On Saturday 02 August 2003 14:33, Guy Cohen wrote:
> > They still do nothing.
> >
> > This is absolutly disrespct for good paying customers!!!
>
> Well, once, in my free time, I interviewed a number of well known sysadmins
> on a certain I
On Saturday 02 August 2003 05:42, Shaul Karl wrote:
> I got a similar message for the 2 last messages that I have sent to
> the list. I guess that I will have another one for this message too. Was
> there a modification to the list policies lately regarding the header of
> the messages that are s
Quoting Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'd say that most ISP's - even large ones - don't respect their own spam
> policies, at least in Israel. I don't remember one account where I contacted
> an ISP with regard of a spammer on their network and got a favourable
> response.
> I used to do that
On Saturday 02 August 2003 17:59, Vasiliev Michael wrote:
> The majority noted that small ISPs don't even respect their own spam
> policies (if they have one) in fear of losing valuable broadband users.
I'd say that most ISP's - even large ones - don't respect their own spam
policies, at least in
On Saturday 02 August 2003 14:33, Guy Cohen wrote:
> They still do nothing.
>
> This is absolutly disrespct for good paying customers!!!
Well, once, in my free time, I interviewed a number of well known sysadmins on
a certain IRC network asking what they do to deal with these pesky spammers.
The
No, this is the same thing.
This person at main.retal.org.il was sending spam, he tried to use
my mail server, and when was not succeding probably used other
methods.
The point is Actcom does not do anyhting and does not care.
Guy
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:50:22PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> On
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:02:34PM +0200, Oleg Kobets wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have received similar message from thmicha.net as well. As I can see we
> both use Actcom as our provider, it seems to me that Actcom is listed in one
> the spam lists that tmicha.net uses for email screening. Perhaps we shou
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:23:45PM +0300, Guy Cohen wrote:
> Yes you are right...
>
> Actcom is very close to lose my vote (and my monthly fee)..
>
> I have informed them 3 times in the last 2 month about spam
> that is coming from there network. actually to be more specific
> from 192.115.135.18
Yes you are right...
Actcom is very close to lose my vote (and my monthly fee)..
I have informed them 3 times in the last 2 month about spam
that is coming from there network. actually to be more specific
from 192.115.135.186 (main.retal.co.il). with specific logs of
spam attempts from this user
Hi.
I have received similar message from thmicha.net as well. As I can see we
both use Actcom as our provider, it seems to me that Actcom is listed in one
the spam lists that tmicha.net uses for email screening. Perhaps we should
notify them of this issue.
Oleg.
- Original Message -
Fro
I got a similar message for the 2 last messages that I have sent to
the list. I guess that I will have another one for this message too. Was
there a modification to the list policies lately regarding the header of
the messages that are sent by it? I didn't get such messages when I had
another IS
12 matches
Mail list logo
