On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:00:18AM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:16:07AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:32:47PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 06:47:22PM +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 29 June 2004 17:30, M
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:11:15PM +0300, Yosef Meller wrote:
> I'm currently using Open-Office whenever I can, but I am still stuck
> with QText on Windows for my homework, and the headache is because my
> powerfull formula editor (MathType 5.0 - big brother of Equation Editor
> 3.0) does not h
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:16:07AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:32:47PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 06:47:22PM +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 29 June 2004 17:30, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > > > I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:32:47PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 06:47:22PM +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 June 2004 17:30, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > > I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
> >
> > I guess you mean a *new* version
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 06:47:22PM +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 June 2004 17:30, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
>
> I guess you mean a *new* version of apache, ssh etc. Otherwise you could
> simply install the original RH
> I'm currently using Open-Office whenever I can, but I am still stuck
> with QText on Windows for my homework, and the headache is because my
> powerfull formula editor (MathType 5.0 - big brother of Equation Editor
> 3.0) does not have a good replacement in Open Office. Truth is,
> OpenOffice's
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:11:15PM +0300, Yosef Meller wrote:
> I'm currently using Open-Office whenever I can, but I am still stuck
> with QText on Windows for my homework, and the headache is because my
> powerfull formula editor (MathType 5.0 - big brother of Equation Editor
> 3.0) does not h
Yosef Meller wrote:
> I'm currently using Open-Office whenever I can, but I am still stuck
> with QText on Windows for my homework, and the headache is because my
> powerfull formula editor (MathType 5.0 - big brother of Equation Editor
> 3.0) does not have a good replacement in Open Office. Truth
I hate to mention it but,
LaTex was created for this. Lyx should give you what you need. I will
warn you that it is a paradine switch.
good luck
Aaron
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 19:38, William Sherwin wrote:
> Oron Peled wrote:
> > 100Mb should be more than enough for many kernels + their initrd and
> > symtabs.
>
> Why would anyone ever need 100 MB for a /boot partition? Mine is 16 MB -
> and only 3.5 MB of it is used...
Indeed ~20MB should b
I'm currently using Open-Office whenever I can, but I am still stuck
with QText on Windows for my homework, and the headache is because my
powerfull formula editor (MathType 5.0 - big brother of Equation Editor
3.0) does not have a good replacement in Open Office. Truth is,
OpenOffice's equatio
בTuesday 29 June 2004 17:23, נכתב על ידי Ilya Konstantinov:
> 1. You having an old version of Qt.
> Solution: Upgrade your Qt to the version which Skype claims it requires.
> 2. You having a version of Qt compiled with an old compiler (g++
> pre-3.0). You can find it out by doing:
> objdump -T /usr
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:45:18PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> And you're correct here, but the obfuscation was done by the compiler,
> not the programmer. Standard C++ name mangling, something about
> QAction and QObject. There is a nifty utility to undo the mangling and
> give you the functio
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> You can do a clean install . But first: is there any existing data
> outside of /home ? Any simple way of backing it up and restoring?
If you have something like PartitionMagic, you can create a new partition called
/backup and store tarballs of user accounts and other neede
Oron Peled wrote:
> 100Mb should be more than enough for many kernels + their initrd and
> symtabs.
Why would anyone ever need 100 MB for a /boot partition? Mine is 16 MB - and
only 3.5 MB of it is used... Also, I don't see why the root partition would
need to be so large, as root doesn't usual
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 05:30:21PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
> started working on it, but it seems a real pain since it doesn't seem
> to be supported and compiling from source requires me to get quite a
> few packages to co
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Tools/Options.../Advanced/General Settings/Mark message read after
displaying for n seconds.
I don't have this check-box selected, but I'm using POP and Thunderbird
0.7, so it's a different setup than yours.
That works, but helps me not at all. BTW, I'm using IMAP.
Hmmm..
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 17:30, Micha Feigin wrote:
> I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
I guess you mean a *new* version of apache, ssh etc. Otherwise you could
simply install the original RH-6.2 RPMS.
> Anyway, is it possible to upgrade it in place to red-hat
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Micha Feigin wrote:
> I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
> started working on it, but it seems a real pain since it doesn't seem
> to be supported and compiling from source requires me to get quite a
> few packages to compile.
>
> Anyway, i
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Micha Feigin wrote:
I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
started working on it, but it seems a real pain since it doesn't seem
to be supported and compiling from source requires me to get quite a
few packages to compile.
Anyway, is it possible
I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
started working on it, but it seems a real pain since it doesn't seem
to be supported and compiling from source requires me to get quite a
few packages to compile.
Anyway, is it possible to upgrade it in place to red-hat 7/9/f
On Monday 28 June 2004 20:19, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> I'm looking for a program that uses pthreads, does something
> non-trivial, and has a good automated testing framework. Google is
> being less than helpful. Any recommendations?
>
Well, I believe python uses pthreads, and I'm almost sure it ha
my os exercise?;)
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>
> >I'm looking for a program that uses pthreads, does something
> >non-trivial, and has a good automated testing framework. Google is
> >being less
Hello,
This question is for LINUX USB gurus:
ov511 and pwc are both linux kernel usb drivers for 2 families of webcams :
ov511 chip based
webcams and philips-based webcams.
Both are part of the linux kernel (under drivers/usb)
(this is only a general description;for details see:
http://alpha.dyndns
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:58:57AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Wine?
Not sure how applicable it is for our purposes (software verification
of pthreaded programs), but I'll pass it along. Thanks.
Cheers,
Muli
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/
signa
25 matches
Mail list logo
