From: Amir Tal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Daniel Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XF86Config problem
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 20:34:29 +0200
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 06:25 pm, Daniel Pearson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002, Amir Tal <[EMAIL P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
áéåí øàùåï, 13 áàå÷èåáø 2002, 00:33, Oron Peled ëúá òì 'Re: A disturbing
article...':
> > A system that works 100% after you read the
> > total of two large instruction books and spend several days writing
> > configuration files still sucks.
>
> Man
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
áéåí øàùåï, 13 áàå÷èåáø 2002, 00:17, Mark Veltzer ëúá òì 'Re: A disturbing
article...':
> I beg to differ. I willing to wager that 90% of windows users NEVER install
> their operating systems. Either the sys admin at the company they are at
> does it
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 22:00:37 +0200
Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I use the system's configuration program to switch to another desktop and
> then switch back - I do expect to get back to exactly the same desktop I
> left, otherwise its a bug.
Definitely.
> A system that works 100%
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 21:41:15 +0200 (IST)
Jonathan Ben Avraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first problem is that Linux advocates usually do not understand just
> how unusable and inappropriate Linux is for the average person, which
The guy in the story had most problems in *configuring* Linu
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002, Mark Veltzer wrote about "Re: A disturbing article...":
> Actually Linux works much better "out of the box" than windows *** IF *** you
> compare two machine which come "scratched" (nothing on the hard drive). But
> since machines don't come that way it *** looks *** like wi
I disagree. At my company I've installed many formatted machine with windows
and had a very easy time performing the installation including setting up
servers connecting to the network etc. I just recently installed linux at
home and I still can't get ADSL to work on it (a whole week playing around
You know, I agree with you a 100%. As one who was "the tech guy" that did
install windows on new / old computers I can testify that it is the case.
Only computer literate people (read: proffesionals) actually do the
installation by themselfes, other people go to shops and ask to repair /
reinstall
here here. Computers are to be *used* by users and installed/configured
by the professionals. Even linux :)
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:17:36AM +0200, Mark Veltzer wrote:
> On Saturday 12 October 2002 21:41, you wrote:
> > Hi List,
> > I tend to concur with Oded,
> >
> > The first problem is that L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 12 October 2002 21:41, you wrote:
> Hi List,
> I tend to concur with Oded,
>
> The first problem is that Linux advocates usually do not understand just
> how unusable and inappropriate Linux is for the average person, which
> leads to the s
no hebrew support in the "Impress" module :(
hopefully yet :)
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 09:08, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Amir Tal wrote:
> > this is the download page at openoffice.org :
> > http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.0.1/index.html#localizations
>
> That versi
Hi List,
I tend to concur with Oded,
The first problem is that Linux advocates usually do not understand just
how unusable and inappropriate Linux is for the average person, which
leads to the second problem, that there is no Linux distribution that
works out-of-the-box like Windows does. This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
áùáú, 12 áàå÷èåáø 2002, 17:38, Guy Cohen ëúá òì 'Re: A disturbing article...':
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote:
> > most for the fact that a lot of user interactivity and system integrity
> > aspects in Linux in general and
hi,
I've became a games addict.
yes, i know, i am 30 years old - so what ?
i must admit that Quake III Arena and Unreal 2003 really grubbed me, and as a
person that didn't spend to much time with computer games, i am finding
myself in front of those games for hours...and hoursand hours.
anyw
On 10/12/2002 7:23 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
I wonder - is there anywhere a machine running the already-not-so-new Itanium
processor, where I can have (rent?) login access?
I would like to do some benchmarking.
Compaq/HP provides testing accounts on their servers, see
http://www.testdrive.com
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002, Nadav Har'El wrote about "Re: open source law?":
> If you misunderstood their "open source" definition, don't feel bad: that's
> *Exactly* what Perens and his friends meant to do (see the "Remaking the meme"
> chapter in O'Reilly's "Peer to Peer" book). They deliberately chose
I wonder - is there anywhere a machine running the already-not-so-new Itanium
processor, where I can have (rent?) login access?
I would like to do some benchmarking.
Thanks,
Dan.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROT
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote:
> most for the fact that a lot of user interactivity and system integrity
> aspects in Linux in general and Red Hat specificly suck nuts.
Heh. Thats total bs. If you can't configure it properly, don't
blame the system.
=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
áéåí øáéòé, 9 áàå÷èåáø 2002, 00:31, Nadav Har'El ëúá òì 'Re: TAU's response to
the complaint about one of the faculties website':
> Is viewing RTF really easier than viewing DOC on Linux?
> I can view DOC files on a text terminal using antiword (and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
áéåí ùìéùé, 8 áàå÷èåáø 2002, 23:11, Arie Folger ëúá òì 'Re: A disturbing
article...':
> On Tuesday 08 October 2002 02:05, Michael Sternberg wrote:
> > http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=1883
>
> The above article is about somebody who had a terr
message sent.
here is the message i sent. not really eloquent or anything, but i think
its a start.
simple and to the point:
"Hello, I am a concerned Israeli surfer. Why is your site not w3c
compliant?
the forum section in the end of an article cannot be seen in mozilla
which
is also the engine of
21 matches
Mail list logo
