Tiny, tiny typo...
On 11 Dec 13, Mike Turquette wrote:
> +clk_set_rate deserves a special mention because it is more complex than
> +the other operations. There are three key concepts to the common
> +clk_set_rate implementation:
> +
> +1) recursively traversing up the clk tree and changing clk
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Just to point out my post about the work we've been doing to have hw
> video decode and XBMC to work with a Pandaboard, using the Ubuntu
> Linaro Evaluation Builds.
>
> http://rsalveti.wordpress.com/2012/01/06/hw-video-decode-
Amit, could you please add the required Kconfig options that need to
be enabled to https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/Kconfig
under Exynos->Thermal?
Zach and Ricardo will then ensure that their kernels have those
Kconfig options enabled.
/Amit
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:54
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Amit Kachhap wrote:
>> Hi Zach/Ricardo,
>>
>> All the thermal Kconfigs are enabled in
>> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/Kconfig.
>
> Great, thanks.
>
> Guess we just need to make
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 12/01/12 12:20, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Ricardo Salveti
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Amit Kachhap
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Zach/Ricardo,
>
On 12 Jan 04, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On 01/04/2012 07:01 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> On 01/03/2012 08:15 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:45:48PM -0800, T
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andy Green wrote:
>>
>> Amit, do you know of a good place to raid for better cpuidle, closer to
>> upstream than OZ?
>
>
> wasn't that merged in 3.2? are you looking for that :
> http://git.kernel.org
Adding Thomas since he is maintainer of hrtimers and John since he
knows a bit about timekeeping. :)
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Dmitry Antipov
wrote:
> This patch provides an attempt to get away from jiffies in msleep()
> and msleep_interruptible() to hrtimers-backed usleep_range() and
> us
Dmitry,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Dmitry Antipov
wrote:
> - moving default_timer_slack_ns from per-task field to global variable
> controlled via sysctl() in [0..100] range (usecs) provides some
> more system-wide control beyond per-task prctl();
What benefits do I get from this
Here is a list of things[1] we plan to talk about and accomplish next week.
If you're interested in specific topics, that page contains names of
people to talk to. Ask me if you have trouble tracking them down.
Come and say Hi. :)
/Amit
--
Amit Kucheria, Tech Lead, Power Management Wo
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Rob Lee wrote:
> Maintainers for drivers/cpuidle, do you have any comments/opinions
> about this patch?
Venki has changed employers (probably needs a patch to MAINTAINERS?).
Cc'ing his new email address.
> Intel cpuidle and acpi cpuidle maintainers, do you have
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> - Various patches from Linaro
>
> * samsung_cpuidle_l2_retention patch set from the power management WG
Amit, is this now in your maintainer's tree queued up for 3.4?
___
linaro-dev mailing lis
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
> nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Of
> course I said Android, but a lot of people actually want a regular
> Linux platform where they can eas
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:03 PM, C.A, Subramaniam
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Wookey wrote:
>> +++ C.A, Subramaniam [2012-02-20 13:32 -0600]:
>>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Wookey wrote:
>>> Would there be a buildroot like setup? Like Wookey mentioned size does
>>> matter.
CC'ing Venki on this too.
The entire thread can be found at:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg161596.html
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Robert Lee wrote:
> This patch series moves vaious functionality duplicated in platform
> cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the pla
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Dmitry Antipov
wrote:
> On 02/28/2012 05:30 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
>> Could you include that in the changelog when the final version is
>> ready?
>
>
> What changelog you're saying about?
Dmitry, he means your commit log message.
_
Good job Rob. Now you need to make sure that the branch you provided
is up to date with Linus's latest -rc (aka rebase your branch every
rc).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: [git pull] Consolidate cpuidle functionality
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Andrey Konovalov
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've pushed the baseline for the 12.03 linux-linaro kernel tree to
> git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git , linux-linaro branch.
>
> Currently this is v3.3-rc6 plus:
> - 4 topics from the ARM LT
> - few comm
Sundar,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Sundar wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> Thanks for the replies. One more query
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Amit Kachhap
> wrote:
>
>>> "Different cpu related cooling devices": Do you mean cooling devices
>>> for different CPUs (num_cpus) or are you refer
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Mike Turquette
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Provide documentation for the common clk structures and APIs. This code
>> > can be found in drivers/clk/ and include/linux
For those who don't follow LWN regularly:
http://dtrace.org/blogs/brendan/2012/03/17/linux-kernel-performance-flame-graphs/
This could be useful for tracking performance bottlenecks.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>
>> On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Robert Lee wrote:
>>> This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform
>>> cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq
>>> disabling was removed
Rob, you should start a new '3.4-fixes' branch containing such
bugfixes that can be pushed to Len after -rc1.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Rob Lee wrote:
> Sekhar tested this patch on Davinci last night and found a problem. I
> looked at the code again and found a mindless omission on my par
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> The usual cpuidle initialization routines are to register the
s/are to//
> driver, then register a cpuidle device per cpu.
>
> With the device's state count default initialization with the
> driver's state count, the code initialization rem
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> Looking at the problem, here's what I think it'd help to fix the situation:
> 1 - Overlay PPA becomes the main repository for basic platform
> development, without having any hardware specific package (not even
> the kernel):
> This PPA w
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti
>>> So in the end we'd be generating 2 sets of hwpacks per board, one
>>> based on the Developme
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Chris Simmonds
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on behalf of an SoC vendor and I am trying to work out which
> (if any) of the many git trees at http://git.linaro.org/gitweb we should
Is this a new SoC (no mainline support) or an existing SoC?
> base our work on.
linux...@lists.linux-foundation.org, Kevin Hilman , Len
Brown , Trinabh Gupta , Arjan van
de Ven , Deepthi Dharwar ,
Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kay Sievers ,
Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria <
amit.kuche...@linaro.org>, Lorenzo Pieralisi ,
Rob Lee
On Friday 30 March 2012 06:23 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wro
Pantelis,
Why would you use anything other than the kick-ass ARM toolchain that
Linaro is providing for over a year now? ;-)
/Amit
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Pantelis Antoniou <
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com> wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I use a somewhat older compiler that doesn't whine so m
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi Mike
>
> A general question to all these patches.
>
> Do you want to get them into 3.4-rc, or linux-next?
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
In 0/13, I think he did ask Arnd to take these in for 3.4-rc even if
they are not strictly bug fixes, si
Adding Guodong and Tushar to make sure that the LT trees also have
thermal management turned on for 12.04.
And cc'ing linaro-dev and the release manager. :)
/Amit
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Please pull the thermal management work for exynos4 and imx6 p
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:02:59AM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > 2) So the new thermal_exynos4_imx6_work obsoletes the old
> > exynos_thermal_framework_V2 topic. You should mention that
> > explicitly when asking to add the new
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> On 04/05/2012 02:03 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> This patch provides a couple of tests for cpuidle in addition with
>> a small program which behaves to sollicitate the cpuidle drivers
>> especially when both cores needs to reach the same
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 12:58 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>
>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>
>>> On 04/24/2012 04:05 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset makes some cleanup on these cpuidle drivers
and consolidate the code across both arch
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:16 PM, wrote:
> From: Rajagopal Venkat
>
> The updated version of these test scripts are
> available in their respective directories.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajagopal Venkat
Ack. Hongbo, please merge this to pm-qa.
> ---
> run_template
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi Hongbo,
>
> On 11 May 2012 10:39, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> PM-QA is updated:
>>
>> 1. Removed obsolete test cases under pm-qa/tastcases
>>
>> 2. Thermal test scripts has been merged into, but is temporarily disabled
>> form the t
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Andy Green wrote:
> On 14/05/12 20:53, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> On 14/05/12 20:45, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>>
>>> Hi Aneesh,
>>>
>>> Adding linaro-dev in the loop as someone else could be also interested
>>>
>>> I have re
Just some nits below:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:47 PM, kejun.zhou wrote:
> From: kejun.zhou
>
> Signed-off-by: kejun.zhou
> ---
> cpuidle/cpuidle_killer.c | 10 ++
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpuidle/cpuidle_killer.c b/cpuidle/cpuidle_killer.c
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:47 PM, kejun.zhou wrote:
> Signed-off-by: kejun.zhou
> ---
> Android.mk | 1 +
> cpufreq/Android.mk | 76
> cpuhotplug/Android.mk | 84
> +
> cpuidle/Andro
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
> On 13 June 2012 10:59, Jean Pihet wrote:
>> Vincent,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Vincent Guittot
>> wrote:
>>> Use cpu compatibility field and clock-frequency field of DT to
>>> estimate the capacity of each core of the system
Panto,
This looks interesting. cc'ing Rob and Charles who were interested in
this at Connect.
/Amit
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Many current interesting systems have no ability to simulate the upcoming
> bigLITTLE machines, since their cores have to be clocked at
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
>
>> +#!/bin/bash
>
> I suspect that stuff like this is going to be unfriendly to the
> androidification work that is going on for pmqa. Hongbo, do all the scripts
> need to be converted over to run under the minimal shell that android
> suppor
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Rajagopal Venkat
wrote:
> add powertop test cases into pm-qa. Run the powertop sanity
> test to check if tool is available. If yes, then run
> powertop in report generation mode and validate the output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajagopal Venkat
> ---
> Makefile
Hi all,
Git Location: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=arm/big.LITTLE/mp.git;a=summary
Branch: big-LITTLE-MP-v1
We're announcing a kernel tree to track the various topics of the
big.LITTLE MP project. The aim of this tree is to help consolidate the
various topic patchsets that improve the behaviour
On 12 Jul 18, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 02:54:15PM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> > I've been looking a bit at how to get this running under DS-5, but I
> > haven't found much documentation. Best thing I've found so far has been
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDStdt
actually cc'ing them this time. :)
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> Oops, I forgot to CC Viresh and Vincent on this, so resending...
> ---
>
> We can't rely on Kconfig options to set the fast and slow CPU lists for
> HMP scheduling if we want a single kernel binary t
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Vikram Dhillon
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am in the process of documenting the major developments that have
> occurred since last year in big.LITTLE processing and I will post a
> formal RFC soon, before that I wanted to get some idea of whether I'm
> going in the righ
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Vikram Dhillon
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
>>
>> I started a skeleton wiki page[2] to keep track of the various
>> patchsets, a short description of the features they enable, etc. It
>> would b
Kejun,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:45 AM, kejun.zhou wrote:
> From: "kejun.zhou"
Commit message?
> Signed-off-by: kejun.zhou
In the future, please indicate in the email subject and commit message
what project/subsystem this patch is meant for. Since you've cc'ed
Rajagopal, I'm guessing this
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Bernhard Rosenkränzer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15 August 2012 10:23, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
>> I'm running
>> https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/panda-jb-gcc47-tilt-tracking-blob,
>> build 23 (Aug15). It's kernel version is 3.4.0-xxx, but 'perf --ve
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Bernhard Rosenkränzer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15 August 2012 13:25, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> Thanks for this Bero. How soon before this gets into a build we can use?
>
> We're planning on pulling it in through upstream, so (unless it&#
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 August 2012 12:32, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>>
>> Is this critical for this month's release? The release candidate builds
>> are possibly already in testing so we would have to request that they
>> are stopped and redone?
>
>
> Not s
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 August 2012 16:39, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>> Sounds OK from my point of view, except that rather than fixed dates
>> each month the should probably be tied to the release dates. E.g. the
>> Monday of the week before release (the no
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Rajagopal Venkat
wrote:
> Fix timer and work perf events timestamp tracing by
> - considering event exit timestamp relative to measurement first
> timestamp for events which entry timestamp is not recorded.
> Currently these events exit timestamp itself is considere
Patch 1 and 3 are independent cleanups. Perhaps you can separate them
out from the per-cpu latency series in case you have to repost.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> The cpuidle core takes care of filling this field from drv->state_count.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> Currently we have the cpuidle_device field in the acpi_processor_power
> structure.
> This adds a dependency in processor.h for cpuidle.h.
>
> In order to be consistent with the rest of the drivers and for the per cpu
> states
> coming righ
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab,
> cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states
>
> we have a single registration for the cpuidle states which makes
> sense. But now two new architectures are coming: tegra3
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to boot kernel on panda board. I got the source from:
>> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-linaro
>>
>
On 11 Jun 16, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The affinity between Arm processors is defined in the MPIDR register.
> We can identify which processors are in the same cluster,
> and which ones have performance interdependency. The cpu topology
> of an Arm platform can be set thanks to this register and t
Some nits below.
After you fix them, you can add a
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria
On 11 Jun 20, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The affinity between ARM processors is defined in the MPIDR register.
> We can identify which processors are in the same cluster,
> and which ones have pe
On 11 Jun 22, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:36:15PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 06/16/2011 11:54 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > On 16 June 2011 21:40, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >> The ARM ARM says these fields are IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED meaning that
> > >> different ven
On 11 Jun 22, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Can you pls pull below patch from 2.6.39 mainline kernel into 11.5
> Linaro kernel? This would fix some of the DVFS related issues seen on
> OMAP3.
> Patch:
> commit 5fd2a84ab3c8b87176e25db1d98c5cc34043a669
> Author: Avinash H.M
> OMA
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
> On 22 June 2011 12:14, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>>> +
>>> +#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].socket_id)
>>> +#define topology_core_id(cpu) (cpu_topol
On 11 Jun 30, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> These tests are used to test the cpufreq driver on ARM architecture.
> As the cpufreq is not yet complete, the test suite is based on the cpufreq
> sysfs API exported on intel architecture, assuming it is consistent across
> architecture.
>
> The different tes
On 11 Jul 01, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>
> > When all tests will be finished I wish to switch the new way test suite
> > execution in lava, if it is possible.
> >
> Given that the old tests are broken at the moment and disabled, any reason
> we
From: Amit Kucheria
(Please bear with pull-request for a single patch, but we're creating a
consolidation tree through which we will offer various topic branches for
merge into the Linaro kernel in the future)
The following changes since commit 620917de59eeb934b9f8cf35cc2d95c1ac8ed0fc:
/cputype.h
* Modify header of arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
* Modify tests and manipulation of MPIDR's bitfields
* Modify the place and dependancy of the config
* Modify Noop functions
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria
---
arch/arm/Kc
Adding John Rigby here.
On 11 Jul 12, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> From: Vincent Guittot
>
> (Patch accepted by Russell for 3.1:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg131273.html)
>
>
> +config ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY
> + bool "Support cpu topology definition"
On 11 Jul 21, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The PM-QA changed its license to GPLv2
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/TSC
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
Ack
> ---
> COPYING | 339
> +
> Makefile |
On 11 Jul 26, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This little program takes the cpu # as parameter, set the affinity and
> renice itself to the maximum priority. It increments a counter during
> one second, display the coutner's value and exit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
Have you looked at the cpubur
Just a nit below.
On 11 Jul 26, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Add a common directory for all the functions we will use later in the test
> scripts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> ---
> include/functions.sh | 251
> ++
> 1 files changed, 251 inse
On 11 Jul 26, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> ---
> cpufreq/test_01.sh | 32
> 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 cpufreq/test_01.sh
>
> diff --git a/cpufreq/test_01.sh b/cpufreq/test_01.sh
> new file
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/26/2011 02:46 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> These tests are for the power mangemenat QA.
>> The test definitions are at:
>>
>> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
>
> I compiled the linux-linaro-3.0 kernel and checked the content of
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[0-1]/topology/physical_package_id and found
> it is equal to '-1'.
>
> I
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/04/2011 12:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 4 August 2011 09:57, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/03/2011 06:25 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 3 August 20
Hi,
In the PMWG, we'd like to to be able to run some apps and measure the
power consumption while they run. Since the power measurement
framework currently supports Android, does anybody know of automated
ways to reproduce a test case?
I found Robotium[1] on googling and would like to know if it
Daniel,
This looks ok. Ack.
/Amit
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> Error messages have to go to the log file
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> ---
> cpufreq/Makefile | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpufreq/Makefile b/cp
Thanks for the info Yong. I'll look into monkeyrunner and Robotium.
Cheers,
Amit
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:35 PM, yong qin wrote:
> Hi, Amit Kucheria
> In my opinion, there are serval ways to do that.
>
> 1. use monkey to run the specified apps randomly.
> http://develop
On 11 Aug 09, Mike Turquette wrote:
> On some platforms it is possible to have some CPUs which support CPU
> hotplug and some which do not. Currently the prescence of an 'online'
> sysfs entry in userspace is adequate for applications to know that a CPU
> supports hotplug, but there is no convenie
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> Here is the example output with the test description. The email wraps
> the lines, actually each test are one line output.
>
> Let me know if it is ok for you.
>
> Thanks
>
See comments inline.
On 11 Aug 10, Mike Turquette wrote:
> On some platforms it is possible to have some CPUs which support CPU
> hotplug and some which do not. Currently the prescence of an 'online'
> sysfs entry in userspace is adequate for applications to know that a CPU
> supports hotplug, bu
ACK.
On 11 Aug 11, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> ---
> cpufreq/Makefile |2 ++
> cpufreq/cpufreq_01.txt |1 +
> cpufreq/cpufreq_02.txt |1 +
> cpufreq/cpufreq_03.txt |1 +
> cpufreq/cpufreq_04.txt |1 +
> cpufreq/cpufreq_05.txt |1 +
> cpuf
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
> Your distraction for the day...
>
> Toolchain has four PandaBoards that are used for building GCC, GDB,
> and other interesting programs. Here's a graph of how busy they are:
> http://ex.seabright.co.nz/misc/utilisation/ursas.png
>
> The gre
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> The main window creation is misplaced in the loop, it is created several
> times.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
ACK.
> ---
> display.c | 10 --
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/display.c
This patch is redundant with Lorenzo's new series[1]. Adding him to cc. I
suggest you rebase on top of his latest series.
On 11 Aug 19, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> These changes are necessary to make the retention cpuidle state work. This
> adds
> support for saving more L2 registers.
>
> Sign
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:18:52AM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:38:13PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> > This series is posted for posterity. It has been NAK'd by the community
>> > since CPU
Good start, but let's move this discussion public.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I did the following cpuset configuration:
>
> if [ ! -d /sys/fs/cgroup ]; then
> echo "cgroup not supported by the k
On 11 Aug 26, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26 August 2011 12:18, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Hi there
> >
> > A few questions--
> >
> > a) Is the omission of the "Developers and Community Builds" links from
> > http://www.linaro.org/downloads/ intentional?
>
> Yes, it is. We made the choice to pr
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Tony Mansson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On the topic of C-state statistics:
>
> For 11.09 there are BP:s to A) fix powertop for ARM and B) create an
> Android app for running powertop in Android. By that I mean executing
> a reconfigured but upstreamable powertop as a se
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:22:03PM -0500, Mounir Bsaibes wrote:
>> * Made hotplug power measurements on st-e u8500 platform
>> * mp3 playback test showed between 7 to 8% power improvement
>> * cpuhotplug - For Linux idle case,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:30 AM, James Westby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are two patches that are needed for the kernel CI effort. I would
> appreciate reviews on my first kernel patches to be submitted, and guidance
> for where to send them to get them accepted upstream.
>
> Needed in order to run th
Ack
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> Extract the URL from the test header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> ---
> cpufreq/Makefile | 4 +++-
> sched_mc/Makefile | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpufreq/Makefile b/cpu
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> here are some tests to test the cpu hotplug.
>
> Any feedback would be appreciate
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> -- Daniel
>
>
> Test 1: check the sysfs files are present
> ===
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/29/2011 05:41 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Daniel Lezcano
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Test 6: do some stress test
>>> ===
>>>
>>> for each c
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano ---
> cpuhotplug/Makefile | 25 +
> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 cpuhotplug/Makefile
>
> diff --git a/cpuhotplug/Makefile b/cpuhotplug/Makef
Ack
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> Specify the test suite can be run on Linux because it is not
> ARM specific.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> ---
> Makefile | 2 +-
> Test.mk | 2 +-
Adding Peter to the discussion..
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
> I work to link the cpu_power of ARM cores to their frequency by using
> arch_scale_freq_power. It's explained in the kernel that cpu_power is
> used to distribute load on cpus and a cpu with more cpu_power w
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 10:51 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> I have several goals. The 1st one is that I need to put more load on
>> some cpus when I have packages with different cpu frequency.
>
> That should be rather easy.
>
>> I also stu
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> Hey Amit,
> In updating our tree to 3.1, I noticed the SCHED_MC config option
> dropped out of the savedefconfig and it doesn't seem to be found in the
> arm Kconfig.
>
> Is that expected? Or are there out of tree patches that provide th
On 11 Oct 26, Richard Zhao wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> Is there anyone working on a SoC bus framework?
> The bus framework can manage the bus fabric, ddr, OCRAM clocks. When a
> device driver become working, it tells bus framework, cpu may access
> me (ip bus and related bus fabric on), I'm also a bus m
1 - 100 of 399 matches
Mail list logo
