On 11 Jun 30, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> These tests are used to test the cpufreq driver on ARM architecture.
> As the cpufreq is not yet complete, the test suite is based on the cpufreq
> sysfs API exported on intel architecture, assuming it is consistent across
> architecture.
> 
> The different tests are described at:
> 
> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts
> 
> Each test's header contains an URL to the anchor related item of this web page
> describing the script.
> 
> Daniel Lezcano (2):
>   cpufreq: add a test set for cpufreq
>   cpufreq: check the frequency affect the performances
> 
>  Makefile           |    6 ++
>  cpufreq/test_01.sh |   43 ++++++++++
>  cpufreq/test_02.sh |   43 ++++++++++
>  cpufreq/test_03.sh |   64 ++++++++++++++
>  cpufreq/test_04.sh |   85 +++++++++++++++++++
>  cpufreq/test_05.sh |  145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  cpufreq/test_06.sh |  236 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  utils/Makefile     |   11 +++
>  utils/cpucycle.c   |  102 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  utils/nanosleep.c  |   45 ++++++++++
>  10 files changed, 780 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 cpufreq/test_01.sh
>  create mode 100644 cpufreq/test_02.sh
>  create mode 100644 cpufreq/test_03.sh
>  create mode 100644 cpufreq/test_04.sh
>  create mode 100644 cpufreq/test_05.sh
>  create mode 100644 cpufreq/test_06.sh
>  create mode 100644 utils/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 utils/cpucycle.c
>  create mode 100644 utils/nanosleep.c
>

Daniel,

The scripts themselves look ok and the documentation is excellent. But I'm in
two minds regarding the location of the documentation though.

While having it on a wiki in the current form allows people w/o access to the
code to browse through the docs, it means that the 'comments' are at a
different place from the code.

But as long as you're confident this works for you, I'm ok with it.

Once youv've published the tree, please get in touch with Paul Larson to
start pulling these scripts into LAVA. I'd like to see what the reports would
look like.

Cheers,
Amit

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to