On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/29/2011 05:41 AM, Paul Larson wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Daniel Lezcano >> <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>wrote: >> >>> Test 6: do some stress test >>> =========================== >>> >>> for each cpu >>> * for i in 1 .. 50 >>> * set cpuX offline >>> * set cpuX back online >>> >> Not sure how evil you want to get with this, but several years back I wrote >> a simple, but nasty test that picked a cpu at random, and set the state to >> the opposite of whatever it happened to be at the time. It was completely >> random, I didn't have anything builtin for record/playback, or doing it in >> the same sequence for reproducibilty, but it didn't really need it. When it >> broke things, it usually broke them within just a few minutes. > > Ok thanks for the idea, I will add what you suggest.
With cpu0 being a special case? _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
