Re: my LWN article on big.LITTLE

2012-02-15 Thread Wookey
owing fast already! Here's a free link so all can read. http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/481055/581bc0245cc94be4/ Buy a subscription if you don't have one. In fact perhaps linaro should have a corporate sub? Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonbo

Re: Linaro embedded Linux distro?

2012-02-20 Thread Wookey
g this, not least because now everyone has SD-card based systems disk space mostly stopped being an issue. People using 'proper flash' still care. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: Linaro embedded Linux distro?

2012-02-20 Thread Wookey
+++ C.A, Subramaniam [2012-02-20 13:32 -0600]: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Wookey wrote: > Would there be a buildroot like setup? Like Wookey mentioned size does matter. No, if you want to use buildroot, use buildroot (or openbricks, or yocto, or OE). Debian/Ubuntu are binary distr

Re: Linaro embedded Linux distro?

2012-02-21 Thread Wookey
is possible to make a debian-based image this small, but it is not a sustainable thing without changes in Debian/Ubuntu to support a busybox base. Nobody is really working on this because there are so many other ways to achieve an image of this size which, frankly,

Re: Rant about binary blobs on #img

2012-02-29 Thread Wookey
+++ Zach Pfeffer [2012-02-29 11:38 -0600]: > Come one and all to change the world Difficult without some clue as to what '#img' might be or where it might be found. IRC channel? twitter hashtag? some website I've never heard of? Something else? Wookey -- Principal hats:

Java jogl and jogamp acceleration

2012-02-29 Thread Wookey
airly trivial matter of telling openjdk to use jogl and then 'stuff goes fast'. If we aren't doing this already in our images we probably should be. Just posting so that whoever worries about graphics and java and stuff knows about this. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro

ARM porting jam on Friday

2012-03-22 Thread Wookey
-dependency/cross-building issues summarised here: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/CrossCompile/MultiarchCrossBuildStatus with logfiles here http://people.linaro.org/~wookey/buildd/precise/sbuild-ma/status.html There is a pile of stuff, much of which is _really easy_. This page tells

ARM porting jam on friday (right now!)

2012-03-30 Thread Wookey
installable): http://edos.debian.net/weather/weather.php?distro=testing&arch=armhf (Is anyone running edos-distcheck on Ubuntu?) The ongoing 'make multiarch cross-building work' process is also still running and there are still easy pickings: Logfiles: http://people.linaro.org/~wookey/

Re: won't someone please think of the users!?

2012-04-06 Thread Wookey
etimes years, for people to get what we are doing via a distro, and that's too long for many of them, which is where the pressure comes from. We are all aware of that tension. So are we a distro now or not? Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro,

Re: Making ARM multiplatform kernels DT-only?

2012-05-04 Thread Wookey
hat I'm not involved with the Debian arm kernel team, so this is merely my general impression from afar. Someone closer to the problem could be more authoratative. Wookey ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: Making ARM multiplatform kernels DT-only?

2012-05-04 Thread Wookey
+++ Arnd Bergmann [2012-05-04 15:17 +]: > On Friday 04 May 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:20:57PM +0100, Wookey wrote: > > > Debian tries very hard not to support anything in the kernel that > > > upstream don't s

Re: Installing the armel libc on armhf

2012-05-10 Thread Wookey
d to find it. This is one of the clearest docs currently: http://suihkulokki.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/cross-compiling-with-multiarch-congrats.html The details are also on the linaro wiki here: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/CrossCompile/UsingMultiArch Linked from the index page: https://wik

pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...)

2012-05-10 Thread Wookey
et more than enough mail (especially from bloody launchpad :-), please try not to send this sort of spam to all - just people who will finds it useful. Ah, that's better... Wookey (who has lost his sig) ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: Installing the armel libc on armhf

2012-05-11 Thread Wookey
t missing files as it looks for amd64 on ports.u.c and arm* on archive.u.c Sadly this can't be automagically configured because of bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/645127 Wookey ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: running an armel image on 12.04

2012-05-22 Thread Wookey
l On Ubuntu (dpkg 1.16.1 to < 1.16.3) it is: echo "foreign-architecture armel" > /etc/dpkg.cfg.d/multiarch That should allow $package:armel as well as $package:armhf packages to be installed, but I don't know if that will actually solve your problem. Wookey __

Remote access info for Connect?

2012-05-25 Thread Wookey
count. It'd be good not to be scrambling to do that at 1am monday morning. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.o

Re: Ubuntu Developer Week

2012-07-18 Thread Wookey
could also be part of it, or at least request a few > > topics to be covered. > > Package cross build and multi-arch would be interesting to have. Yep. I'll be back from hols by then (just) so should be able to do something on how to do M-A crossbuilds. How does it work - one do

Re: Raspbian's hard float benchmarks

2012-07-18 Thread Wookey
d. I suspect all of those are mixed in. Interesting nevertheless. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: Raspbian's hard float benchmarks

2012-07-18 Thread Wookey
gt; I assume the Ogg encoder is fixed-point and therefore doesn't get the hf > benefit. You need to link against libtremor to get integer ogg en/decoding and few apps do, so I'd expect it to be fp too. But without the details of what was tested we can't tell from here. Woo

Re: ARM Cross-Compilation

2011-06-24 Thread Wookey
ive-build :-) there are an awful lot fewer things to go wrong and the tools are much more mature. There is plenty of work going on at the moment to improve the situation, and at least your source package is farily well-behaved (many aren't). It does look like it needs a couple of f

Re: ARM Cross-Compilation

2011-06-27 Thread Wookey
urrent > problems. If it's just too much of a pain, I'll have to give wheezy a try, but > I don't think it'll be as easy to get wheezy up and running on the > pandaboard. This thread suggests it's perfectly do-able: http://groups.google.com/group/pandaboard/browse_thread

Google docs disappear if @linaro.org account deleted

2011-08-25 Thread Wookey
accounts. I always knew this cloud thing was a bad plan... Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: Google docs disappear if @linaro.org account deleted

2011-08-25 Thread Wookey
+++ Christian Robottom Reis [2011-08-25 12:00 -0300]: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:43:50PM +0100, Wookey wrote: > > Peter Pearse collected all his ALIP cross-build status work in a > > google doc spreasheet using his @linaro.org login: > > PPearses ALIP build status google

Re: What would you like to cross-compile?

2011-08-30 Thread Wookey
vg is >50 on this > package, hm, forget about this, I'll just probably file a BR on the > package) > rawtherapee > rosegarden heh - only the easy stuff :-) useful list of things to test though. cheers. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM

Re: What would you like to cross-compile?

2011-08-31 Thread Wookey
ltiarching system libraries isn't going to help much. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH is not a supported

2011-09-07 Thread Wookey
g-query -l multiarch-support That's not the package that's complaining. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: vexpress and 11.08

2011-09-26 Thread Wookey
> * Ethernet > > Was buggered, is fixed now :-) When did it become un-buggered? Tim Klein here is trying to get said machine to boot over TFTP with NFS root and it just hangs at init. Which rootfs version and kernel are known to work? Wookey -- Principal hats

Easy crossbuilding of package sets/images

2011-10-11 Thread Wookey
rted packages, and this HOWTO makes it easy to set up a consistent build environment, so do give it a try and get stuck in if you'd like to see this working fully sooner rather than later. Reports of success, breakage, miserable failure, or how this almost-but-doesn't-quite address your u

Re: Easy crossbuilding of package sets/images

2011-10-11 Thread Wookey
+++ Michael Hope [2011-10-12 09:17 +1300]: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Wookey wrote: > > One output from the 11.09 release was a reasonably painless way of > > cross-building whole images against an archive, which also forms the > > basis for an auto-crossbuilder

Re: hackbox will be rebooted on Friday, 2011/11/11 (how cool is that date eh?) at 11:11 UTC

2011-11-08 Thread Wookey
+++ Zach Pfeffer [2011-11-08 12:06 -0500]: > (How cool is that date?) 11/11/11 has been declared 'Spinal Tap day'. A moment's thought will explain why :-) Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM h

Re: [EOL] Request for End Of Life - Beagleboard and Beagleboard-xM

2011-12-02 Thread Wookey
re not being (unduly) left in the lurch? Do we have our 'end-of-support' criteria written down somewhere? I think they should contain something more than 'member says so', which seems to be where we are currently at. But if in fact that really is how it's going to work then

Re: "struct user" conflicts on arm

2011-12-15 Thread Wookey
disclaimer: I know nothing at all about this except what I just read in that thread. Please refer to the thread for details. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ __

Re: Question: What is the current level of Free Software support by vendors?

2012-10-02 Thread Wookey
are at least 5 different graphics cores available, and 3 or 4 of them have RE projects to free them up, but it'll be a while before any are in useful shape. If you have any relevant expertise (or would like to aquire some) you will be exceedingly welcome to help out. http://limadriver.org/ h

Re: Add AArch64 support into util-linux

2012-10-03 Thread Wookey
bly an autoreconf. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Installable ARMv8 cross-toolchain

2012-10-25 Thread Wookey
4' and get a working cross-build environment. The repo is here: http://people.debian.org/~wookey/bootstrap.html That should be useable for both dpkg-cross style bulding or multiarch-style bulding. The repo also contains updated dpkg-cross, multiarch python, multiarch perl, updated dpkg wi

Re: [Query]: Can people post to this mailing list without subscription?

2013-02-20 Thread Wookey
opic)? Arguments about the admin load of moderation, or the difficulties of spam-filtering accurately on an open list, I can understand; but the idea that this list should be restricted to only suitably enlightened people by default seems wrong to me. It should be as open as we can practically make it,

arm64 Debian/Ubuntu port image available

2013-02-26 Thread Wookey
--host arm64 '. The current bootstrap packageset status is here: http://people.linaro.org/~wookey/buildd/raring-arm64/status-bootstrap.html There is no armv8 (arm64/aarch64) hardware available yet, so this image can currently only be run in a model. ARM provide a free-beer prorietary 'Foun

Re: arm64 Debian/Ubuntu port image available

2013-02-27 Thread Wookey
+++ Ian Campbell [2013-02-27 12:00 +]: > On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 02:10 +0000, Wookey wrote: > > > > Setting up an arm64 build environment is very simple. Use > > sbuild-createchroot or mk-sbuild > > and point at the bootstrap repo, with a bit of config and some updat

Re: arm64 Debian/Ubuntu port image available

2013-03-12 Thread Wookey
+++ Wookey [2013-02-27 02:10 +]: > State of the Debian/Ubuntu arm64 port > = > > *** Arm64 lives! *** > > Executive summary > - > > * There is now a bootable (raring) image to download and run > * A bit m

Re: *****SPAM***** Re: cross build packages for quantal

2013-04-02 Thread Wookey
cross anyway so some hacking will be needed) It also need multiarch python, which is not in quantal. You can add my quantal-bootstrap repo which has a suitable python in it: --- /etc/apt/sources.list.d/quantal-bootstrap.list deb [arch=armhf] http://people.debian.org/~wookey/bootstrap/ubunture

Re: cross build packages for quantal

2013-04-03 Thread Wookey
gmodule-no-export-2.0 gobject-2.0` > debian/tmp/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/libgstreamer-1.0.so > -Idebian/tmp/usr/include/gstreamer-1.0 > perldoc -o man debian/dh_gstscancodecs > > debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/dh_gstscancodecs.1 This is wrong. It should be: $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TY

Re: cross build packages for quantal

2013-04-04 Thread Wookey
t the usual way of working... Yes, the debian/ubuntu default is to build natively, which avoids the problems of cross-tools and cross-dependencies. The catch is that, whilst it gets faster by the day, it's still generally slower than crossbuilding on a fast x86 box. A chromebook or arndale boar

Re: Question relating to arm

2013-04-15 Thread Wookey
dd to recommend this one unless someone says 'I have to have really cheap, but need full linux, I need easy IO Pins and really don't care about freeness'. Or possibly 'I am clueless noob and heard there is an RPi club near here'. Otherwise I'd suggest any nu

Re: Question relating to arm

2013-04-15 Thread Wookey
nd for running a POS system, and I'm not aware of any of them being aimed at low-volume manufacturers who aren't wanting to lay out their own boards (which sounds like where you are coming from). Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware

Re: automated build coverage

2013-05-14 Thread Wookey
orking out how the Jenkins part of it works and implementing faster ubuntu kernel builds (by crossing them instead of native-building on canonical PPAs) (I'm still kicking this, but I hope it'll be running any day now), but there is piles of other stuff that only Fathi and the Lava pe

Re: Cross-Compiling Qemu for Aarch64?

2013-05-17 Thread Wookey
dency and the following pages are linked > to this issue (directly or indirectly) and I have tried all of them > without any success: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-oe/+bug/1097561 > http://people.debian.org/~wookey/bootstrap.html > http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_wit

Re: Cross-Compiling Qemu for Aarch64?

2013-05-17 Thread Wookey
h crossbuilding' is woefully out of date. If I was being snarky I might point out that this would already have been working and up-to-date when you wanted to use it if people hadn't insisted that this work was not wanted and I should stop. Still, it didn't take long to get going, a

Re: Cross-Compiling Qemu for Aarch64?

2013-05-20 Thread Wookey
> On 05/17/2013 07:16 PM, Wookey wrote: +++ Mian M. Hamayun [2013-05-20 20:13 +0200]: > Hi, > > First of all, many thanks for your kind support. I have been able to > setup a crossbuild chroot environment for aarch64. I can now > configure and compile qemu using this envir

M0 and M3 patches in linaro toolchains

2013-08-19 Thread Wookey
concept of making existing linux-arm cross-compilers, with M0 and M3 support included, and using spec-file jiggery-pokery to get them to DTRT for M* targets. This should be possible, but advice from anyone who's every actually tried on the gotchas would be good. cheers Wookey -- Principal hats: L

Re: M0 and M3 patches in linaro toolchains

2013-08-19 Thread Wookey
+++ Matthew Gretton-Dann [2013-08-19 16:58 +0100]: > On 19 August 2013 15:04, Wookey wrote: > > Debconf13 (last week) considered the matter of bare-metal > > cross-toolchains in Debian. > > The linaro embedded toolchains > > (https://launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded/

Re: Regarding full build of Ubuntu ARM with linaro toolchain

2013-08-19 Thread Wookey
y difficult for many years. Solutions are coming (debile and pybit are current contenders), but sadly it's not easy, and nor is it documented. I really hope this will finally get fixed soon - some progress was made at debconf and I hope to try it (and document it if it works) soonish. Wookey -

Re: mailing list for cross build issues created

2013-08-21 Thread Wookey
+++ Matthias Klose [2013-08-21 22:31 +0200]: > Today the debian-cr...@lists.debian.org ML was created. > Please subscribe to this list if you are interested in cross build issues. Here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cross/ Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloo

Re: Google hangout not working in debian sid/testing

2013-10-14 Thread Wookey
ds SIP/XMPP accounts for everyone, and we'd be smart to run our own turn server. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.li

Re: [question]multi-arch support for arm and arm64

2013-10-17 Thread Wookey
And Ubuntu Saucy now has lots of arm64 packages you can use: http://ports.ubuntu.com/dists/saucy/main/binary-arm64/ So you should be able to debootstrap an arm64 image and add armhf binaries to it, or vice versa. I've not actually tried that so I don't know how well it works. There may sti

Re: [question]multi-arch support for arm and arm64

2013-10-18 Thread Wookey
think of good reasons why it could go either way. Does anyone else know for sure? Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: Cross compiling a package for aarch64 foundation model

2013-11-12 Thread Wookey
gt;linux)? Maybe. Not sure what a coreisbr-unknown-linux-gnu is. Here is a build log from an (ubuntu) gmp cross-build which might give some clues: http://people.linaro.org/~wookey/buildd/quantal-arm64/sbuild-ma/gmp_2:5.0.2+dfsg-2ubuntu2arm64-quantal-bootstrap-arm64-20121117-234708.6930.log

Re: Ubuntu-based image for use with foundation model

2013-11-27 Thread Wookey
line (which of course the axf wrapper makes awkward - see below). Here is an ubuntu arm64 rootfs + suitable kernel images http://people.debian.org/~wookey/bootstrap/rootfs/ (and a debian one as of last week) https://wiki.debian.org/Arm64Port#Pre-built_Rootfs They also work (a whole lot faster) with

Re: Ubuntu-based image for use with foundation model

2013-11-27 Thread Wookey
+++ Christopher Covington [2013-11-27 11:17 -0500]: > Hi Wookey, > > > There is a wiki page somewhere for wrapping your own kernel with > > bootwrapper foo, but I found it much easier to use a handy internal tool > > which > > rewrites the kernel command line inside

32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-01-29 Thread Wookey
at, but it looks like we have at least two issues.. So this mail is really to ask what the best fix is and thus who will deal with it? Do I need to file a bug or a card somewhere? Possibly more to follow when I work out what else is wrong... Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Em

Re: 32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-01-29 Thread Wookey
+++ Arnd Bergmann [2014-01-29 18:14 +0100]: > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:49 Wookey wrote: > > Running 32-bit binaries is quite seriously broken until this is fixed. I > > presume this currently isn't on anyone's list to fix? I'm not sure who's > > l

'test' hangout

2014-02-11 Thread Wookey
Hangout audio and video is regularly broken for people which causes general aggravation for people in meetings. Could we have a 'test/corridor/watercooler/coffeemachine' hangout somewhere for people to test if it's working for them today? Maybe there is one already? Wookey --

Re: 'test' hangout

2014-02-11 Thread Wookey
+++ Nicolas Dechesne [2014-02-11 09:24 -0700]: >Le 11 f�vr. 2014 09:18, "Wookey" <[1]woo...@wookware.org> a �crit : >> >> Hangout audio and video is regularly broken for people which causes >> general aggravation for people in meetings.

Re: 32bit binaries on 64-bit linux (fixed)

2014-02-24 Thread Wookey
+++ Wookey [2014-01-29 16:36 +]: > Someone asked if this worked, and I thought 'that's trivial to test with > multiarch' so I did. > On Saucy (where there is no multiarch version skew issue between binary > versions of packages) the > dpkg --add-architecutre ar

[ACTIVITY] week 22

2014-05-30 Thread Wookey
keys Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

[ACTIVITY] Week23

2014-06-06 Thread Wookey
Issues == * Too many packages are buildable but not rebuildable. * Having to build NMUs twice in slightly different formats for debian-ports unreleased and debian proper bug/upload is a pain. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http

[ACTIVITY] Week24

2014-06-13 Thread Wookey
(DEVPLAT-221: 10%) * Worked on arm64 NMU process with Chen (DEVPLAT-221: 5%) * Some bootstrap sprint organising (5%) == Plans == * Fix/Build soprano (DEVPLAT-217) * NMU pile of packages * Test Arm64 rootfs on ARM hardware == Issues == Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware

[ACTIVITY] Week 25

2014-06-20 Thread Wookey
-217: 5%) * Tried to port emacs23 as it's causing many build failures. Failed so far (hangs during build): #752031 (DEVPLAT-221: 10%) * Rebuilt packages for colord transition: (DEVPLAT-221: 5%) * Set up sortblockers script: (DEVPLAT-221: 10%) http://people.debian.org/~wookey/boot

[ACTIVITY] Week26

2014-06-27 Thread Wookey
eakage (10%) * GSOC midterm evaluation (15% == Plans == * Finish/test/upload openjdk/zookeeper * Fix/NMU remaining packages in SCC http://people.debian.org/~wookey/bootstrap/blockerlist * Investigate PDF build errors. * Mail release team about arm64 prospects == Issues == NMUing gets tediou

[ACTIVITY] Week28

2014-07-11 Thread Wookey
-binutils package (now in Archive) (DEVPLAT-220) (5%) * Finalised Bootstrap/crossbuild sprint for Paris/August (20%) * Extended sortblockers script to generate outofdate list: http://people.debian.org/~wookey/bootstrap/outofdatelist (2%) * Investigated crappy connection to china (losing 60% of my packets

[ACTIVITY] Week29

2014-07-18 Thread Wookey
packages (10%) * Bootstrap/crossbuild sprint travel booked * Bootstrap/crossbuild sprint cat-herding (5%) * Updated cross-binutils build for latest binutils - uploaded (5%) == Plans == * Fix/NMU remaining packages in SCC http://people.debian.org/~wookey/bootstrap/blockerlist * Investigate PDF build

[ACTIVITY] Week32

2014-08-08 Thread Wookey
(DEVPLAT-220: 5%) * Worked on breakage in current cross-gcc packages for upcoming sprint: (DEVPLAT-220: 5%) == Plans == * Get cross-toolchain packages into buildable state * Add multiarch builds to sbuild * Fix/NMU remaining packages in SCC http://people.debian.org/~wookey/bootstrap

Re: [GIT PULL] Create a workload generator tool

2014-08-08 Thread Wookey
oad that would be helpful (now that no-one actually _does_ releases anymore and you just have to know when a 'good' git commit point happens :-) That should propogate to ubuntu too, but doesn't seem to have done so yet, and they just froze imports to utopic, so $someone should poke $som

[ACTIVITY] Week33

2014-08-31 Thread Wookey
(DEVPLAT-220: 5%) * Worked on breakage in current cross-gcc packages for upcoming sprint: (DEVPLAT-220: 5%) == Plans == * Get cross-toolchain packages into buildable state * Add multiarch builds to sbuild * Fix/NMU remaining packages in SCC http://people.debian.org/~wookey/bootstrap/blockerlist

[ACTIVITY] Weeks33-35

2014-08-31 Thread Wookey
r britney cross-arch processing discussed (DEVPLAT-220 3%) debile (buildd) cross-support designed with developer Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@l

[ACTIVITY] week 40

2014-09-29 Thread Wookey
) == Plans == * Get cross-toolchain packages into testing before freeze * Upload multiarch-ready sbuild * Enable new buildd hardware == Issues == Shortage of hours in day. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org

[ACTIVITY] week40

2014-10-03 Thread Wookey
on turfan (APM machine)(CARD-1586: 20%) == Plans == * Get cross-toolchain packages into testing before freeze * Upload sbuild with profile support * Enable new buildd hardware == Issues == Shortage of hours in day before freeze Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloon

[ACTIVITY] week41

2014-10-10 Thread Wookey
into testing before freeze * Enable new buildd hardware == Issues == Shortage of hours in day. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http

[ACTIVITY] Week42

2014-10-17 Thread Wookey
s) * built and uploaded cross-binutils-0.13 (DEVPLAT-220: 10%) == Plans == * Get cross-toolchain packages into testing before freeze (looking iffy) == Issues == Shortage of hours in day. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wo

[ACTIVITY] Week43

2014-10-24 Thread Wookey
FTPmasters (DEVPLAT-220: 20%) == Plans == * Fix more arm64 build failures * Build within-arch crosstoolchains to break impasse == Issues == Gcc maintainer has torpedoed multiarch-built cross-toolchains in Jessie. ( DebianBug: 766619) Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard

[ACTIVITY] Week43

2014-10-31 Thread Wookey
%) * Wrote and Presented ARM in Debian, Debian in arm: wookware.org/talks/debianinarm/reveal 20% * Admin catchup on 3 months of expenses 10% = Plans == get standalone builds working == Issues == Cross-toolchain build-method disagreements Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM

[ACTIVITY] week44

2014-11-07 Thread Wookey
porterbox configured * Investigated gccxml (hard to backport - ancient gcc ver): 15% = Plans == get standalone builds working == Issues == Cross-toolchain build-method disagreements Looks like cross-toolchain packages won't make Jessie Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Woo

[ACTIVITY] Week46

2014-11-21 Thread Wookey
== Progress == * Updated xbuilder to 1.1. Uploaded to Debian (NEW) * Ran cross-build tests on Jessie with new toolchains: https://people.linaro.org/~wookey/buildd/testing/sbuild/latest/status.html * Set up new emdebian server after crack. * Cross-toolchain design work with team - udated wiki

[ACTIVITY] Week47

2014-11-28 Thread Wookey
affected arm64 packages * Upgraded desktop to jessie = Plans == get standalone builds working == Issues == Cross-toolchain build-method disagreements Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro

[ACTIVITY] week50

2014-12-12 Thread Wookey
-toolchain build methods at https://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/Cross = Plans == get multilib cross-gcc builds working == Issues == Cross-toolchain build-method disagreements Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org

[ACTIVITY] Week3

2015-01-16 Thread Wookey
lans == == Issues == Breakage from Jessie upgrade (no printing, schroots bunged up, 30G of logs filled /) Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

[ACTIVITY] Week 5

2015-01-30 Thread Wookey
with jessie arm64 qemu setup for students (25%) Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: OpenOCD

2010-09-22 Thread Wookey
JTAG is always cranky in my experience with tedious wrinkles about different dongles, interface boards and strange effects of other devices if, for example, the JTAG pins on the CPLD get re-used. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ __

Re: the linaro toolchain and older arm versions

2010-10-07 Thread Wookey
v4t-nothumb-novfp maximum-compatibilty flavour: http://emdebian.org/crosstools.html ('binary toolcahins' link). This issue is a useful subject for UDS discussion, I believe. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ __

Re: the linaro toolchain and older arm versions

2010-10-07 Thread Wookey
+++ Andrew Stubbs [2010-10-07 12:46 +0100]: > On 07/10/10 12:03, Wookey wrote: > A possible solution to the problem would be to include the sources to > libgcc.a in the installation, and teach gcc to compile it on-the-fly, as > necessary. If it was possible to separate-out libgcc

Re: back to xdeb, fails to build

2010-10-19 Thread Wookey
y. I'll have a look later. Is any of this stuff available/in maverick yet so I can try to reproduce? I suggest you file a bug too. Are you using xdeb 0.6.3? Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: Teaching sbuild how to use xdeb

2010-11-11 Thread Wookey
d idea. I've been planning to send a 'the state of cross building at the end of this cycle' mail very soon (once specs are done with), to say what we have so far, what works and what doesn't. (before we mess with things again :-) > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 21:30 +, Wookey wrote:

Re: Building Linaro-netbook filesystem from sources

2010-12-17 Thread Wookey
ood overview. That has a currently more-or-less empty 'Rebuilding everything for a new ABI/flavour section. I'll fill that out now. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: ALIP project

2011-01-25 Thread Wookey
quite sure what is was you wanted to do. Ask again if I haven't helped. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

tcl8.5 breaks dpkg-cross assumptions and multiarch

2011-01-31 Thread Wookey
Does anyone disgree with the above conclusions? And do people agree that policy 8.2 could be clearer on this point? I've filed a bug containing some of the above discussion and a patch for tcl8.5. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611650 Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro,

Re: tcl8.5 breaks dpkg-cross assumptions and multiarch

2011-01-31 Thread Wookey
;s actually correct. Its policy of only crossing arch-dependent files is the right one, I believe. (It does allow symlinks within /usr/src which presumably has/had a good reason.) Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ __

Re: tcl8.5 breaks dpkg-cross assumptions and multiarch

2011-02-03 Thread Wookey
+++ Loïc Minier [2011-02-01 12:50 +0100]: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011, Wookey wrote: > > But if something is looking for arch-independent stuff in /lib then in > > general that's wrong, and I'm not aware of any examples of > > correctly-packaged packages that need t

Fun with libtool and cross-builds

2011-02-10 Thread Wookey
before installing it make[4]: *** [install-libLTLIBRARIES] Error 1 I note that when doing this libtool --config shows that it does have an idea of where the right place is: maverick)wookey@kh:~/ubuntu/maverick/build/pcre3$ ./libtool --config | grep sys_lib sys_lib_search_path_spec="/usr/lib/

Re: Making linaro-nano smaller or Give Up Disk Space for Lent

2011-03-10 Thread Wookey
st fit on and there is no room to generate an apt-cache? One thing that has been missing from apt for a long time is ability to split upgrades into coherent chunks so an upgrade requiring downloads larger than the space available can proceed. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, B

Re: Making linaro-nano smaller or Give Up Disk Space for Lent

2011-03-11 Thread Wookey
it with > the emdebian folks-- there's a risk of reinventing what they do; plus > they certainly have tools which are useful for this. Indeed. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: Making linaro-nano smaller or Give Up Disk Space for Lent

2011-03-11 Thread Wookey
using apt and dpkg for resolving and installing). It's probably a better tool for making nano images than debootstrap, which has a more conventional focus. Certainly worth looking into. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ _

  1   2   >