er.ubuntu.com
gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect to host
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0
Can you tell me whats going wrong here.
Regards,
Amit Bag
On 16/02/12 12:57, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
instance of cooling device is associated with trip points).
More over the existing PASSIVE cooling trip type does the same thing and
iterates across all the cooling state.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
On 20 December 2011 18:07, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> I'm not sure that using the
instance of cooling device is
associated with trip points). More over the existing PASSIVE cooling
trip type does the same thing and iterates across all the cooling
state.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
>
> On 20 December 2011 18:07, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>
>> Hi Amit,
>>
>&g
3.3 merge window? Kindly let me know your
opinion.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap
wrote:
> Changes since V3:
> *Implemented Russell feedback and moved sleep magic 4byte memory before
> s3c_cpu_resume to data section.
>
> Changes since V2:
.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
On 4 January 2012 03:55, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 06:59 -0500, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> Export and register information from the hwmon tmu sensor to the samsung
>> exynos kernel thermal framework where different cooling devices and ther
On 3 January 2012 18:52, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> amit kachhap wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mr kim,
>>
>> All the comments have been addressed for the Exynos cpu idle patchset.
>> The updated patchset was posted about one month back and there have
>> been no further commen
Tiny, tiny typo...
On 11 Dec 13, Mike Turquette wrote:
> +clk_set_rate deserves a special mention because it is more complex than
> +the other operations. There are three key concepts to the common
> +clk_set_rate implementation:
> +
> +1) recursively traversing up the clk tree and changing clk
Clark get a few spare cycles ;-).
>
> We hope to also have a set-top box image by the end of this cycle,
> that should use XBMC by default.
>
> Please give it a try and let us know about any other issue you may find.
Wow! Awesome work. Looks like I might just be ab
Amit, could you please add the required Kconfig options that need to
be enabled to https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/Kconfig
under Exynos->Thermal?
Zach and Ricardo will then ensure that their kernels have those
Kconfig options enabled.
/Amit
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6
Hi Zach/Ricardo,
All the thermal Kconfigs are enabled in
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/Kconfig.
Thanks,
Amit D
On 10 January 2012 23:55, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Amit, could you please add the required Kconfig options that need to
> be enabled to
&
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Amit Kachhap wrote:
>> Hi Zach/Ricardo,
>>
>> All the thermal Kconfigs are enabled in
>> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/Kconfig.
>
> Great, thank
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 12/01/12 12:20, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Ricardo Salveti
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Amit Kachhap
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Zach/Ricardo,
>
can't be
> > accessed thru accessors though.
> >
> >> I'd like to spin the question around: if we're OK exposing some stuff
> >> (in your example above, the parent pointer), then what clk data are
> >> you trying to hide?
> >
> > Well, everything from drivers which the current clk implementations do
> > hide. Catching abuse in with drivers coming in from all different trees
> > and lists will be impossible.
> >
> > For platform code it is more fuzzy. I don't think platform code should
> > be allowed to muck with prepare/enable counts for example.
>
> So there is a clear dichotomy: drivers shouldn't be exposed to any of
> it and platform code should be exposed to some of it.
>
> How about a drivers/clk/clk-private.h which will define struct clk and
> must only be included by clk drivers in drivers/clk/*?
>
> This establishes a bright line between those things which are allowed
> to know the details of struct clk and those that are not: namely that
> clk drivers in drivers/clk/ may use '#include "clk-private.h"'.
> Obviously struct clk is opaque to the rest of the kernel (in the same
> way it has been prior to the common clk patches) and there is no need
> for struct clk_hw anymore. Also helper functions are no longer needed
> for clock driver code, which I think *is* a manageable set of code to
> review. Also clk drivers must live in drivers/clk/ for this to work
> (without a big ugly path in someone's #include directive somewhere).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Mike
Thomas?
We're stuck on this fundamental point for a while now. And v5 of the
patchset doesn't make much sense without resolving it.
/Amit
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
libcurses library and let you know.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
On 12 January 2012 17:37, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> I used linaro powertop to check idle state on embedded board
> with EXYNOS4 series. I modified Makefile to use -lncurse
> instead of -lncursew and it was well op
On 11 January 2012 13:32, Rob Lee wrote:
> Hey Amit, I was able to use your code on an i.MX6Q thermal
> implementation and it seemed to work pretty well. Thanks for adding
> this. A couple of comments below.
Thanks for testing and reviewing the code.
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 a
Hi Rob,
I got your point. The main idea of doing like this is to keep the
cooling implementation independent from thermal zone
algorithms(thermal_sys.c). But binding freq_tab index to the trip
numbers may be not be bad idea. I will give more thought into it in
the next patchset.
Regards,
Amit D
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andy Green wrote:
>>
>> Amit, do you know of a good place to raid for better cpuidle, closer to
>> upstream than OZ?
>
>
> wasn't that merged
On 13 December 2011 20:43, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> PATCH 1) [thermal: Add a new trip type to use cooling device instance number]
> This patch adds a new trip type THERMAL_TRIP_STATE_ACTIVE which passes
> cooling device instance number and may be helpful for cpufreq cooling devices
Adding Thomas since he is maintainer of hrtimers and John since he
knows a bit about timekeeping. :)
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Dmitry Antipov
wrote:
> This patch provides an attempt to get away from jiffies in msleep()
> and msleep_interruptible() to hrtimers-backed usleep_range() and
> us
Dmitry,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Dmitry Antipov
wrote:
> - moving default_timer_slack_ns from per-task field to global variable
> controlled via sysctl() in [0..100] range (usecs) provides some
> more system-wide control beyond per-task prctl();
What benefits do I get from this
Here is a list of things[1] we plan to talk about and accomplish next week.
If you're interested in specific topics, that page contains names of
people to talk to. Ask me if you have trouble tracking them down.
Come and say Hi. :)
/Amit
--
Amit Kucheria, Tech Lead, Power Management Wo
On 1 February 2012 20:19, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I'm not really a fan of this as it stands - the name isn't very
> intuitive and the code's pretty difficult to read. Would the following
> (incomplete and obviously untested) not have the effect you want? Then
> you register multiple trip points
On 1 February 2012 20:19, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> I'm not really a fan of this as it stands - the name isn't very
> intuitive and the code's pretty difficult to read. Would the following
> (incomplete and obviously untested) not have the effect you want? Then
> you register multiple trip points
On 1 February 2012 20:27, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:43:16PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
>> implementations using frequency scaling and cpuhotplugg currently.
>
> We've be
On 3 February 2012 12:42, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Hi, sorry for the late response.
>
> On 四, 2012-01-19 at 14:47 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
>> On 13 December 2011 20:43, Amit Daniel Kachhap
>> wrote:
>> > PATCH 1) [thermal: Add a new trip type to use cooling device in
stats/trans_table
are the places where the output is more than 1 value.
Anyway I can enclose this sysfs inside CONFIG_THERMAL_COOLING_STATS macro.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Hi eduardo,
Thanks for the detail review.
On 6 February 2012 23:09, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello Amit,
>
> some comments embedded.
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> Add a sysfs node code to report effective cooling of all coolin
Hi eduardo,
Again thanks for the review.
On 7 February 2012 00:25, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello Amit,
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:43:16PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
>> implementations using
On 6 February 2012 16:18, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:16:17PM -0800, Amit Kachhap wrote:
>> On 6 February 2012 09:03, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:56:58PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >> >
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Rob Lee wrote:
> Maintainers for drivers/cpuidle, do you have any comments/opinions
> about this patch?
Venki has changed employers (probably needs a patch to MAINTAINERS?).
Cc'ing his new email address.
> Intel cpuidle and acpi cpuidle maintainers, do you have
://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/Kconfig#Samsung_Exynos
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
On 13 February 2012 12:22, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> If someone has something which is not in the mainline, was not in the 12.01
> kernel release, but worth including into the 12.02 ke
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> - Various patches from Linaro
>
> * samsung_cpuidle_l2_retention patch set from the power management WG
Amit, is this now in your maintainer's tree queued up for 3.4?
___
lina
Hi Amit Kucheria,
I have asked the samsung maintainer(Kukjin Kim) to queue this patch
set 1 month back. But seems like it is not present.
Hi Mr Kim,
Can you please queue this patchset in your tree for next merge window?
The V5 version submitted fixes all the known issues.
http
s
> class of users is arguably the largest class of people using these
> boards so creating something targeted at them would allow them to get
> all the benefits of Linaro in a easy to use fashion.
Developer images aren't useful for these folks?
I find them e
port minimal builds for bootstrapping purposes which
>> might be useful in this regard, but that's not really what it's for.
>>
> Well minimal is all I care... not buildroot. But I would expect it to
> be < 20M in size. Does that make sense or am i speaking gibberish
&
they are working fine.
Some modification was done for CHECK_FLAG.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
On 18 February 2012 07:29, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Amit Kachhap wrote:
>>
>> Hi Amit Kucheria,
>>
> Hi all,
>
> (Cc'ed Jaecheol Lee and Jongpill Lee)
>
>> I have asked
On 21 February 2012 16:37, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Amit Kachhap wrote:
>>
>> Hi kukjin Kim,
>>
> Hi,
>
>> I was on travel for elc and linaro conferences so little late for
>> replying. Thanks for testing these patches.
>> I just submitted the V6 series of
On 23 February 2012 12:16, R, Durgadoss wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: amit kachhap [mailto:amitdani...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Amit Daniel
>> Kachhap
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 3:44 PM
>> To: linux...@lists.l
Hi Durgadoss,
Thanks for the detailed review comments.
On 24 February 2012 16:34, R, Durgadoss wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: amit kachhap [mailto:amitdani...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Amit Daniel
>> Kachhap
>> Sent: Wednesday, February
CC'ing Venki on this too.
The entire thread can be found at:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg161596.html
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Robert Lee wrote:
> This patch series moves vaious functionality duplicated in platform
> cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the pla
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Dmitry Antipov
wrote:
> On 02/28/2012 05:30 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
>> Could you include that in the changelog when the final version is
>> ready?
>
>
> What changelog you're saying about?
Dmitry, he means your commit log message.
_
Hi,
I verified this patch on exynos4 based origen board.
Tested-by: Amit Daniel
Thanks,
Amit D
On 29 February 2012 08:41, Robert Lee wrote:
> Enable core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and remove that
> handling from this code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Lee
> ---
&
On 3 March 2012 17:51, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 03/03/2012 12:06 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>
>> This movement is needed because the hwmon entries and corresponding
>> sysfs interface is a duplicate of utilities already provided by
>> driver/thermal/thermal_
On 3 March 2012 23:34, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 11:44:10AM -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 04:36:05PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> > This movement is needed because the hwmon entries and corresponding
>> > sysfs
Good job Rob. Now you need to make sure that the branch you provided
is up to date with Linus's latest -rc (aka rebase your branch every
rc).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: [git pull] Consolidate cpuidle functionality
ke to land various bits of cpuidle functionality for
member platforms for the March release.
Rob will provide you with a pull request next week that contains:
- his work on cpuidle core consolidation
- his work adding cpuidle support for i.MX5/6
- Daniel's work on adding cpuidle support for ST-E u85
Hi Durgadoss,
Thanks for the detailed review.
On 12 March 2012 16:21, R, Durgadoss wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> Thanks for keeping this up. And Sorry for late reply.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: amit kachhap [mailto:amitdani...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Amit D
On 13 March 2012 09:24, Tushar Behera wrote:
> On 03/03/2012 04:36 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> This codes uses the generic linux thermal layer and creates a bridge
>> between temperature sensors, linux thermal framework and cooling devices
>> for samsung exynos platform
On 11 March 2012 09:41, Sundar wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> I am new here; so please bear with my questions/doubts :)
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap
> wrote:
>> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
>> implementations u
Sundar,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Sundar wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> Thanks for the replies. One more query
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Amit Kachhap
> wrote:
>
>>> "Different cpu related cooling devices": Do you mean cooling devices
>
On 13 March 2012 15:44, Sundar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
>> Sundar,
>
> Hi Amit,
>
>> At the moment it doesn't. But there was some discussion around
>> creating something that will work with devfreq. This would allow
ple are waiting for a
somewhat stable version before starting their ports.
And what is the path into mainline - will Russell carry it or Arnd
(with Russell's blessing)?
Regards,
Amit
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
For those who don't follow LWN regularly:
http://dtrace.org/blogs/brendan/2012/03/17/linux-kernel-performance-flame-graphs/
This could be useful for tracking performance bottlenecks.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.
On 19 March 2012 17:15, Srivatsa S. Bhat
wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 11:47 AM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>
>> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
>> implementations using cpuhotplug based on the thermal level requested
>> from user. Different cpu
re.
>
I don't mean to be piling on to Len here, but Daniel Lezcano too has a
bunch of clean ups that didn't get any maintainer review for over two
months. He has now refreshed them for 3.3 and is getting ready to send
them out again. We (Linaro) expect to be spending a lot of time
Rob, you should start a new '3.4-fixes' branch containing such
bugfixes that can be pushed to Len after -rc1.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Rob Lee wrote:
> Sekhar tested this patch on Davinci last night and found a problem. I
> looked at the code again and found a mindless omission on my par
On 21 March 2012 19:43, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:40:01 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> Basically without this patch changing the mode of thermal zone
>> is not possible as wrong string size is passed to strncmp.
>
> Actually it is possible,
> $
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> The usual cpuidle initialization routines are to register the
s/are to//
> driver, then register a cpuidle device per cpu.
>
> With the device's state count default initialization with the
> driver's state count, the code initialization rem
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> Looking at the problem, here's what I think it'd help to fix the situation:
> 1 - Overlay PPA becomes the main repository for basic platform
> development, without having any hardware specific package (not even
> the kernel):
> This PPA w
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti
>>> So in the end we'd be generating 2 sets of hwpacks per board, one
>>> based on the Developme
Hi Eduardo,
On 3 April 2012 19:45, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:50:14PM +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
>> On 23 February 2012 12:16, R, Durgadoss wrote:
>> > Hi Amit,
>> >
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >
Hi Len/Rui,
Any comment or feedback from your side about the status of this patch?
Is it merge-able or major re-work is needed? I have fixed most of the
comments in this patchset and currently working on some of the minor
comments received and will submit them shortly.
Regards,
Amit Daniel
On
use git
branches to track the tree and cherry-pick the bits that you do need.
Can you give examples of things that you do need from the Linaro tree?
/Amit
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
fixes and cleanups to
the various LTs too.
/Amit
-- Forwarded message --
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/5] coupled cpuidle state support
To: Colin Cross
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org,
Pantelis,
Why would you use anything other than the kick-ass ARM toolchain that
Linaro is providing for over a year now? ;-)
/Amit
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Pantelis Antoniou <
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com> wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I use a somewhat older compiler that d
builds/~linaro-android/vexpress-ics-gcc46-armlt-stable-open-12.04-release/
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkxwyUNxNaAadExQdHNxTnR5SFZCQzJnN1ZtQ2ZhWkE
> >
> > Amit Pundir has a VE board for exactly that reason so I suggest he is
> > tasked
Hi Rui,
Thanks for looking into the patches.
On 10 April 2012 06:28, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Hi, Amit,
>
> On 三, 2012-04-04 at 10:02 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
>> Hi Len/Rui,
>>
>> Any comment or feedback from your side about the status of this patch?
>> Is it merg
e not strictly bug fixes, since this is a new framework. Up to
the arm-soc maintainers now.
/Amit
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Adding Guodong and Tushar to make sure that the LT trees also have
thermal management turned on for 12.04.
And cc'ing linaro-dev and the release manager. :)
/Amit
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Please pull the thermal management work for ex
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:02:59AM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > 2) So the new thermal_exynos4_imx6_work obsoletes the old
> > exynos_thermal_framework_V2 topic. You should mention that
> > explicitly when asking to add the new
s have you tested these on?
Hongbo, could you try this on your platform and merge it into pm-qa?
/Amit
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On 16 April 2012 07:37, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On 三, 2012-04-11 at 18:17 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
>> Hi Rui,
>>
>> Thanks for looking into the patches.
>>
>> On 10 April 2012 06:28, Zhang Rui wrote:
>> > Hi, Amit,
>> >
>> > On 三, 201
o bear on this series.
> Mike ? if you have time, is it possible you test it on your board ?
And Mike and Rajendra, if you could help with this, it would be great.
We'd really like to get various platform cpuidle driver changes in for
3.5 so that Daniel can take a stab at more consolidati
Hi Mr Kukjin,
Any comment or update about this patch?
Regards,
Amit Daniel
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Rob Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>> On 04/25/2012 02:11 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch enable
On 9 May 2012 01:46, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2012 21:48:14 +0530
> Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>
>> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
>> implementations using frequency scaling up/down based on the registration
>> parame
On 9 May 2012 01:46, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2012 21:48:17 +0530
> Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>
>> This code added creates a link between temperature sensors, linux thermal
>> framework and cooling devices for samsung exynos platform. This layer
>> monito
On 9 May 2012 01:36, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> Hi, Amit,
>
> Sorry for the late response as I'm in a travel recently.
>
> I think the generic cpufreq cooling patches are good.
>
> But about the THERMAL_TRIP_STATE_INSTANCE patch, what I'd like to see is that
> 1. fro
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:16 PM, wrote:
> From: Rajagopal Venkat
>
> The updated version of these test scripts are
> available in their respective directories.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajagopal Venkat
Ack. Hongbo, please merge this to pm-qa.
> ---
> run_template
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi Hongbo,
>
> On 11 May 2012 10:39, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> PM-QA is updated:
>>
>> 1. Removed obsolete test cases under pm-qa/tastcases
>>
>> 2. Thermal test scripts has been merged into, but is temporarily disabled
>> form the t
d
>> for 4460.
>>
>> At the moment we disabled 1.2GHz on tilt-3.3, we think we have a fix +
>> workaround and I'll update with it tomorrow.
>
>
> tilt-3.3 is updated with the fixes and workaround of disabling CPU_IDLE,
>
Just some nits below:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:47 PM, kejun.zhou wrote:
> From: kejun.zhou
>
> Signed-off-by: kejun.zhou
> ---
> cpuidle/cpuidle_killer.c | 10 ++
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpuidle/cpuidle_killer.c b/cpuidle/cpuidle_killer.c
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:47 PM, kejun.zhou wrote:
> Signed-off-by: kejun.zhou
> ---
> Android.mk | 1 +
> cpufreq/Android.mk | 76
> cpuhotplug/Android.mk | 84
> +
> cpuidle/Andro
heduler takes into account the maximum capacity of a
> core when it checks the load balance of the system.
Jean,
Various discussions around power-aware scheduling have amplified the
need for the scheduler to have some knowledge of DVFS. This would then
require the scheduler to track 'cpu_power' ( = max power) and perhaps
a new variable 'current_power' that is changed by the DVFS framework.
The first goal, though, is to make sure that the scheduler can handle
different cpu_power values due to asymmetric cores.
/Amit
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
m and /data as
read-write, to store user profiles/settings/apps, so we need two separate
partitions.
Regards,
Amit Pundir
>
> ___
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-
Panto,
This looks interesting. cc'ing Rob and Charles who were interested in
this at Connect.
/Amit
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Many current interesting systems have no ability to simulate the upcoming
> bigLITTLE machines, since their cores have to
the Android team who has been looking into this.
/Amit
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Rajagopal Venkat
wrote:
> add powertop test cases into pm-qa. Run the powertop sanity
> test to check if tool is available. If yes, then run
> powertop in report generation mode and validate the output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajagopal Venkat
> ---
> Makefile
testing on real
hardware and models.
Problems should be reported on LKML/LAKML as usual if they are related
to the individual topic trees. If they're related to a bad merge or
config enablement please report on linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org.
Regards,
Amit
p.s. People who've shown an intere
Hi Rob/Eduardo,
As these patches have still not made into mainline. I will rebase the
whole set along with your suggestion and send them shortly.
Sorry for late reply.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Valentin, Eduardo
wrote:
> Hey Rob and Amit,
>
> On Tue, Jun 26
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 12 May 2012 17:40, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
>> implementations using frequency scaling up/down based on the registration
>>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 12 May 2012 17:40, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
>> implementations using frequency scaling up/down based on the registration
>>
to give it a try though, maybe it
> > will work for you.
>
> Zach, Alexander and I spent some time trying to get it to work in Hong
> Kong and got to exactly the same results as you are describing.
>
> IIRC Amit knew how to set it up and get it to produce true results, or
actually cc'ing them this time. :)
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> Oops, I forgot to CC Viresh and Vincent on this, so resending...
> ---
>
> We can't rely on Kconfig options to set the fast and slow CPU lists for
> HMP scheduling if we want a single kernel binary t
ts, a short description of the features they enable, etc. It
would be nice if you could contribute to this directly. Feel free to
edit it.
May I ask what you interest in b.L MP is?
Regards,
Amit
[1] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=arm/big.LITTLE/mp.git;a=summary
[2]
https://wiki.linaro.org/Workin
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Vikram Dhillon
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
>>
>> I started a skeleton wiki page[2] to keep track of the various
>> patchsets, a short description of the features they enable, etc. It
>> would b
Kejun,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:45 AM, kejun.zhou wrote:
> From: "kejun.zhou"
Commit message?
> Signed-off-by: kejun.zhou
In the future, please indicate in the email subject and commit message
what project/subsystem this patch is meant for. Since you've cc'ed
Rajagopal, I'm guessing this
; way by patching the kernel tree and submitting the patch - but
> currently Android's external perf is the one that gets installed)
Thanks for this Bero. How soon before this gets into a build we can use?
/Amit
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Bernhard Rosenkränzer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15 August 2012 13:25, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> Thanks for this Bero. How soon before this gets into a build we can use?
>
> We're planning on pulling it in through upstream, so (unless it&#
able dates - say 1st and 15th of every month. This
will lighten the load for everyone concerned: you, Andrey, build team
with one downside: integration problems will not get detected until
late.
I'd like to hear your views.
Regards,
Amit
___
linaro
k before release (the normal WG cut-of date), and two
>> weeks before (or after?) that?
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have updated
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Process/bigLittleMPTree
>
> as per our last discussion. Please see if i have mi
1 - 100 of 585 matches
Mail list logo
