e to generate beagle_sd.img using linaro-media-create on Ubuntu
12.04 (64-bit)
Hi all,
Below is the link for the bug-id (Bug #1135454 ) created for the issue "failure
to generate beagle_sd.img using linario-media-create on ubuntu 12.04 on 64bit
OS".
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-im
eagle_image
wget
http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-m/hwpacks/final/hwpack_linaro-omap3_20101109-1_armel_supported.tar.gz
wget
http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-m/headless/release-candidate/linaro-m-headless-tar-20101101-0.tar.gz
sudo linaro-media-create --image_file beagle_sd.img --dev beagle --bin
On 19 February 2013 18:54, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:03 PM, James Tunnicliffe
> wrote:
>> On 19 February 2013 16:08, Alexander Sack wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:53 PM, James Tunnicliffe
>>> wrote:
Good point! I would be pleasantly surprised if an image + hwp
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:03 PM, James Tunnicliffe
wrote:
> On 19 February 2013 16:08, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:53 PM, James Tunnicliffe
>> wrote:
>>> Good point! I would be pleasantly surprised if an image + hwpack from
>>> 2010 worked with our current tools.
>>
>> Act
On 19 February 2013 16:08, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:53 PM, James Tunnicliffe
> wrote:
>> Good point! I would be pleasantly surprised if an image + hwpack from
>> 2010 worked with our current tools.
>
> Actually, I am surprised if they do not work.
>
> Our official promise
thing it needs included
>> and you might be able to hack around the fact that lmc bails out...
>>
>> CCing a few folks to see if they have an idea on how to hack/workaround.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Amar Shankar
>> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
folks to see if they have an idea on how to hack/workaround.
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Amar Shankar
> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am trying to create beagle_sd.img for beagle board using
>> linaro-media-create, by referring the procedure in
>&
ed
and you might be able to hack around the fact that lmc bails out...
CCing a few folks to see if they have an idea on how to hack/workaround.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Amar Shankar
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to create beagle_sd.img for beagle board using
> linaro-medi
As James said, Anything from the LTS (12.04 - Precise) onwards.
Dave
On 19 Feb 2013, at 10:02, Amar Shankar
wrote:
> No
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Subject: Re: Failure to generate beagle_sd.img using linaro-media-create
Just a thought: It looks to me to be down to using 10.10 (Maverick) - I'm not
sure l-m-c supports that far back, but I may be wrong.
On 19 Feb 2013, at 05:31, Amar Shankar
mailto:amar.shan...@infotech-enterprises.com>
k) - I'm
> not sure l-m-c supports that far back, but I may be wrong.
>
> On 19 Feb 2013, at 05:31, Amar Shankar
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to create beagle_sd.img for beagle board using
> linaro-media-create, by referring the procedure in
> http://sourcef
Just a thought: It looks to me to be down to using 10.10 (Maverick) - I'm not
sure l-m-c supports that far back, but I may be wrong.
On 19 Feb 2013, at 05:31, Amar Shankar
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to create beagle_sd.img for beagle board using
> linaro-media-create,
Hi All,
I am trying to create beagle_sd.img for beagle board using linaro-media-create,
by referring the procedure in
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/tianocore/index.php?title=BeagleBoardPkg#How_to_build_UEFI_for_the_BeagleBoard
But I am getting the below error.
Could someone please help
tools?)
> And, there was another bug reported for linaro-image-tools that occurs with
> the same command. This is not a error but it is warning about /bin/df (bug #
> 651918):
> $ sudo linaro-media-create --image_file beagle_sd.img --dev beagle --binary
> nano-n-tar-20110823-1.tar
Hello,
I am trying to emulate beagleboard in qemu. I am using linaro 11.08
releases of nano rootfs and hwpack (this release is dated as on 2011/08/23)
and the version of linaro-media-create I am using is 2012.06. After I run
the following command, I do get a image generated but with the
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 09:19:49AM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> linaro-media-create/linaro-android-media-create command line options are now
> using dashes to separate words instead of underscores.
Woot, nice catch fixing it before I even complained! Thanks guys,
--
Christian Robotto
Hi,
linaro-media-create/linaro-android-media-create command line options are now
using dashes to separate words instead of underscores.
e.g. "--image_size" becomes "--image-size"
This changes is available on the bzr repository and will be part of 2011.10
release. Please, upd
Hi Tom,
That's a cool idea, thanks for doing it.
Thanks,
James
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:23:52 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As part of the 11.09 cycle I've completed an extension to live-build3
> that add linaro-media-create. This means with this branch of linaro&#
Hi Tom,
On 4 October 2011 23:57, Tom Gall wrote:
> Not getting any answers in #linaro. Which version of
> linaro-media-create is required for oneiric based hwpacks and images?
> Should the PPA version suffice or does one need to use the latest
> greatest from bzr?
Latest rele
Hi,
Not getting any answers in #linaro. Which version of
linaro-media-create is required for oneiric based hwpacks and images?
Should the PPA version suffice or does one need to use the latest
greatest from bzr?
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Tom
"We want great men who, when fortune frowns will n
Hi All,
As part of the 11.09 cycle I've completed an extension to live-build3
that add linaro-media-create. This means with this branch of linaro's
live-build 3 one is able to build your custom image and directly
output it to either your SD media or to a file which you an dd
directly to
:08
To: Frederik Lotter
Cc: Linaro Development
Subject: Re: [frederik.lot...@arm.com: [UBUNTU] linaro-media-create failing]
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:20:17PM +0100, Frederik Lotter wrote:
> I am using 32-bit Ubuntu 11.04. Just here in my office everyone is
> running into the same issue. We a
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:20:17PM +0100, Frederik Lotter wrote:
>> I am using 32-bit Ubuntu 11.04. Just here in my office everyone is
>> running into the same issue. We are all Ubuntu users (11.04) and both
>> 32-bit and 64-bit mac
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:20:17PM +0100, Frederik Lotter wrote:
> I am using 32-bit Ubuntu 11.04. Just here in my office everyone is
> running into the same issue. We are all Ubuntu users (11.04) and both
> 32-bit and 64-bit machines.
Hey Frederik,
Did you figure out what the issue was?
--
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011, James Westby wrote:
> It was in the posted log:
> qemu-user-static:
> Installed: 0.14.50-2011.06-0-0ubuntu1~ppa11.04.1
Ah thanks; that's fairly recent, so I guess this is a bug that deserves
filing
--
Loïc Minier
___
linaro-d
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:19:59 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> What's your QEMU version (qemu-arm-static)? Old versions of QEMU have
> bugs and limitations in their emulation of ARM instructions which might
> cause weird failures such as segfaults when installing the hwpack.
It was in the posted lo
wget
>>>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-ubuntu-desktop/20110728/1/images/tar/linaro-n-ubuntu-desktop-tar-20110728-1.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> wget
>>>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/lt-panda/20110728/0/images/hw
0110728/0/images/hwpack/hwpack_linaro-lt-panda_20110728-0_armel_supported.tar.gz
>>
>> bzr branch lp:linaro-image-tools
>>
>> ./linaro-image-tools/linaro-media-create --mmc /dev/sdc --dev panda
>> --hwpack hwpack_linaro-lt-panda_20110728-0_armel_supported.tar.gz
>> --binary lin
org or IRC etc.
Ideally, we would detect broken QEMU versions when running
linaro-media-create, but it's non-trivial and a low priority feature,
so it didn't get implemented so far.
Thanks!
--
Loïc Minier
--- End Message ---
___
lina
>
> wget
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/lt-panda/20110728/0/images/hwpack/hwpack_linaro-lt-panda_20110728-0_armel_supported.tar.gz
>
> bzr branch lp:linaro-image-tools
>
> ./linaro-image-tools/linaro-media-create --mmc /dev/sdc --dev panda
>
mages/hwpack/hwpack_linaro-lt-panda_20110728-0_armel_supported.tar.gz
bzr branch lp:linaro-image-tools
./linaro-image-tools/linaro-media-create --mmc /dev/sdc --dev panda
--hwpack hwpack_linaro-lt-panda_20110728-0_armel_supported.tar.gz
--binary linaro-n-ubuntu-desktop-tar-20110728-1.tar.gz
-Zach
...@linaro.org]
Sent: 16 August 2011 14:36
To: Frederik Lotter
Cc: Linaro Development
Subject: [frederik.lot...@arm.com: [UBUNTU] linaro-media-create failing]
> We have several people here in the support office trying to build an
> sdcard using the latest hwpack and root filesystem files as
> We have several people here in the support office trying to build an
> sdcard using the latest hwpack and root filesystem files as found
> here:
>
> http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-n/ubuntu/leb-panda/latest/
>
> We are running into a segfualt in /usr/bin/dpkg during what seems to
> b
On Tue, May 03, 2011, Tony MANSSON wrote:
> We'd like to use the --mmc option to distinguish between these two
> cases: 3 partitions vs. 2 partitions.
(This would be counter-intuitive as other pointed out)
For now, until Hwpackv2 are implemented, you could propose a new flag
indicating the ima
rnal eMMC or to the SD
> card, in both cases with the standard boot and root partitions as created by
> Linaro-Media-Create.
>
> When creating images, this first partition is needed for the option
> --image_file, but should not be created for the option --mmc.
>
> We'd li
ard, in both cases with the standard boot and root partitions as created by
> Linaro-Media-Create.
>
> When creating images, this first partition is needed for the option
> --image_file, but should not be created for the option --mmc.
This sounds like you would end up with differen
partitions as created by
Linaro-Media-Create.
When creating images, this first partition is needed for the option
--image_file, but should not be created for the option --mmc.
We'd like to use the --mmc option to distinguish between these two cases: 3
partitions vs. 2 partitions.
Some tim
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> === wait_device testing ===
> * On reader #1, consistently fails with 30 seconds timeout
> * On reader #2, very likely succeeds after 2 seconds (5 out of 6
> iterations), (fails with 30 seconds timeout on the 6th iteration)
> * On reader #3, consistently s
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:32:29PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:01:33PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
[...]
> I have to add something here to correct the conclusion about reader's
> impact.
>
> I just got the third reader to play with, and interestingly it can get
> all of these
terations), (fails with 30 seconds timeout on the 6th iteration)
* On reader #3, consistently succeeds after 0 seconds
=== l-m-c installing with sleep(5) ===
* On reader #1, fails on '/dev/sdb: No medium found' like below.
[...]
proc umounted
/dev/sdb: No medium found
sfdisk: cannot
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 08:53:50PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hello Guilherme,
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:53:00AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
> > > machine which is behind the com
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 20:30 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > My concern is that sfdisk -l returning non-zero may not be a very good
> > indication that we should sleep. It will return non-zero on any error
> > and I expect most errors to not go away af
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> My concern is that sfdisk -l returning non-zero may not be a very good
> indication that we should sleep. It will return non-zero on any error
> and I expect most errors to not go away after a 30 seconds sleep, in
> which case we'd be delaying l-m-c
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 20:14 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > Do we know why this happens in some cases? It'd be better if we could
> > only sleep when we know there's a chance that the partitions may be
> > available after that.
>
> I'm not sure what
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> Do we know why this happens in some cases? It'd be better if we could
> only sleep when we know there's a chance that the partitions may be
> available after that.
I'm not sure what you're asking; are you asking for a test on whether
we need to s
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>> The upstream master branch of U-Boot on git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git
>> has the bug too.
>
> Yes, this is where I was pasting the bogus code from; I just have no
> idea why write() would suddenly be
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:34 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I just tried another SanDisk 4GB SD card (#8) borrowed from colleague.
> > With 20 iterations testing, it reports:
> >
> > Could list partitions after 0 seconds! --> 13 times
> > Could list partition
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I just tried another SanDisk 4GB SD card (#8) borrowed from colleague.
> With 20 iterations testing, it reports:
>
> Could list partitions after 0 seconds! --> 13 times
> Could list partitions after 2 seconds! --> 5 times
> Could list partitions after 4 sec
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:01:33PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:59:18PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > I'm scanning all 7 cards I have with the script wait_device, each card
> > > with 10 iterations of the test.
> > >
> > > 1) Tra
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:59:18PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I'm scanning all 7 cards I have with the script wait_device, each card
> > with 10 iterations of the test.
> >
> > 1) Transend 4GB SD
> > 2) SanDisk 2GB SD
> > 3) KingMax MMC Mobile 2GB
> >
>
Hello Guilherme,
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:53:00AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
> > machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I have apt proxy
> > set on host machine, l-m-c
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> The upstream master branch of U-Boot on git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git
> has the bug too.
Yes, this is where I was pasting the bogus code from; I just have no
idea why write() would suddenly become partial ones, but I didn't check
the eglibc or linux cod
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> I just added this one, and it does not help. The l-m-c still fails at
>> the last step.
>> mkimage: Write error on /tmp/tmpUiR_m1/boot-disc/uImage: Success
>
> This error sounded a bit weird; I checked
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> $ apt-cache policy uboot-mkimage
> uboot-mkimage:
> Installed: 0.4build1
> Candidate: 0.4build1
> Version table:
> *** 0.4build1 0
> 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Ok;
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 05:39:27PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I just added this one, and it does not help. The l-m-c still fails at
> > the last step.
> > mkimage: Write error on /tmp/tmpUiR_m1/boot-disc/uImage: Success
>
> This error sounded a bit wei
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:59:18PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I'm scanning all 7 cards I have with the script wait_device, each card
> > with 10 iterations of the test.
> >
> > 1) Transend 4GB SD
> > 2) SanDisk 2GB SD
> > 3) KingMax MMC Mobile 2GB
> >
>
> Interesting :-)
> >
> > But the linaro-media-create "size" output is probably broken for the
> > same reason: sdb appears to be unavailable for some time after changing
> > the partition table:
> >
> >> Are you 100% sure, on selecting [/dev/
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I just added this one, and it does not help. The l-m-c still fails at
> the last step.
> mkimage: Write error on /tmp/tmpUiR_m1/boot-disc/uImage: Success
This error sounded a bit weird; I checked the u-boot sources, and this
string is used in a bunch of
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:03:12PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> W dniu 08.03.2011 15:48, Shawn Guo pisze:
> >On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:16:32PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> >>W dniu 08.03.2011 09:51, Shawn Guo pisze:
> >>
> >>>By looking the workaround on the hacking branch, I changed the s
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I'm scanning all 7 cards I have with the script wait_device, each card
> with 10 iterations of the test.
>
> 1) Transend 4GB SD
> 2) SanDisk 2GB SD
> 3) KingMax MMC Mobile 2GB
>
> All above 3 cards passed the test with giving "Could list partitions
> after
On 8 March 2011 18:52, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> Have a look at the /dev/sdb change in device report before and after
>> the command you suggest ...
>
> Interesting :-)
>
> But the linaro-media-create "size" output is p
W dniu 08.03.2011 15:48, Shawn Guo pisze:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:16:32PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
W dniu 08.03.2011 09:51, Shawn Guo pisze:
By looking the workaround on the hacking branch, I changed the sleep(1)
to sleep(5) in /usr/share/pyshared/linaro_media_create/partitions.py,
an
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:16:32PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> W dniu 08.03.2011 09:51, Shawn Guo pisze:
>
> >By looking the workaround on the hacking branch, I changed the sleep(1)
> >to sleep(5) in /usr/share/pyshared/linaro_media_create/partitions.py,
> >and almost made it, but sadly it st
W dniu 08.03.2011 09:51, Shawn Guo pisze:
By looking the workaround on the hacking branch, I changed the sleep(1)
to sleep(5) in /usr/share/pyshared/linaro_media_create/partitions.py,
and almost made it, but sadly it still fails at the last step.
You most likely missed another sleep (there sho
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> That's not an option for me. Myself is on ssh terminal. I do not
> have a nice monitor for that machine :)
Ok; I could propose various network tricks such as changing the routing
table to mark your APT repo unreachable, but I guess we really have to
fi
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:53:08AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > Yes, it is. Do we have a quick fix right now? I need it ...
>
> As a workaround, try disabling your (host's) network entirely before
> running linaro-media
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Yes, it is. Do we have a quick fix right now? I need it ...
As a workaround, try disabling your (host's) network entirely before
running linaro-media-create; I could run it completely networkless, but
I think your proxy is confusing APT.
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Have a look at the /dev/sdb change in device report before and after
> the command you suggest ...
Interesting :-)
But the linaro-media-create "size" output is probably broken for the
same reason: sdb appears to be unavailable for
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:04:08AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >> I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
> >> machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I ha
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:53:00AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
> > machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I have apt proxy
> > set on host machine, l-m-c installing system
Permission denied
> >
> > sfdisk: cannot open /dev/sdb read-write
>
> you want to sudo the sfdisk call too
>
Have a look at the /dev/sdb change in device report before and after
the command you suggest ...
--- quote begin ---
r65073@S2101-09:~/image/linaro$ linaro-media-c
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
>> machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I have apt proxy
>> set on host machine, l-m-c installing system (chroot env
age needs it? I'm guessing it's either linaro-image-tools
> or python-linaro-image-tools (possibly both).
grep udisks to the rescue, and
/usr/share/pyshared/linaro_media_create/check_device.py and
/usr/share/pyshared/linaro_media_create/partitions.py seem to use it,
so I'd say
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
> machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I have apt proxy
> set on host machine, l-m-c installing system (chroot env?) does not
> know it. Can we improve the l-m-c a little
Looking at the packaging branch lp:ubuntu/linaro-image-tools, I see
there are now multiple binary packages generated from
linaro-image-tools.
The udisks dependency needs to be added somewhere -- does anyone know
which package needs it? I'm guessing it's either linaro-image-tools
or python-linaro-
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> mkimage: Write error on /tmp/tmpXkyS2N/boot-disc/uImage: Success
Could it be that your MMC is flaky?
--
Loïc Minier
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listi
On 8 March 2011 17:19, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
> machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I have apt proxy
> set on host machine, l-m-c installing system (chroot env?) does not
> know it. Can we improve the l-m-c a litt
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > parted -s /dev/sdN mklabel msdos && sfdisk -L /dev/sdN
>
> $ sudo parted -s /dev/sdb mklabel msdos && sfdisk -L /dev/sdb
> /dev/sdb: Permission denied
>
> sfdisk: cannot open /dev/sdb read-write
you want to sudo the sfdisk call too
--
Loïc Minier
I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I have apt proxy
set on host machine, l-m-c installing system (chroot env?) does not
know it. Can we improve the l-m-c a little bit to copy apt proxy
setting if any on host ma
Hash Sum mismatch
>
> E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones
> used instead.
> Cleaning up ...Done
> [sudo] password for r65073:
> proc umounted
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/r65073/repos/linaro/lmc/hackin
r65073:
proc umounted
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/r65073/repos/linaro/lmc/hacking/linaro-media-create", line 128,
in
ROOTFS_DIR, TMP_DIR, lmc_dir, args.hwpack_force_yes, *hwpacks)
File "/home/r65073/repos/linaro/lmc/hacking/linaro_media_create/hwpack.py&quo
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:03:15PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > proc umounted
> > /dev/sdb: No medium found
> >
> > sfdisk: cannot open /dev/sdb read-write
>
> Hmm that's really bad; the only thing that I can think of is that your
> device goes away for
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> This will most lokalu not help.
Well, I'm trying to figure out one issue at a time; I would like to
avoid sleep() at all costs.
--
Loïc Minier
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
h
This will most lokalu not help.
Try my hacking branch of linaro-image-tools. I had the same problem as you and
I added a workaround.
Sorry for the brevity, I'm on holiday + phone
Wysłane z iPhone'a
Dnia 07-03-2011 o godz. 14:03 Loïc Minier napisał(a):
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> proc umounted
> /dev/sdb: No medium found
>
> sfdisk: cannot open /dev/sdb read-write
Hmm that's really bad; the only thing that I can think of is that your
device goes away for some time after the empty partition table is
created, and so the sfdisk cal
On 7 March 2011 12:43, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Thanks, Dave. Installing udisks helps. But now, it ends up with
> other problem. Here is the full log. (Sorry for the long paste)
>
> $ linaro-media-create --rootfs ext3 --mmc /dev/sdb --binary
> linaro-n-developer-tar-20110302-0.
endencies list if so.
>
Thanks, Dave. Installing udisks helps. But now, it ends up with
other problem. Here is the full log. (Sorry for the long paste)
$ linaro-media-create --rootfs ext3 --mmc /dev/sdb --binary
linaro-n-developer-tar-20110302-0.tar.gz --hwpack
hwpack_linaro-imx51_
;> https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/DailyBuilds#On%20Ubuntu%2010.10
>> >>
>> >> Is there another wiki page with conflicting instructions that we need to
>> >> clean up? Or did you read this and go for the download instead of the ppa
>> >> (in
or the download instead of the ppa
> >> (in which case we should clarify the text to direct people to the ppa more
> >> strongly)?
>
> Adding the PPA should achieve the necessary thing.
>
> qemu-linaro is the name of the source package: the generated binary
> pack
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Spring Zhang wrote:
>
> Ok. Which wiki page did you look at? We should be directing maverick
>> users
>> to enable the linaro-maintainers/tools ppa, which includes both the
>> linaro-image-tools and qemu-linaro packages.
>>
> I can find linaro-image-tools, but no
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Spring Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 9 February 2011 04:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>
>> Hi Aneesh,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 05:43:39PM +0530, Aneesh V wrote:
>>
>> > On Monday 07 February 2011 11:07 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > >On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:06PM +0
On 9 February 2011 04:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 05:43:39PM +0530, Aneesh V wrote:
>
> > On Monday 07 February 2011 11:07 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > >On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:06PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > >>Since we only really support devel
Hi Aneesh,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 05:43:39PM +0530, Aneesh V wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2011 11:07 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:06PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> >>Since we only really support developer platform hosts with the tools
> >>ppa enabled, could we i
Hi Steve,
On Monday 07 February 2011 11:07 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:06PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Since we only really support developer platform hosts with the tools
ppa enabled, could we improve l-m-c to print a warning if that ppa
isn't enabled?
The othe
with Linaro daily
build image.
I downloaded linaro-image-tools from:
https://launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools
I installed all dependencies mentioned in the README and tried to run
linaro-media-create like below:
sudo ./linaro-media-create --rootfs ext3 --mmc /dev/sdb1 --binary
/home/a0393566local
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 20:30 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 February 2011 19:53, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > Ok, so ISTM that to keep this solution working we'll need to do
> > something like running qemu-arm-static with no arguments and parse its
> > output for the version string. Unless t
On 7 February 2011 19:53, Guilherme Salgado
wrote:
> Ok, so ISTM that to keep this solution working we'll need to do
> something like running qemu-arm-static with no arguments and parse its
> output for the version string. Unless there's another way to easily
> trigger the bug without running som
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 16:55 +, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 7 February 2011 16:50, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > In lmc we already have some code which checks if a given utility is
> > present and if not, install (via apt-get) a package which provides that.
> > We could extend it to check for a
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Since we only really support developer platform hosts with the tools
> ppa enabled, could we improve l-m-c to print a warning if that ppa
> isn't enabled?
This sounds awfully Ubuntu specific; we released a standalone tarball
as to allow people to gra
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 08:14 +1300, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > In lmc we already have some code which checks if a given utility is
> > present and if not, install (via apt-get) a package which provides that.
>
> (I don't like that - am I pr
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
