Hi Barry,
> I am a freshman to linaro. I found people sent some patches to
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org. Here I have 2 questions:
> 1. Whether will linaro send those patches based on newest tree to
> Linus' mainline or not? Or developers need to send those patches to
> mainline by themselves?
A
Hi, Shawn,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:56:52PM +0800, Jason Hui wrote:
>> Hi, Shawn,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> > The patch is to add all gpt, uart related dt clock nodes for babbage.
>> > It sticks to the clock na
Hi Zygmunt,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:19:41PM +0100, Zygmunt Bazyli Krynicki wrote:
> This will most lokalu not help.
> Try my hacking branch of linaro-image-tools. I had the same problem as you
> and I added a workaround.
>
Thanks. But using your branch make it fail at some other place.
---
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:56:52PM +0800, Jason Hui wrote:
> Hi, Shawn,
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > The patch is to add all gpt, uart related dt clock nodes for babbage.
> > It sticks to the clock name used in clock-mx51-mx53.c, so that
> > everything gets consistent
Hi, Shawn,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The patch is to add all gpt, uart related dt clock nodes for babbage.
> It sticks to the clock name used in clock-mx51-mx53.c, so that
> everything gets consistent to Reference Manual. For example, the
> numbering in clock name usual
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:03:15PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > proc umounted
> > /dev/sdb: No medium found
> >
> > sfdisk: cannot open /dev/sdb read-write
>
> Hmm that's really bad; the only thing that I can think of is that your
> device goes away for
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@ti.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:05 AM
> To: Santosh Shilimkar
> Cc: Dave Martin; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> patc...@linaro.org; Tony Lindgren; Jean Pihet-XID; linux-
> o...@vger.kernel.org; Nicolas Pitre; linar
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:37AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > The 'rate' is added for fixed-clock support, while 'pll_base' is for
> > pll clock. These two particular type of clocks are supposed to be
> > gracefully supported by the common cl
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:31:07AM +0800, Jason Hui wrote:
> Hi, Shawn,
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:20:33AM +0800, Jason Hui wrote:
> >> Hi, Shawn,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >> > Aha, Jason. Grant and I
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:48:10AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > The patch is to add all gpt, uart related dt clock nodes for babbage.
> > It sticks to the clock name used in clock-mx51-mx53.c, so that
> > everything gets consistent to Reference
Hi, Shawn,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:20:33AM +0800, Jason Hui wrote:
>> Hi, Shawn,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> > Aha, Jason. Grant and I put many comments on v1 of this patch, but it
>> > seems that v2 is identi
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:20:33AM +0800, Jason Hui wrote:
> Hi, Shawn,
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > Aha, Jason. Grant and I put many comments on v1 of this patch, but it
> > seems that v2 is identical to v1, except adding Rob Herring sign-off.
>
> Please compare wi
Hi All,
I am a freshman to linaro. I found people sent some patches to
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org. Here I have 2 questions:
1. Whether will linaro send those patches based on newest tree to
Linus' mainline or not? Or developers need to send those patches to
mainline by themselves?
Is there any do
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release
of Linaro GDB 7.2.
Linaro GDB 7.2 2011.03-0 is the fourth release in the 7.2 series.
Based off the latest GDB 7.2, it includes ARM-focused bug fixes and
enhancements.
Interesting changes include:
* Hardware watchpoint support
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release
of both Linaro GCC 4.5 and Linaro GCC 4.6.
Linaro GCC 4.5 is the eighth release in the 4.5 series. Based off the
latest GCC 4.5.2+svn170352, it includes many ARM-focused performance
improvements and bug fixes.
Interesting chang
Hi, Grant,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> comments below.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 79
>> ++
Hi, Shawn,
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Aha, Jason. Grant and I put many comments on v1 of this patch, but it
> seems that v2 is identical to v1, except adding Rob Herring sign-off.
Please compare with v1 and say it once again, It should include the
grant and your comment
Attached is a pdf with all the results of the buffer size testing on the
Beagle C4 and Panda. I think this pretty much conclusively shows that
increasing the buffer size when using timer based scheduling results in no
improvement in cpu wakes per second. I also went back and tested alsa 1.0.24
in t
Dave Martin writes:
> This set of patches, along with some other patches under
> discussion on alkml, should enable omap3 and omap4 kernels to be
> built with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL.
>
> This patch set builds on recent cleanup done by the omap
> maintainers.
>
> At least some of this code definitel
Santosh Shilimkar writes:
> Dave,
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dave Martin [mailto:dave.mar...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 11:05 PM
>> To: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: patc...@linaro.org; Tony Lindgren; Santosh Shilimkar; Jean
>> Pihet; Kevin Hilman; linux
On 2 Mar 2011, at 08:52, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> On 2 March 2011 01:33, Michael Hope wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Peter Maydell
>>> wrote:
>>> https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/MonthlyMilestones
>>
That would be
On 03/07/2011 01:47 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
To quote the GCC manual:
-Os
Optimize for size. -Os enables all -O2 optimizations that do not
typically increase code size. It also performs further optimizations
designed to reduce code size.
-Os disables the following optimization flags:
-fal
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Tom Gall wrote:
> To quote the GCC manual:
>
> -Os
> Optimize for size. -Os enables all -O2 optimizations that do not
> typically increase code size. It also performs further optimizations
> designed to reduce code size.
> -Os disables the following optimization fla
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Jim Huang wrote:
> From the above messages, Google introduced the automated approach to deploy
> benchmark suite and evaluate it on the fly.
Hi jserv. That's quite cool. I'll have a look into their benchmark
suite as there seems to be a lot of overlap with what I
To quote the GCC manual:
-Os
Optimize for size. -Os enables all -O2 optimizations that do not
typically increase code size. It also performs further optimizations
designed to reduce code size.
-Os disables the following optimization flags:
-falign-functions -falign-jumps -falign-loops
On 2 March 2011 09:51, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Jim Huang wrote:
[...]
>> The skia maintainer, Mike Reed, made two branches: one is hosted in
>> Google Code, and another is
>> inside Android source tree:
>> http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/external/skia.gi
Thoughts?
Thanx, Paul
- Forwarded message from Jesper Juhl -
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 00:49:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
cc: Andrew Morton ,
"Paul E. McKenney" ,
Ingo Molnar ,
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The 'rate' is added for fixed-clock support, while 'pll_base' is for
> pll clock. These two particular type of clocks are supposed to be
> gracefully supported by the common clk api when it gets ready.
How does the current imx clock code handle
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The patch is to add all gpt, uart related dt clock nodes for babbage.
> It sticks to the clock name used in clock-mx51-mx53.c, so that
> everything gets consistent to Reference Manual. For example, the
> numbering in clock name usually starts fro
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 07 March 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> > Alternatively, it could be done the other way round: rename the identifiers
>> > in the file from mx51_ to mx5_, and make sure that they don't contain
>> > any mx51 specific settings but always re
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr
Hi Jason,
comments below.
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 79
> --
> 1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/
With the platform clock support, the 'struct clk' should have been
associated with device_node->data. So the use of function
__of_clk_get_from_provider can be eliminated.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
---
drivers/of/clock.c | 23 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletio
This patch is to change the static clock creating and registering to
the dynamic way, which scans dt clock nodes, associate clk with
device_node, and then add them to clkdev accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
---
arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c | 436 +--
The big deal here is that it removes the call to mx51_clocks_init,
where all the possible clocks are added to clkdev in static way.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
---
arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-dt.c |9 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-d
The patch is to add all gpt, uart related dt clock nodes for babbage.
It sticks to the clock name used in clock-mx51-mx53.c, so that
everything gets consistent to Reference Manual. For example, the
numbering in clock name usually starts from 1, while 'reg' property
numbering starts from 0 to easy
Before translating all mx5 clocks from static adding way to dynamic
way, I would send this out for review and comment, so that I can turn
around in case that I'm on a wrong direction.
It's based on Jason's mx51-basic-dt-support patch set, and only adds
gpt and uart related clocks, but it's enough
The 'rate' is added for fixed-clock support, while 'pll_base' is for
pll clock. These two particular type of clocks are supposed to be
gracefully supported by the common clk api when it gets ready.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
---
arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/clock.h |4
1 files changed,
On Monday 07 March 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > Alternatively, it could be done the other way round: rename the identifiers
> > in the file from mx51_ to mx5_, and make sure that they don't contain
> > any mx51 specific settings but always refer to properties in the
> > device tree for the differenc
Aha, Jason. Grant and I put many comments on v1 of this patch, but it
seems that v2 is identical to v1, except adding Rob Herring sign-off.
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:05:59PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
> Singed-off-by: Rob Herring
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts |
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:37:48PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 07 March 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
> > > index 0d43be9..540697e 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Ma
On Monday 07 March 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
> > index 0d43be9..540697e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
> > @@ -18,3 +18,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_EUKREA_CPUIMX51SD) += board-cpuimx51
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:05:58PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-dt.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..90593f5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-dt.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +/*
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:05:58PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig |8
> arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile |1 +
> arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-dt.c| 64
> +++
> arch/arm/ma
Hi Jason,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:05:59PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
> Singed-off-by: Rob Herring
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts | 110
> +
> 1 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> This will most lokalu not help.
Well, I'm trying to figure out one issue at a time; I would like to
avoid sleep() at all costs.
--
Loïc Minier
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
h
This will most lokalu not help.
Try my hacking branch of linaro-image-tools. I had the same problem as you and
I added a workaround.
Sorry for the brevity, I'm on holiday + phone
Wysłane z iPhone'a
Dnia 07-03-2011 o godz. 14:03 Loïc Minier napisał(a):
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr
---
drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 79 --
1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
index dfcf4b1..1ebca28 100644
--- a/drivers
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
Singed-off-by: Rob Herring
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts | 110 +
1 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts
new file mode 100644
index 00
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
---
arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig |8
arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile |1 +
arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-dt.c| 64 +++
arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c | 43 -
arch/arm/plat-m
From: Jason Liu
This patchset adds FSL mx51 with device tree support. This
is based on
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 devicetree/test
This patch has been tested on MX51 babbage board and can
boot up succesfully to linux console with DT enabled.
Jason Liu (3):
arm/dt: add basic mx51 dev
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> proc umounted
> /dev/sdb: No medium found
>
> sfdisk: cannot open /dev/sdb read-write
Hmm that's really bad; the only thing that I can think of is that your
device goes away for some time after the empty partition table is
created, and so the sfdisk cal
On 7 March 2011 12:43, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Thanks, Dave. Installing udisks helps. But now, it ends up with
> other problem. Here is the full log. (Sorry for the long paste)
>
> $ linaro-media-create --rootfs ext3 --mmc /dev/sdb --binary
> linaro-n-developer-tar-20110302-0.tar.gz --hwpack
> hw
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:52AM +, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > Hello Dave,
[...]
> > And I'm running Maverick server edition on a 'AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2
> > Dual Core Processor 3800+'.
> >
>
> It looks like you have the correct linaro-image-tool
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hello Dave,
>
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 12:03:51PM +, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Spring Zhang wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 9 February 2011 04:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Aneesh,
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Feb 08,
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Dave Martin writes:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Santosh Shilimkar [110304 09:36]:
>
> Following up on this, it looks like I have some locally-recorded
> acks
> which didn't make it into
55 matches
Mail list logo
