On Monday 07 March 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > Alternatively, it could be done the other way round: rename the identifiers
> > in the file from mx51_ to mx5_, and make sure that they don't contain
> > any mx51 specific settings but always refer to properties in the
> > device tree for the differences.
> >
> So our ultimate goal is to have only one board-dt.c in one mach-xxx?
I wouldn't make that a strict rule, but I'd say that one goal should be
to have as few board-dt files as possible without adding complexity.
As a start, we can say we want one file for per set of machines that
can run a common binary kernel, but there may be good reasons for
deviating from that rule on both sides.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
