On 2 Mar 2011, at 08:52, Michael Hope wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> On 2 March 2011 01:33, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/MonthlyMilestones >> >>>> That would be an annoying format change for toolchain group >>>> releases, which are already on a monthly schedule and currently >>>> use "2011.03" for milestone names, and "2011.03-0" (-1, -2 ...) >>>> for release versions. >> >>> Hi Peter. We'll keep the 2011.xx-y names for the products. Each >>> project has product series and a planning series. The product series >>> are ones like '4.5' or '4.4' for gcc-linaro, and 'trunk' for >>> qemu-linaro, and these then have milestones like '2011.03'. >> >> Is this a proposal to vary the proposed new milestone names, >> or a suggestion that the toolchain group should continue as >> it is and not worry about the inconsistency with other groups? > > There's no change from our product series/milestone naming point of > view. The dates will change to the end of the month to sync up across > Linaro. There will be a parallel and, unfortunately, largely > identical planning series with milestones as well.
We talked more about this tonight and the takeaway was that we need to investigate the best possible way of tracking deliverables with the existing tools we use. This may not explicitly be dependant on a specific milestone name, rather its date but this is still in progress. I'll reply back when I have more information. > -- Michael Regards, Jamie. _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
