I have the following code:
\version "2.19.81"
\fixed c' {
\time 3/4
c c c
\once \override Score.FootnoteItem.annotation-line = ##f
\footnote \markup\huge { * } #'(0 . 5) \markup {\lower #0.8 { \super { *
} }
"The second time play the measure as " \raise #0.5
\score {
\new S
On 2018-11-01 1:04 am, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
I have the following code:
\version "2.19.81"
\fixed c' {
\time 3/4
c c c
\once \override Score.FootnoteItem.annotation-line = ##f
\footnote \markup\huge { * } #'(0 . 5) \markup {\lower #0.8 { \super
{ *
} }
"The second time play the m
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 09:33, Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2018-11-01 1:04 am, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > I have the following code:
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > \fixed c' {
> > \time 3/4
> > c c c
> >
> > \once \override Score.FootnoteItem.annotation-line = ##f
> > \footnote \markup\huge { * }
Ahem I found another issue Aaron.
Suppose you have a variable containing the music and the reference to your
footnote code. Something like this:
var = {a b c d \myfootnote e f g a}
If you 'use' the variable multiple time in your score you probably don't
want to display the footnote multiple
Il 2018-10-31 07:43 Aaron Hill ha scritto:
On 2018-10-31 12:34 am, David Kastrup wrote:
Federico Bruni writes:
Hi all
I'm trying again to make lilypond-invoke-editor work in Windows.
Someone managed to make it work using Windows Subsystem for Linux,
that is installing the LylyPond Linux bina
On 2018-11-01 2:59 am, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
Ahem I found another issue Aaron.
Suppose you have a variable containing the music and the reference to
your
footnote code. Something like this:
var = {a b c d \myfootnote e f g a}
If you 'use' the variable multiple time in your score you pro
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 11:12, Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2018-11-01 2:59 am, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > Ahem I found another issue Aaron.
> >
> > Suppose you have a variable containing the music and the reference to
> > your
> > footnote code. Something like this:
> >
> > var = {a b c d \myfootnote
Am 01.11.18 um 01:34 schrieb Rohan Srinivasan:
Thank you - I meant to reply to the list. I have the following:
The problem is the Ambitus_engraver. The ambitus is given at the
beginning of the piece, and if you do this, the first staff of the
singing voice is not empty (but contains the Amb
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> Am 01.11.18 um 01:34 schrieb Rohan Srinivasan:
>> Thank you - I meant to reply to the list. I have the following:
>
> The problem is the Ambitus_engraver. The ambitus is given at the
> beginning of the piece, and if you do this, the first staff of the
> singing voice
Where would you expect the Ambitus marker to show up if you do not
want the staff to appear in the first system?
First entry? I am not sure that the interfaces the Ambitus_engraver
exercises would allow to make that difference, but if they did, this
would be a reasonable expectation. Though
Hi Lukas,
> It seems to me that the whole point (or, at least, the most important
> application) of the Ambitus indication is to enable users of the score to
> judge the tessitura "at first glance" (even though, of course, for a reliable
> judgement one would have to look at the actual music in
I wrote some macros to help write analysis of musical pieces.
Here is an example file (on Bach's Invention I).
Structural analysis is (of course) performed by hand, and displayed on
a Lyrics structure on top of the music. (This part is only a set of
very simple macros).
Harmonic analysis is perf
> So, to be honest, I'm not sure whether trying to make the
> Ambitus_engraver compatible with hiding empty staves would be worth
> the effort, especially if (as you say) that effort would be large.
+1. I've *never* seen an ambitus except at the very beginning of a
piece.
Werner
Am Do., 1. Nov. 2018 um 14:44 Uhr schrieb Jérôme Plût :
>
>
> I wrote some macros to help write analysis of musical pieces.
> Here is an example file (on Bach's Invention I).
>
> Structural analysis is (of course) performed by hand, and displayed on
> a Lyrics structure on top of the music. (This p
Hi Werner,
> +1. I've *never* seen an ambitus except at the very beginning of a piece.
I often use an ambitus in front- or end-matter, to give vocal ranges separate
from the score itself. Of course, "front-matter" can be interpreted as "the
very beginning of a piece", but I think of it as enti
Am Do., 1. Nov. 2018 um 16:24 Uhr schrieb Kieren MacMillan
:
>
> Hi Werner,
>
> > +1. I've *never* seen an ambitus except at the very beginning of a piece.
>
> I often use an ambitus in front- or end-matter, to give vocal ranges separate
> from the score itself. Of course, "front-matter" can be i
+1. I've *never* seen an ambitus except at the very beginning of a piece.
I often use an ambitus in front- or end-matter, to give vocal ranges separate from the score itself. Of
course, "front-matter" can be interpreted as "the very beginning of a piece", but I think
of it as entirely separate
Hi Thomas,
I thought since the behavior could be repeatable (like in my MWE) that
it was a symptom of some other problem.
So I suppose that what LilyPond does in some repeatable situation is
to print the BarNumber first and in some other print the
SystemStartBar first.
Changing the layer does inde
Hi there,
In the example bellow :
Why doesn't the SystemStartBracket push the BarNumber up?
Probably rather :
Why doesn't the SystemStartBracket register in the skylines?
\version "2.21.0"
\layout {
\override Score.BarNumber.self-alignment-X = #CENTER
\override StaffGroup.SystemStartBracket.
Kalendis Novembribus MMXVIII scripsit Thomas Morley :
> Part of the problem is you use 'structure as a music-property without
> declaring it. As a consequence using the option -dcheck-internal-types
> makes the compilation fail.
This is why, in a previous iteration of this code, I used an invisibl
Am Mo., 29. Okt. 2018 um 15:30 Uhr schrieb Jérôme Plût :
>
> I have a few questions about using Scheme to build Lilypond data.
>
> 1. I have some Scheme code that builds custom articulations (more
> precisely, it attaches metadata to NoteEvents, and the only way I found
> to make this possible is v
Am Do., 1. Nov. 2018 um 19:37 Uhr schrieb Jérôme Plût :
>
> Kalendis Novembribus MMXVIII scripsit Thomas Morley :
> > Part of the problem is you use 'structure as a music-property without
> > declaring it. As a consequence using the option -dcheck-internal-types
> > makes the compilation fail.
>
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
