Am Do., 1. Nov. 2018 um 19:37 Uhr schrieb Jérôme Plût <plut.jer...@gmail.com>: > > Kalendis Novembribus MMXVIII scripsit Thomas Morley : > > Part of the problem is you use 'structure as a music-property without > > declaring it. As a consequence using the option -dcheck-internal-types > > makes the compilation fail. > > This is why, in a previous iteration of this code, I used an invisible > articulation to hold the metadata (cf. my previous message on this > list; ...].
I had seen your request. And tried several codings, to no avail until gave up. In the light of your mail I retried with success. :) I posted the code to this thread: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Three-questions-about-Scheme-functions-td216957.html > > I just had a look at define-music-properties.scm -- I had not realized > that it was even possible to *declare* a music property. Adding these > lines makes my code compile even with -dcheck-internal-types: > > (music-property-description 'structure markup? "structural markup") > (music-property-description 'harmony markup? "harmony markup") > (music-property-description 'motif-define markup? "motif name") Not sure this will be sufficient, but this is only my gut feeling, I haven't looked in the source again. > There are still a few warnings because of an invalid 'origin property, > but these would take quite a bit longer to fix (the correct location > object would need to be passed along a *long* chain of procedure > calls). > > By the way, I have one more question: Given (on the Scheme side) a > list L of markup objects, I can build a column with > (make-column-markup L), but this column is left-aligned. How could I > make it right-aligned? (make-right-column-markup '("one" "two" "three")) Best, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
