Thanks,
With the following 'script' and syllables enclosed by "" I get a score
including the text:
\score {
<<
\new Devnull = "inv" { \chd }
\new ChordNames {
\set chordChanges = ##t
\chd
}
\new Staff <<
\new Voice = "
Hi all,
how do I write a cross-staff chord with stems down? In the following
fragment I want to connect the eighth notes of the upper staff to the eighth
notes in the lower staff, but not to the quarter note in the lower staff:
\version "2.16.0"
\layout {
\context {
\Score
autoBeaming
Eluze gmail.com> writes:
> maybe this could be merged into
> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2830
That issue is about fingering and string numbers inside chord brackets <>,
documenting how the order of input works together with script-priority
8( )
( )
articulatio
Keith OHara writes:
> Eluze gmail.com> writes:
>
>> maybe this could be merged into
>> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2830
>
> That issue is about fingering and string numbers inside chord brackets <>,
> documenting how the order of input works together with script-priority
I see two options:
1) Instead of using \chd with your proper chords in it, you could just
create a dummy chord voice like
dummy = \chordmode { \repeat unfold n { c1 } }
and use that to associate the Lyrics Staff with. That way you definitely
have one "stop" per measure.
I don't really ge
Dear all,
There is Christmas around the corner, and the recent report from Noeck
on showcasing Lilypond at a teacher training reminds me on the outward
visibility. And on the topic of music integration in wiki environments.
For the mediawiki software (known from its wikipedia use) there exists
Ex
Klaus Föhl writes:
> There is Christmas around the corner, and the recent report from Noeck
> on showcasing Lilypond at a teacher training reminds me on the outward
> visibility. And on the topic of music integration in wiki environments.
>
> For the mediawiki software (known from its wikipedia u
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2012/11/29 David Kastrup :
>> Noeck writes:
>>
>>> Am 28.11.2012 21:42, schrieb Eluze:
try
{ c'' d''-4 \parenthesize -4 e'' a c''-4 }
Eluze
>>>
>>> Why does that work at all? I would have excpected that the (4) and the
>>> 4 is printed on the d''
The Manual 3.1.4 seems to say that one can place [ . . .] anywhere to start
and end beams, but when I do this to a file that otherwise works, it chokes.
"However, the remaining bracket-like constructs, described with the word
'Marks' in the table above together with ties and tuplets, do not hav
Greetings!
After an inactivity of maybe 4+ years, I'm coming back to the Lilypond users'
community and to working with Lilypond. I must say I'm glad to see the progress
of this project. The documentation has been improved a lot. I like the idea of
a Learning Manual and a Notation Manual. I had t
2012/12/12 Christopher Brooks :
> \time 5/4
>
> \repeat volta 2 {
>
> \times 4/7 {4..
>
> ^\markup {seven against five} a'8}]
>
> \times 4/7 {d'8. a'4}
>
> \times 4/7 {d'16 a'4.. a'16}
>
> \times 4/7 {d'4 a'8.}
>
> \times 4/7 {d'8 a'4.
I've tried using paired brackets, that doesn't work either. However, the
manual says you don't need paired beam brackets.
> \time 5/4
>
> \repeat volta 2 {
>
> \times 4/7 {4..
>
> ^\markup {seven against five} a'8}]
>
> \times 4/7 {d'8. a'4}
>
> \times
Am 12.12.2012 15:29, schrieb Christopher Brooks:
> I've tried using paired brackets, that doesn't work either. However, the
> manual says you don't need paired beam brackets.
>
>> \times 4/7 {4..
>> ^\markup {seven against five} a'8}]
Here, you really should use \noBeam instea
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Brooks"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:29 PM
Subject: RE: beam brackets
I've tried using paired brackets, that doesn't work either. However, the
manual says you don't need paired beam brackets.
Which manual? Please identify exactly
Hello,
I tried asking on IRC but got no replies.
I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X
(my case: 10.6.8) terminal since I am
generating the data for lilypond via a python application.
It would therefor be preferred to run lilypond from the terminal in
an automated no
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Morley"
To: "Christopher Brooks"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: beam brackets
2012/12/12 Christopher Brooks :
\time 5/4
\repeat volta 2 {
\times 4/7 {4..
^\markup {seven against five} a'8
On 12 déc. 2012, at 14:57, Eduardo Silva wrote:
> Greetings!
> After an inactivity of maybe 4+ years, I'm coming back to the Lilypond users'
> community and to working with Lilypond. I must say I'm glad to see the
> progress of this project. The documentation has been improved a lot. I like
>
Eduardo Silva writes:
> Greetings!
> After an inactivity of maybe 4+ years, I'm coming back to the Lilypond
> users' community and to working with Lilypond. I must say I'm glad to
> see the progress of this project. The documentation has been improved
> a lot. I like the idea of a Learning Manual
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Parham FH wrote:
> I tried asking on IRC but got no replies.
> I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X
> (my case: 10.6.8) terminal since I am
> generating the data for lilypond via a python application.
> It would therefor be preferred to
On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Parham FH wrote:
> I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X
> (my case: 10.6.8) terminal
Instructions are here:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/web/macos-x
"Running on the command-line"
Cheers,
-Paul
__
Paul Morris writes:
> On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Parham FH wrote:
>
>> I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X
>> (my case: 10.6.8) terminal
>
> Instructions are here:
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/web/macos-x
>
> "Running on the command-line"
Stu
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:32 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Paul Morris writes:
>
>> On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Parham FH wrote:
>>
>>> I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X
>>> (my case: 10.6.8) terminal
>>
>> Instructions are here:
>> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/
Dear fellow Lilyponders,
throughout this year I was working on a songbook, entirely done with
LilyPond, for my favourite musician and American progressive rock
legend Neal Morse. It got published a few days ago as a book and a PDF
version: http://www.radiantrecords.com/products/428-sing-it-high-so
On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:32 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Paul Morris writes:
>
>> On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Parham FH wrote:
>>
>>> I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X
>>> (my case: 10.6.8) terminal
>>
>> Instructions are here:
>> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.1
Great Paul! Thanks for this. I wish I knew Scheme enough to do this myself, but
I've not learned it and for someone who doesn't know Scheme, it looks really
strange and the learning curve looks steep.
Best,
-Arle
On 2012 Dec 11, at 22:00 , Paul Morris wrote:
> Hi Arle,
>
> Below is a rev
David,
> "David", not "Daniel". The one with the constant harping, not the one
> able to coexist peacefully with multiple versions of Lion.
Ha! I see what you did there…
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
Eduardo,
Nice job, perhaps hymnals are now obsolete. That would throw my synod
into a tizzy. It makes me almost want a tablet. Hopefully you will
raise a few pennies in your endeavor.
Shane Brandes
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> David,
>
>> "David", not "Daniel". T
Arle Lommel writes:
> Great Paul! Thanks for this. I wish I knew Scheme enough to do this
> myself, but I've not learned it and for someone who doesn't know
> Scheme, it looks really strange and the learning curve looks steep.
Scheme is not all that hard to learn, but some kind of tricks you can
"Maarten de Keijzer" writes:
> Thanks,
> With the following 'script' and syllables enclosed by "" I get a score
> including the text:
>
> \score {
> <<
> \new Devnull = "inv" { \chd }
> \new ChordNames {
> \set chordChanges = ##t
> \chd
> }
>
Greetings all.
This forum was most helpful recently in showing me how to use \context { \Staff
\RemoveEmptyStaves } to hide non-empty staves containing music.
The purpose of this was to swap a single staff with two combined voices for two
separate staves with one voice each after a line break,
In case, I buried this detail too deep in the message, this needs to work
WITHOUT explicit line breaking, due to multiple font-sizes and versions with
different combinations of instruments.
On Dec 12, 2012, at 11:05 AM, nothingwaver...@gmail.com wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> This forum was most
On 12 Dec 2012, at 16:32, David Kastrup wrote:
> Paul Morris writes:
>
>> On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Parham FH wrote:
>>
>>> I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X
>>> (my case: 10.6.8) terminal
>>
>> Instructions are here:
>> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Do
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 08:47:27PM +0100, Hans Aberg wrote:
>
> On 12 Dec 2012, at 16:32, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Stupid question: why would one create executable shims to something like
> > DIR/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/* in ~/bin and then add ~/bin to
> > one's PATH when one can just
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 08:47:27PM +0100, Hans Aberg wrote:
>>
>> On 12 Dec 2012, at 16:32, David Kastrup wrote:
>> > Stupid question: why would one create executable shims to something like
>> > DIR/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/* in ~/bin and then add ~/bin to
>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:14:12PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > The executable shims avoid those problems, while being relatively easy
> > to explain to newbies.
>
> The libexec route appears to cater for all of that. We should use bin
> just for executables suppo
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> The libexec route appears to cater for all of that. We should use bin
> just for executables supposed to be entry points of LilyPond.
Please, no!
>From man 1 hier
[..]
libexec/ system daemons & system utilities (execute
Eric Pancer writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> The libexec route appears to cater for all of that. We should use bin
>> just for executables supposed to be entry points of LilyPond.
>
> Please, no!
>
>>From man 1 hier
>
> [..]
> libexec/ system
While writing some conga exercises (for four drums) in Lilypond, I've
found I can get by using the following notes*:
- bd (super tumba)
- toml (tumba)
- sn (conga)
However, I'm looking for a 4th pitch to notate a quinto (high drum)
and would like to use E6 (4th space in treble clef). Since ther
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Which is pretty much what we are talking about. I was not talking about
> /libexec but libexec, like the LilyPond executables are not in /bin but
> some bin (well, actually out/bin) and, after installation, in some
> /usr/local/bin (so the c
Hi Lilypond helpers,
The following snippet :
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=346
does not work any longer.
The error occurs "In procedure car in expression (car pes):
/home/eric/musique/lilypond/test.ly:49:49: Wrong type (expecting pair): ()"
that is, at line (in function defineTransfor
Eric Pancer writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Which is pretty much what we are talking about. I was not talking about
>> /libexec but libexec, like the LilyPond executables are not in /bin but
>> some bin (well, actually out/bin) and, after installation, in some
Eric writes:
> Hi Lilypond helpers,
>
> The following snippet :
>
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=346
>
> does not work any longer.
>
> The error occurs "In procedure car in expression (car pes):
> /home/eric/musique/lilypond/test.ly:49:49: Wrong type (expecting pair): ()"
>
> that is, a
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:02 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Eric Pancer writes:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Which is pretty much what we are talking about. I was not talking about
>>> /libexec but libexec, like the LilyPond executables are not in /bin but
>>> some
Eric Pancer writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:02 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Eric Pancer writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Which is pretty much what we are talking about. I was not talking about
/libexec but libexec, like the LilyPond executables
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> The whole point was _not_ to have it added to the PATH as it was
> supposed to _only_ contain binaries used _internally_ in LilyPond.
Ah! Sorry, I'll smack my own forehead :-)
___
lilypond-user ma
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Eric Pancer wrote:
> While writing some conga exercises (for four drums) in Lilypond, I've
> found I can get by using the following notes*:
> - bd (super tumba)
> - toml (tumba)
> - sn (conga)
>
> However, I'm looking for a 4th pitch to notate a quinto (high dru
Dear all,
I try to use the balloonGrobText. After I found out that I have to add
it to the Score, Staff _and_ to the Voice, some questions remain:
1. All spanners have zero length if a balloonGrobText is attached to
them. At least Beams, Hairpins, Slurs, PhrasingSlurs, TupletBrackets are
affected
Noeck writes:
> PS: Why such a strange name, balloonGrobText? Why not just annotation?
Because nobody sanitized this up to now. It should probably get pretty
much the same interface as \footnote. However, the interface of
\footnote changed about monthly for quite a while, so it made sense
gett
David Kastrup writes:
> Eric writes:
>
>> Hi Lilypond helpers,
>>
>> The following snippet :
>>
>> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=346
>>
>> does not work any longer.
>>
>> The error occurs "In procedure car in expression (car pes):
>> /home/eric/musique/lilypond/test.ly:49:49: Wrong type
Thanks to everyone for recent help. I've been truly impressed by how helpful people have been for my requests.Now I have one more problem with the piano piece I am working on. I am using a pianoStaff, which works fine, except that I now have a portion with a bunch of ossia parts (almost one a measu
Am 12.12.2012 23:01, schrieb David Kastrup:
> Noeck writes:
>> PS: Why such a strange name, balloonGrobText? Why not just annotation?
>
> Because nobody sanitized this up to now. It should probably get pretty
> much the same interface as \footnote. However, the interface of
> \footnote changed
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 12 Dec 2012, at 21:16, Eric Pancer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> The libexec route appears to cater for all of that. We should use bin
>>> just for executables supposed to be entry points of LilyPond.
> (pnew (ly:music-property (list-ref pitches i) 'pitch))
Thanks, it works perfectly :^)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 12 Dec 2012, at 23:50, Eric Pancer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
>> On 12 Dec 2012, at 21:16, Eric Pancer wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
The libexec route appears to cater for all of that. We should use bin
just fo
fenevad wrote
> 2. In the first two instances where I call the ossia parts, there is one
> on the last half beat of a measure and a *separate* one on the first half
> beat of the next measure. Lilypond, quite logically, assumes that these
> should be stuck together (since there is no time between t
On 12 Dec 2012, at 21:16, Eric Pancer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> The libexec route appears to cater for all of that. We should use bin
>> just for executables supposed to be entry points of LilyPond.
>
> Please, no!
>
> From man 1 hier
>
Hi Arle,
2012/12/12 Arle Lommel
> Thanks to everyone for recent help. I've been truly impressed by how
> helpful people have been for my requests.
>
> Now I have one more problem with the piano piece I am working on. I am
> using a pianoStaff, which works fine, except that I now have a portion w
On Dec 12, 2012, at 16:57, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 12 Dec 2012, at 23:50, Eric Pancer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
>>> On 12 Dec 2012, at 21:16, Eric Pancer wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> The libexec route appears t
On Dec 12, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Parham Fazelzadeh
wrote:
> I have tried searching for the answer online
[...]
> thank you so much. I feel stupid now, can't believe I missed that. I guess my
> eyes were looking for the word "terminal". Also, I would have maybe expected
> that information to also
2012/12/12 Eric Pancer :
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Eric Pancer wrote:
>> While writing some conga exercises (for four drums) in Lilypond, I've
>> found I can get by using the following notes*:
>> - bd (super tumba)
>> - toml (tumba)
>> - sn (conga)
>>
>> However, I'm looking for a 4th
Hey guys,
thank you so much. I feel stupid now, can't believe I missed that. I guess
my eyes were looking for the word "terminal". Also, I would have maybe
expected that information to also exist under the Manual link and not
Downloads!
either way, big thanks
/Parham
On 13 December 2012 00:25, P
2012/12/11 Paul Morris :
> Below is a revised version
[...]
Hi Paul,
I had a look at the LSR-snippet
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861
It's no problem to make it work with 2.14.2 just adding a $-sign
before offsets in the music-function.
But you will have noticed that after applying the f
Hi Harm,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2012/12/11 Paul Morris :
>> Below is a revised version
> [...]
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I had a look at the LSR-snippet
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861
>
> It's no problem to make it work with 2.14.2 just adding a $-sign
> before
On Dec 12, 2012, at 7:24 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I had a look at the LSR-snippet
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861
>
> It's no problem to make it work with 2.14.2 just adding a $-sign
> before offsets in the music-function.
>
> But you will have noticed that after appl
Hi David (N), Paul,
2012/12/13 Paul Morris :
> On Dec 12, 2012, at 7:24 PM, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> I had a look at the LSR-snippet
>> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861
>>
>> It's no problem to make it work with 2.14.2 just adding a $-sign
>> before offsets in the music-
Hi Harm,
On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> I've seen the updated version in the LSR already and tend to approve it as is.
> I doubt it could be possible to create an automatism for 'stem-attachment.
Ok, I went ahead and added examples of manual overrides for fixing stem
atta
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
> Keith OHara oco.net> writes:
>
> > The irregular behavior Oliver sees occurs when there is no <> chord
> > indication.
>
> Fingering_engraver
Well, fingerings go to Fingering_engraver but the string-numbers go to
New_fingering_engraver. (Better than version
Keith OHara oco.net> writes:
> There are two or
> three separate pieces of code setting fingerings and scripts according to
> different combinations of rules,
> It seems if we give Fingerings and StringNumbers different script-priorities
> by default, as David suggested, it would render a lot
I'd like to increase the distance between piano staffs (the two staves
connected by the brace). After looking through the IR, I think the
skyline-horizontal-padding of the system-interface is what need to be
changed. My attempts have failed and I don't know if it's because my
override commands we
ed stuckems gmail.com> writes:
>
> I'd like to increase the distance between piano staffs
\new PianoStaff \with {
\override StaffGrouper #'staff-staff-spacing #'basic-distance = #20
} <<
\new Staff { c'1 }
\new Staff { c'1 } >>
__
Thomas,
Thanks so much. That got me about 90% of the way there, but playing around with
what you did got me the other 10% of the way there, so that does it. What was
missing for me was the "\once \override Staff.BarLine #'allow-span-bar = ##f",
which was obvious in its intent, but which my pre
71 matches
Mail list logo