midi.
Thanks,
-William
% -
\version "2.25.19"
rightHand = \relative {
\time 3/4
<<
{ \voiceOne e'4. d'8 }
\new Voice { \voiceFour e,2 }
>>
\oneVoice \appoggiatura { c'16 d e } d8 c | c8
}
\include "articulate.ly"
\score {
On 2024-09-16 14:27, Knute Snortum wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 2:14 PM Knute Snortum wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:15 PM David Kastrup wrote:
In my book, an appoggiatura is executed at least with the written
duration, and here you take 3/16 of time from 1/8
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 2:14 PM Knute Snortum wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:15 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>
>> In my book, an appoggiatura is executed at least with the written
>> duration, and here you take 3/16 of time from 1/8. How is that supposed
>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:15 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>
> In my book, an appoggiatura is executed at least with the written
> duration, and here you take 3/16 of time from 1/8. How is that supposed
> to work? You probably want \acciaccatura or \grace instead.
I think you're
Knute Snortum writes:
> I have discovered that LilyPond 2.25.19 produces a bad bar check warning
> under certain circumstances. The three parts are 1) using two voices, 2)
> an appoggiatura, 3) using articulate.ly. Below is my example code:
>
> %%%
> \version "
I have discovered that LilyPond 2.25.19 produces a bad bar check warning
under certain circumstances. The three parts are 1) using two voices, 2)
an appoggiatura, 3) using articulate.ly. Below is my example code:
%%%
\version "2.25.19"
rightHand = \relative {
\time 3/4
<<
Staff {
>> <<
>> \time 6/8
>> \clef bass
>> \new Voice = "a" {
>> \voiceFour
>> %\time 6/8 \clef bass
>> \appoggiatura c,8 c2. \appoggiatura c,8 c2.
>> }
>> \new Voice = "b" {
>>
: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Appoggiatura in bass clef at start of piece
Thanks, Harm,
Sorry, I seemed to have missed out the most important part of the challenge!
Apologies. This is a simplified extract of the lower staff from the start of a
two staff piano arrangement that
the second voice that causes the additional
treble clef to appear, with a single voice there is no problem. But
when you add a second…
\version "2.22.2"
\new Staff {
<<
\time 6/8
\clef bass
\new Voice = "a" {
\voiceFour
%\time 6/8 \clef bass
clef to
appear, with a single voice there is no problem. But when you add a second…
\version "2.22.2"
\new Staff {
<<
\time 6/8
\clef bass
\new Voice = "a" {
\voiceFour
%\time 6/8 \clef bass
\appoggia
% \clef bass
> \new Voice = "a" {
> \voiceFour
> \time 6/8 \clef bass \appoggiatura c,8 c1 \appoggiatura c,8 c1
> }
> \new Voice = "b" {
> \voiceThree
> \grace s8 e1 \grace s8 e1
> }
> >>
> }
&
Hi,
I’m wondering if there is a better way of writing this code:
\version "2.22.2"
\new Staff {
<<
% \time 6/8
% \clef bass
\new Voice = "a" {
\voiceFour
\time 6/8 \clef
he Ball Game". I decided to skip the lyrics for now
> > and replace the corresponding notes with a trumpet.
> >
> > I'm having a problem correctly displaying appoggiatura that exists
> > inside a repeat volta.
> >
> > The problem: The appoggiatura a
angement of
> > "Take Me Out to the Ball Game". I decided to skip the lyrics for now
> > and replace the corresponding notes with a trumpet.
> >
> > I'm having a problem correctly displaying appoggiatura that exists
> > inside a repeat volta.
>
Kenneth Wolcott writes:
> Hi;;
>
> I'm trying to engrave the 8notes.com's Voice+Piano arrangement of
> "Take Me Out to the Ball Game". I decided to skip the lyrics for now
> and replace the corresponding notes with a trumpet.
>
> I'm having a
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 2:45 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Have a look at the recent thread
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2021-07/msg00012.html
>
> Workaround:
>
> \version "2.22.1"
>
> \new Voice \relative c' {
>$(add-grace-property 'Voice 'Slur 'direction UP)
>\acciacc
David Kastrup writes:
> Knute Snortum writes:
>
>> I've run into what I think is a bug (and I couldn't find it in gitlab
>> Issues). If an acciaccatura or appoggiatura is the first note in a
>> piece, a \slurUp is not honored (it stays a down slur).
Le 04/08/2021 à 02:18, Knute Snortum a écrit :
I've run into what I think is a bug (and I couldn't find it in gitlab
Issues). If an acciaccatura or appoggiatura is the first note in a
piece, a \slurUp is not honored (it stays a down slur). Subsequent
notes work fine. MWE:
%%%
\versi
Knute Snortum writes:
> I've run into what I think is a bug (and I couldn't find it in gitlab
> Issues). If an acciaccatura or appoggiatura is the first note in a
> piece, a \slurUp is not honored (it stays a down slur). Subsequent
> notes work fine. MWE:
>
I've run into what I think is a bug (and I couldn't find it in gitlab
Issues). If an acciaccatura or appoggiatura is the first note in a
piece, a \slurUp is not honored (it stays a down slur). Subsequent
notes work fine. MWE:
%%%
\version "2.23.3"
\relative c' {
\accia
t; >
> >
> > On 1/29/21 10:48 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> > > Hello;
> > >
> > >I have two (only two at this time!) misunderstandings on how to
> > > properly engrave ornamental notes. The grace (?) notes are slurred
> > > (so not a
beginning of a bar.
> >
> > Now the syntax: \grace { note(s) } followed by regular notes. This
> > makes sense because the appoggiatura syntax and the acciaccatura have
> > only one note allowed prior to the "regular" notes.
>
> \acciaccatura{ note1 note2, etc.
regular notes. This
makes sense because the appoggiatura syntax and the acciaccatura have
only one note allowed prior to the "regular" notes.
\acciaccatura{ note1 note2, etc. } will allow as many notes as you need.
Paul
But the grace notes are not slurred?
Why does the time sig
appoggiatura syntax and the acciaccatura have
only one note allowed prior to the "regular" notes.
But the grace notes are not slurred?
Why does the time signature get displayed after the "grace" notes as
well is the beginning of the staff where it should be?
I'm looking
Hi Harm,
thank you for pointing me to that (and actually now I recall having seen
this hack some day).
Am 18.01.19 um 21:14 schrieb Thomas Morley:
Am Fr., 18. Jan. 2019 um 19:14 Uhr schrieb Urs Liska :
Is there any convenient and semantically acceptable way of engraving an
appoggiatura (or
On 1/18/19, Thomas Morley wrote:
> you could try to use David K's cheat:
Neat! I’ve added it to the LSR, and also tagged it as doc:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1083
V.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/m
Hi Harm,
Thanks. I tend to adjust rest positions manually anyway, so that's not an
issue for me personally. With a bar full of notes it also usually looks
pretty good.
Andrew
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 12:20, Thomas Morley
wrote:
>
> Spacing is a little off. The R1 is not really centered:
>
>
___
tle off. The R1 is not really centered:
{
R1
\appoggiatura { \bar "" d''8 \bar "|" } c''4 r2.
}
That's what I remember directly, not sure whether there is more.
Cheers,
Harm
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019
I should add that this works for grace notes also, which is actually what I
use the technique for.
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
gt;
> {
> R1
> %% default
> \appoggiatura d''8 c''4 r2.
> %% cheated
> \appoggiatura { \bar "" d''8 \bar "|" } c''4 r2.
> }
>
> It has it's own drawbacks, though.
>
>
___
Am Fr., 18. Jan. 2019 um 19:14 Uhr schrieb Urs Liska :
>
> Is there any convenient and semantically acceptable way of engraving an
> appoggiatura (or other grace notes) *before* the barline? I know that
> usually one is pointed to \afterGrace to achieve something like that but
Is there any convenient and semantically acceptable way of engraving an
appoggiatura (or other grace notes) *before* the barline? I know that
usually one is pointed to \afterGrace to achieve something like that but
that seems semantically problematic. I produced the attached image using
a
the issue.
Thanks
Urs
Am 14.01.19 um 13:08 schrieb Urs Liska:
In an appoggiatura with the main note having the stem downwards the
appoggiatura's slur will cross the stem, see the first of the two
instances in this example:
{
\appoggiatura d''4 c''
\appoggiatura
On 2019-01-14 4:08 am, Urs Liska wrote:
In an appoggiatura with the main note having the stem downwards the
appoggiatura's slur will cross the stem, see the first of the two
instances in this example:
{
\appoggiatura d''4 c''
\appoggiatura d'4 c'
}
A clie
Urs,
Forgot something
{
\slurUp \stemDown \grace d''4 (c'')
\stemUp
\appoggiatura d'4 c'
}
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Urs Liska
Sent: Monday, January 14,
Urs,
Perhaps
{
\slurUp \stemDown \grace d''4 (c'')
\appoggiatura d'4 c'
}
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Urs Liska
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:08
In an appoggiatura with the main note having the stem downwards the
appoggiatura's slur will cross the stem, see the first of the two
instances in this example:
{
\appoggiatura d''4 c''
\appoggiatura d'4 c'
}
A client requests me to shorten the slurs so
Maurits Lamers writes:
> One of my students came to me with something peculiar with
> accacciatura and appoggiatura when used as the first item in a score
> with multiple staffs.
Issue 34.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:18:42AM -0700, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> Maurits,
>
>
>
> This is a known glitch. A “dummy” acciaccatura or appoggiatura must be
> added to all other voices. See below
\grace of the same value will do (it's easier to type).
Paul
>
&g
Maurits,
This is a known glitch. A "dummy" acciaccatura or appoggiatura must be added
to all other voices. See below
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Maurits Lamers
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 8:12 AM
To: Lilypond-Us
Hi all,
One of my students came to me with something peculiar with accacciatura and
appoggiatura when used as the first item in a score with multiple staffs.
I tried to find any obvious errors in his code, but I couldn't find anything. I
managed to create a minimal working example, inc
Encountering this bug for the first time is a right of passage. It will
probably not be fixed in our lifetimes.
Congratulations, you are now a Lilyponder!
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/appoggiatura-problem-tp192328p192353.html
Sent from the User
Many tahnks! Have understood the problem.
Regards
Am 07.07.2016 um 17:42 schrieb David Kastrup:
bb writes:
I tried to write a treble line and a bass line. The treble line has an
appoggiatura at the beginning, the bass line has not. If you compile
that attached snippet you will find the
bb writes:
> I tried to write a treble line and a bass line. The treble line has an
> appoggiatura at the beginning, the bass line has not. If you compile
> that attached snippet you will find the appoggiatura before the time
> definition. in the second measure/bar it is not.
>
&g
I tried to write a treble line and a bass line. The treble line has an
appoggiatura at the beginning, the bass line has not. If you compile
that attached snippet you will find the appoggiatura before the time
definition. in the second measure/bar it is not.
There is also a strange treble clef
Luca,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Luca Danieli [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n178112...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hello Lilypond-ers again!
>
> How can I write an appoggiatura, which goes into an acciaccatura, and then
> into the main note?
> More or less t
Hello Lilypond-ers again!
How can I write an appoggiatura, which goes into an acciaccatura, and then into
the main note?More or less this is what I thought:
appoggiatura fis16\pp { \acciaccatura fis 8 fis2\mp }
Luca
or 16th) notes in runs. Small
as these hooks are, the original typesetter placed these carefully, the
mid-point resting between or crossing the line where a the notehead of the
auxiliary note would land (even providing them with ledger lines).
For now, I'm notating these with smaller-si
> On 29 Nov 2014, at 23:19, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
>
> I'm typesetting BWV 1055, which includes these so-called nachschlags (or
> passing appoggiaturas, accents)
> They can appear coming down or up to the following note (see attached).
>
> These are explained here:
> http://www.iment.com/mai
Hi Javier,
it's probably not what you are looking for and your case is perhaps easier to
solve. But there might
be ideas to take from this post:
http://lilypondblog.org/2013/08/adding-ornamentations-to-note-heads-part-1/
Just because the symbol looks similar.
Cheers,
Joram
_
I'm typesetting BWV 1055, which includes these so-called nachschlags (or
passing appoggiaturas, accents)
They can appear coming down or up to the following note (see attached).
These are explained here:
http://www.iment.com/maida/familytree/henry/music/bachnotation.htm#passinga
How to ty
reble clef's first measure is
>
> << { \appoggiatura { g16 ([a] } \voiceOne g4) (c8 g) a4 (b) } \\ {
> \appoggiatura { s8 }2 4 } >>
>
> where the \voiceOne is need to prevent warnings about too many clashing note
> columns (which I also don't understand, but it do
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 04:16:17PM -0500, Frederick Bartlett wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> Are you sure \transpose changes the key signature? It doesn't work for me,
> unless the \key is inside the \transpose, which won't generally be the
> case, since I put \key in a \global ... or is there some easier w
nspose all voices in
a piece with a single command rather than putting an individual \transpose
on each voice.)
Also, the snippet is quite simplified; I really do need the two-voice
construct. The actual treble clef's first measure is
<< { \appoggiatura { g16 ([a] } \voic
I put a \transpose c des {} around
> every voice and changed the \key in my \global to des\major.
Frederick,
Don't change the key to des\major. \transpose c des {} will do it for you.
>
> Now, in my first bar (which has an appoggiatura), the key signature shows up
> on the third be
des\major.
Now, in my first bar (which has an appoggiatura), the key signature shows
up on the third beat (literally 'on': it's superimposed over the notes),
even though I have the spacers everywhere. This snippet shows most of the
problems, though not the superimposition, and the
It is a common problem.
You have to put an appogiatura with spacer rests in all voices.
Hth
Urs
Frederick Bartlett schrieb:
>I'm running Lilypond 2.16.2 inside Frescobaldi 2.0.10 on Fedora 19.
>
>This gives two 'C' time signatures, one before and one after the
>
I'm running Lilypond 2.16.2 inside Frescobaldi 2.0.10 on Fedora 19.
This gives two 'C' time signatures, one before and one after the
appoggiatura:
\version "2.16"
\book {
\score {
\new Staff = "treble" <<
\new Voice = "tre
"Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re:fermata on dotted notes on the top line (SoundsFromSound)
>> 2. Re:fermata on dotted notes on the top line (Richard Shann)
>> 3. Re:Appoggiatura or not appoggia
he top line (SoundsFromSound)
> 2. Re:fermata on dotted notes on the top line (Richard Shann)
> 3. Re:Appoggiatura or not appoggiatura? (David Rogers)
> 4. feature request: abs-fontsize available for all text grobs
> (Kieren MacMillan)
> 5. Uneven note spacing (Andrew Bernard)
ion "2.16.0"
> \relative c'
> { \clef treble
> \time 6/8
> \key b \major
> ais'4.\p \once \override Slur #'stencil = ##f \appoggiatura {b8[\( ais
> gisis ais]}
> <<
> {dis4 b8}
> \new Voice
> {\stemUp
> \once \override TupletBracke
e
\time 6/8
\key b \major
ais'4.\p \once \override Slur #'stencil = ##f \appoggiatura {b8[\( ais gisis
ais]}
<<
{dis4 b8}
\new Voice
{\stemUp
\once \override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f
\once \override TupletNumber #'stencil =
Le 03/06/2013 17:32, Mark Stephen Mrotek disait :
Good Day!
A piece begins with an anacrusis – see attached file “without.ly.” When
the “g” is notated as an appoggiatura to the “f” – see attached file
“with.ly” – some dreck appears.
Both hands don't have the same duration since one of
Good Day!
A piece begins with an anacrusis - see attached file "without.ly." When the
"g" is notated as an appoggiatura to the "f" - see attached file "with.ly" -
some dreck appears.
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=183 states that the grace sho
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Andrew Bernard
wrote:
>
> Don't know if this works in 2.16, but here you are:
>
>
>
> \version "2.17.14"
>
>
>
> treble = \relative c'' {
>
> \clef treble
>
> \time 3/4
>
> s2 g,8( a) |
>
> 2 4
>
> }
>
>
> bass = \relative c {
>
> \clef bass
>
> \time 3/4
>
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Ralph Palmer wrote:
> Greetings -
>
> I'm running Ly 2.16.2 under Win7.
>
> I'm trying to reproduce the appoggiatura below. I've looked in the
> Notation Reference, the Snippet Repository, and the mailing list archives,
> and
Greetings -
I'm running Ly 2.16.2 under Win7.
I'm trying to reproduce the appoggiatura below. I've looked in the Notation
Reference, the Snippet Repository, and the mailing list archives, and I
haven't found anything that helps. Can anyone help me with this?
I appreciate you
2012/11/30 Noeck :
> Am 29.11.2012 23:56, schrieb Nick Payne:
>> \version "2.17.6"
>>
>> \relative c'' {
>> \once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
>> \appoggiatura f8 fis,
>> \once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
>
Am 29.11.2012 23:56, schrieb Nick Payne:
> \version "2.17.6"
>
> \relative c'' {
> \once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
> \appoggiatura f8 fis,
> \once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
> \shape #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0
slur-curve offsets)
#})
And the above definition would only work with that new version. But
wouldn't it be equivalent to the \shape macro applied as
\relative c'' {
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\shapeSlur #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) \appoggiatur
d coordinates
> (loop n)
> coords))
>
> shapeSlur = #(define-music-function (parser location offsets) (list?)
> #{
> \once \override Slur.control-points = #(alter-slur-curve offsets)
> #})
>
> \relative c'' {
> \once \override Slur
ive c'' {
>> \once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
>> \shapeSlur #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) \appoggiatura f8 fis,
>> }
>
> \shape #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) Slur \appoggiatura ...
>
> ?
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
ts)
> #})
And the above definition would only work with that new version. But
wouldn't it be equivalent to the \shape macro applied as
> \relative c'' {
> \once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
> \shapeSlur #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) \appogg
ne-music-function (parser location offsets) (list?)
#{
\once \override Slur.control-points = #(alter-slur-curve offsets)
#})
\relative c'' {
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\shapeSlur #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) \appoggiatura f8 fis,
}
___
mposer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Appoggiatura-help-tp136978p137008.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
, 2012 at 8:02 PM, SoundsFromSound
wrote:
> Nick Payne-3 wrote
> > On 29/11/12 18:32, SoundsFromSound wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above
> >> the
> >> note, instead of wher
Nick Payne-3 wrote
> On 29/11/12 18:32, SoundsFromSound wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above
>> the
>> note, instead of where it is now? It's all messy and overlapping; I'd
>> like
>
Nick Payne-3 wrote
> On 29/11/12 18:32, SoundsFromSound wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above
>> the
>> note, instead of where it is now? It's all messy and overlapping; I'd
>> like
>
On 29/11/12 18:32, SoundsFromSound wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above the
note, instead of where it is now? It's all messy and overlapping; I'd like
to move it to be above the notes.
If you mean the slur, use \once
Hello,
Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above the
note, instead of where it is now? It's all messy and overlapping; I'd like
to move it to be above the notes.
Coming from Sibelius, I know it's easy to just hit a key and flip a
slur-st
Damn. Really should have seen that. Thanks.
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>
> On 12 December 2011 00:30, George_ wrote:
>>
>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p32957263/Untitled.jpg
>>
>> What I want is for the appoggiatura to be on the same side of the double
>> bar
&
On 12 December 2011 00:30, George_ wrote:
>
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p32957263/Untitled.jpg
>
> What I want is for the appoggiatura to be on the same side of the double bar
> line as the D#. What I wrote looks something like what is below (at the
> end). As you can see
http://old.nabble.com/file/p32957263/Untitled.jpg
What I want is for the appoggiatura to be on the same side of the double bar
line as the D#. What I wrote looks something like what is below (at the
end). As you can see I've put the volta repeats only into the top part. Up
until now it
As has been already pointed out, this is a known bug, see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=630&q=grace
(which by the way contains some misleading information).
One working workaround is to move the grace/appoggiatura outside the
<<{...} \\ {...}>> construct:
Maybe you want an
> acciaccatura?
We're not in disagreement about what the appoggiatura's meant to do :-).
We both agree that the output from
\appoggiatura d8 c4
should be like
d8 c8
However, what happens with the unpatched articulate is instead like
d16 c8
The new length o
On 29.09.2009, at 16:14, Nick Didkovsky wrote:
Hello
Stems are going the wrong direction on the first measure of a score
when a grace note is present.
This is a known issue with graceMusic. \voiceOne has to be re-set
after the grace note.
Subsequent measures do not show this problem.
patch to add \staccatissimo.
Nothing fancy: it's implemented just like the \staccato, only it takes a
quarter of the note's value by default, not a half.
3. Appoggiatura. Unfortunately, articulate's \appoggiatura doesn't
quite work (at least for me with Lilypond version 2.12.2).
.
The first note of each measure has an appoggiatura.
The problem: The first measure displays stems going down when they
should be going up. Second measure (and subsequent measures if I make a
longer score) show stems going in the proper direction. So this problem
is limited to the first measure of
's
Iain> similar to c\trill d\trill e\trill
I don't know what it's supposed to do, so I'll bow to superior experience.
Iain> 2. Staccatissimo. I've got a simple patch to add
Iain> \staccatissimo. Nothing fancy: it's implemented just like the
Iain>
ple patch to add \staccatissimo.
Nothing fancy: it's implemented just like the \staccato, only it takes a
quarter of the note's value by default, not a half.
3. Appoggiatura. Unfortunately, articulate's \appoggiatura doesn't
quite work. For example,
\include "articul
Thanks
Nick Didkovsky
James E. Bailey wrote:
Have you added the spacer appoggiatura to the other staff?
On 19.09.2009, at 21:07, Nick Didkovsky wrote:
Hello,
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong?
I have a staff where the first note has an appoggiatura (see below)
When this sta
gt; R4*4
>
> How are you suggesting Staff 2's content need be altered?
Please see the Known Issues and Warnings in the Notation Reference, section
1.2.6 under Grace notes. This issue is explained there.
Carl
>
> Thanks
> Nick Didkovsky
>
> James E. Bailey wrot
mes E. Bailey wrote:
Have you added the spacer appoggiatura to the other staff?
On 19.09.2009, at 21:07, Nick Didkovsky wrote:
Hello,
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong?
I have a staff where the first note has an appoggiatura (see below)
When this staff is converted, the layout looks
Have you added the spacer appoggiatura to the other staff?
On 19.09.2009, at 21:07, Nick Didkovsky wrote:
Hello,
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong?
I have a staff where the first note has an appoggiatura (see below)
When this staff is converted, the layout looks good although
Hello,
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong?
I have a staff where the first note has an appoggiatura (see below)
When this staff is converted, the layout looks good although there's too
much horizontal space between the appoggiatura and the quarter note
If it is laid out with an
James E. Bailey Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:51 PM
Wow, thanks. With that bit of information, I could change my code
appropriately.
\version "2.11.57"
{
\relative {
\voiceOne
\appoggiatura e'
\voiceOne
f4 e d c b a g f
}
}
Can this be mention
attached code, if the appoggiatura is commented out,
then the stems follow how they're supposed to. Is this a bug or a
super-special feature of graceMusic that I just didn't know about?
It seems that the grace note commands are yet another example of a
command that messes up ooiceOne/voiceTw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 schrieb Daniel Hulme:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:32:31PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 schrieb James E. Bailey:
> > > Oddly, in the attached code, if the appoggiatur
Wow, thanks. With that bit of information, I could change my code
appropriately.
\version "2.11.57"
{
\relative {
\voiceOne
\appoggiatura e'
\voiceOne
f4 e d c b a g f
}
}
Can this be mentioned somewhere in the docs?
Am 27.08.2008 um 22:32 s
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:32:31PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 schrieb James E. Bailey:
> > Oddly, in the attached code, if the appoggiatura is commented out,
> > then the stems follow how they're supposed to. Is this a bug or a
> >
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
