David, Yes I like your approach much better. I had forgotten about the difference between using \times and using multiplication to show a tuplet.
--John K Sent from my iPod On Jul 16, 2013, at 2:52 AM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: > Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to > lilypond-user@gnu.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > lilypond-user-ow...@gnu.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re:fermata on dotted notes on the top line (SoundsFromSound) > 2. Re:fermata on dotted notes on the top line (Richard Shann) > 3. Re:Appoggiatura or not appoggiatura? (David Rogers) > 4. feature request: abs-fontsize available for all text grobs > (Kieren MacMillan) > 5. Uneven note spacing (Andrew Bernard) > 6. Re:feature request: abs-fontsize available for all text grobs > (Marc Hohl) > 7. LSR preview broken? (Werner LEMBERG) > 8. Dash one sibling of a slur/PhrasingSlur/Tie (Urs Liska) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:38:39 -0700 (PDT) > From: SoundsFromSound <soundsfromso...@gmail.com> > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Re: fermata on dotted notes on the top line > Message-ID: <1373906319709-148050.p...@n5.nabble.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hmm, that does like quite bad. > > But Eluze has the right idea: > I would just use something like > > f''4.- \tweak #'padding #1 \fermata > > ...as a temporary fix :) > > -Ben > > > > Eluze wrote >> >> Richard Shann wrote >>> I don't know if this is the right forum for posting unfortunate examples >>> of LilyPond's output but I came across this one: >>> >>> \version "2.16" >>> \score { >>> f''4.\fermata >>> } >>> >>> The fermata seems connected visually with the dot on the note, it looks >>> better to me dragged further away, which I have done for the score in >>> question using Denemo. >> this looks a bit ugly - I'vel added an issue to the tracker >> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3456&thanks=3456&ts=1373898751. >> >> two quick workarounds: >> >> f''4.- \tweak #'padding #2 \fermata >> >> or >> >> \dotsDown f''4. \fermata >> >> thank your Robert for reporting this >> >> Eluze > > > > > > ----- > composer | sound designer > -- > View this message in context: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/fermata-on-dotted-notes-on-the-top-line-tp148048p148050.html > Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:08:16 +0100 > From: Richard Shann <richard.sh...@virgin.net> > To: SoundsFromSound <soundsfromso...@gmail.com> > Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Re: fermata on dotted notes on the top line > Message-ID: <1373908096.2135.209.ca...@debian-box.lan> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > What I actually used was a tweak to the offset, as I hadn't got round to > adding padding as an option in Denemo; Eluze has pricked my conscience > about this and I have now added an option to tweak the padding of such > objects by right clicking on the typeset score and choosing Padding from > the pop-up menu. > > Richard > > > On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 09:38 -0700, SoundsFromSound wrote: >> Hmm, that does like quite bad. >> >> But Eluze has the right idea: >> I would just use something like >> >> f''4.- \tweak #'padding #1 \fermata >> >> ...as a temporary fix :) >> >> -Ben >> >> >> >> Eluze wrote >>> >>> Richard Shann wrote >>>> I don't know if this is the right forum for posting unfortunate examples >>>> of LilyPond's output but I came across this one: >>>> >>>> \version "2.16" >>>> \score { >>>> f''4.\fermata >>>> } >>>> >>>> The fermata seems connected visually with the dot on the note, it looks >>>> better to me dragged further away, which I have done for the score in >>>> question using Denemo. >>> this looks a bit ugly - I'vel added an issue to the tracker >>> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3456&thanks=3456&ts=1373898751. >>> >>> two quick workarounds: >>> >>> f''4.- \tweak #'padding #2 \fermata >>> >>> or >>> >>> \dotsDown f''4. \fermata >>> >>> thank your Robert for reporting this >>> >>> Eluze >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> composer | sound designer >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/fermata-on-dotted-notes-on-the-top-line-tp148048p148050.html >> Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> lilypond-user@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:48:24 -0700 > From: David Rogers <davidandrewrog...@gmail.com> > To: "lilypond-user\@gnu.org" <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Subject: Re: Appoggiatura or not appoggiatura? > Message-ID: <87txjv3eaf....@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain > > John Kliewe <kli...@yahoo.com> writes: > >> Many thanks to the lilypond-user group for their advice on measure #47 >> of the Chopin Nocturne #3 (Op 9 No 3). Urs' article on voices was >> particularly helpful. >> >> My next challenge appeared in measure #69. This is working for me : >> >> \version "2.16.0" >> \relative c' >> { \clef treble >> \time 6/8 >> \key b \major >> ais'4.\p \once \override Slur #'stencil = ##f \appoggiatura {b8[\( ais >> gisis ais]} >> << >> {dis4 b8} >> \new Voice >> {\stemUp >> \once \override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f >> \once \override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f >> \times 1/2 >> {dis8 \teeny d cis c} >> \normalsize b8} >> \oneVoice >> ais4 gis8\) >> } >> >> At first I assumed that both tuplets were appoggiatura, but I couldn't >> get that to work. I also tried cue notes, but merging the head of a >> cue note with a full-size note head was no good either. So my final >> version (above) treats the first tuplet as an appoggiatura, but the >> second is a new voice in a smaller font. >> >> I'm delighted with the results. But I do wonder if anyone in the group >> thinks I may have missed a better approach? > > > Not better, but another possible way: > > \version "2.16.0" > \relative c' > { \clef treble > \time 6/8 > \key b \major > ais'4.\p \once \override Slur #'stencil = ##f \appoggiatura {b8[\( ais > gisis ais]} > << > {dis4 b8} > \new Voice > {\stemUp > { dis8*1/2[ \teeny d cis c} > \normalsize b8]} > \oneVoice > ais4 gis8\) > } > > > -- > David R > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:30:25 -0400 > From: Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> > To: Lilypond-User Mailing List <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Subject: feature request: abs-fontsize available for all text grobs > Message-ID: <blu0-smtp74cd98fab24cb1ccd9d07994...@phx.gbl> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hello, > > There are a lot of places where I would like to use abs-fontsize: > InstrumentName, LyricText, etc. > > It would be nice if there were a built-in, intuitive, consistent, direct > method of setting an absolute font size, e.g., > \override InstrumentName.font-size = #(abs-fontsize . 10) > > How difficult would this be to implement? > (I'm happy to contribute a few euros in sponsorship funds.) > > Thanks, > Kieren. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:14:12 +1000 > From: Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> > To: lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Subject: Uneven note spacing > Message-ID: <51e4c894.4020...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" > > Greetings List, > > In the following example from a piece I am setting, the composer wants > the notes in the tuplets exactly evenly spaced, but I see considerable > unevenness here. There are two questions. First, is this really the > classical and canonical way to space tuplet notes when in the cross > staff situation here? Secondly, even if it is, how can I make them > evenly spaced out? > > If I use proportional notation, the only way to spread them out evenly > is to use such a large value that the score becomes ridiculously widely > spaced. > > The dodecaphonic accidental style is required in this piece. > > Any help appreciated! > > Andrew > > ==== > > \version "2.17.21" > > > \paper { > ragged-right = ##t > } > > % move to upper staff, stems down > upsd = #(define-music-function (parser location) () > #{ > \change Staff = upper > \stemDown > #} > ) > > % move to lower staff, stems up > downsu = #(define-music-function (parser location) () > #{ > \change Staff = lower > \stemUp > #} > ) > > > upper = \relative c'' { > \clef bass > \time 1/4 > > s4 s4 s4 s4 s4 s4 > } > > lower = \relative c { > \clef bass > \time 1/4 > > \override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##t > \tupletDown > > \tuplet 7/8 { > r16. a32^.[ > \once \override Stem.beaming = #(cons (list 0 1 2) (list 1 2)) > \upsd g'_. > \once \override Stem.beaming = #(cons (list 0 1) (list -1 0 1)) f_. > \downsu bes,^.] > } > > \stemUp > \tuplet 7/8 { > ces32[ \upsd ces ces \downsu ces \upsd ces \upsd ces \downsu ces] > } > > c4 c4 c4 c4 > } > > \score { > > << > \new Staff = "upper" { \upper } > \new Staff = "lower" { \lower } > \layout { > \context { > \Score > \accidentalStyle Score.dodecaphonic > } > } > } > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/attachments/20130716/3d271f10/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:22:38 +0200 > From: Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de> > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Re: feature request: abs-fontsize available for all text > grobs > Message-ID: <51e4e6ae.7000...@hohlart.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > Am 15.07.2013 20:30, schrieb Kieren MacMillan: >> Hello, >> >> There are a lot of places where I would like to use abs-fontsize: >> InstrumentName, LyricText, etc. >> >> It would be nice if there were a built-in, intuitive, consistent, direct >> method of setting an absolute font size, e.g., >> \override InstrumentName.font-size = #(abs-fontsize . 10) > > I had thought of such a feature some months ago; my syntax proposal > would be something like > > \set fontScaling = #absolute > > or > > \set fontScaling = #relative > > perhaps with a better keyword. > > By the way, a feature like this would come in handy for eps inclusions, > too ? I remember that I had to define a \epsfile-mm command in > analogy to the implemented \epsfile to allow for dimensions to be set > in millimeters. > >> >> How difficult would this be to implement? > > My estimations in such situations go horribly wrong each time, so > I just state "I don't know" for safety reasons ;-) > > Marc >> (I'm happy to contribute a few euros in sponsorship funds.) >> >> Thanks, >> Kieren. >> _______________________________________________ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> lilypond-user@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:34:49 +0200 (CEST) > From: Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: LSR preview broken? > Message-ID: <20130716.083449.266258739...@gnu.org> > Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii > > > I've just added a snippet to the LSR (`Percent repeat counters for > piano music'), but I'm not able to preview it. Since I don't have a > 1.14 lilypond binary, I can't check whether the problem is in the file > (it compiles fine with 1.16 and the current development version). > However, even adding a very simple lilypond snippet which certainly > displays fine doesn't succeed. I thus wonder whether the LSR preview > for non-approved snippets currently work at all... > > > Werner > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:52:40 +0200 > From: Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> > To: Lilypond-User <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Subject: Dash one sibling of a slur/PhrasingSlur/Tie > Message-ID: <51e4edb8.8080...@openlilylib.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed > > Hi, > > in an edition I prepare I often have the situation that I want to dash > one sibling of a Slur (because the original edition forgot to start a > slur before the line break. > > Is there a convenient way to do so without having to define two curves > and tweak them independently? > > Thanks > Urs > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > End of lilypond-user Digest, Vol 128, Issue 53 > ********************************************** _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
