> It is the default behavior, lilypond compresses the whole line. You can
> see it in the example below. I'm still confused about what the question
> is, but perhaps a handwritten example or scan from another score would help.
An even more obvious example:
```
{
\repeat unfold 32 { 8 \noBreak
Dear Tim,
It is the default behavior, lilypond compresses the whole line. You can
see it in the example below. I'm still confused about what the question
is, but perhaps a handwritten example or scan from another score would help.
Thanks,
-William
% -
\version "2.25.21"
\layout {
Sent from my Galaxy
Original message From: Tim's Bitstream via LilyPond user
discussion Date: 1/28/25 12:03 AM (GMT-07:00) To:
lily Pond Subject: Re: key and/or time signature at end
of line So you want Lilypond to take that space equally from all the measures
in that
So you want Lilypond to take that space equally from all the measures in that line, rather than just the last measure?I'm actually surprised if that is not the default behavior...On Jan 27, 2025, at 11:15 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
I don't want to cancel it. I want it not to compres
I don't want to cancel it. I want it not to compress the music in the
last measure of the line.
I haven't been able to find one of my examples or create a MWE.
Thank you,
Paul
On 1/25/25 11:33 AM, Hans Aikema wrote:
On 25 Jan 2025, at 00:35, Paul Scott wrote:
When a time signature or k
> On 27 Jan 2025, at 20:37, Paul Scott wrote:
>
> Thank you for your reply, Hans
>
> I'll get back with an example soon. These answers all seem to address the
> case where the changes happen one measure before the end of the line rather
> then on the next line.
All the examples I sent on
Thank you for your reply, Hans
I'll get back with an example soon. These answers all seem to address
the case where the changes happen one measure before the end of the line
rather then on the next line.
Paul
On 1/25/25 11:51 AM, Hans Aikema wrote:
On 25 Jan 2025, at 19:33, Hans Aikema
> On 25 Jan 2025, at 19:33, Hans Aikema wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 25 Jan 2025, at 00:35, Paul Scott wrote:
>>
>> When a time signature or key change happens at the beginning of a line it is
>> repeated at the end of the previous line. This is good and normal.
>>
>> The space needed for this is
> On 25 Jan 2025, at 00:35, Paul Scott wrote:
>
> When a time signature or key change happens at the beginning of a line it is
> repeated at the end of the previous line. This is good and normal.
>
> The space needed for this is taken from the last measure on that previous
> line often maki
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 6:37 PM Paul Scott wrote:
> When a time signature or key change happens at the beginning of a line
> it is repeated at the end of the previous line. This is good and normal.
>
> The space needed for this is taken from the last measure on that
> previous line often making
...and I just realized that I can use \once for that purpose! Thank you for
helping me through this!
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 4:25 PM Eric Benson wrote:
> OK, I see the problem. Since my page breaks are nearly always explicit, I
> could get the effect I need if there was a way to say "change the r
OK, I see the problem. Since my page breaks are nearly always explicit, I
could get the effect I need if there was a way to say "change the rule for
this upcoming break, but then change it back immediately after". Otherwise
I have to put the undo setting somewhere after the beginning of the first
Eric Benson writes:
>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 1:13 PM Eric Benson wrote:
>>
>>> I'm making lead sheets, where, unlike common practice, the key signature
>>> and clef are not usually shown at the beginning of each line. LilyPond
>>> makes this easy to control, with
>>>
>>> \override Score.Clef.b
Any thoughts? Anyone?
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 1:13 PM Eric Benson wrote:
> I'm making lead sheets, where, unlike common practice, the key signature
> and clef are not usually shown at the beginning of each line. LilyPond
> makes this easy to control, with
>
> \override Score.Clef.break-visibilit
> I have a situation with a lot of transposing instruments and some
> key changes. I have disabled key cancellations, but of course they
> are necessary if the new key has no sharps or flats. When naturals
> are required, they push key signatures to the right, even though the
> two will never ap
flats will
be right there for me to see. I have actually found myself wishing for this on
occasion, so all is well. 👍
From: David Kastrup
Sent: 14 May 2024 19:33
To: Giles Boardman
Cc: msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca ; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Key signatures
Giles Boardman writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have figured "it" out - Cakewalk expects Key Signature to be in
> Track 0 of a Midi file and Lilypond puts it in whichever track has it
> in, which is much more sensible. I realized this while compiling the
> cry for help below, so I've left my workings out i
M and
the Key Sigs stand out because there's more than one.
So, Cakewalk expects Key Signatures in Track #0 and Lilypond doesn't put them
there and how data is brought into Lilypond won't change that.
From: David Kastrup
Sent: 11 May 2024 20:22
To:
On Sat 11 May 2024 at 15:14:47 (+), Giles Boardman wrote:
> You are, of course, right. Your evidence is clear. The position of the \key
> command seems a strong candidate but I can't get it into the .MID even in the
> simplest of snippet.
>
> As I mentioned I also have other behaviour I can'
Giles Boardman writes:
> You are, of course, right. Your evidence is clear. The position of the \key
> command seems a strong candidate but I can't get it into the .MID even in the
> simplest of snippet.
>
> As I mentioned I also have other behaviour I can't explain so it could also
> be versi
rt2v1.ly"
\score {
\time 4/4
\key d\major
{ \mark "1K002-1a-" { \partial 8 g''8 fis''16 d''8. b'8. d''16 a'4 fis'4
fis'16 a'8. d''8. fis''16 g''16 e''8. e''8. g'
On Sat, 11 May 2024, Giles Boardman wrote:
> I have now been more systematic in my approach and conclude that \key is not
> reflected in MIDI output. I tried various positions for events and in each
Well, it definitely is reflected in the output in my own tests. The
example code I posted, when r
msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca writes:
> On Sat, 11 May 2024, Giles Boardman wrote:
>
>> When I create MIDI output from Lilypond, if I have imported a MIDI file and
>> then resaved it with changes made in LilyPond, the output is like that, too.
>
> Lilypond as such does not import MIDI files. I think y
40
To: Giles Boardman
Cc: Hans Åberg ; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Key signatures in MIDI output
On Sat, 11 May 2024, Giles Boardman wrote:
> When I create MIDI output from Lilypond, if I have imported a MIDI file and
> then resaved it with changes made in LilyPond, the output is li
On Sat, 11 May 2024, Giles Boardman wrote:
> When I create MIDI output from Lilypond, if I have imported a MIDI file and
> then resaved it with changes made in LilyPond, the output is like that, too.
Lilypond as such does not import MIDI files. I think you must be using
some piece of software ot
> On 10 May 2024, at 22:21, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 May 2024, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>>> signature. The MIDI file does not contain that information; it is up to
>>> whatever software reads the MIDI file, to display it appropriately.
>>
>> So to go back to staff notation f
Giles Boardman writes:
> However, when I create new files, I am getting output that is as if I
> have chosen to write everything in C major, with all the flats and
> sharps shown explicitly. Nevertheless, the screen and pdf output are
> written in, for example G, with no sharps on the individual
nippets to the forum.
Thanks for your interest.
From: msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca
Sent: 10 May 2024 21:21
To: Hans Åberg
Cc: Giles Boardman ; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Key signatures in MIDI output
On Fri, 10 May 2024, Hans Åberg wrote:
> > sign
Giles Boardman writes:
> Hello,
>
> I am reading that I can create MIDI output which is different from the
> printed output. For example, I can unfold repeats in the midi output
> but use alternative endings and double barlines in my score. Awesome!
>
> So, I tried it and I notice that my MIDI ou
On Fri, 10 May 2024, Hans Åberg wrote:
> > signature. The MIDI file does not contain that information; it is up to
> > whatever software reads the MIDI file, to display it appropriately.
>
> So to go back to staff notation from MIDI, one must know what enharmonic
> equivalences that have been app
> On 10 May 2024, at 21:50, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 May 2024, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>> Programs like ABC work so that one writes the music without accidentals,
>> and then apply a key signature to get them. It was my reading that the
>> OP asked for that.
>
> Okay. I didn
On Fri, 10 May 2024, Hans Åberg wrote:
> Programs like ABC work so that one writes the music without accidentals,
> and then apply a key signature to get them. It was my reading that the
> OP asked for that.
Okay. I didn't read it that way because the OP said he was getting
correct output in the
> On 10 May 2024, at 20:18, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 May 2024, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>> To change the MIDI output, you will need to change the notes, say by
>> transposing or something else.
>
> MIDI files can include events ("key-change meta messages") for key
> signatures
On Fri, 10 May 2024, Hans Åberg wrote:
> To change the MIDI output, you will need to change the notes, say by
> transposing or something else.
MIDI files can include events ("key-change meta messages") for key
signatures, each specifying a root and whether it's major or minor (which
actually make
> On 10 May 2024, at 16:26, Giles Boardman wrote:
>
> I am reading that I can create MIDI output which is different from the
> printed output. For example, I can unfold repeats in the midi output but use
> alternative endings and double barlines in my score. Awesome!
>
> So, I tried it and I
Thank you all for the useful input. I have tried both solutions presented
by everybody and they both work fine. The output it exactly the same with
both solutions. I find the solution with the tags more elegant though, so I
think I will be using that. Below are 3 short scores. The first and second
Sorry, wrong link :
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-01/msg00541.html
Le ven. 17 févr. 2023 à 13:08, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi Aberforth,
> Try :
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-03/msg00258.html
> HTH, Ch
> Le 17 févr. 2023 à 10:37, Aberforth D - Instrumentals
> a écrit :
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a complete piano vocal score for an opera. To keep things
> manageable I work on individual pieces one at a time, one file per piece. I
> intend to combine them later with a superseding f
See
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.24/Documentation/notation/different-editions-from-one-source#using-tags
Phil Holmes
On 17/02/2023 12:10, Aberforth D - Instrumentals wrote:
Thanks Shane,
That works for the individual piece. It actually works better with s4
than with s1 because it avoids an au
Thanks Shane,
That works for the individual piece. It actually works better with s4 than
with s1 because it avoids an automatic bar line at the end of the staff.
However, this may create a problem when all pieces are combined. The
incomplete or invisible bar will then show up again at the start of
Hi Aberforth,
Try :
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-03/msg00258.html
HTH, Cheers,
Pierre
Le ven. 17 févr. 2023 à 10:36, Aberforth D - Instrumentals <
aberfor...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a complete piano vocal score for an opera. To keep things
> mana
Add an empty measure after the double bar. /bar "||" s1
Shane
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023, 4:36 AM Aberforth D - Instrumentals <
aberfor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a complete piano vocal score for an opera. To keep things
> manageable I work on individual pieces one at a time, o
I could have thought of that... Thanks David for the tip and Jean for
opening the issue. I'll use the workaround until then...
Le vendredi 13 janvier 2023 à 14:03, David Wright a écrit :
> On Fri 13 Jan 2023 at 19:30:29 (+), nitra...@posteo.net wrote:
> > I was talking about the first note of
Le 13/01/2023 à 10:16, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
Regardless of that, it is indeed a severe bug: No need to ever align
key signatures vertically, AFAIK. Simply left-align them.
I have opened an issue for this:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6520
OpenPGP_signature
Description:
On Fri 13 Jan 2023 at 19:30:29 (+), nitra...@posteo.net wrote:
> I was talking about the first note of each measures after the Key Signature.
> But you were right, it is the default spacing.
>
> About the distance between different accidentals, consider the example
> bellow. You can see a diff
I was talking about the first note of each measures after the Key Signature.
But you were right, it is the default spacing.
About the distance between different accidentals, consider the example
bellow. You can see a difference between the "Reference staff" and number
"C" in the "Corrected Output"
On Fri 13 Jan 2023 at 11:58:42 (+), nitra...@posteo.net wrote:
> Yes it is better, thank you for your fast reply. But several problems are
> still there in my opinion:
>
> - The first note of the measure doesn't align with the last accidental and
> is still too far.
None of the first notes
Yes it is better, thank you for your fast reply. But several problems are
still there in my opinion:
- The first note of the measure doesn't align with the last accidental and
is still too far.
- I don't understand why the distance between different accidentals is
wider (for instance between a
Le 13/01/2023 à 10:16, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
I just discovered this huge bug in the recent release of 2.24.0
which wasn't in the previous version.
What previous version did you test this with? For me, the output is
the same in 2.22 and in 2.18.2.
Regardless of that, it is indeed a severe bug
You're right, I worked for my last score on 2.22.0 and the bug was there and I
didn't notice it... So it isn't specific to 2.22.4 as written in the
subject.
Le vendredi 13 janvier 2023 à 09:17, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
> Le 13/01/2023 à 09:34, nitra...@posteo.net a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I
>> I just discovered this huge bug in the recent release of 2.24.0
>> which wasn't in the previous version.
>
> What previous version did you test this with? For me, the output is
> the same in 2.22 and in 2.18.2.
Regardless of that, it is indeed a severe bug: No need to ever align
key signatur
Le 13/01/2023 à 09:34, nitra...@posteo.net a écrit :
Hi all,
I just discovered this huge bug in the recent release of 2.24.0 which
wasn't in the previous version.
What previous version did you test this with? For me, the output is the
same in 2.22 and in 2.18.2.
Best,
Jean
OpenPGP_signat
I have gotten to where I can do what I intended to do today and now I may
have the patience to read. Thank you for all your help!
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 10:25 AM Carl Sorensen
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:16 AM Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As for the key
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:16 AM Andrew Musselman
wrote:
> As for the key signature, I am still seeing nothing about key in the pdf
> when I do this to remove all complexity:
>
> \version "2.22.2"
> \key d \major
> {
> a
> }
>
put the first brace before \key and it will give you what you want.
P
gt; }
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *lilypond-user gmail@gnu.org> on behalf of Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday, June 3, 2022 at 1:16 PM
> *To: *lilypond-user@gnu.org
> *Subject: *Re: Key and tie questions
>
> As for the key signat
: lilypond-user
on behalf of Andrew Musselman
Date: Friday, June 3, 2022 at 1:16 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Key and tie questions
As for the key signature, I am still seeing nothing about key in the pdf when I
do this to remove all complexity:
\version "2.22.2"
As for the key signature, I am still seeing nothing about key in the pdf
when I do this to remove all complexity:
\version "2.22.2"
\key d \major
{
a
}
Log says:
$ lilypond -f pdf the-mountain.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.22.2 (running Guile 2.2)
Processing `the-mountain.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music..
Okay subtle but I do see the difference; thank you
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 10:07 AM David Kastrup wrote:
> Andrew Musselman writes:
>
> > I got a beam by adding `\(` and `\)` around the b and c, looks good.
>
> That's not a beam but a phrasing slur, and at that point in the score, a
> phrasing s
Andrew Musselman writes:
> I got a beam by adding `\(` and `\)` around the b and c, looks good.
That's not a beam but a phrasing slur, and at that point in the score, a
phrasing slur seems like an odd choice: it usually extends over whole
phrases rather than joining two notes. You probably want
A tie from the b cannot be terminated because there is no following b!
If you're trying to tie from the c in the middle of the triplet to the c after
it, put the tilde next to it - of course, this will fail by default, but can be
enabled to succeed by using: \set tieWaitForNote = ##t
Paul
Andrew Musselman writes:
> Hi all, I'm not seeing a key signature show up when I do this:
>
> ```\version "2.22.2"
> \relative
> \key d \major
> {
> <<
> {
> a'8 g'8 \tuplet 3/1 {f' c' b} c'8 c'2
> }
> >>
> }```
This consists of _two_ scores. The first score is
```
\rela
I got a beam by adding `\(` and `\)` around the b and c, looks good.
Still curious why key sig is not showing up.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 9:38 AM Andrew Musselman
wrote:
> Hi all, I'm not seeing a key signature show up when I do this:
>
> ```\version "2.22.2"
> \relative
> \key d \major
> {
>
Le 01/03/2022 à 16:41, Thomas Scharkowski a écrit :
Hi,
I’d like to have key cancellation naturals at the beginning of a score for f, c
and g.
How can I do this?
Thank you,
Thomas
Try this:
\version "2.22.1"
\new Staff {
\set Staff.lastKeyAlterations = #`((3 . ,SHARP)
Le 01/03/2022 à 23:51, Alasdair a écrit :
Dear Jean,
I have just had time to make that change (of key to key-signature).
However, there is still an issue. For example, in change from g major
to g minor, we go from one sharp to two flats. As I have a key
signature in the middle of a bar
On 01/03/2022 22:51, Alasdair wrote:
However, what happens is that the natural sign is printed on top of the
double bar line. So either I need to not print the natural (which would
be my preference), or somehow push the entire new key signature (one
natural and two flats) after the clef sign.
Sunday, 27 February 2022 7:31 PMTo: Alasdair McAndrew; lilypond-user@gnu.orgSubject: Re: Key change with clef after the bar line? Le 27/02/2022 à 08:09, Alasdair McAndrew a écrit :> In my current project, I'm trying as far as possible to replicate the > spirit of the original 18th cent
Dear Jean,
Thank you very much for your detailed reply. What a duffer I am not to realize
that \global was not being used! I'll look through - and experiment with -
your solution with care and great interest.
kind regards,
Alasdair
On Sunday 27 February 2022 19:31:17 (+11:00), Jean Abou Samra
Le 27/02/2022 à 09:31, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Le 27/02/2022 à 08:09, Alasdair McAndrew a écrit :
In my current project, I'm trying as far as possible to replicate the
spirit of the original 18th century publication, in which a key
change has a clef printed, and both after the bar line. I
Le 27/02/2022 à 08:09, Alasdair McAndrew a écrit :
In my current project, I'm trying as far as possible to replicate the
spirit of the original 18th century publication, in which a key change
has a clef printed, and both after the bar line. In one piece,
there's a segno in the middle of a bar,
break-align-symbols is mentioned in 2.20.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/internals/staffsymbol
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/internals/staff_002dsymbol_002dinterface
As you say, it should be altered with considering other effects.
On 2022/02/06 1:20, Richard Shann wr
On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 00:15 +0900, Masaki, Akikazu wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> The last spacer is not necessary, but staff lines don't reach
> trailing
> key or time signatures by default. (I guess you tried that.)
yes, that's the purpose of the spacer.
> Set StaffSymbol.break-align-symbols proper
Hi Richard,
The last spacer is not necessary, but staff lines don't reach trailing
key or time signatures by default. (I guess you tried that.)
Set StaffSymbol.break-align-symbols property;
\version "2.22.0"
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override StaffSymbol.break-align-symbols
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 10:31 AM Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
> See:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/key-change-at-end-of-snippet-td227745.html
> Cheers,
> Pierre
>
> Le mar. 3 nov. 2020 à 16:13, Ralph Palmer a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi -
>>
>> I'm
Hi,
You might test something like "\key a\major s32" at the end of the
score.
Hope this helps,
Jean
Le mardi 03 novembre 2020 à 09:42 -0500, Ralph Palmer a écrit :
> Hi -
>
> I'm trying to add a clef change at the end of a fiddle tune, to show that the
> first section is in a different key tha
Hi Ralph,
See:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/key-change-at-end-of-snippet-td227745.html
Cheers,
Pierre
Le mar. 3 nov. 2020 à 16:13, Ralph Palmer a
écrit :
> Hi -
>
> I'm trying to add a clef change at the end of a fiddle tune, to show that
> the first section is in a different key than t
From your answer I gather that getting this information this way is fine.
The other, more implicit question: has this change been overlooked when
creating the changes documentation
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/changes-big-page.html)?
cheers
Maurits
> Op 3 sep. 2020, om 21:07 h
On 2020-09-03 5:03 am, Maurits Lamers wrote:
Hi all,
I finally figured out what goes wrong here. The issue is that I get
the key signature and the last key signature from the context in the
following way:
(ly:context-property (ly:translator-context engraver) 'keySignature))
(ly:context-property
Hi all,
I finally figured out what goes wrong here. The issue is that I get the key
signature and the last key signature from the context in the following way:
(ly:context-property (ly:translator-context engraver) 'keySignature))
(ly:context-property (ly:translator-context engraver) 'lastKeySign
On 2020-08-31 8:15 am, Maurits Lamers wrote:
Hi all,
I just noticed that in Lilypond 2.20 the key signature listener in my
braille system doesn't get called anymore, where under 2.18.2 it does.
I added a code sample below where I show how I attach the listeners.
All the other events seem to be c
From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: key change at end of snippet
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 09:41:45 +0100
> \relative c' {
> \key d \major
> d1
> \key c \major
> \grace s256
> }
Thanks for the suggestion! I'm now trying Thomas's route.
Werner
>> I have to typeset a snippet that is an excerpt of a longer piece,
>> and this snippet ends with a key change:
>>
>> \relative c' {
>> \key d \major
>> d1
>> \key c \major
>> }
>>
>> However, the staff stops right before the key change, see attached
>> image. What can I do to avo
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> I have to typeset a snippet that is an excerpt of a longer piece, and
> this snippet ends with a key change:
>
> \relative c' {
> \key d \major
> d1
> \key c \major
> }
>
> However, the staff stops right before the key change, see attached
> image. What c
Am Sa., 25. Jan. 2020 um 06:31 Uhr schrieb Werner LEMBERG :
>
>
> I have to typeset a snippet that is an excerpt of a longer piece, and
> this snippet ends with a key change:
>
> \relative c' {
> \key d \major
> d1
> \key c \major
> }
>
> However, the staff stops right before the ke
Am 25. Januar 2020 08:17:05 MEZ schrieb Werner LEMBERG :
>
>>> I think it is necessary to somehow keep the staff line alive – I
>>> guess I can probably fake a solution by adding another bar with a
>>> suppressed bar line that contains some invisible music. Not sure
>>> yet whether this is sens
>> I think it is necessary to somehow keep the staff line alive – I
>> guess I can probably fake a solution by adding another bar with a
>> suppressed bar line that contains some invisible music. Not sure
>> yet whether this is sensible, and if yes, how to make the width of
>> this extra bar (alm
Am 25. Januar 2020 07:30:01 MEZ schrieb Werner LEMBERG :
>
>> \once \override Score.BreakAlignment #'break-align-orders =
>> #(make-vector 3 '( staff-bar
>> clef
>> span-bar
>> breathing-sign
>> ...
>>
> \once \override Score.BreakAlignment #'break-align-orders =
> #(make-vector 3 '( staff-bar
> clef
> span-bar
> breathing-sign
> ...
> key
> time-signature)),
>
> To in
Werner,
Perhaps using
\once \override Score.BreakAlignment #'break-align-orders = #(make-vector 3
'( staff-bar clef span-bar breathing-sign . . key time-signature)),
To insert the key change before the bar.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounce
This works wonderfully. Thank you very much!
El lun., 22 abr. 2019 a las 14:22, Malte Meyn ()
escribió:
>
>
> Am 22.04.19 um 19:06 schrieb Malte Meyn:
> > {
> >\set Staff.keyAlterations =
> >#`((3 . ,NATURAL)
> > (0 . ,NATURAL)
> > (4 . ,NATURAL)
> > (1 . ,NATURAL)
> >
Am 22.04.19 um 19:06 schrieb Malte Meyn:
{
\set Staff.keyAlterations =
#`((3 . ,NATURAL)
(0 . ,NATURAL)
(4 . ,NATURAL)
(1 . ,NATURAL)
(5 . ,NATURAL)
(2 . ,NATURAL)
(6 . ,NATURAL))
c'
}
That’s in the order they would appear after cancelling 6 sharps
Am 22.04.19 um 18:44 schrieb Stefano Troncaro:
I looked in the documentation and it
states how to create synthetic key signatures, but it doesn't seem to
tell how to make the naturals explicit.
It can be done the same way as with sharps and flats:
\version "2.21.0"
{
\set Staff.keyAlter
2018-04-17 7:47 GMT+02:00 Lukas-Fabian Moser :
> Am 17.04.2018 um 01:24 schrieb Torsten Hämmerle:
>
> Even if my opinion may differ from the general opinion here, I think that
>> in
>> popular music, one would use standard D major key signature.
>> Reason: Two sharps clearly show D major tonic and
>> Even if my opinion may differ from the general opinion here, I think that in
>> popular music, one would use standard D major key signature.
>> Reason: Two sharps clearly show D major tonic and the characteristic mixo
>> tone C (flat seventh) stands out in the sheet music by the accidental used
Am 2018-04-17 um 07:47 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser :
> Am 17.04.2018 um 01:24 schrieb Torsten Hämmerle:
>
>> Even if my opinion may differ from the general opinion here, I think that in
>> popular music, one would use standard D major key signature.
>> Reason: Two sharps clearly show D major tonic
Am 17.04.2018 um 01:24 schrieb Torsten Hämmerle:
Even if my opinion may differ from the general opinion here, I think that in
popular music, one would use standard D major key signature.
Reason: Two sharps clearly show D major tonic and the characteristic mixo
tone C (flat seventh) stands out in
Peter Crighton wrote
> I am transcribing a song in D Mixolydian
> [...]
> in this case it is a pop song
Hi Peter,
Even if my opinion may differ from the general opinion here, I think that in
popular music, one would use standard D major key signature.
Reason: Two sharps clearly show D major tonic
The music is forced to have one sharp or it will be unreadable to musicians.
I would say suppress the key name. Musicians know what key it is in already.
Al.
Original message
From: Peter Crighton
Date: 4/16/18 2:36 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: LilyPond User Mailing List
Subject:
> On 16 Apr 2018, at 21:18, Peter Crighton wrote:
>
> I am transcribing a song in D Mixolydian and am wondering which key signature
> to notate it in – d \mixolydian (because that is the mode it is in) or d
> \major (because a D major chord clearly is the tonic of the song). I’d rather
> nota
Peter Crighton writes:
> Hello all,
>
> my question is not exclusive to LilyPond, but I hope you can enlighten me
> anyway.
>
> I am transcribing a song in D Mixolydian and am wondering which key
> signature to notate it in – d \mixolydian (because that is the mode it is
> in) or d \major (becaus
2018-04-16 21:18 GMT+02:00 Peter Crighton :
> Hello all,
>
> my question is not exclusive to LilyPond, but I hope you can enlighten me
> anyway.
>
> I am transcribing a song in D Mixolydian and am wondering which key
> signature to notate it in – d \mixolydian (because that is the mode it is
> in)
1 - 100 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
