Re: Photoscore

David Kastrup: > And indeed the externally attached drive (via USB) was named /dev/sda > while the internal drive the Linux rescue environment booted from was > /dev/sdb. So this time round the root disk system not being able to > mount stuff on /dev/sda* had more than one reason. > > But I was su

Re: Photoscore

David Wright writes: > On Tue 29 Nov 2016 at 09:37:21 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote: >> David Wright writes: >> >> > On Mon 28 Nov 2016 at 21:26:17 (+), Karlin High wrote: >> >> On 11/28/2016 2:12 PM, David Wright wrote: >> >> > So it should be worth booting from a live linux CD to mount the

Re: Photoscore

On Tue 29 Nov 2016 at 17:20:51 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote: > David Wright writes: > > > On Tue 29 Nov 2016 at 16:10:00 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote: > >> David Wright writes: > >> > >> > On Tue 29 Nov 2016 at 09:37:21 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote: > >> >> > >> >> My father is living away sev

Re: Photoscore

David Wright writes: > On Tue 29 Nov 2016 at 16:10:00 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote: >> David Wright writes: >> >> > On Tue 29 Nov 2016 at 09:37:21 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote: >> >> >> >> My father is living away several hours and is not technically savvy. >> >> The system boots into some sor

Re: Photoscore

Another issue: If there's any need to revert the computer to the prior version of Windows, there is limited time to do this. In the upgrade, Windows makes a backup of the prior version that eventually gets wiped out. http://www.thewindowsclub.com/rollback-windows-10-after-30-days With a drive i

Re: Photoscore

On Tue 29 Nov 2016 at 16:10:00 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote: > David Wright writes: > > > On Tue 29 Nov 2016 at 09:37:21 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >> My father is living away several hours and is not technically savvy. > >> The system boots into some sort of maintenance mode, so makin

Re: Photoscore

David Wright writes: > On Tue 29 Nov 2016 at 09:37:21 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote: >> >> My father is living away several hours and is not technically savvy. >> The system boots into some sort of maintenance mode, so making a disk >> image via dd via phone instructions is going to be reasonably

Re: Photoscore

On Tue 29 Nov 2016 at 09:37:21 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote: > David Wright writes: > > > On Mon 28 Nov 2016 at 21:26:17 (+), Karlin High wrote: > >> On 11/28/2016 2:12 PM, David Wright wrote: > >> > So it should be worth booting from a live linux CD to mount the > >> > partitions to check th

Re: Photoscore

On 29 Nov 2016 13:40, "Karlin High" wrote: > > On 11/28/2016 12:22 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > I thought the Windows EULA protested against being subjected to a VM? > > Buy a Windows full-version retail license for the virtual machine and > you should be good to go. > > Windows 10 EULA (2)(d)(iv)

Re: Photoscore

On 11/28/2016 12:22 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > I thought the Windows EULA protested against being subjected to a VM? Buy a Windows full-version retail license for the virtual machine and you should be good to go. Windows 10 EULA (2)(d)(iv): *Use in a virtualized environment.* This license allows

Re: Photoscore

David Wright writes: > On Mon 28 Nov 2016 at 21:26:17 (+), Karlin High wrote: >> On 11/28/2016 2:12 PM, David Wright wrote: >> > So it should be worth booting from a live linux CD to mount the >> > partitions to check their contents, and to reinstall Grub >> > (or whatever you use to boot) in

Re: Photoscore

On Mon 28 Nov 2016 at 21:26:17 (+), Karlin High wrote: > On 11/28/2016 2:12 PM, David Wright wrote: > > So it should be worth booting from a live linux CD to mount the > > partitions to check their contents, and to reinstall Grub > > (or whatever you use to boot) into the MBR. > > The thing to

Re: Photoscore

Chris Yate writes: > On 28 Nov 2016 23:11, "David Kastrup" wrote: >>> > >> > I don't keep up to date on this stuff, so I'm no authority. All I know is >> > that I used to load XP into a VM using parallels and did not ecnounter such >> > a problem. >> >> You don't "encounter" licensing problems

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 23:11, "David Kastrup" wrote: >> > > > I don't keep up to date on this stuff, so I'm no authority. All I know is > > that I used to load XP into a VM using parallels and did not ecnounter such > > a problem. > > You don't "encounter" licensing problems unless you actually read > th

Re: Photoscore

Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes: >> >> Really, if you still have some dual boot environment, remove the Windows >> >> partition as fast as you can before it destroys your system. >> >> >> > >> > Working in web development where we are still required to make sites work >> > on various ancient comb

Re: Photoscore

Hi, Am 28.11.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Johan Vromans: > Do they realise they are completely at the mercy of their software? Vendor lock-in is an underrated problem, IMHO. In particular for small companies. However, large companies (and some publishing houses might get into that region but probably on

Re: Photoscore

> >> Really, if you still have some dual boot environment, remove the Windows > >> partition as fast as you can before it destroys your system. > >> > > > > Working in web development where we are still required to make sites work > > on various ancient combinations of Windows and IE, and therefore

Re: Photoscore

Karlin High writes: > On 11/28/2016 3:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> There are enough sneaky Windows 10 update stories >> with monthly "oh, you were annoyed? Then we won't do it this way next >> time" pseudo-excuses from Microsoft. This is clearly not an accident. > > Which is why the Never10 u

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 21:13, "David Kastrup" wrote: > > > Depending on the importance of the data, Well, that's the knub of it. The ideal situation is that everything you can't afford to lose is stored off site - possibly multiple times. Github, Bitbucket, or other means. I try my best... :) That's eas

Re: Photoscore

On 11/28/2016 2:12 PM, David Wright wrote: > So it should be worth booting from a live linux CD to mount the > partitions to check their contents, and to reinstall Grub > (or whatever you use to boot) into the MBR. The thing to do IMMEDIATELY is make a "drive image backup." RedoBackup, Clonezilla

Re: Photoscore

On 11/28/2016 3:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > There are enough sneaky Windows 10 update stories > with monthly "oh, you were annoyed? Then we won't do it this way next > time" pseudo-excuses from Microsoft. This is clearly not an accident. Which is why the Never10 utility exists for preventing t

Re: Photoscore

Johan Vromans writes: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:27:05 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > >> The point (and a partially understandable one) is that publishers don't >> want to get prepress files but files they can edit in the future, even >> if the original person is not available anymore. > > Basically th

Re: Photoscore

David Wright writes: > The most important thing in this situation is not to panic. > It's quite possible that only two things have been altered: > the Master Boot Record may have been overwritten, and the > partition types may have been altered in the absence of any > other changes, in particular

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 20:12, "David Wright" wrote: > > > The most important thing in this situation is not to panic. > It's quite possible that only two things have been altered: > the Master Boot Record may have been overwritten, and the > partition types may have been altered in the absence of any > ot

Re: Photoscore

On Mon 28 Nov 2016 at 10:11:07 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote: > You mean, if it doesn't already own you. My father is a retired > professor of theoretical physics who is still publishing. He received a > final draft of such a paper back from a physics journal along with > instructions to put any

Re: Photoscore

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:27:05 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > The point (and a partially understandable one) is that publishers don't > want to get prepress files but files they can edit in the future, even > if the original person is not available anymore. Basically they want program sources, and they

Re: Photoscore

Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes: >> Really, if you still have some dual boot environment, remove the Windows >> partition as fast as you can before it destroys your system. >> > > Working in web development where we are still required to make sites work > on various ancient combinations of Window

Re: Photoscore

> Really, if you still have some dual boot environment, remove the Windows > partition as fast as you can before it destroys your system. > Working in web development where we are still required to make sites work on various ancient combinations of Windows and IE, and therefore must have multiple

Re: Photoscore

> > For what reason do they still insist on tools and not on results? > > > > The argument I've heard from my commercial publisher is that they need to > be able to edit the files later, such as in the case of > scholarly/definitive editions where the state of research regarding the > "true" versi

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 16:13, "Johan Vromans" wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:48:59 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > > > The big houses more or less *exclusively* use Sibelius and Finale in > > parallel, with a very low share still using SCORE and an actually tiny > > share using Amadeus. > > > > Breitkopf ju

Re: Photoscore

Am 28.11.2016 um 17:12 schrieb Johan Vromans: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:48:59 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > >> The big houses more or less *exclusively* use Sibelius and Finale in >> parallel, with a very low share still using SCORE and an actually tiny >> share using Amadeus. >> >> Breitkopf just la

Re: Photoscore

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Johan Vromans wrote: > > For what reason do they still insist on tools and not on results? > The argument I've heard from my commercial publisher is that they need to be able to edit the files later, such as in the case of scholarly/definitive editions where the

Re: Photoscore

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:48:59 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > The big houses more or less *exclusively* use Sibelius and Finale in > parallel, with a very low share still using SCORE and an actually tiny > share using Amadeus. > > Breitkopf just last year decided to quit any diversity and to move > eve

Re: Photoscore

Chris Yate writes: > It's terrible that you've had that experience, I've not heard of that > happening - although I dual boot at home Google for Linux partition windows anniversary or something like that. My father's plight is by no means unusual. And then decide whether you'd rather wan

Re: Photoscore

There's hope for your wife! My elderly mother had a side job pre-retirement setting up computer systems for small businesses (like, server plus maybe a dozen workstations), and through me got into Linux. Now she rolls Linux Mint, and got my dad -- who first thought my installation of OpenOffice on

Re: Photoscore

Urs Liska writes: > Am 28.11.2016 um 10:11 schrieb David Kastrup: > >> All of the Linux partitions are now "Windows recovery environment" or >> "Microsoft basic data" partitions and it is not clear how much of the >> original data will still be in there. >> >> Really, if you still have some dual

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 09:11, "David Kastrup" wrote: > > > > > > > You mean, if it doesn't already own you. My father is a retired > professor of theoretical physics who is still publishing. He received a > final draft of such a paper back from a physics journal along with > instructions to put any corr

Re: Photoscore

Am 28.11.2016 um 10:11 schrieb David Kastrup: > Chris Yate writes: > >> Hi Andrew >> >> >> >> Apologies in advance, I'm going to be *that guy*... ;-) >> >> >> For what it’s worth, I’m a huge fan of Linux, Lilypond and Muse and all the >> other wonderful **free** tools that we have available

Re: Photoscore

Chris Yate writes: > Hi Andrew > > > > Apologies in advance, I'm going to be *that guy*... ;-) > > > For what it’s worth, I’m a huge fan of Linux, Lilypond and Muse and all the > other wonderful **free** tools that we have available BUT if I was in > any sense interested in working with a com

Re: Photoscore

Am 28. November 2016 01:58:07 MEZ, schrieb Chris Yate : >On 27 Nov 2016 23:49, "Urs Liska" wrote: >> >> >> >> Am 28.11.2016 um 00:41 schrieb Chris Yate: >>> >>> Hi Jacques, >>> >>> I don't know... It seems ridiculous that they have no common format >- >but it's a relatively tiny industry... But

Re: Photoscore

On 27 Nov 2016 23:49, "Urs Liska" wrote: > > > > Am 28.11.2016 um 00:41 schrieb Chris Yate: >> >> Hi Jacques, >> >> I don't know... It seems ridiculous that they have no common format - but it's a relatively tiny industry... But I doubt the big houses like Peters and Barenreiter use either Sibeli

Re: Photoscore

a copy of Sibelius. That’s just >> what they expect; and quite reasonably, as it's the industry >> standard! >> >> >> Also, if you’re expected to give them a well-presented score >> rather than just the notes, you’re going to need to d

Re: Photoscore

ess about. I’d buy a copy of Windows, > if I didn’t already own one, and then buy a copy of Sibelius. That’s just > what they expect; and quite reasonably, as it's the industry standard! > > > Also, if you’re expected to give them a well-presented score rather than > just the no

Re: Photoscore

>> >> >> Also, if you’re expected to give them a well-presented score rather >> than just the notes, you’re going to need to do some work, possibly >> quite a bit, within Sib. Photoscore will give you the music entry at >> higher speed than manual entry, but in my ex

Re: Photoscore

’re going to need to do some work, possibly quite a bit, within > Sib. Photoscore will give you the music entry at higher speed than manual > entry, but in my experience of Sibelius (mainly the now old version 3), > getting a piece to performance quality output requires quite a lot of manual

Re: Photoscore

the notes, you’re going to need to do some work, possibly quite a bit, within Sib. Photoscore will give you the music entry at higher speed than manual entry, but in my experience of Sibelius (mainly the now old version 3), getting a piece to performance quality output requires quite a lot of manual wo

Re: Photoscore

> "Jacques" == Jacques Menu Muzhic writes: Jacques> Oups, totally forgot I had tested it two years ago, my Jacques> fault. So use a different email to get another free trial. -- Laura (mailto:lcon...@laymusic.org) (617) 661-8097

Re: Photoscore

parts from the .ly file, and we're >>> going to try to copy the latter into the former, hoping that we can >>> re-import into Sibelius into something that only requires a reasonable >>> amount of work to clean up and submit. >>> >>> Problem is, MusicX

Re: Photoscore

d submit. >> >> Problem is, MusicXML is turning out to be somewhat … sub-functional, so >> we're having difficulties. >> >> However, my partner tells me that there's a commercial program called >> "Photoscore" that can take scanned scores an

Re: Photoscore

nable > amount of work to clean up and submit. > > Problem is, MusicXML is turning out to be somewhat … sub-functional, so > we're having difficulties. > > However, my partner tells me that there's a commercial program called > "Photoscore" that can take sc

Re: Photoscore

- composer | sound designer LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Photoscore-tp196994p197002.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.

Re: Photoscore

I do have Sibelius 7, and I do have its lite PhotoScore and I do have a full version of SharpEye, which is similar to PhotoScore and exports XML. I'd be happy to attempt to contribute by reading your PDFs into XML and thence to Sib if you want - depending on how many pages/scores, of c

Re: [Spam] Photoscore

e having difficulties. However, my partner tells me that there's a commercial program called "Photoscore" that can take scanned scores and produce Sibelius files from them. But it's around $400, and (obviously) doesn't have a linux version. My question for the list is: do any

Re: Photoscore

Hi Andrew, This reply is not about Photoscore. But there is maybe another "sort of hacky solution", which works for Finale and maybe also works in Sibelius. (I don't have Sibelius); The midi-files I generate with LilyPond are opened, by default, in Finale and as a bonus one ge

Re: Photoscore

ot a Sibelius user myself, but isn’t Photoscore included in Sibelius? If > you have to use that program to do the job, then would it not have > Photoscore already? > > > > http://www.sibelius.com/products/photoscore/lite.html > > > > Andrew > > > > >

RE: Photoscore

Hi Andrew, Not a Sibelius user myself, but isn’t Photoscore included in Sibelius? If you have to use that program to do the job, then would it not have Photoscore already? http://www.sibelius.com/products/photoscore/lite.html Andrew

Photoscore

, so we're having difficulties. However, my partner tells me that there's a commercial program called "Photoscore" that can take scanned scores and produce Sibelius files from them. But it's around $400, and (obviously) doesn't have a linux version. My question for the l

Re: LilyPond score used on PhotoScore site

On 09/02/16 17:48, Helge Kruse wrote: Am 09.02.2016 um 18:12 schrieb Alberto Simões: I was pleasantly surprised to see a Mutopia score (Beethoven's Piano Trio, Opus 11, Movement 1) "featured" on PhotoScore's

Re: LilyPond score used on PhotoScore site

Am 09.02.2016 um 18:12 schrieb Alberto Simões: > >> I was pleasantly surprised to see a Mutopia score (Beethoven's Piano >> Trio, Opus 11, Movement 1) >> >> >> "featured" on PhotoScore's product page. Here's the dir

Re: LilyPond score used on PhotoScore site

On 09/02/16 17:04, Abraham Lee wrote: I was pleasantly surprised to see a Mutopia score (Beethoven's Piano Trio, Opus 11, Movement 1) "featured" on PhotoScore's product page. Here's the direct link to the page:

LilyPond score used on PhotoScore site

I was pleasantly surprised to see a Mutopia score (Beethoven's Piano Trio, Opus 11, Movement 1) "featured" on PhotoScore's product page. Here's the direct link to the page: http://www.neuratron.com/photoscore2.htm