On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Johan Vromans <jvrom...@squirrel.nl> wrote:
> > For what reason do they still insist on tools and not on results? > The argument I've heard from my commercial publisher is that they need to be able to edit the files later, such as in the case of scholarly/definitive editions where the state of research regarding the "true" version of a piece might change. I made my contact there the exact same offer: I could serve up a PDF that would meet all of their standards, and they flatly refused on this reason. And to answer your other questions: I would never configure Lily to look like Sibelius, because Sibelius' output, even under the best circumstances, still looks terrible to me. Cheers, A
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
