On 05/11/17 02:33, Daniel Mehdizadeh wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out how to creat parts and use them to
> compile an orchestral score. I've finally made some sense of it all
> however am facing one problem:
> I've successfully created some random parts: horn,
Hello Daniel,
Maybe you have \score blocks or the like in the .ly files you include?
JM
> Le 5 nov. 2017 à 02:33, Daniel Mehdizadeh a écrit :
>
> I've been trying to figure out how to creat parts and use them to compile an
> orchestral score. I've finally made some sens
Hi Daniel,
you have to separate the music content from the score/layout in the
parts. You end up with something like
1. files for the music content of each part
2. files with the score/layout block for each part, which have an
include statement for the respective music content file(s).
3. O
I've been trying to figure out how to creat parts and use them to compile
an orchestral score. I've finally made some sense of it all however am
facing one problem:
I've successfully created some random parts: horn, violin, flute and
trumpet and they all have this layout:
\v
rto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Orchestral-score-bottom-staff-position-tp161720p161755.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https:/
ew this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Orchestral-score-bottom-staff-position-tp161720p161754.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
dding . 0) (stretchability . 0))
>> }
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> What is the problem you’re seeing?
>
> You are totally right, this works as expected (sorry, I read too quickly
> your first message and I swore you wrote ragged-last-bottom instead of
> last-bottom
Hi Gilberto,
> You are totally right, this works as expected (sorry, I read too quickly
> your first message and I swore you wrote ragged-last-bottom instead of
> last-bottom-spacing)
I wrote both. =)
> I believe LilyPond is taking in consideration the distance
> between the lowest grob, and no
roblem you’re seeing?
You are totally right, this works as expected (sorry, I read too quickly
your first message and I swore you wrote ragged-last-bottom instead of
last-bottom-spacing). This, for instance, fixes the LSR snippet before.
But on my orchestral score, the last staff still keep mov
Hi Gilberto,
>> Does setting ragged-bottom = ##f and last-bottom-spacing appropriately not
>> work?
> Not really.
This looks fine to me:
\version "2.18.2"
\paper {
ragged-bottom = ##f
last-bottom-spacing = #'((basic-distance . 0) (minimum-distance . 0) (padding
. 0) (stretchability . 0))
ck. My guess is that ragged-bottom only forces a
system to the bottom when there is more than one system , but not staves
inside of a system.
On my own orchestral score, I have both ragged-bottom = ##f and
ragged-last-bottom = ##f.
Take care,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://li
Hi Gilberto,
Does setting ragged-bottom = ##f and last-bottom-spacing appropriately not work?
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
hy and I will not try
to figure this out since I don't use Sibelius anymore), but notice how in
all other pages the bottom staff keeps a constant distance from the margin.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Orchestral-score-bottom-staff-position-tp161720p
hen flick around the pages around. You will
notice that the bottom staff does not keep a constant distance from the
bottom of the page (the difference is particularly strong between pages 2
and 3).
Best,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Orchest
It's cool to have someone around with such a good and current knowledge of the
LSR :-)
Pierre Perol-Schneider schrieb am 22.04.2014:
>2014-04-22 1:10 GMT+02:00 Gilberto Agostinho
>:
>
>> Hello LilyPonders,
>>
>
>Hi Gilberto,
>
>
>>
>> I a
2014-04-22 1:10 GMT+02:00 Gilberto Agostinho :
> Hello LilyPonders,
>
Hi Gilberto,
>
> I am current writing a orchestral score with a lot of instruments on it,
> meaning that I will always have only a single system per page (no hidden
> staves). The thing is, the distance
Hello LilyPonders,
I am current writing a orchestral score with a lot of instruments on it,
meaning that I will always have only a single system per page (no hidden
staves). The thing is, the distance between the bottom staff (the Double
Bass in my case) and the bottom of the page keeps changing
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2012/10/7 Jay Hamilton :
>
>> I can see where some brackets are missing but it seems now that you point
>> them out that the log/error file and Frescobaldi should have been able to
>> point them out too. And neither did.
>
> Not sure what you want to say.
> Compiling your
2012/10/7 Jay Hamilton :
> I can see where some brackets are missing but it seems now that you point
> them out that the log/error file and Frescobaldi should have been able to
> point them out too. And neither did.
Not sure what you want to say.
Compiling your code after deleting a _needed_ bra
Mr. Morley- Thank you for the response.
I can see where some brackets are missing but it seems now that you point
them out that the log/error file and Frescobaldi should have been able to
point them out too. And neither did.
So I will put in the ones I can find and try to compile,thanks
jay
2012/10/6 :
> Hello-
>
> I 'think' I copied the info out of the 2.16 manual for the score below but
> both my editor and Frescobaldi won't compile it and both say they can't find
> errors.
>
> It looks weird to me but that's because I am not used to the 'new' format
> for this but what's missing.
Hello-
I 'think' I copied the info out of the 2.16 manual for the
score below but both my editor and Frescobaldi won't compile it and both
say they can't find errors.
It looks weird to me but that's because I
am not used to the 'new' format for this but what's missing. If there
are some >>'s
2008/1/10, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What I tried was just a copy of the example in
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Vertical-spacing-inside-a-system#Vertical-spacing-inside-a-system
> (without the paper-size and staff-size settings and removing the
> unnecess
What I tried was just a copy of the example in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Vertical-spacing-inside-a-system#Vertical-spacing-inside-a-system
(without the paper-size and staff-size settings and removing the
unnecessary \book{...})
where I replaced the current setting
2008/1/10, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Have you tried
> \override VerticalAlignment #'max-stretch = #1000
Wow, I didn't know that one.
I tried to add it to the LSR, but I seem to have misunderstood how it works:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=371
Can you enlighten me?
Cheer
#f ) worked great.
The issue here is just that in a 32 pages orchestral score, the total
vertical height of the score increases and decreases with the number
of ledger lines and text and I find the "look" of the score awkward as
I read through the pages.
Is there a way to instruc
Hi Jeremiah!
I'm still running v2.8.X and I don't know what has changed since.
Nevertheless I'm going to show you how I handle score layout. Perhaps my
logical approach can give you the right clou...
Reilly schrieb:
I have a score with 22 staves, one system to a page.
I want Lilypond to lay
ode or music to post. This is a
different problem from my prior question asking how to even out the
staves over multiple pages in orchestral parts. The solution offered
(to set ragged-last-bottom = #f ) worked great.
The issue here is just that in a 32 pages orchestral score, the total
vertical
I am stumped.
I have a score with 22 staves, one system to a page.
I want Lilypond to layout the score so that the the score "fills" the
page. It would be very nice if the first staff and last staff on each
page lined up when laid side by side. In other words, I want Lilypond
to stretch the i
ncertoNo3.ly:
>
> \include "myMusic_ForConcertoNo3.ly"
> \include "myStructure_ViolinI.ly"
> \include "myStructure_Orchestra.ly"
>
> \myOrchestralScore
>
> This is a more structured approach than splitting the syntax across
> file
a more structured approach than splitting the syntax across
> files. Perhaps it is already possible to do this -- I haven't tried.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>-Dave
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Orchestral-score-file-organization-tf2288589.html#a6413345
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
David Greene wrote:
This is a more structured approach than splitting the syntax across
files. Perhaps it is already possible to do this -- I haven't tried.
Try it! You will be positively surprised.
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypon
Rick Hansen (aka RickH) wrote:
\include CommonHeader.ly% contains header block and begins a
score block and begins a nested choir staff block
\include AltoSax1.ly % generic template for alto
sax and transposes for Eb
\include AltoSax2.ly
l items to variables and use them
> throughout a piece. This helps a lot, thanks!
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Orchestral-score-file-organization-tf2288589.html#a6368078
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
x27;Y-offset = #0.08
>
> \override MultiMeasureRest #'expand-limit = 1
>
> Then after that, there's the actual music. Each file has that part up
> there in common, with only the file name and the instrument name changed.
> If I need to transpose anything or use a d
OnionRingOfDoom wrote:
>
> I'm working on writing out a full orchestral score, and I have a lot of
> the individual instruments done. I was just wondering, what would be the
> best way to combine all the pieces into the score itself? Should I keep
> each part as a seperate file a
New syntax in 2.7.19 to nest brackets and braces affords a couple of
nice features for orchestral score.
Here's an example:
START DELIMITER HIERARCHY SNIPPET %%
\version "2.7.19"
\score {
<<
\new StaffGroup <<
\set StaffGroup.sy
Hello,
I am currently working on a orchestration with involve a really *big*
number of musicians (4 solists, choral, and 12 percussionnists, each
playing several instruments)
As you can expect, even with "paper11.ly" everybody does not fit on a
single page !
So my questions are :
- Is t
38 matches
Mail list logo
