Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

Hi all, What about a radical alternative? What if each non-reference part has an additional “tick” barline (numbered according to the reference context) whereever the barlines don’t line up? Just a thought… Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kier

Re: ScholarLy fails with \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

Graham King writes: > This took a little while to nail down, but it seems that ScholarLy's > annotation engine fails silently when \RemoveEmptyStaffContext is > active. Almost-minimal example attached. > \layout { > %{ %Toggle this block comment to reveal pro

Re: ScholarLy fails with \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

Thank you for tracking that down, and sorry I didn't have time to reply to your personal message. Am 15.11.2015 um 12:15 schrieb Graham King: > This took a little while to nail down, but it seems that ScholarLy's > annotation engine fails silently when \RemoveEmptyStaffCon

Re: ScholarLy fails with \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 09:24 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham King writes: > > > This took a little while to nail down, but it seems that ScholarLy's > > annotation engine fails silently when \RemoveEmptyStaffContext is > > active. Almost-minimal examp

Re: ScholarLy fails with \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

Graham King writes: > On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 09:24 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Graham King writes: >> >> > This took a little while to nail down, but it seems that ScholarLy's >> > annotation engine fails silently when \RemoveEmptyStaffContex

Re: ScholarLy fails with \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 09:24 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham King writes: > > > This took a little while to nail down, but it seems that ScholarLy's > > annotation engine fails silently when \RemoveEmptyStaffContext is > > active. Almost-minimal examp

ScholarLy fails with \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

This took a little while to nail down, but it seems that ScholarLy's annotation engine fails silently when \RemoveEmptyStaffContext is active. Almost-minimal example attached. Is there anything I should be doing differently? And should I be filing ScholarLy issues here or on the openli

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 10:38 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 10 Nov 2015 at 13:52:33 (+), Graham King wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 21:53 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > On Mon 09 Nov 2015 at 23:22:14 (+), Graham King wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 14:55 -0600, Christopher

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

On Tue 10 Nov 2015 at 13:52:33 (+), Graham King wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 21:53 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 09 Nov 2015 at 23:22:14 (+), Graham King wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 14:55 -0600, Christopher R. Maden wrote: > > On 11/09/2015 02:47 PM, Kieren MacM

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 18:44 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > > > > Am 11.11.2015 um 11:14 schrieb Graham King: > > > > > > > > > > > > annotate "installs" itself in the Score context, and in polymetric > > > > > scores the timing-translator has to be removed from that context. > > > > > > > > >

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

Am 11.11.2015 um 11:14 schrieb Graham King: > annotate "installs" itself in the Score context, and in polymetric scores the timing-translator has to be removed from that context. So to approach the issue one would have to remove \annotationProcessor from the Score contex

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 09:18 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > > > > Am 11.11.2015 um 01:32 schrieb Graham King: > > > > > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 22:50 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > > > > > Am 10.11.2015 um 18:06 schrieb Graham King: > > > > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 10:09 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > > > >>

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

Am 11.11.2015 um 01:32 schrieb Graham King: > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 22:50 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: >> Am 10.11.2015 um 18:06 schrieb Graham King: >> > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 10:09 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Am 09.11.2015 um 17:34 schrieb Graham King: >> >> >> >>> (This note describes

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 22:50 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > Am 10.11.2015 um 18:06 schrieb Graham King: > > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 10:09 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > >> > >> > >> Am 09.11.2015 um 17:34 schrieb Graham King: > >> > >>> (This note describes an issue arising from the separate thread, > >>> "Sch

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

Am 10.11.2015 um 18:06 schrieb Graham King: > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 10:09 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: >> >> >> Am 09.11.2015 um 17:34 schrieb Graham King: >> >>> (This note describes an issue arising from the separate thread, >>> "Scholarly footnotes" [1]) >>> >>> I would like to use Urs' annotate.ily[

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 10:09 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > > > > Am 09.11.2015 um 17:34 schrieb Graham King: > > > > > (This note describes an issue arising from the separate thread, > > "Scholarly footnotes" [1]) > > > > I would like to use Urs' annotate.ily[2] to add some footnotes to an > > ed

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 21:53 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 09 Nov 2015 at 23:22:14 (+), Graham King wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 14:55 -0600, Christopher R. Maden wrote: > > > > On 11/09/2015 02:47 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > > The very first thing they said to me was, “A

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

Am 10.11.2015 um 14:28 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: > Hi Urs, > >> I have no idea if it is also appropriate for ancient music. > > Well, the absence of [any] barlines makes barline numbering more complex… ;) Of course it depends on the way an edition deals with that. > >> Aren't there any usefu

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

Hi Urs, > I have no idea if it is also appropriate for ancient music. Well, the absence of [any] barlines makes barline numbering more complex… ;) > Aren't there any useful references, how have others dealt with that challenge? I can’t find any! Cheers, Kieren. ___

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

Hi Graham, > On the positive side: > +1This scheme guarantees a unique id for each bar. The id increases in a > sensible manner. > +2The scheme is robust with respect to re-formatting, if systems are > split or joined. > +3Since Lilypond's default behaviour is to break lines only wh

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

Am 09.11.2015 um 17:34 schrieb Graham King: > (This note describes an issue arising from the separate thread, > "Scholarly footnotes" [1]) > > I would like to use Urs' annotate.ily[2] to add some footnotes to an > edition of sixteenth-century polyphony. But, before investing too > much time, I n

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

Am 10.11.2015 um 00:56 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: > Hi Graham, > >> I've just realised that, under my system as I described it, a part could >> have the same bar number twice. > My proposed solution would be an “analytic continuation” (to borrow a > mathematical term) of the non-polymetric measu

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

On Mon 09 Nov 2015 at 23:22:14 (+), Graham King wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 14:55 -0600, Christopher R. Maden wrote: > > On 11/09/2015 02:47 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > The very first thing they said to me was, “Add measure numbers.” > > > > That’s sufficient reason for

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

Hi Graham, > I've just realised that, under my system as I described it, a part could have > the same bar number twice. My proposed solution would be an “analytic continuation” (to borrow a mathematical term) of the non-polymetric measure numbering scheme: 1. A “reference context” would be est

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 14:55 -0600, Christopher R. Maden wrote: > On 11/09/2015 02:47 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > The very first thing they said to me was, “Add measure numbers.” > > > > That’s sufficient reason for me. =) > > Good answer. > > In that case, I would pick one part, and force t

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

On 11/09/2015 02:47 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: The very first thing they said to me was, “Add measure numbers.” That’s sufficient reason for me. =) Good answer. In that case, I would pick one part, and force those measure numbers in as numeric rehearsal marks in the other parts. Otherwis

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

Hi Chris, > What do you need the bar numbers for? I suspect rehearsal marks would fit > the bill, no? If not, why not? The score runs 105 measures in the piano part. I have 9 rehearsal marks (A-I), for an average of ~12 measures per rehearsal mark. In anticipation of officially [self-]publis

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

On 11/09/2015 01:47 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Is there a standard/convention/best practice on measure numbering in polymetric scores? I’m running into an issue of that myself (in my song “The Country Wife”), and can’t find anything definitive. Note: Gould (p. 484) writes, “Bar numbers should n

Re: ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

Hi all, Is there a standard/convention/best practice on measure numbering in polymetric scores? I’m running into an issue of that myself (in my song “The Country Wife”), and can’t find anything definitive. Note: Gould (p. 484) writes, “Bar numbers should not be used in music in which individua

ScholarLy and polymetric music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)

= "A" shortInstrumentName = "A" } \relative c''{ % Suppress bar numbers by default, as this is not the top staff of the system. \override Staff.BarNumber.break-visibility = ##(#f #f #f) \time 2/4 \repeat unfold 6 g4 \time 3/4 \repeat

Re: Temporary disable \RemoveEmptyStaffContext for individual staffs

Yes, it seems to adress the same question. However, I don't know how to apply the answer to my SATB setup where every staff line has about the same properties. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Temporary-disable-RemoveEmptyStaffContext-for-individual-s

Re: Temporary disable \RemoveEmptyStaffContext for individual staffs

2014-05-20 0:32 GMT+02:00 Speldosa : > Im using the \RemoveEmptyStaffContext command and it works exactly as I > expect it to. However, sometimes, I would like a certain staff to show up > even though it only contains rests (for example, if a certain staff only is > empty for a couple

Temporary disable \RemoveEmptyStaffContext for individual staffs

Im using the \RemoveEmptyStaffContext command and it works exactly as I expect it to. However, sometimes, I would like a certain staff to show up even though it only contains rests (for example, if a certain staff only is empty for a couple of bars, it might be more confusing to remove it and let

Re: trouble with RemoveEmptyStaffContext

On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 02:50 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2014-04-02 0:42 GMT+02:00 Graham King : > > In a vocal score (SATB on separate staves + keyboard), it is useful to > > suppress empty staves when all the singers are silent, using: > > \score { \layout { \context { \Re

Re: trouble with RemoveEmptyStaffContext

\tenorVoicePart \bassVoicePart >> \pianoPart >> \layout { \context { \ChoirStaff \consists Keep_alive_together_engraver } \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext } } } ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: trouble with RemoveEmptyStaffContext

g: \score { \layout { \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext }}} Is there a way to suppress this behaviour selectively, when one singer happens to have a few bars rest? In other words, force the tenor (for example) to display a line of R1 rests, to prevent the score suddenly appearing as SAB + ke

Re: trouble with RemoveEmptyStaffContext

2014-04-02 0:42 GMT+02:00 Graham King : > In a vocal score (SATB on separate staves + keyboard), it is useful to > suppress empty staves when all the singers are silent, using: > \score { \layout { \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext }}} > > Is there a way to suppress this behavi

trouble with RemoveEmptyStaffContext

In a vocal score (SATB on separate staves + keyboard), it is useful to suppress empty staves when all the singers are silent, using: \score { \layout { \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext }}} Is there a way to suppress this behaviour selectively, when one singer happens to have a few bars rest

Re: RemoveEmptyStaffContext and merge rests snippet not co-operating

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 07:08:47PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > […] Any changes made previously to \Staff after the definition of > RemoveEmptyStaffContext will be gone. Broken by design, so it got > deprecated. Perhaps we are not doing people a favor keeping it around. Good to kn

Re: RemoveEmptyStaffContext and merge rests snippet not co-operating

is in my attached example by having a \layout block at the top >> of the file. The result is that, as soon as I add >> \RemoveEmptyStaffContext to >From ly/engraver-init.ly %% Keep the old definitions in here for compatibility (they erase previous %% settings to the

Re: RemoveEmptyStaffContext and merge rests snippet not co-operating

de -- I get two rests above each other. >> > >> >> for me it works - can you provide an example? > > OK, finally I found the time to deal with this. I found out that among the > things that \RemoveEmptyStaffContext changes are the settings that merge > rests. >

Re: RemoveEmptyStaffContext and merge rests snippet not co-operating

gt; for me it works - can you provide an example? OK, finally I found the time to deal with this. I found out that among the things that \RemoveEmptyStaffContext changes are the settings that merge rests. I attached a mini-example to demonstrate. In my normal setup I have a global include fil

Re: RemoveEmptyStaffContext and merge rests snippet not co-operating

ilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/RemoveEmptyStaffContext-and-merge-rests-snippet-not-co-operating-tp132260p132272.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

RemoveEmptyStaffContext and merge rests snippet not co-operating

Dear list Using 2.14.2, I am setting an SA-TB choir score with an additional solo voice. With the help of snippet 336¹ I am auto-merging rests in the two-voiced staves. I also want to use \layout{ \context{ \RemoveEmptyStaffContext } } in order to hide the solo staff where it is silent. While

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove empty staff

Hi Thomas, > I would like to, but I guess I would have to know GUILE/Scheme and/or C++ in > order to do that Not really… Just Lilypond. What are the features/behaviours you want? I'm sure we can quickly build it together. Cheers, Kieren. ___ lilypond

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove empty staff

Hi, In some piano music, you may have three different levels, as it were, e.g. > a melodic line in the treble, played by the right hand, a deep bass > consisting of long notes in the left hand, and in between chords filling in > the time between the bass notes, also played by the left hand. In suc

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove empty staff

Hi David, On 27/4/12 10:34 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Thomas Ruedas writes: i.e., my main concern here is the situation where you may have more than two staves, which is a much more common situation. Why would you be using a PianoStaff for those? I'm not sure I understand what you are wondering

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove empty staff

Hi Kieren, On 27/4/12 3:41 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: It should be easy to define a custom context (e.g. MultiStaffPiano) to behave this way — perhaps when you've got it worked out as you think it should behave, you can add it to the codebase? I would like to, but I guess I would have to know GU

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove empty staff

Thomas Ruedas writes: > Hi Kieren, > On 27/4/12 3:00 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >>> I doubt that this new default behavior reflects common practice, though >> As a pianist, I can tell you it absolutely does reflect common engraving >> practice for piano staves: It is a very rare piano score (per

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove empty staff

Hi Thomas, > i.e., my main concern here is the situation where you may have more than two > staves, which is a much more common situation. The case I wanted to make in > the first place is to drop empty staves beyond the second staff, and in the > piano scores I have (e.g. Debussy or Messiaen),

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove empty staff

Hi Kieren, On 27/4/12 3:00 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: I doubt that this new default behavior reflects common practice, though As a pianist, I can tell you it absolutely does reflect common engraving practice for piano staves: It is a very rare piano score (perhaps 1/10 of 1%) that contains only

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove empty staff

Hi Thomas, > I doubt that this new default behavior reflects common practice, though As a pianist, I can tell you it absolutely does reflect common engraving practice for piano staves: It is a very rare piano score (perhaps 1/10 of 1%) that contains only a single staff. That is precisely the re

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove empty staff

gression/collated-files.html, which is similar to my original. Would be nice If you name the sippet, the regression-test is very large. For the record, the snippet is in http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/input/regression/b5/lily-f6f979e0.ly the link to which can be found by searching for "\Remov

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove empty staff

you want this behaviour, remove the "Keep_alive_together_engraver". Your layout should look: \layout { \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext } \context { \PianoStaff \remove "Keep_alive_together_engraver" } \context { \Score \override VerticalAxisGroup #'remove

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove empty staff

th { midiInstrument = "acoustic grand" } \scoreARight \new Staff = "middle" \with { midiInstrument = "acoustic grand" } { \clef bass \scoreAMiddle } \new Staff = "left" \with { midiInstrument = "acoustic grand" } { \clef bass \scoreALeft } >

\RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove empty staff

} \new Staff = "left" \with { midiInstrument = "acoustic grand" } { \clef bass \scoreALeft } >> \layout { \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext } \context { \Score \override VerticalAxisGroup #'remove-first = ##t } } } --

Re: RemoveEmptyStaffContext und Bar_number_engraver

I have found the following workaround: \version "2.12.2" \layout { \context { \Score \remove "Bar_number_engraver" } % \context { %\RemoveEmptyStaffContext % } } \relative c' << \new Staff \with { \consists "Bar_number_engra

RemoveEmptyStaffContext und Bar_number_engraver

I am using RemoveEmptyStaffContext to hide empty staves. Now I want to show bar numbers for each bar above the first "visible" staff of each system. My first attempt was to set BarNumber #'break-visibility = #all-visible for the entire score: \version "2.12.2" \layou

Re: was \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?) -- now How Force a Brace?

harm6 wrote: at least some of the suggestions should work!! Make sure the lines to hide are really empty. Or, if you're using some other context/voice (Lyrics , Dynamics etc.), try to comment these to locate the problem. Some time ago I had a similiar one: a wrong rhythm in \new Dynamics disturb

Re: was \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?) -- now How Force a Brace?

harm6 wrote: at least some of the suggestions should work!! Make sure the lines to hide are really empty. Or, if you're using some other context/voice (Lyrics , Dynamics etc.), try to comment these to locate the problem. Some time ago I had a similiar one: a wrong rhythm in \new Dynamics disturb

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

Ok, sniffing Thanks harm6 wrote: PMA-2 wrote: I've tried again with Xavier's "RemoveEmptyStaves" code, and that in turn again with James's "Grand" substitutions. No difference so-far at all. I reckon my best next step is to download 2.14.2. Each version I've coded two ways -- with the

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

PMA-2 wrote: > > I've tried again with Xavier's "RemoveEmptyStaves" code, > and that in turn again with James's "Grand" substitutions. > No difference so-far at all. I reckon my best next step is > to download 2.14.2. > > Each version I've coded two ways -- with the \layout block > within \sco

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

%settings %% into the desired context. That's just as easy, requires only %one line more %% (the \*Staff), but preserves previous context mods. %% TODO: DEPRECATED_2.13.17, remove at some point in the future RemoveEmptyStaffContext = \context { \Staff \RemoveEmptyStaves } - Graham Sorry! Re

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

%settings %% into the desired context. That's just as easy, requires only %one line more %% (the \*Staff), but preserves previous context mods. %% TODO: DEPRECATED_2.13.17, remove at some point in the future RemoveEmptyStaffContext = \context { \Staff \RemoveEmptyStaves } - Graham Sorry! Re

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

t the \RemoveEmptyStaves > %settings > %% into the desired context. That's just as easy, requires only > %one line more > %% (the \*Staff), but preserves previous context mods. > %% TODO: DEPRECATED_2.13.17, remove at some point in the future > RemoveEmptyStaffContext = \context { >

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

At Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:23:00 -0400, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: > From: PMA > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?) > > I have a 40-bar LilyPond piano score notated in > 3-staff systems (to accomodate a leaping-over > left hand). Occasi

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:21:11PM -0700, harm6 wrote: > > Xavier Scheuer wrote: > > \RemoveEmptyStaffContext has been replaced by \Staff \RemoveEmptyStave > > in version 2.13.something. > > I didn't found \RemoveEmptyStaffContext in the docs, but there is a >

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

Xavier Scheuer wrote: > > \RemoveEmptyStaffContext has been replaced by \Staff \RemoveEmptyStave > in version 2.13.something. > Cheers, > Xavier > Hi, I didn't found \RemoveEmptyStaffContext in the docs, but there is a definition in engraver-init.ly (version 2.14.2) f

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

\new Staff = "theme" \theme >\new Staff = "lower" \lower > >> > \layout { >\context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext } > } > } > > The output shows no errors, but also no effect: > its rest-only staves are still there. Could some- > one

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

#'SystemStartBrace instrumentName = #"aa"} << \new Staff = "upper" \upper \new Staff = "theme" \theme \new Staff = "lower" \lower >> \layout { \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext } \c

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

\new PianoStaff<< \set PianoStaff.instrumentName = #"" \new Staff = "upper" \upper \new Staff = "theme" \theme \new Staff = "lower" \lower >> \layout { \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext } } } The output shows

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

stions. > > \score { >\new PianoStaff << > \set PianoStaff.instrumentName = #"" > \new Staff = "upper" \upper > \new Staff = "theme" \theme > \new Staff = "lower" \lower >>> >\layout { >

\RemoveEmptyStaffContext (?)

, following Notation & Snippets Ref. suggestions. \score { \new PianoStaff << \set PianoStaff.instrumentName = #"" \new Staff = "upper" \upper \new Staff = "theme" \theme \new Staff = "lower" \lower >> \layout { \cont

Re: Can't get \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and \RemoveEmptyRhythmicStaffContext to work together

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Am Freitag, 8. Juli 2011, 03:52:54 schrieb Brett McCoy: >> And neither work, my rhythmicstaff is still printing with empty staves >> where I expect it to be suppressed. What is the correct syntax when >> using both? > > Both should work j

Re: Can't get \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and \RemoveEmptyRhythmicStaffContext to work together

{ c1 | r1 | \break R1*3 | c1 } \new RhythmicStaff { c1 | r1 | \break d1 d \break d d | } >> } \layout { % \context { % \RemoveEmptyStaffContext % } %\context { % \RemoveEmptyRhythmicStaffContext %

Re: Can't get \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and \RemoveEmptyRhythmicStaffContext to work together

ayout { >    \context { >      \RemoveEmptyStaffContext >    } >  } > >  \layout { >   \context { >     \RemoveEmptyRhythmicStaffContext >    } > } > > and I tried > > \layout { >    \context { >      \RemoveEmptyStaffContext >    } >   \conte

Re: Can't get \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and \RemoveEmptyRhythmicStaffContext to work together

Sorry email got sent before I finished! I meant to say: I tried this: \layout { \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext } } \layout { \context { \RemoveEmptyRhythmicStaffContext } } and I tried \layout { \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

Can't get \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and \RemoveEmptyRhythmicStaffContext to work together

I have an orchestral score and I am trying to suppress empty staves from printing in systems, using \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and \RemoveEmptyRhythmicStaffContext. Going by a previous thread I found, I have tried this: \layout { \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext } } \layout

Re: How does \RemoveEmptyStaffContext work in ly 2.14.1?

isible all the time, > even if one or the other has only rests for a complete system. > > Maybe PianoStaff overrides \RemoveEmptyStaffContext? New behavior in 2.14? Note to self... read the manual before posting :) I should have used GrandStaff instead of PianoStaff... other note to self...

How does \RemoveEmptyStaffContext work in ly 2.14.1?

Hi, Has something changed with respect to \RemoveEmptyStaffContext? Initially I installed lilypond from the Ubuntu 10.04 package (lilypond version 2.12.3-4). In that version, the ly code pasted below prints just one staff (of course, there will be two staves for this instrument elsewhere

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

> Have you considered ? No... > Hope this helps! ...and yes! Thank you very much, works like a charm! (Although it doesn't look like the ideal solution for a thing as common as this, but I assume \removeEmptyStaves will ultimately solve this(?)...)

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

Hi Laurens, > Unless anybody knows when this will be solved, is there any other way to > elegantly force staves to 'not exist' for 'a while'. Have you considered ? Hope this helps! Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mai

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

Hi list, Unless anybody knows when this will be solved, is there any other way to elegantly force staves to 'not exist' for 'a while'. I just need some PianoStaff to join the first one a couple of systems later, instead of using rests all the time (and wasting lots of space/paper). Thanks, l

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

> > Does not build here. I get : > > ... > > Paul > Exactly the same here, so it's not my system at least... anybody any suggestions? Doesn't seem to work properly yet.. Thanks all, laurens. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

On 03/23/2011 01:49 AM, Laurens van der Wee wrote: Hi, Thanks for all these interesting insights, however, problem still not solved.. This builds on your systems? -> \score{ << \new PianoStaff \with { \RemoveEmptyStaves }<< \new Staff {

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

Hi, Thanks for all these interesting insights, however, problem still not solved.. This builds on your systems? -> \score{ << \new PianoStaff \with { \RemoveEmptyStaves } << \new Staff { \relative{

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:57:22PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > Does that make sense since most commands have backslashes? Maybe > there should be a sub alphabetical sort under '\' Patches appreciated: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=855 Cheers, - Graham ___

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

On 03/22/2011 02:51 PM, Graham Percival wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:48:08PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: On 03/22/2011 02:36 PM, Graham Percival wrote: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext has been removed >from the index as it should but RemoveEmptyStaves has not b

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:48:08PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > On 03/22/2011 02:36 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > >>\RemoveEmptyStaffContext has been removed > >>from the index as it should but RemoveEmptyStaves has not been > >>added. > >Yes it has.

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

On 03/22/2011 02:36 PM, Graham Percival wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:28:57PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: Where is it documented? NR 1.6 Staff -> Hiding staves \RemoveEmptyStaffContext has been removed from the index as it should but RemoveEmptyStaves has not been ad

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:28:57PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > Where is it documented? NR 1.6 Staff -> Hiding staves > \RemoveEmptyStaffContext has been removed > from the index as it should but RemoveEmptyStaves has not been > added. Yes it has. staff.itely, line

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

ears too! How can I apply this \RemoveEmptyStaffContext to just the upper PianoStaff and only to the whole thing, not it's individual Staff-s? Everything I try gives me lots of errors with unexpected \layout or \context-s... Move to the latest development version. It solves this problem. \Rem

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

The problem is that there are also some passages where the 'main' piano (the lower staff) has multiple bars of rests. This one should stay though. The current situation is even worse: if only the right hand has something to play, the left hand disappears too! How can I apply this \R

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

The problem is that there are also some passages where the 'main' piano >>>> (the lower staff) has multiple bars of rests. This one should stay >>>> though. The current situation is even worse: if only the right hand has >>>> something to play, the lef

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

bars of rests. This one should stay though. The current situation is even worse: if only the right hand has something to play, the left hand disappears too! How can I apply this \RemoveEmptyStaffContext to just the upper PianoStaff and only to the whole thing, not it's individual Staff-s? Every

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

gt; > though. The current situation is even worse: if only the right hand has > > something to play, the left hand disappears too! > > How can I apply this \RemoveEmptyStaffContext to just the upper > > PianoStaff and only to the whole thing, not it's individual Staff-s? >

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext

has something to play, > the left hand disappears too! > How can I apply this \RemoveEmptyStaffContext to just the upper PianoStaff and > only to the whole thing, not it's individual Staff-s? Everything I try gives > me lots of errors with unexpected \layout or \context-s... Move to t

\RemoveEmptyStaffContext

<< \new Staff{ \music } \new Staff{ \music } >> >> } \layout{ \context{ \RemoveEmptyStaf

Re: RemoveEmptyStaffContext should keep at least one staff alive?

11 09:00 PM, Andrew Hawryluk wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Paul Scott >>  wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> 2.13.54 >>> >>> Does it ever make sense for RemoveEmptyStaffContext to remove all staves? >>&g

Re: RemoveEmptyStaffContext should keep at least one staff alive?

On 03/14/2011 09:00 PM, Andrew Hawryluk wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Paul Scott wrote: Hi, 2.13.54 Does it ever make sense for RemoveEmptyStaffContext to remove all staves? Should not at least one be kept alive showing the rests? Is there a way to force this behavior? I

  1   2   >