Pascal, as many other languages, has its roots in Algol 60.
In the latter, there was only the « procedure » keyword.
You just prefixed the definition with a type to make it a function, such as:
integer procedure foo (…)
begin
…
foo := …;
Hi Andrew,
See here :
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/internals/tupletnumber
\override TupletNumber.avoid-slur = #'outside
Regards,
Calixte.
2015-04-19 6:22 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :
> How to get a slur inside a tuplet bracket, that is, closer to the notes
> that the tuplet bracke
On 19/04/2015 09:33, bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
I'm trying to make a title/cover page within LilyPond. I'm aware of the
possibility of workarounds:
lilypond-book/LaTeX; Strikes me as a bit ham-fisted, not sure if I would run
into trouble as I've seen the warning about \pageBreak not playing we
How to get a slur inside a tuplet bracket, that is, closer to the notes that
the tuplet bracket?
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello all,
is it possible to not specify the output format via the command line, but
instead directly in the .ly file? I want to have a score typeset with two
different page sizes – one as a PDF file and the other one as one PNG per
page.
Currently I have to switch the paper size every time I want
On 19/04/15 00:33, bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
> I'm trying to make a title/cover page within LilyPond. I'm aware of the
> possibility of workarounds:
>
> lilypond-book/LaTeX; Strikes me as a bit ham-fisted, not sure if I would run
> into trouble as I've seen the warning about \pageBreak not play
I'm trying to make a title/cover page within LilyPond. I'm aware of the
possibility of workarounds:
lilypond-book/LaTeX; Strikes me as a bit ham-fisted, not sure if I would run
into trouble as I've seen the warning about \pageBreak not playing well with
lilypond-book
Create separate title/cov
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 05:54:44PM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
[...]
> > The only really painful part was the partcombiner
>
> This is a big one for me. I would love to see — and would be happy to
> help fund — a GUPPY (Grand Unified Partcombiner Project, Yay!) to
> tackle a rewrite from the g
On 4/16/15, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> That being said, orchestral music is not what's the most difficult to
> engrave (even dual-voices staves remain somewhat simple overall, even
> with unmetered contemporary notation, microtones, feathered beams
> etc.). To me, complex keyboard music is probab
Hi David,
I'm happy to answer your questions and try to help you get Jianpu working in
LilyPond. It will take learning some Scheme, and how LilyPond can be extended
with Scheme. I'd suggest looking at the "extending" manual and searching the
LSR for examples of code that uses "stencil" or "pa
Hi Orm,
> the biggest score so far for me is a piece for big orchestra, 6
> soloists, live-electronics and fixed media from last year.
This sounds great!
Would love to see it, but the link didn’t work for me… =\
> considering the amount of source files
Curious! For my 57-part orchestra piece,
Am 18.04.2015 um 19:11 schrieb Jay Anderson:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Paul Morris wrote:
Hi Trevor,
On Apr 18, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
But wouldn't this show a speed-up on systems other than Windows?
There are similar speed-ups on macs (see earlier in this threa
On 18/04/15 22:11, PMA wrote:
> Aha. So the improper-er their code got, the tougher time
> compilers had trying to -- as Martin says -- "throw it out".
>
> All told, is there now any real need _not_ to use the terms
> "function" and "procedure" interchangeably? That is, any
> real need to try to
Wols Lists wrote:
On 18/04/15 19:56, PMA wrote:
AFAIK, of our major ancestor languages, only Pascal insisted on a
literal working
function-vs-procedure distinction. Did Wirth ever defend this insistence
(as more
than a track-keeping enforcer re value-outputting vs
non-value-outputting code)?
A
Martin Tarenskeen wrote Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:29 PM
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, Paul Morris wrote:
>> > On Apr 18, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Trevor Daniels
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > But wouldn't this show a speed-up on systems other than Windows?
>>
>> There are similar speed-ups on macs (see earlier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/04/15 21:28, PMA wrote:
> J Martin Rushton wrote:
>
>
>
> FORTRAN also insists on the distinction (at least officially). In
> FORTRAN you CALL procedures as a single statement whereas you
> simply use functions in an expression. If you t
On 18/04/15 19:56, PMA wrote:
> AFAIK, of our major ancestor languages, only Pascal insisted on a
> literal working
> function-vs-procedure distinction. Did Wirth ever defend this insistence
> (as more
> than a track-keeping enforcer re value-outputting vs
> non-value-outputting code)?
Actually, s
J Martin Rushton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/04/15 20:41, PMA wrote:
PMA wrote:
Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello,
Yes, historically a disctinction was made between the «
sub-programs » that return a value and those that don’t, but
the Scheme docs seem to use the ter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/04/15 20:41, PMA wrote:
> PMA wrote:
>> Jacques Menu wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Yes, historically a disctinction was made between the «
>>> sub-programs » that return a value and those that don’t, but
>>> the Scheme docs seem to use the terms f
PMA wrote:
Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello,
Yes, historically a disctinction was made between the « sub-programs »
that return a value and those that don’t, but the Scheme docs seem to
use the terms function and procedure interchangeably.
In C++, everything is a function : a procedure is merely a fu
Hi Pierre,
Looking at this some more I see how it would really be handy for working with
paths in LilyPond. Thanks for creating it and sharing it! I made some
revisions to the code in the graph-paper file, simplifying things. See
attached.
I’ve had good luck with a different approach: rende
It seems to me that one of the things this conversation is tending towards
is a sort of "best practices style guide" for large-project collaboration
(or just for how to structure large projects in general for the most
efficient editing). What might a guide like that involve? What guidelines
are the
Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello,
Yes, historically a disctinction was made between the « sub-programs » that
return a value and those that don’t, but the Scheme docs seem to use the terms
function and procedure interchangeably.
In C++, everything is a function : a procedure is merely a function tha
Keith OHara oco.net> writes:
>
> Trevor Daniels treda.co.uk> writes:
>
> > >>> Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, April 16, 2015 2:00 PM
> > >>>
> > The performance of LilyPond 2.19.18 on Windows is _much_ better than
> > previous versions. Some examples:
> On Linux, I see no measurable
Trevor Daniels treda.co.uk> writes:
> >>> Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, April 16, 2015 2:00 PM
> >>>
> The performance of LilyPond 2.19.18 on Windows is _much_ better than
> previous versions. Some examples:
>
> A 26 page multi-score piece I've been working on:
> 2.19.16:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, Paul Morris wrote:
Hi Trevor,
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Trevor Daniels
> wrote:
>
> But wouldn't this show a speed-up on systems other than Windows?
There are similar speed-ups on macs (see earlier in this thread). I don’t
think we’ve had anyone corrobo
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Jacques Menu
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yes, historically a disctinction was made between the « sub-programs »
> that return a value and those that don’t, but the Scheme docs seem to use
> the terms function and procedure interchangeably.
>
>
And the primitive-proc
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Paul Morris wrote:
> Hi Trevor,
>
>> On Apr 18, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>>
>> But wouldn't this show a speed-up on systems other than Windows?
>
> There are similar speed-ups on macs (see earlier in this thread). I don’t
> think we’ve had anyon
Hi Trevor,
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> But wouldn't this show a speed-up on systems other than Windows?
There are similar speed-ups on macs (see earlier in this thread). I don’t
think we’ve had anyone corroborate the results on GNU/Linux yet.
Thanks for looking
Hello,
Yes, historically a disctinction was made between the « sub-programs » that
return a value and those that don’t, but the Scheme docs seem to use the terms
function and procedure interchangeably.
In C++, everything is a function : a procedure is merely a function that
returns a value of
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>
> So the choice of these names is actually an inconsistency in LilyPond's
> terminology?
>
> I'm asking this because I have just completed a tutorial about
> define-music-function and its siblings, and I realized that I used the terms
> funct
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just stumbled over a terminology issue: are "procedure" and "function"
> synonyms in Scheme or do they refer to different things?
>
> From my earliest experiences with programming I'd recall the difference to
> be that functions re
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Peter Crighton wrote:
> I am reviving this old message because I stumbled over the problem, too.
> Does anyone know how to make \shapeTieColumn (from openLilyLib) work in
> the top staff of a system after a line break?
>
>
> 2014-10-17 16:23 GMT+02:00 Neil Thornoc
2015-04-18 17:47 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann :
> On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 17:21 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Am 18.04.2015 um 15:08 schrieb Richard Shann:
>> > On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 13:11 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Am 18. April 2015 12:15:08 MESZ, schrieb Richard Shann
>> >> :
>> >>> On Sat,
On 18/04/15 16:21, Urs Liska wrote:
> So the choice of these names is actually an inconsistency in LilyPond's
> terminology?
>
> I'm asking this because I have just completed a tutorial about
> define-music-function and its siblings, and I realized that I used the
> terms function and procedure in
On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 17:21 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 18.04.2015 um 15:08 schrieb Richard Shann:
> > On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 13:11 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 18. April 2015 12:15:08 MESZ, schrieb Richard Shann
> >> :
> >>> On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 11:51 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> H
Am 18.04.2015 um 15:08 schrieb Richard Shann:
On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 13:11 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 18. April 2015 12:15:08 MESZ, schrieb Richard Shann
:
On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 11:51 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Hi all,
I just stumbled over a terminology issue: are "procedure" and
"function"
s
> Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, April 16, 2015 3:43 PM
>>
>> From: "Trevor Daniels"
>> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 3:28 PM
>>>
>>> Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, April 16, 2015 2:00 PM
>>>
The performance of LilyPond 2.19.18 on Windows is _much_ better than
previous versions. Some exampl
> On 18 Apr 2015, at 13:06, Brian Barker wrote:
>
> At 12:55 18/04/2015 +0100, Michael Hendry wrote:
>> I think it was Pascal that introduced a distinction between a Procedure
>> (which does something without returning a value) and a Function (which does
>> something AND returns a value).
>
>
I am reviving this old message because I stumbled over the problem, too.
Does anyone know how to make \shapeTieColumn (from openLilyLib) work in the
top staff of a system after a line break?
2014-10-17 16:23 GMT+02:00 Neil Thornock :
> See the exchange below between myself and David. Hoping for
Hello!
Good to hear replies! My code does not need to type the rythem twice, I rewrite
the rythem again for comparation. Yes, the beams want more improvements on
appreance. Let's see how to improve it!
David Zhang___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilyp
On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 13:11 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>
> Am 18. April 2015 12:15:08 MESZ, schrieb Richard Shann
> :
> >On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 11:51 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I just stumbled over a terminology issue: are "procedure" and
> >"function"
> >> synonyms in Scheme
Hi Urs,
I hesitated to reply because of (2) but for the sake of completeness:
1. I would love to contribute because of the beauty of LilyPond
2. I have a very limited amount of time and therefore it is not worth
counting me in.
3. Skills: I would say: average compared to people on this list.
At 12:55 18/04/2015 +0100, Michael Hendry wrote:
I think it was Pascal that introduced a distinction between a
Procedure (which does something without returning a value) and a
Function (which does something AND returns a value).
Really?!
Pascal: published 1970
Fortran II (included SUBROUTINE
> On 18 Apr 2015, at 11:15, Richard Shann wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 11:51 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just stumbled over a terminology issue: are "procedure" and "function"
>> synonyms in Scheme or do they refer to different things?
> The Guile reference manual uses the t
Thomas,Thank you for the solution.Immanuel,Ming
On Saturday, April 18, 2015 5:25 AM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
2015-04-18 11:18 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2015-04-18 2:40 GMT+02:00 MING TSANG :
>> Dear lilyponders,
>> The same code when run with v2.18.2 all notes are displayed on pdf;
David,
Please refer to email below. Silas has developed a way to generate jianpu. I
find it duplicate of input - one for jianpu and one for lilypond code. I asked
if his code can use lilypond code to generate jianpu and the answer is no.The
way I see your approach is the same jianpu
Am 18. April 2015 12:15:08 MESZ, schrieb Richard Shann
:
>On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 11:51 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just stumbled over a terminology issue: are "procedure" and
>"function"
>> synonyms in Scheme or do they refer to different things?
>The Guile reference manual uses
On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 11:51 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just stumbled over a terminology issue: are "procedure" and "function"
> synonyms in Scheme or do they refer to different things?
The Guile reference manual uses the term procedure
>
> From my earliest experiences with programm
I'd be down for helping out with commissioned engraving work, but I think
it raises some issues with which I have not yet made myself familiar within
Lily's workflow. Primarily, how is the work distributed? Does each
participant get individual parts, while a general editor makes sure things
line up
Hi all,
I just stumbled over a terminology issue: are "procedure" and "function"
synonyms in Scheme or do they refer to different things?
From my earliest experiences with programming I'd recall the difference
to be that functions return a value and procedures don't. But that's
clearly not t
2015-04-18 11:18 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2015-04-18 2:40 GMT+02:00 MING TSANG :
>> Dear lilyponders,
>> The same code when run with v2.18.2 all notes are displayed on pdf; but it
>> run with v2.19.18 only one note displayed.
>> Is this a bug?
>> Immanuel,
>> Ming
>>
>> ___
2015-04-18 2:40 GMT+02:00 MING TSANG :
> Dear lilyponders,
> The same code when run with v2.18.2 all notes are displayed on pdf; but it
> run with v2.19.18 only one note displayed.
> Is this a bug?
> Immanuel,
> Ming
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
2015-04-18 4:19 GMT+02:00 James Harkins :
> *sigh* Most of the time, LilyPond is amazing. Other times...
>
> I have an old document, a lead sheet, following basically the form an excerpt
> [A]. This prints out as I would expect: a single staff with melody, lyrics
> below and chord names above the
Am 18.04.2015 um 00:33 schrieb H. S. Teoh:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:12:50PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 17.04.2015 um 20:44 schrieb H. S. Teoh:
[...]
More annoying is the fact that \partcombine often gets confused when
the two voices have very divergent rhythms -- crescendo hairpins
don't m
55 matches
Mail list logo
