Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello,
Yes, historically a disctinction was made between the « sub-programs » that
return a value and those that don’t, but the Scheme docs seem to use the terms
function and procedure interchangeably.
In C++, everything is a function : a procedure is merely a function that
returns a value of the « void » type, i.e. no value.
JM
Le 18 avr. 2015 à 18:33, David Nalesnik<david.nales...@gmail.com> a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Urs
Liska<u...@openlilylib.org<mailto:u...@openlilylib.org>> wrote:
Hi all,
I just stumbled over a terminology issue: are "procedure" and "function"
synonyms in Scheme or do they refer to different things?
From my earliest experiences with programming I'd recall the difference to be
that functions return a value and procedures don't. But that's clearly not the
case in Scheme.
Any enlightenment available?
Well, I'm guilty of using them interchangeably...
Anyway, maybe the following will help -- or add to the confusion :)
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/721090/what-is-the-difference-between-a-function-and-a-procedure<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/721090/what-is-the-difference-between-a-function-and-a-procedure>
DN
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi List --
AFAIK, of our major ancestor languages, only Pascal insisted on a
literal working
function-vs-procedure distinction. Did Wirth ever defend this insistence
(as more
than a track-keeping enforcer re value-outputting vs
non-value-outputting code)?
PMA
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
