Am 22.12.2010 03:43, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 12/21/10 7:26 PM, "Marc Mouries" wrote:
On Dec 21, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Well, it's supposed to be the number of semitones above middle C for
each
open string, starting with the highest string.
Wow, that's really not self
David Kastrup writes:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> The final answer is that it will be quite easy to to create a music function
>> that creates a string tuning object. How would this syntax be?
>>
>> \makeStringTuning #'violinTuning {e' a d g}
>>
>> If this sounds good, I'll have it done in the
Carl Sorensen writes:
> The final answer is that it will be quite easy to to create a music function
> that creates a string tuning object. How would this syntax be?
>
> \makeStringTuning #'violinTuning {e' a d g}
>
> If this sounds good, I'll have it done in the next day or so.
I think that
\
On 12/21/10 5:14 PM, "Michael Ellis" wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael Ellis
> wrote:
>> While working with a much larger version of the score below (BWV 206 chorale
>> in 4 voices), I tried using the NoteNames engraver to put note names under
>> each voice. For some reason
On 12/21/10 7:26 PM, "Marc Mouries" wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> Well, it's supposed to be the number of semitones above middle C for each
>> open string, starting with the highest string.
>>
>
> Wow, that's really not self-explanatory but i get why it
On Dec 21, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> Well, it's supposed to be the number of semitones above middle C for each
> open string, starting with the highest string.
>
Wow, that's really not self-explanatory but i get why it's needed. However I'll
have one less argument when my frie
Oops wrong image for ok.png in previous msg.
Cheers,
Mike
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael Ellis wrote:
> While working with a much larger version of the score below (BWV 206
> chorale in 4 voices), I tried using the NoteNames engraver to put note
> names under each voice. For some re
While working with a much larger version of the score below (BWV 206
chorale in 4 voices), I tried using the NoteNames engraver to put note
names under each voice. For some reason, invoking it twice causes the clef
and instrument name to change on the top staff. The notes (and the note
names)
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:31 -0500, craigbakalian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How does one ragged-bottom-last in multiple scores in a book. Am I
> missing something? It appears that the only ragged-bottom-last is the
> last score of the book?
>
> I am using the latest lily
> 2.13.43
>
The doc (NR 4.1.3)
Hi,
How does one ragged-bottom-last in multiple scores in a book. Am I
missing something? It appears that the only ragged-bottom-last is the
last score of the book?
I am using the latest lily
2.13.43
--
Craig Bakalian
560 Keswick Drive
Yardley, PA 19067
215-428-0856
__
I have the same problem.
The problem came after the update of Lilypond form 2.13.4 to 2.13.5.
Returning to Lilypond 2.13.4 the problem is over.
Now I cannot use Lilypond 2.13.5 or higher.
Jacquesv
Orm Finnendahl-3 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> a file I could typeset yesterday now fails on the convers
On 21/12/10 23:28, Peter Buhr wrote:
\version "2.13.40"
\include "english.ly"
#(set-global-staff-size 24)
melody = \relative c {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
\stemUp2\arpeggio f4 e \break
}
bass = \relative c {
\set fingeringOrientati
On 12/21/10 11:19 AM, "Marc Mouries" wrote:
> This is because your violinTuning variable is wrong. You have the wrong
>> pitches for the open strings.
>>
>> If you set
>>
>> violinTuning = #'(28 21 14 7)
>>
>> then everything works properly.
>>
> what's the meaning for that?
Well, it's suppo
On 12/21/10 10:47 AM, "Marc Mouries" wrote:
> On 12/21/2010 12:09 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> On 12/21/10 9:44 AM, "Marc Mouries" wrote:
>>
>>> I just tested the example "Defining predefined fretboards for other
>>> instruments" with 2.13 and it produces a bizarre output.
>>>
>>> http:/
On 12/21/2010 12:09 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 12/21/10 9:44 AM, "Marc Mouries" wrote:
I just tested the example "Defining predefined fretboards for other
instruments" with 2.13 and it produces a bizarre output.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/input/lsr/lilypond-snippets/Fretted-strings
On 12/21/10 9:44 AM, "Marc Mouries" wrote:
>I just tested the example "Defining predefined fretboards for other
> instruments" with 2.13 and it produces a bizarre output.
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/input/lsr/lilypond-snippets/Fretted-strings
>
>
>
This is a 2.12 snippet, and w
On 12/21/10 9:40 AM, "Marc Mouries" wrote:
>On 12/21/2010 12:30 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> The syntax is slightly different from 2.12 and 2.13
>>
>> But since your chords have different names, you'll just do something like
>> (2.12 syntax):
>>
>> \storePredefinedDiagram
>>
I just tested the example "Defining predefined fretboards for other
instruments" with 2.13 and it produces a bizarre output.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/input/lsr/lilypond-snippets/Fretted-strings
\paper {
#(define dump-extents #t)
indent = 0\mm
line-wi
On 12/21/2010 12:30 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 12/20/10 8:47 PM, "Marc Mouries" wrote:
Hi Lilyponders,
I am trying to generate a chord chart for Violin and i have an alignment
problem.
I want to include the different possibilities of playing a chord and
thus i can't use the command storeP
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 12/21/10 12:51 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>> You can't really calculate [position] all too well. In "first
>> position", the pinky is in the current scale a fifth above the empty
>> string. In "half position", it is a diminuished fifth, while the
>> index finger is
On 12/21/2010 10:51 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 12/21/10 12:51 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
Carl Sorensen writes:
On 12/20/10 8:57 PM, "Marc Mouries" wrote:
The fret diagram prints a fret number indication on the right that is
confusing from a Violinist perspective.
Is there any optio
Peter Buhr wrote:
> In the following example, the arpeggio symbol appears over
> the time signature, about 1cm from the chord, and the
> finger number is to the left of the arpeggio symbol, while
> I want the finger number to be on the right of the
> arpeggio symbol. Suggestions?
By the way, this
On 12/21/10 8:48 AM, "Music Teacher" wrote:
> Where are the deutsch.ly, italian.ly etc. I would like to have a look there.
> Thanks
> Francois
>
The files are in the ly/ subdirectory of your lilypond installation. I
can't say where lilypond is installed on your system. But you should be able
t
On 12/21/10 12:51 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> On 12/20/10 8:57 PM, "Marc Mouries" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The fret diagram prints a fret number indication on the right that is
>>> confusing from a Violinist perspective.
>>> Is there any option for the fret diagram n
There have been a lot of changes from that version to the current development
version. This is close to being a release candidate, so I'd suggest moving to
2.13.43 and checking the new vertical spacing methods in the manuals for that
version.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
Where are the deutsch.ly, italian.ly etc. I would like to have a look there.
Thanks
Francois
2010/12/21, Adam Good :
> Bertalan,
> Thanks for writing. So there's no way for me to use a midi keyboard
> for note entry while using makam.ly to get those pitch names correct?
>
> Best,
> Adam
>
> On Mon
Peter Buhr wrote:
the arpeggio symbol appears [...] about 1cm from the chord,
and the finger number is to the left of the arpeggio symbol,
while I want the finger number to be on the right of the arpeggio symbol.
Suggestions?
Check out my hack at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypon
Bertalan,
Thanks for writing. So there's no way for me to use a midi keyboard
for note entry while using makam.ly to get those pitch names correct?
Best,
Adam
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
wrote:
> Currently LilyPondTool doesn't support custom note names in the w
Hi..it is posible..i'm using the newest 2.12.3..
2010/12/21 Phil Holmes
> There is a problem with systems-per-page at present: see
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1460
>
> What version of LilyPond are you using?
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *F
On 21/12/2010 12:28, Peter Buhr wrote:
\stemUp2\arpeggio f4 e \break
\stemUp 2-4\arpeggio f4 e \break
Move the finger instruction outside of the <>
?
james
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
In the following example, the arpeggio symbol appears over the time signature,
about 1cm from the chord, and the finger number is to the left of the arpeggio
symbol, while I want the finger number to be on the right of the arpeggio
symbol. Suggestions?
\version "2.13.40"
\include "english.ly"
#(s
Hi Marc, Carl and David,
On 21/12/10 07:51, David Kastrup wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> On 12/20/10 8:57 PM, "Marc Mouries" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The fret diagram prints a fret number indication on the right that is
>>> confusing from a Violinist perspective.
>>> Is there any option for
Thanks Martin; installing it today :-)
Ludo
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Martin Tarenskeen
wrote:
>
>
> I am using Frescobaldi on a non-KDE Fedora 14 system. I am running a LXDE
> version of Fedora, and sometimes I also use GNOME. And yes, when I install
> Frescobaldi using my package manag
hsweet wrote:
Search/Replace in an editor is fine for one or 2 files. + I never remember
regex syntax so this way it's written down : ) +I just wanted to avoid
having to do this manually for >50 files. This does them all at once. 50 or
500.
i find sed handy for this kind of batch text mani
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010, Ludo Beckers wrote:
Hi Wilbert
The 2nd address in your signature is the forum where I reacted on 2 of your
posts, but didn't see a reaction.
I'm "catch22" in that one.
I might be interested in also checking out Frescobaldi, but wonder if it makes
much sense on a non-KD
There is a problem with systems-per-page at present: see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1460
What version of LilyPond are you using?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Stjepan Horvat
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 3:35 PM
36 matches
Mail list logo
