Re: Lilypond python upgrade

> Moving a thread across from the user list, I just wanted to let > people know that I will be starting on the work of upgrading > lilypond to use Python 3 - yes, with all the complexity that > entails. I am happy to have a serious shot at this task. Great, and thanks in advance! I guess your g

Re: Lilypond python upgrade

On 12/7/16 6:28 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Andrew Bernard" wrote: >Hi All, > > > >Moving a thread across from the user list, I just wanted to let people >know >that I will be starting on the work of upgrading lilypond to use Python 3 >- >yes, with all the complexity that entails. I am ha

Lilypond python upgrade

Hi All, Moving a thread across from the user list, I just wanted to let people know that I will be starting on the work of upgrading lilypond to use Python 3 - yes, with all the complexity that entails. I am happy to have a serious shot at this task. Andrew _

Re: bypassing the patch countdown

- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" To: Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 10:34 PM Subject: bypassing the patch countdown Is this still an accepted practice? If not, I suggest that it should be. If I had to formalize it, I'd say something like "if two developers with push

Re: bypassing the patch countdown

Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, December 07, 2016 10:34 PM > We instituted the policy of patch countdowns and Patchy after the > lengthy wait for 2.14.0, which was due to a large number of > regression bugs due to patches which either broke the compile, or > broke previously-working output. > >

Re: bypassing the patch countdown

2016-12-07 23:58 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska : > > > Am 7. Dezember 2016 23:34:39 MEZ, schrieb Graham Percival > : >>I was going to wait a month or two before suggesting this, just to >>make sure I was fully "up to date", but I'll jump in now. >> >>We instituted the policy of patch countdowns and Patchy a

Re: bypassing the patch countdown

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:58:14PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > Am 7. Dezember 2016 23:34:39 MEZ, schrieb Graham Percival > : > >(please note that I'm not suggesting that anybody should feel > >obligated to make such typo fixes -- instead, I'm checking that > >the "door is open". So that if we manag

Re: bypassing the patch countdown

Am 7. Dezember 2016 23:34:39 MEZ, schrieb Graham Percival : >I was going to wait a month or two before suggesting this, just to >make sure I was fully "up to date", but I'll jump in now. > >We instituted the policy of patch countdowns and Patchy after the >lengthy wait for 2.14.0, which was due

bypassing the patch countdown

I was going to wait a month or two before suggesting this, just to make sure I was fully "up to date", but I'll jump in now. We instituted the policy of patch countdowns and Patchy after the lengthy wait for 2.14.0, which was due to a large number of regression bugs due to patches which either bro

Re: referencing hash key with music symbol

Urs Liska writes: > Am 7. Dezember 2016 19:20:26 MEZ, schrieb David Kastrup : >>> >>> In that context, "Slur" is of course an arbitrary name. However, when >>a >>> symbol is used to indicate what item is being annotated in scholarly, >>e.g.: >>> >>> >>> \criticalRemark \with { >>> >>> message

Re: referencing hash key with music symbol

Am 7. Dezember 2016 19:20:26 MEZ, schrieb David Kastrup : >Jeffery Shivers writes: > >> Hi LP team, >> >> I am working on automating editorial commands with ScholarLY, and I >am >> having some trouble pulling a music function that is stored in a hash >> table. If I make a table and assign a key

Re: cross-voice spanners

2016-12-07 19:45 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : > You'll find that the above works fine already in versions where Nathan > has not yet been involved. > > Its internals are slightly modified now in order to prepare for better > integration of Nathan's code. Even if that code were already committed, > it

Re: cross-voice spanners

Francisco Vila writes: > 2016-12-07 19:22 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : >> Francisco Vila writes: >> >>> 2016-12-03 22:38 GMT+01:00 Nathan Chou : { f\=1( g\=2( a\=1) b\=2) } >>> >>> Thank you for this, it is very useful. Good work. >> >> Now Nathan and I just need to figure out who of us two ha

Re: cross-voice spanners

2016-12-07 19:22 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : > Francisco Vila writes: > >> 2016-12-03 22:38 GMT+01:00 Nathan Chou : >>> { f\=1( g\=2( a\=1) b\=2) } >> >> Thank you for this, it is very useful. Good work. > > Now Nathan and I just need to figure out who of us two has more reason > to be frustrated. >

guile-2: error when running make doc

Hi all I get this error when I run `make doc` on the dev/guile-v2-work branch. I'm running Debian testing in a 686 VM. Drawing systems... warning: compressing over-full page by 32.6 staff-spaces Writing header field `texidoc' to `./e1/lily-0581dc11.texidoc'... Writing ./e1/lily-0581dc11-1.signat

Re: cross-voice spanners

Francisco Vila writes: > 2016-12-03 22:38 GMT+01:00 Nathan Chou : >> { f\=1( g\=2( a\=1) b\=2) } > > Thank you for this, it is very useful. Good work. Now Nathan and I just need to figure out who of us two has more reason to be frustrated. -- David Kastrup

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

Antonio Ospite writes: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:42:29 +0100 > Urs Liska wrote: > >> Am 07.11.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Federico Bruni: >> > In case you don't know already, last news about guile2 and debian: >> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746005#216 >> >> Just for the record

Re: referencing hash key with music symbol

Jeffery Shivers writes: > Hi LP team, > > I am working on automating editorial commands with ScholarLY, and I am > having some trouble pulling a music function that is stored in a hash > table. If I make a table and assign a key 'Slur to slurDashed, I can use it > successfully in the following ex

Re: preparing LilyDev for guile-v2-work branch

Il giorno lun 5 dic 2016 alle 13:20, Federico Bruni ha scritto: Il giorno ven 2 dic 2016 alle 23:53, Thomas Morley ha scritto: no clue what's causing the error for you. I just checked again with the following command-sequence (nothing unusual): git checkout remotes/origin/dev/guile-v2-wor

Re: cross-voice spanners

2016-12-03 22:38 GMT+01:00 Nathan Chou : > { f\=1( g\=2( a\=1) b\=2) } Thank you for this, it is very useful. Good work. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org ht

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

Il giorno mer 7 dic 2016 alle 13:34, Dr. Tobias Quathamer ha scritto: The link points to the obsolete dependencies. You'll want this link instead: This has an updated fonts package list as wel

PATCHES: Countdown for December 7th

Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on December 10th. A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be found here: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/ __ Push: 5002 Correct the guns for hire list under "Community" -

Re: Fix MusicXML reg tests that have both Lyrics and Chords (issue 316950043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

author Vincent Le Ligeour Wed, 7 Dec 2016 13:10:32 + (13:10 +) committer James Lowe Wed, 7 Dec 2016 13:10:38 + (13:10 +) commit 503a553ab5a1ace4a4f03a321d2d353f253bf5f4 Thank you Vincent. https://codereview.appspot.com/316950043/ _

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

Am 07.12.2016 um 11:06 schrieb Urs Liska: Am 07.12.2016 um 10:31 schrieb Antonio Ospite: For the time being, you can still get the list of dependencies from here: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/lilypond.git/tree/debian/control?h=debian And pass the list to apt-get. Yes, but as me

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

Il giorno mer 7 dic 2016 alle 11:41, Urs Liska ha scritto: Sorry, I should have told you to install guile-1.8-dev instead of guile-2.0-dev (now the default in LilyDev, as we want other people to test the work on guile2 migration). And where do I get this from as it has been removed from D

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

Am 07.12.2016 um 11:34 schrieb Federico Bruni: > Il giorno mer 7 dic 2016 alle 10:28, Urs Liska ha > scritto: >> OK, thank you. >> After installing these building LilyPond fails with the following error: >> >> WARNING: Please consider installing optional programs or files: URW++ >> OTF fonts (d

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

Il giorno mer 7 dic 2016 alle 10:28, Urs Liska ha scritto: OK, thank you. After installing these building LilyPond fails with the following error: WARNING: Please consider installing optional programs or files: URW++ OTF fonts (download OTF files from 'http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core3

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

Am 07.12.2016 um 10:31 schrieb Antonio Ospite: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:42:29 +0100 > Urs Liska wrote: > >> Am 07.11.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Federico Bruni: >>> In case you don't know already, last news about guile2 and debian: >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746005#216 >> J

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:42:29 +0100 Urs Liska wrote: > Am 07.11.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Federico Bruni: > > In case you don't know already, last news about guile2 and debian: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746005#216 > > Just for the record (although it's probably evident): >

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

Am 07.12.2016 um 09:53 schrieb Federico Bruni: > Il giorno mer 7 dic 2016 alle 8:42, Urs Liska ha > scritto: >>> In case you don't know already, last news about guile2 and debian: >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746005#216 >> >> Just for the record (although it's probably

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

Am 07.12.2016 um 09:53 schrieb Federico Bruni: > Yesterday I was updating LilyDev to stretch (now testing) and I found > that ttf- packages are no more in Debian. B I wanted to install ttf-inconsolata and was directed to install fonts-inconsolata instead. Does that help? ___

Re: referencing hash key with music symbol

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Jeffery Shivers wrote: > > \criticalRemark \with { > > message = "my message" > > apply = addition > > } Slur f'( g') % "Slur" indicated here > > > ... we will use that symbol to determine what function, previously assigned > to the so-named key in the

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

Il giorno mer 7 dic 2016 alle 8:42, Urs Liska ha scritto: In case you don't know already, last news about guile2 and debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746005#216 Just for the record (although it's probably evident): This doesn't only mean one can't install "lilypond"