Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, December 07, 2016 10:34 PM > We instituted the policy of patch countdowns and Patchy after the > lengthy wait for 2.14.0, which was due to a large number of > regression bugs due to patches which either broke the compile, or > broke previously-working output. > > However, even after that, I still pushed some commits directly to > staging, bypassing the countdown. Obviously I did this for > updating the VERSION when making a release, but I also did it for > a few typo fixes as well. > > Is this still an accepted practice?
It is. But as a minimum it must have been tested locally with a build or (partial) doc build, or passed the automated tests before pushing to staging. Of course significant changes still need to go through countdown. Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
